=== BUGabundo is now known as MADBUG === MADBUG is now known as BUGabundo [06:19] hmmm [06:19] make[7]: *** No rule to make target `-lpthread', needed by `js'. Stop. [06:19] rc2 from natty fails to build [06:34] weird, all google gives me is failed builds on slackware [06:42] ahh i fail at package management [06:43] nvm :P [07:04] phsi, that's bug 737641 [07:04] Launchpad bug 737641 in make-dfsg "Mozilla packages don't build in Natty (and blocking FF4.0 RC2/final)" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/737641 [08:25] mozilla 642395 [08:25] gnomefreak: Error: Error getting Mozilla bug #642395: NotPermitted [08:25] anyone know why i cant access that bug report? [08:37] gnomefreak, because it's security related, most likely [08:37] i can't access them either [08:37] k thanks [08:39] ok thanks i let elky know [08:46] chrisccoulson: if it was you that fixed prefered apps menu to include tb3.3 but it still is lacking 3.1 i dont think we packaged 3.2 [08:47] gnomefreak, yeah. there is a merge request to fix 3.1, but the merge is wrong (and there are bigger issues with 3.1 in natty) [08:48] chrisccoulson: ah ok thanks [11:06] hello :) === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [14:50] hi fta, you might be interested in subscribing to or commenting on bug 740225 [14:50] Launchpad bug 740225 in launchpad "The differences between New and Translated for upstreams was removed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/740225 [15:10] HURRY UP BUILDERS! [15:10] gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah === JanC_ is now known as JanC [15:21] Congrats all on Firefox 4.0 [15:21] world class software [15:23] [reed]: are you partying yet? === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away [15:25] heh [15:27] we really need something like this: http://glow.mozilla.org/ :-) [15:32] so fx4 is now building? :) is it going to be in french as well? in the ppa === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [15:44] msucan, you'll need the fr xpi to get french [15:45] chrisccoulson: is it going to be pushed as a package in the ppa? [15:45] msucan, yes [15:45] oky, thanks [15:46] i want to upgrade my ubuntu 10.04 lts to firefox 4 ... from 3.6, and i have my system in french [15:46] working with custom builds is not ideal :). i prefer a nice ppa [15:46] will the ppa provide security updates as well? [15:48] yeah, you'll need to get the french language pack from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/4.0/linux-i686/xpi/ [15:48] there's not really any other way to do that, because we bundle the 3.6 translations in our language packs [15:48] and those won't work in 4.0 [15:49] it would be nice if the language packs could be updated somehow [15:49] yeah, that's impossible at the moment though, unless we ship full language packs in the PPA [15:50] and i don't want to go there ;) [15:52] Is firefox4.0 still at rc1 in the PPA? [15:53] chrisccoulson: hehe, right. i'll just install the xpi ;) [15:59] msucan, in future, this PPA will probably go away and we will push straight to the archive [15:59] (with proper language packs) [15:59] that would be great. for the LTS you mean? [15:59] yeah [16:18] dpm, done, thanks. but i'm not sure if it's about upstream or packaging [16:19] rickspencer3, pff, not fair, no congrats for chromium 5/6/7/8/9/10 ;) [16:19] fta, I read it as a feature request for having back those coloured stats in an upstream project in LP (not in Ubuntu source packages) [16:20] dpm, i read it as a bug complaint about a useful feature dropped (with which i 1000% agree) [16:22] fta, heh, yeah, interpretations might vary. In any case, I'd like to have them back as well ;) [16:23] fta - i guess there will be less excitement about firefox releases when we get 5/6/7/8 all in the same year ;) [16:25] chrisccoulson, i feel it's more about main+default = great vs universe+opt-in = worthless :( [16:26] hm, wth? debconf turned pink ??! [16:28] fta - are you able to run chromium in strace? it just hangs here [16:28] try without the sandbox [16:28] fta - how do i do that? [16:28] --disable-sandbox [16:28] fta - cool, thanks [16:29] hmm, it still hangs :( [16:29] hm [16:30] http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20591 [16:31] it should be possible, most devs even valgring it [16:31] incl the buildbots [16:31] valgrind [16:32] heh, valgrind is pretty crazy ;) [16:32] speaking of valgrind, i have to valgrind my own projects, 2 nasty crashers to catch [17:04] chrisccoulson, why do you need to strace ch? [17:32] updated to firefox 4. thanks chris for the quick release of the fx4 ppa builds for ubuntu! [17:44] woo! [17:44] nice work chrisccoulson [17:44] fta: you too every 6 weeks. :) [17:50] hi. anybody know why the ubuntu-mozilla-daily ppa is on b13? is it pulling from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/ ? [17:53] ag [17:54] i think the pointer may need to be redirect to somewhere in the http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/ branch [17:58] lder, no, we always build from source [17:59] fta: ah. any idea why there is no source since b13? [18:02] chrisccoulson: thanks for ff4! :D [18:03] m_conley, you probably shouldn't thank me, i just uploaded it ;) [18:03] :D [18:03] lder, the version hasn't been bumped on mozilla-central yet [18:08] i guess i should be using the firefox-stable ppa instead? === micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team (Chromium too!): | Firefox 4 10.04-10.10 http://is.gd/5Fyywu | Seamonkey 2.0.12 in http://is.gd/dsudW needs testing | Firefox 3.6.15/Thunderbird 3.1.8 in Stable Releases | Report Mozilla PPA bugs here: http://is.gd/hdZc1 [18:12] will ff4 be in maverick 10.10 official repo? [18:13] i know its in ppa [18:15] why does firefox-4.0 for lucid install globalmenu? [18:17] jdstrand, PIE? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/66991055/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-amd64.chromium-browser_11.0.696.16~r78799-0ubuntu1~ucd~dev1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [18:18] i wonder why it's only in -dev, but not in trunk [18:25] wernicke, it's an empty package on lucid [18:25] smallfoot-, no, but maverick will get a future firefox version [18:26] (probably 5) [18:26] ahh, ok. thanks for uploading [18:26] fta: so, this is only in the dev channel? [18:27] why does firefox copy everything chrome does? [18:27] the interface, now the version numbering with 4,5,6,7,8 in some months [18:30] fta: multiarch :) [18:30] smallfoot-, what's the issue with copying good design decisions? [18:31] or should developers never reuse the work of someone else? [18:36] micahg, hm.. so trunk will fail tomorrow then [18:37] fta: most probably [18:38] ok, only natty/amd64 failed [18:40] right, which makes sense [18:40] grrr, i don't have time for this [18:44] fta: I'll mention it to slangasek in #ubuntu-devel [18:44] ok, thanks [18:55] chrisccoulson, yes its good do stuff like implement WebGL, HTML5 [18:55] but when they adopt same version numbering (thats not a design decision) it seems it going too far [19:07] Hi [19:07] Will Firefox 4 final be in daily repo? [19:07] i think not [19:07] it seems it will be in 11.04 natty [19:08] and maybe backported to 10.10 later, in long time [19:09] so, for final version, I need to use firefox stable ppa? [19:09] yes, i think so [19:27] this su**s .... It took my old Firefox 3.6 profile, and not Minefield 4 profile :( [19:27] I'll stay on Minefield... :) [19:28] Milos_SD: which version from where? [19:28] Milos_SD, it should have prompted you ;) [19:28] (it worked here) [19:28] chrisccoulson, it didn't :( [19:28] micahg, Firefox 4 final from firefox stable ppa [19:29] it upgraded Firefox 3.6, and not Firefox 4 b13pre from daily ppa [19:29] :( === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away [22:37] thanks for the 4.0 ppa! i was having ugly fonts with the mozilla.com build and submitted a bug report (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643884), which seems resolved with the ppa version. fonts look good again, cheers [22:37] Mozilla bug 643884 in General "fonts appear choppy / light on linux" [Major,Unconfirmed] [22:45] fta: can't get gmail desktop notifications to work, nor can I clear the option in the Settings :\\\\\ [22:57] why is the firefox-stable build still branded as mozilla developer preview? [23:03] chrisccoulson: ^^ [23:06] it shouldn't be [23:08] Dimmuxx, lucid or maverick? [23:08] they all seem to be built with official branding here. are you sure you're using the right version? [23:09] i'm not sure what builds you're using, but they aren't the ones from firefox-stable [23:09] Dimmuxx: it's firefox, not firefox-4.0 in stable [23:16] fta: FYI http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=77106 [23:36] micahg, fyi, linux/beta (10.0.648.151 -> 11.0.696.16) [23:36] fta: ACK [23:40] micahg, has the crypt fix been pushed already? [23:40] fta: yes, I'm test building chromium now [23:40] i have to drop inspector for the next daily [23:41] it's been merged into resources.pak [23:41] fta: we'll probably know in about an hour and a half if it was successful [23:46] i wonder if i should continue to ship the deb empty or drop it [23:47] maybe it's best to keep it empty to ease the transition [23:47] for those shifting channels [23:55] micahg, i think i will clean up d/control for ch11. like drop chromium-testsuite completely, it's gone since ch4 so it never reached the repos