=== Omega is now known as bootri [03:48] if there is an issue booting up onto a live cd [03:48] what is the recommended action? === timc_ is now known as timc === waschtl|gone is now known as waschtl === ogra is now known as Guest42038 === Guest42038 is now known as ogra_ [10:18] What package is the Disk Mounter applet associated with in order to report a bug? [11:15] o/ === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [14:41] I lack some understanding how bugs are treated regarding different "levels". ( example: #621265 is "in" Linux (high, confirmed); linux(ubuntu) (medium, confirmed); linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (medium, incomplete)). Where do those differences come from? [14:46] that question was not particularly clear :-( by "different levels" I mean Linux vs. linux(ubuntu) vs. linux(ubuntu maverick), the differences I was asking about are: Importance high vs. medium and status: confirmed vs. incomplete [15:08] whoelse, check out https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance - for information on what the different statuses are used for [15:12] whoelse: as for the task names: [15:12] linux(ubuntu) is the general task, which means the bug is tracked against the development release [15:12] linux(ubuntu maverick) is a task that tracks this bug seperately for the maverick release [15:12] the last variant is used by developers to indicate that the bug is important for that particular release and it's mostly used to track SRUs [15:12] !sru [15:12] Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates [15:14] timc: thx, I (think I) know then basic meaning, what I cannot grasp is why the same bug has different importances and different status in the three ?projects? and how they are related to each other (dependency...) regarding bugs [15:14] whoelse: as for the Linux task (without ubuntu), that is a task that tracks the status of the upstream bug that's linked on launchpad. Here auto-bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org #1932 [15:15] yofel: thx, I was typing while you responded :-) [15:16] true. the linux(Fedora) task is also a link to another bug in the red had bugtracker. In this case for the Fedora distribution [15:27] yofel: I think I get it - slowly - what bothers me is especially "incomplete" in ubuntu maverick, when it is "confirmed" in ubuntu === fabio_ is now known as fabio [15:37] mvo: the traceback in bug 707990 looks like it is really an aptdaemon bug is that right? [15:37] Launchpad bug 707990 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "update-manager crashed with DBusException in _convert_dbus_exception(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 18)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs [15:43] bdmurray: I think this is the one that gets triggered if a policykit prompt is unanswered for more than 5min [15:46] mvo: the traceback show _on_clicked .. cancel() [15:48] mvo: so I think there are 2 that look similar, unanswered and cancel clicked [15:48] bdmurray: indeed, sorry, I overlooked that part [15:48] mvo: well I could have said that at the beginning ;-) [15:50] thanks, reassinged to aptdaemon and confirmed [16:51] Hey guys, anyone here? [16:52] bug 689214, and quite a few others, the previous triager isn't much help at all [16:52] Launchpad bug 689214 in ubuntu "Cannot connect Kodak C613 digital camera to F-spot. (affects: 1) (heat: 35)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/689214 [16:53] and by simply asking if they can upgrade cures no problems at all, BAD triaging!! [16:58] bug 689228, another example, coul have tranlsated it themselves and edited description (doing it now) [16:58] Launchpad bug 689228 in ubuntu "eingefrorener Bildschirm (affects: 1) (heat: 35)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/689228 [17:02] That would have been njin, I think. He has been spoken to about that kind of triaging, I believe. [17:03] charlie-tca: Is that who FM is? [17:03] charlie-tca: Ps, Hi :) [17:03] Hello, xteejx [17:03] yes, that would be njin [17:03] Ok, no probs, just thought a karma of 17525 would know better that's all :) [17:04] * xteejx **rant over** [17:04] He is not bug control yet [17:04] Just BSq I saw that [17:04] Sometimes, I think he can do really good [17:04] I think my renewal is coming up soon [17:05] I'll admit I've had some off days where I've completly went off on something else altogether by not reading the description when I've been tired [17:05] but you know... lol [17:05] yeah, I have done that, too [17:06] whew! glad I'm not the only one :) [17:06] He has had his share of being yelled at, though [17:06] Ohhh hang on was he the guy that wasin 2 days ago asking something REALLY obvious? [17:06] He gets jumped by two or three people somedays. [17:06] yes [17:06] :( [17:06] That sounds right [17:07] no I mean it was really f'ing stupid lol [17:07] Oops, irc! I forget, [17:07] I don't know then, but we do all learn at different speed, and for some, it is really hard [17:08] but, we do have about 20+ new people trying to learn, too [17:08] I'm hardly the brightest here, I mean yeah I'm a smart guy but never coded or anything and I can do it [17:08] its effort, asking questions, taking notes, looking at others' work [17:09] that's how I learnt [17:09] I think I might become a mentor [17:09] Yeah, that was my method too, but it won't work for some people. [17:09] We need more mentors [17:09] Sign me up then! [17:09] ;) [17:10] I've been in BC for over 2 years, think I got it by now lol [17:11] Now I have to find the pages [17:11] I'll have a look, assume its on the wiki somehwere [17:12] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad/Mentors [17:13] Cheers charlie :) [17:13] vish: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad/Mentors/AdminList is not up to date, but I don't think I know the changes. [17:13] :-) [17:18] Applicaiotn sent [17:18] Application even [17:19] anyways, I'm off for now, catch you all laater and thanks charlie-tca :) [17:24] charlie-tca: i'm not sure what to do with that page either.. :) that was the old page we used when assigning mentee to mentor [17:24] and the admins on that page were supposed to keep up.. [17:24] Want to delete the page entirely? [17:24] I know how to do that [17:25] sure, no probs for me :) [17:25] Okay. I will go take care of it then [17:50] QA Team Meeting at #ubuntu-quality in ~10 mins [19:27] folks, do you know if there is an issue with some formats of current documentation.. seems like yelp is doing something wrong with some packages (for example banshee - nautilus if you press F1) [19:59] kamusin: I agree: There is an issue with some formats of current documentation.. seems like yelp is doing something wrong with some packages, for example Banshee. [20:00] kamusin: I am speaking about Ubuntu 11.04. [20:01] kamusin: You better file a bug report to Launchpad. [20:05] bullgard4, yes I think so.. [20:12] well is done, thanks for your comment bullgard4 [20:13] :-) [21:04] Someone able to check Bug #414181 - hoping to have it set to Triaged/Medium it's quite an old one [21:04] Launchpad bug 414181 in update-manager (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Update Manager, "install" button does nothing when u-m was opened by itself (affects: 31) (dups: 5) (heat: 116)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/414181 [21:11] timc: done [21:11] thanks charlie [21:31] Hello, when a patch is released on bugzillla, i've to attach it to LP report too? [21:44] njin: no, it is not necessary to attach it to the launchpad report. The bugzilla report number is there, right? [21:45] The launchpad bug report should stay in triaged status until the app with the patch included is in the repository [21:49] timc: How should I go about trying bug 404241 again? [21:49] Launchpad bug 404241 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "dist-upgrade to karmic removed audacious (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/404241 [21:52] bdmurray, there have been a few releases since that bug was submitted. Yours is the only one I could find similar. Perhaps when you update to 11.04 (natty) you could check on it then? [21:58] timc: I guess I feel that the standard reply is a little inappropriate here especially the wording regarding 'there hasn't been any activity in recently'. [22:00] I'd rather hear I scoured the depths of launchpad and could find no bugs similar to yours and since its been awhile since you reported yours it might have been a transitory problem in the archive. [22:00] or something like that. [22:01] Appreciate the feedback. Thanks. [23:39] guys, I'm getting "gtk-update-icon-cache: The generated cache was invalid." for all ubuntu-mono icon themes since natty upgrade [23:40] any idea? I haven't found a bug so far