[04:17] <xene> HY
[04:17] <rww> hello
[04:17] <xene> lets all get naked
[04:17] <rww> no thanks
[04:17] <xene> yes
[04:18] <xene> get naked now, or i will beat you with a hose
[04:18] <xene> like your parents used to
[04:18] <rww> I guess it's one of those days today.
[04:18] <xene> on your knees bitch
[04:20] <xene> so, lets all take off one article of clothing
[04:20] <xene> i have a webcam, it'll be fun. you can see my junk and compare
[04:25] <xene> unban me
[04:28] <xene> unban me
[04:31] <xene> unban me
[04:34] <xene> unban me
[04:35] <elky> no.
[04:37] <xene> unban me
[04:38] <rww> careful, if elky unbans you enough times, it'll overflow and become a ban.
[04:38] <elky> oh i'm pretty sure that limit for him is 0.
[04:40] <xene> unban me
[04:41] <rww> nuqɐu ɯǝ
[04:48] <bazhang> zcat[1], hi
[04:51] <IdleOne> !appeals > xene
[04:52] <IdleOne> zcat[1]: How can we help you?
[04:55] <IdleOne> zcat[1]: you are active enough to be talking in #debian you can take the time to answer me.
[04:58] <IdleOne> your*
[04:59] <Flannel> IdleOne: He's forwarded, may not have known he was in here.
[05:00] <IdleOne> which is why I highlighted twice
[05:00] <IdleOne> plus bazhang did too
[05:01] <Flannel> IdleOne: If he's active in another channel, he could very well be in the middle of something there, and isn't sure where the mystery pings are coming from (again, because he isn't even aware he's in this channel)
[05:01] <IdleOne> had he responded I would of taken the time to explain to him where he was and why but he is to busy moaning in #debian just like he did in #ubuntu when he was banned
[05:05] <zcat[1]> Hmmm
[05:05] <IdleOne> zcat[1]: welcome back
[05:05] <zcat[1]> have I been banned?
[05:05] <IdleOne> you have from #ubuntu
[05:05] <zcat[1]> Ywah, I know why..
[05:05] <IdleOne> and forwarded here
[05:06] <zcat[1]> totally lost it with some very unhelpful help eg "go use windows"
[05:06] <zcat[1]> while trying to set up raid
[05:08] <zcat[1]> not sure why I even bother coming to #ubuntu some days, I hardly ever get my questions answered
[05:08] <zcat[1]> but... I apologise for my inappropriate comments anyhow.
[05:08] <IdleOne> appreciated
[05:09] <IdleOne> So can I unban you and trust you will follow the guidelines?
[05:09] <IdleOne> !guidelines
[05:09] <zcat[1]> I'll try...
[05:10] <IdleOne> alright, I'll take a chance. Please read that link.
[05:10] <zcat[1]> can ubuntu try and fix software raid so it works properly?
[05:10] <IdleOne> you can help fix it
[05:11] <zcat[1]> Yeah, I should probably check launchpad.. I suspect it's something to do with the mobo I was using not being well supported or something
[05:11] <zcat[1]> kinda had a dozen people on my back wanting their mail working again.
[05:12] <zcat[1]> ended up just setting it all up on a single drive which I'm not happy with, but it's better than 'raid' where either drive failing causes the box to not boot.
[05:12] <IdleOne> could you please join #ubuntu to make sure I got the ban lifted
[05:12] <IdleOne> thank you.
[05:12] <zcat[1]> yep that's good thanks
[05:14] <Jordan_U> FakeRAID :(
[05:14] <IdleOne> Sometimes you remove an idler and they come back all upset and continue the behaviour that got them here in the first place. Sometimes the removal is just a nudge to say "Hey I need you to focus on me for a second".
[05:15] <rww> kicking people out of #ubuntu-ops when there isn't anything for them to interrupt, they are highly unlikely to be planning a bot attack, and there's someone else that's been idling here on and off for days :(
[05:15] <IdleOne> rww: I said something about that days ago
[05:15] <IdleOne> not sure who/what to do about it
[05:16] <rww> You're already over-enforcing the silly policy, why not go all out and start banning people for repeated non-compliance?
[05:16] <IdleOne> I see what your saying.
[05:17] <IdleOne> I'll stop enforcing the no idling rule.
[05:18] <Jordan_U> No enforcement of the idling rule? Why did I become an op then? ;)
[05:55] <elky> ... IdleOne surely you can find a halfway point.
[05:59] <IdleOne> not sure how to enforce half a policy
[05:59] <IdleOne> either we do or we don't
[06:00] <Flannel> IdleOne: Spirit of the law, not letter of the law.
[06:00] <rww> enforce the policy when it's useful, and don't enforce it when it's not?
[06:00] <Flannel> also known as: use common sense, don't be a robot.
[06:00] <IdleOne> no idling means no idling
[06:00] <rww> it says "We reserve the right to remove idlers", not "No idling"
[06:00] <elky> Use more than 10 minutes from first greet to first boot is closer to halfway.
[06:00] <IdleOne> k
[06:02] <IdleOne> well necreo has been here for days
[06:33] <rww> Any staffers around?
[06:33] <rww> hrm, nvm, I should go ask in #freenode instead of here
[08:21] <elky> gnomefreak do you have mozilla bugtracker access?
[08:23] <gnomefreak> elky: yes
[08:24] <gnomefreak> what can i do for you?
[08:24] <elky> gnomefreak, pm'd
[08:24] <gnomefreak> k
[11:56] <Pici> jrib: fwiw, cat /etc/debian_version says squeeze/sid on this maverick install.
[12:00] <Pici> !prayer > Pici
[12:02] <jrib> !cookie > Pici
[12:24] <elky> hah
[12:25] <Pici> eh?
[12:50] <Pici> ircc: may want to check bognarandras's irc cloak status, hes asking for it to be removed right now in #freenode
[12:52] <tsimpson> he's still listed as an ubuntu member
[13:58] <LjL> !runlevels
[19:17] <genii-around> Heads up, might start getting something like: <dufyhn> Hi, kunwon1 here. Have you been waiting 2, 3, 4+ years for a Freenode GRF (Group Registration Form) to be approved by Freenode staff? Has Freenode staff stolen your channel and given it to someone else, because they made a cash donation? If so join ##freenodelawsuit today! A class action suit against freenode is in the works, and our legal counsel Saul Goodman will be answering your
[19:17] <genii-around> questions.  ging mumbles jussi TheOV magnetron intgr linear_shift star
[19:18]  * IdleOne goes for more coffee
[19:28] <Tm_T> genii-around: lovely
[19:29] <genii-around> Tm_T: Looks like the 4 nicks I saw doing this are k-lined now
[19:29] <IdleOne> Saul Goodman, sounds like a real lawyer name
[19:30] <IdleOne> ME is the abrv. for Maine correct?
[19:31] <Pici> yes.
[19:31] <IdleOne> Got his degree from Broklineme law and tire repair school
[19:31] <Pici> o.O
[19:32] <Pici> Hes a regular in #freenode iirc.
[19:32] <Pici> I know I've seen the nick before.
[19:34] <IdleOne> juk? yeah
[19:34] <Pici> no
[19:34] <Pici> saul goodman
[19:34] <IdleOne> oh
[19:34] <IdleOne> I like my BroKlineME name for the school
[20:48] <IdleOne> Anybody if I add !ff4 is <reply> Firefox 4 is the current stable version of Firefox. To install it, add the PPA repository with the following command << sudo add-apt-repository ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable && sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade »
[20:48] <IdleOne> mind*
[20:51] <IdleOne> hmm my «  turned to < <
[20:52] <IdleOne> !ff4 is <reply> Firefox 4 is the current stable version of Firefox. To install it, add the PPA repository with the following command <<  sudo add-apt-repository ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable && sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade »
[20:52] <IdleOne> darn why doesn't it show properly
[20:53] <IdleOne> rww: mind doing your sed magic on the «
[20:53] <IdleOne> heh
[20:53] <IdleOne> now they pop up
[20:54] <rww> !ff4
[20:54] <rww> !ff4 =~ s/<</«/
[20:54] <rww> !ff4
[20:54] <IdleOne> thank you
[20:54] <rww> !ff4 =~ s/  / /
[20:55] <rww> no problem
[21:45] <bazhang> just a heads up smallfoot- in +1 (no time to watch now)
[21:46] <bazhang> thanks IdleOne
[21:57] <rww> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IrcGuidelines. (with dot) --> what?
[21:58] <IdleOne> huh?
[21:58] <rww> open https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IrcGuidelines. in a web browser.
[21:59] <IdleOne> done
[21:59] <IdleOne> your client fails at urlwith.
[21:59] <rww> notice the part where it's a bunch of badly-written guidelines by someone called Joshua
[22:00] <rww> IdleOne: I didn't say "open https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IrcGuidelines in a web browser", I said "open https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IrcGuidelines. in a web browser" ;P
[22:01] <IdleOne> ahh I see
[22:01] <IdleOne> sorry my assumption was fail
[22:02] <IdleOne> badly written but still good advice
[22:02] <IdleOne> :)
[22:03] <rww> I could enumerate the problems I have with it (I count seven), but I'm just going to rm it instead ;P
[22:04] <IdleOne> sounds like a plan
[22:04] <IdleOne> evening Logan_
[22:04] <Logan_> hey
[22:04] <Logan_> yay, it worked
[22:04] <rww> !fx4 is <alias> ff4
[22:04] <IdleOne> sorta
[22:05] <IdleOne> now it works
[22:05] <Logan_> lol
[22:05] <rww> bad IdleOne, uses the wrong acronym :(
[22:05] <IdleOne> thanks Logan_
[22:05] <Logan_> rww: can I have factoid-adding privs. for ubottu, or is that just for ops?
[22:05] <rww> !firefox4 is <alias> ff4
[22:05] <IdleOne> Logan_: just ops
[22:05] <Logan_> ah, okay
[22:06] <IdleOne> !canibeanop > Logan_
[22:06] <rww> Logan_: The answer to that question is shrouded in time, incorrect information, and disagreement, but by far the most likely way to get editing privileges is to get ops in a core channel.
[22:07] <Logan_> rww: ok, thanks
[22:07]  * Logan_ will part so that he is not idling