[15:57] <zul> hi
[15:57] <RoAkSoAx> o/
[15:57] <jamespage> o/
[15:58] <zul> who is running the meeting?
[15:58] <raphink> hello :)
[15:59] <jamespage> zul: SpamapS
[15:59] <jamespage> (according to the wiki)
[16:00] <zul> good good
[16:00] <jamespage> speak of the devil and he shall appear!
[16:00] <SpamapS> ---[16:00] <smb> *poof*
[16:00]  * SpamapS parks the ti-fighter
[16:00] <SpamapS> Well then, lets not delay
[16:01] <SpamapS> #startmeeting
[16:01] <MootBot> Meeting started at 11:01. The chair is SpamapS.
[16:01] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[16:01] <hallyn> o/
[16:01] <SpamapS> [TOPIC] Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:01] <MootBot> New Topic:  Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:01] <SpamapS> Daviey to talk with wider docs team regarding translations (deferred)
[16:02] <Daviey> dammit... deferred.
[16:02] <SpamapS> alright
[16:02] <SpamapS> [ACTION] Daviey to talk with wider docs team regarding translations (deferred)
[16:02] <MootBot> ACTION received:  Daviey to talk with wider docs team regarding translations (deferred)
[16:02] <Daviey> thanks.
[16:02] <SpamapS> Daviey to post another followup one euca-dhcp bug.
[16:02] <Daviey> That is making progress, but not as good as we had hoped
[16:03] <Daviey> Have been in contact with upstream, cjwatson and security team and Debian Maintainer.
[16:03] <Daviey> (of isc-dhcp)
[16:03] <soren> Which bug is this?
[16:03] <Daviey> It's likely it needs a patch to resolve a potential regression
[16:03] <SpamapS> yes bug number would be helpful
[16:03] <Daviey> soren, one mo
[16:03] <soren> ta
[16:04] <Daviey> bug #717166
[16:04] <SpamapS> Daviey: shall we carry that over to next week as well then?
[16:04] <Daviey> SpamapS, it's being followed up on... please
[16:04] <Daviey> thanks
[16:04] <SpamapS> [ACTION] Daviey to post another followup one euca-dhcp bug.
[16:04] <MootBot> ACTION received:  Daviey to post another followup one euca-dhcp bug.
[16:05] <SpamapS> smb to look into kernel fs modules config for bug 732046
[16:05] <Daviey> ta
[16:05] <SpamapS> smb: want to cover that during your time later?
[16:05] <smb> I think there was the missing codepage sumbmitted for sru
[16:05] <smb> its ok now as well
[16:06] <smb> An extra modules package is rather unlikely
[16:06] <smb> But rather have a limited set (what is really needed) in the virtual build
[16:06] <smb> ..
[16:07] <SpamapS> alright that seems covered
[16:07] <SpamapS> [TOPIC] Natty Development
[16:07] <MootBot> New Topic:  Natty Development
[16:08] <SpamapS> http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/natty/canonical-server-ubuntu-11.04-beta-1.html
[16:08] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/natty/canonical-server-ubuntu-11.04-beta-1.html
[16:08] <SpamapS> Seems we need to pick up the pace or start postponing
[16:08] <SpamapS> s/start/continue/
[16:09] <SpamapS> wow.. lively bunch.. don't everybody talk at once please.
[16:09] <raphink> \o/
[16:10]  * smb did a natty server install and feels aubergine...
[16:10] <SpamapS> So anyway, we should be hovering around 75% completion
[16:10] <SpamapS> smb: ^5
[16:10] <SpamapS> Moving on..
[16:10] <RoAkSoAx> SpamapS: sir yes sir :P
[16:11] <SpamapS> [TOPIC] Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:11] <MootBot> New Topic:  Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:11] <RoAkSoAx> TLF, April 2nd, both kirkland and I are presenting
[16:11] <SpamapS> As noted previously, I will be at the MySQL User's Conference April 13/14, speaking on April 13 about Drizzle on Natty.
[16:11] <kirkland> \o/
[16:11] <SpamapS> whats TLF?
[16:11] <kirkland> and UDS-O is comming up
[16:11] <kirkland> Texas Linux Fest, SpamapS
[16:11] <robbiew> Texas Linux Fest
[16:11] <jamespage> good luck!
[16:11] <SpamapS> Nice
[16:12] <raphink> the lone star conf
[16:12] <SpamapS> I blieve sponsorship nominations for UDS-O are due by next Tuesday right?
[16:13] <SpamapS> Is there a wiki page or google calendar with only Ubuntu Server related events?
[16:13] <zul> nope
[16:13] <SpamapS> That would be cool.. ;)
[16:13] <SpamapS> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[16:13] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[16:14] <zul> are you starting one? :)
[16:14] <SpamapS> noep
[16:14] <SpamapS> hggdh: here? got anything?
[16:14] <hggdh> Only update from me: Daviey and I are trying the change to DHCP proposed by Euca, but no success yet
[16:15]  * hggdh was typing :-)
[16:15] <hggdh> oh
[16:15] <hggdh> and dear jamespage is bringing on Jenkins for real :-)
[16:15]  * SpamapS gets all giddy
[16:15] <hggdh> questions for me?
[16:16] <hggdh> a last point, really: I would like ideas on *what* we can test for server
[16:16] <SpamapS> hggdh: what is the average air speed velocity of an unladen Macaw?
[16:17] <hggdh> SpamapS, slightly faster than a, er, laden, one
[16:17] <hallyn> libvirt-tck and kvm-autotest :)
[16:17] <SpamapS> hggdh: boot, install a package from the seed, shutdown, boot back up.. see if the root fs was unmounted properly. ;)
[16:17]  * hggdh goes writing down
[16:17] <SpamapS> hggdh: jhunt and I are going to propose jenkins jobs that do that on every upload.
[16:18] <hggdh> SpamapS, perfect!
[16:18] <jamespage> SpamapS: sounds good
[16:18] <hggdh> hallyn, kvm-autotest... will look at it.
[16:18] <SpamapS> jamespage: I'm so glad you say that and not "thats impossible!!"
[16:18] <SpamapS> :)
[16:18] <SpamapS> ok lets move on
[16:18] <SpamapS> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[16:18] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[16:18]  * smb thinks people aught to know he is feeling very depressed (about Xen)
[16:19] <smb> Apart from that
[16:19] <hallyn> hggdh: cool.  i have some work to do for ubuntu guests.
[16:19] <jamespage> hggdh: everythings possible with Jenkins...
[16:19] <smb> there is one thing I wanted to bring up
[16:19] <smb> bug 720095
[16:20] <smb> Looking at that basically brought up that having NET_NS (network namespaces) enabled in Lucid was not the best idea
[16:20] <smb> Because teardown is slow as hell
[16:21] <hallyn> quantify?
[16:21] <smb> IT was done to support some containerize stuff, the question to the server-team would be, how loud would be the expected complaining and shouting should we need to disable it
[16:21] <smb> hallyn, 1 namespace per second
[16:21] <hallyn> very
[16:21] <smb> while you easily can create 8 in the same time
[16:21] <hallyn> is there a cherrypickable fix?
[16:22] <smb> That is sort of the problem
[16:22] <smb> I have not really found a smallish change (yet) and not sure there is one
[16:22] <hallyn> lots of ppl using lxc on lucid, so turning off is not really an option
[16:22] <smb> There has been a long series of changes towards Maverick
[16:22] <hallyn> hm
[16:22] <smb> that batched up destruction
[16:23] <hallyn> yeah it rings a bell
[16:23] <SpamapS> is it possible to use the maverick kernel on lucid for heavy lxc usage?
[16:23] <hallyn> what do other distros do?
[16:23] <smb> The last hope is to try whether locking could be relaxed in inet_twsk_purge, but that is probably neither simple
[16:23] <hallyn> they may have a patch...
[16:23] <smb> Well, the option was marked experimental at that time
[16:23] <smb> Not sure they use it
[16:24] <hallyn> which means little :)
[16:24] <smb> SpamapS, The problem seems to be in that case that there is other problems somewhere else preventing to use the maverick kernel
[16:24] <SpamapS> also can you boot a lucid guest on LXC from maverick?
[16:24] <hallyn> well i dont mind tracking thagt down next week
[16:24] <hallyn> yes
[16:25] <smb> SpamapS, don't now (boot lucid gues on lxc)
[16:25] <smb> know
[16:25] <hallyn> but that won't ease user's minds who want stable host
[16:25] <smb> I have been making a backport for the approach of queuing /batching ns destrucktion
[16:25] <smb> from upstream
[16:26] <hallyn> who from?
[16:26] <smb> Though it seems to work, it is 6 or 7 patches
[16:26] <SpamapS> hallyn: if they start w/ natty, that will get them to the next LTS .. so its not the worst thing.
[16:26] <smb> from between 2.6.32 and 2.6.35
[16:26] <smb> Side effect is that connection speed goes down
[16:26] <SpamapS> smb: how likely is that to be SRU'able?
[16:26] <smb> I mean the rate of connects to the vsftp server
[16:26] <hallyn> cnxn spd?
[16:27] <hallyn> you mean veth data rate?
[16:27] <hallyn> or dev creation?
[16:27] <smb> SpamapS, Only in emergencies I geuss
[16:27] <hallyn> ah
[16:27] <smb> hallyn, rather dev creation I guess
[16:27] <smb> (its similar in Maverick)
[16:28] <smb> I just don't know whether that could be seen as a regression in Lucid
[16:28] <hallyn> there will be loud cries if netns is turned off in lucid
[16:28] <smb> Anyway. That was mainly what I wanted to know. :)
[16:29] <hallyn> smb: thx :)
[16:29] <SpamapS> smb: anything else?
[16:29] <smb> nope
[16:29] <smb> other questions?
[16:29] <smb> does not seem to
[16:30] <smb> so I am done
[16:30] <SpamapS> smb: thx!
[16:30] <SpamapS> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
[16:30] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
[16:30] <SpamapS> So .. sommer has I think officially disappeared. Should we approach the ubuntu doc team about our need for a server guide maintainer?
[16:31] <SpamapS> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs?field.searchtext=server&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.has_no_package=
[16:32] <SpamapS> haha whoops
[16:32] <SpamapS> anyway, server guide bugs are mounting. :-P
[16:32] <hallyn> sure?
[16:32] <SpamapS> Hah ok glad we have consensus
[16:33] <jamespage> sounds like we need to
[16:33] <SpamapS> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[16:33] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[16:33] <kim0> Howdy folks .. Just a reminder that Ubuntu Cloud Days is tomorrow 4pm UTC .. Please spread/tweet/dent ...etc
[16:33] <kim0> Updates to the schedule include an OpenStack session, thanks soren
[16:33] <kim0> A Eucalyptus session thanks obino, and Daviey has made up his mind and doing puppet :) Thanks Daviey
[16:33] <kim0> That's basically all for me
[16:33]  * SpamapS will be doing a demo of Ensemble as well
[16:33]  * Daviey screams.
[16:34] <kim0> Rock n Roll @SpamapS
[16:34] <hallyn> Daviey: sshhhh
[16:34] <SpamapS> kim0: dekujume moc! (thank you very much)
[16:34] <kim0> :)
[16:34] <SpamapS> [TOPIC] Open Discussion
[16:34] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion
[16:34] <SpamapS> hallyn: go!
[16:35] <hallyn> ?
[16:35] <SpamapS> [hallyn] Reduce meeting notes delivery duplication? (blog post only, perhaps?)
[16:35] <hallyn> oh, yes.
[16:35] <hallyn> what SpamapS said :)
[16:36] <SpamapS> hallyn: do you know about the unbuntuserver-minutes code?
[16:36] <hallyn> can we agt least drop ubuntu-devel?
[16:36] <kim0> SpamapS: It's a language google translate doesn't seem to know about .. what's that
[16:36] <hallyn> i tried it once
[16:36] <SpamapS> hallyn: I have a fixed version that works a little better  lp:~clint-fewbar/+junk/ubuntuserver-minutes/
[16:36] <hallyn> and it avoids the need to reformat?
[16:36] <SpamapS> hallyn: allows to send to multiple email addresses at once.
[16:37] <SpamapS> yes it renders the page from the wiki
[16:37] <SpamapS> into the email and blog post
[16:37] <hallyn> SpamapS: can you put a link in mtg notes?
[16:37] <hallyn> i'll try it next time
[16:37] <hallyn> sounds awesome.
[16:38] <SpamapS> [ACTION] SpamapS to put his version of ubuntuserver-minutes in directions for writing minutes
[16:38] <MootBot> ACTION received:  SpamapS to put his version of ubuntuserver-minutes in directions for writing minutes
[16:38] <SpamapS> Anything else?
[16:38] <hallyn> thx!
[16:39] <SpamapS> [TOPIC] Announce next meeting date and time
[16:39] <MootBot> New Topic:  Announce next meeting date and time
[16:39] <SpamapS> Tuesday, March 29 2011 16:00 UTC
[16:39] <SpamapS> Be there or be square (I'll be square.. on holiday)
[16:39] <SpamapS> #endmeeting
[16:39] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 11:39.
[16:40] <hallyn> \o
[16:40] <raphink> :)
[16:41] <jamespage> cheerio all :-)
[16:41] <raphink> bye
[16:42] <kirkland> o/
[16:58] <JFo> o/
[16:58] <sconklin> \o
[16:58] <herton> o/
[16:58] <kamal> o/
[16:58] <vanhoof> \o/
[16:58] <cking> p/
[16:59] <sforshee> o/
[16:59] <smb> \o
[16:59] <jjohansen> o/
[17:00] <bjf> #startmeeting
[17:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 12:00. The chair is bjf.
[17:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[17:00] <ppisati> o/
[17:00] <bjf> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[17:00] <bjf> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Natty
[17:00] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[17:00] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Natty
[17:00] <bjf> # Meeting Etiquette
[17:00] <bjf> #
[17:00] <bjf> # NOTE: '..' indicates that you are finished with your input.
[17:00] <bjf> #       'o/' indicates you have something you'd like to add (wait until you are recognized)
[17:00] <bjf> #
[17:00] <bjf> [TOPIC] Release Metrics (JFo)
[17:00] <MootBot> New Topic:  Release Metrics (JFo)
[17:00] <JFo> Release Meeting Bugs (8 bugs, 9 Blueprints)
[17:00] <JFo> [17:00] <JFo>  * 4 linux kernel bugs (down 4)
[17:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux-ti-omap bugs (no change)
[17:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux-meta-ti-omap bug (no change)
[17:00] <JFo> [17:00] <JFo>  * 20 linux kernel bugs (down 2)
[17:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux-ti-omap bugs (no change)
[17:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux-meta-ti-omap bug (no change)
[17:00] <JFo> [17:00] <JFo>  * 6 blueprints (Including HWE Blueprints)
[17:01] <JFo> [17:01] <JFo>  * 73 Linux Bugs (up 2)
[17:01] <JFo> [17:01] <JFo>  * 94 Linux Bugs (no change)
[17:01] <JFo> [17:01] <JFo>  * [[https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bugs?field.has_patch=on | Bugs with Patches]]
[17:01] <JFo>  * [[http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/csv-stats/bugs-with-patches/linux/ | Breakdown by status]]
[17:01] <JFo> ..
[17:01] <bjf> [TOPIC] Blueprints: Natty Bug Handling (JFo)
[17:01] <bjf> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/hardware-kernel-n-bug-handling
[17:01] <MootBot> New Topic:  Blueprints: Natty Bug Handling (JFo)
[17:01] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/hardware-kernel-n-bug-handling
[17:01] <JFo> nothing to report
[17:01] <JFo> ..
[17:01] <bjf> [TOPIC] Status: General Natty (apw)
[17:01] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: General Natty (apw)
[17:01] <ogasawara> We've uploaded the 2.6.38-7.38 kernel which is a no change upload to rebuild against the recent compiler update.  I do not expect any further uploads of the kernel until after Beta.  Note that Beta freeze is this Thursday.
[17:01] <ogasawara> ..
[17:02] <bjf> [TOPIC] Status: Stable Kernel Team (sconklin / bjf)
[17:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: Stable Kernel Team (sconklin / bjf)
[17:02] <sconklin> ||
[17:02] <sconklin> || Last week, all kernels except Dapper completed QA and certification testing, and were released.
[17:02] <sconklin> || Dapper has now completed testing and should be released soon.
[17:02] <sconklin> ||
[17:02] <sconklin> || New packages have been placed in -proposed, beginning another cycle. However, due to the upcoming Natty
[17:02] <sconklin> || release and insufficient testing resources, it is expected that further SRU kernels will not be released until
[17:02] <sconklin> || May. However, the stable kernel team will continue to hold to a normal two week cadence, and complete
[17:02] <sconklin> || verification of fixes for each cycle until release testing can resume.
[17:02] <sconklin> ||
[17:02] <sconklin> ..
[17:02] <bjf> [TOPIC] Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Karmic/Hardy/Dapper (sconklin / bjf)
[17:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Karmic/Hardy/Dapper (sconklin / bjf)
[17:03] <sconklin> || Package                                    || Upd/Sec              || Proposed             ||  TiP || Verified ||
[17:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || dapper   linux-source-2.6.15               || 2.6.15-55.93         || 2.6.15-57.94         ||    1 ||        1 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.15.56            || 2.6.15.57            ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.15    || 2.6.15-55.13         || 2.6.15-57.15         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || hardy    linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24   ||                      || 2.6.24.18-29.9       ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24       || 2.6.24-28.47         || 2.6.24-29.48         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.24    || 2.6.24-28.37         || 2.6.24-29.38         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.24.28.30         || 2.6.24.29.31         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.24-28.86         || 2.6.24-29.88         ||    2 ||        1 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || karmic   linux-ec2                         || 2.6.31-308.28        || 2.6.31-308.29        ||    1 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.31-23.74         || 2.6.31-23.75         ||    1 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || lucid    linux-ec2                         || 2.6.32-314.27        || 2.6.32-315.28        ||    5 ||        1 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ports-meta                  || 2.6.32.30.23         || 2.6.32.31.23         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-mvl-dove                    || 2.6.32-211.27        || 2.6.32-216.33        ||   32 ||       27 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-mvl-dove               || 2.6.32.209.12        || 2.6.32.216.18        ||    1 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-lts-backport-maverick       || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1  || 2.6.35-28.50~lucid1  ||   12 ||       10 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.32    || 2.6.32-30.29         || 2.6.32-31.30         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.34.4               || 1.34.7               ||    1 ||        1 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.32-30.59         || 2.6.32-31.60         ||    5 ||        1 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.32.30.36         || 2.6.32.31.37         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || maverick linux-mvl-dove                    ||                      || 2.6.32-416.33        ||   17 ||       14 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-mvl-dove               ||                      || 2.6.32.416.6         ||    1 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.38.4               || 1.38.5               ||    3 ||        2 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.35-28.49         || 2.6.35-28.50         ||    6 ||        0 ||
[17:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[17:03] <sconklin> ..
[17:04] <bjf> [TOPIC] Incoming Bugs: Regressions (JFo)
[17:04] <MootBot> New Topic:  Incoming Bugs: Regressions (JFo)
[17:04] <JFo> Incoming Bugs
[17:04] <JFo>  359 Natty Bugs (up 62)
[17:04] <JFo>  1232 Maverick Bugs (up 14)
[17:04] <JFo>  1045 Lucid Bugs (up 11)
[17:04] <JFo> Current regression stats (broken down by release):
[17:04] <JFo> [17:04] <JFo>   * 42 maverick bugs (up 2)
[17:04] <JFo>   * 75 lucid bugs (up 1)
[17:04] <JFo>   * 7 karmic bugs (no change)
[17:04] <JFo>   * 0 hardy bugs (no change)
[17:04] <JFo> [17:04] <JFo>   * 162 natty bugs (up 31)
[17:04] <JFo>   * 242 maverick bugs (up 2)
[17:04] <JFo>   * 221 lucid bugs (no change)
[17:04] <JFo>   * 38 karmic bugs (no change)
[17:04] <JFo>   * 2 hardy bugs (no change)
[17:04] <JFo> [17:04] <JFo>   * 8 natty bugs (up 3)
[17:04] <JFo>   * 0 maverick bugs (no change)
[17:05] <JFo>   * 0 lucid bugs (down 1)
[17:05] <JFo>   * 0 karmic bug (no change)
[17:05] <JFo> ..
[17:05] <bjf> [TOPIC] Incoming Bugs: Bug day report (JFo)
[17:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  Incoming Bugs: Bug day report (JFo)
[17:05] <JFo> I've postponed today's bug day to next week. I was unable to prepare for it, so I will send out e-mail
[17:05] <JFo> today for the next one which should be covering bugs in the confirmed state.
[17:05] <JFo> ..
[17:06] <bjf> Are bug days accomplishing anything ?
[17:06] <JFo> seem to be, just not as much as I would like for them to
[17:06] <bjf> ok
[17:06] <bjf> [TOPIC] Triage Status (JFo)
[17:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  Triage Status (JFo)
[17:06] <JFo> Answered some askubuntu questions with the help of various team members. Other than that, it was a slow week for triage.
[17:06] <JFo> ..
[17:07] <bjf> [TOPIC] Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[17:07] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[17:07] <bjf> thanks everyone
[17:07] <bjf> #endmeeting
[17:07] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 12:07.
[17:07] <JFo> thanks bjf
[17:07] <cking> wow speedy
[17:07] <jjohansen> thanks bjf
[17:07] <sconklin> thanks!
[17:08] <ogasawara> record time, thanks bjf
[17:08] <kamal> thanks bjf