=== ogra is now known as Guest42038 === Guest42038 is now known as ogra_ [12:08] good morning everyone [12:23] good morning mgariepy [13:28] no daily build for today: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/natty/edubuntu-dvd/20110323/livecd-20110323-i386.out [16:48] stgraber: this is basically what I get for i386 and amd64 (except s/i386/amd64/g on amd64): http://irc.jonathancarter.org/files/screenshots/ltsp-i386-fail.png [16:49] hmmm, where does that .tmp come from ? [16:49] that's on alternate ? [16:49] if so, please pastebin the /var/log/installer/syslog for both installs [16:52] stgraber: yep, alternate i386 and amd64 [16:53] highvoltage: ok, let me know when you have the syslog [16:54] it's really big [16:54] 1.9M :) [16:54] I'll put the file up [16:54] ok, send it over on jabber or something [16:56] stgraber: http://irc.jonathancarter.org/files/temp/syslog [17:01] highvoltage: can you also scp /var/log/installer/ltsp-image-build.log ? [17:01] # make sure /etc/dhcp3/dhcpd.conf is for the right architecture [17:01] LTSP_ARCH=$(ls -1 /target/opt/ltsp/images | sed "s/.img//g") [17:01] chroot /target sed "s/i386/$LTSP_ARCH/g" -i /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf [17:02] that's what failed for you [17:02] so somehow the image didn't finish building and remaining as a .tmp [17:02] ltsp-image-build.log should show why [17:02] (diskspace or similar) [17:02] stgraber: ltsp-image-build.log does not exist on my system after installation [17:02] hmm, weird [17:03] what do you have in /var/log/installer/ then ? [17:03] oh, check /var/log/ltsp-image-build.log [17:03] apparently the build script doesn't put it in installer/ [17:04] http://paste.ubuntu.com/584375 [17:20] highvoltage to what extent are the LTSP proproetary items (ie, distro specific) inlcuded... I guess what I'm aksing is, how long would it it tkae to take all those compoents out and be left with a bar system [17:22] nubae: I do not understand your question [17:22] nubae: what would you like to know? [17:22] itsnot for this project, its ofr the XS sever which has been extremely built for fedora 9 [17:23] and now I want to modularise the pieces so they can fit into any distro [17:23] LTSP seems like the mst similar sequence of events [17:23] nubae: ah, ok [17:24] nubae: ltsp upstream has already done that, you can get all the ltsp specific bits from ltsp upstream and integrate it with any distribution [17:24] nubae: but I believe there is someone who is already doing / has already done it for fedora [17:25] hmmm you lost me on the last sentenc [17:26] nubae: I think someone has already integrated ltsp into fedora [17:47] right I got that part [17:48] the thing is... the XS porject is goign through similar growing pains that LTSp4 went through being tied to one distro and indeed one reseale thereof [17:49] I'm trying to make a case that we follow the LTSP 5 route [17:49] * highvoltage is unfamiliar with XS, what is it? [17:49] oficially we support rhel [17:50] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Dextrose/Server [17:51] that is the current fork, as the main guy is uniwlling to take the horseblind off [17:52] there is also code for building the RHEL6 deployment builder [17:53] amd I'm currently writing the debian 6 FAI route [17:53] its eaier than it semems [17:54] and the whole point is to mle tje sustems as autonomu as possible [17:55] with every new relese, acpuple of change will need to be cera [17:55] created [17:56] but the system ill remail up to dte, anteahcers oinput has been exst [17:56] ecstatic [17:58] I want t suport rhel 5.6, 6, centos equivelant if necessary [18:00] debian6, Ubuntu LTS, na maybe just Maybe Fedora (j-/k - feora will be inthe