[00:02] yeah, there's nothing to link against with a plugin [00:03] rockin'!! built! [00:03] excellent :) [00:05] and works, too [00:06] chrisccoulson: is it planned to avoid having to specify libs manually? i. e. provide a libxul-like pkgconfig in firefox-dev? [00:06] pitti - possibly, if we need to [00:09] anyway, uploaded [00:10] and with that, good night! [00:10] atk built, failed packages retried, should be happier in the morning [00:13] good night pitti [02:13] hey robert_ancell, RAOF how is life in tomorrow? [02:13] rickspencer3, it's awesome. Get prepared! === rickspencer3 is now known as greatcthulu [02:13] greatcthulu, mysterious :) [02:13] how can this nick be available? [02:14] hehe [02:14] I think it's reserved, you may be getting nightmares now for using it [02:14] or people all over the irc are going to have inexplicable nightmares tonight [02:14] * didrocks misses the reference :) [02:15] it's my new "I'm not really working" nick [02:15] didrocks, it refers to the very pinnacle of English literature [02:16] greatcthulu: it's maybe better than I mess the reference then (looks like the pinnacle is ironic) :) [02:16] miss* [02:16] hold on [02:16] I missed an "h" === greatcthulu is now known as greatcthulhu [02:17] didrocks, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Call_of_Cthulhu [02:17] in case you need something to do while waiting to get Unity uploaded [02:18] Narwhals keeps Cthulhu from eating ye! [02:18] lol [02:18] greatcthulhu: well, still landing some code right now ;) but while nux is building, why not :) [02:18] didrocks, it's good stuff - I can bring you a book of his stories to UDS :) [02:19] H.P. Lovecraft and P.G. Wodehouse are my 2 favorite authors [02:19] robert_ancell: I never really adhere to Lovecraft's writing, but why not, let's see in English ;) [02:19] short stories of no real significance, I guess [02:19] didrocks, it occurs to me, you should have gotten robert_ancell to make Unity release tonight, you could have slept! [02:20] greatcthulhu: well, I needed to sneak some fixes upstream as well, so it's not just "waiting". So, that's ok :) [02:21] drag to trash, expanding launcher, some tooltip not displaying… was still a productive evening :) [02:21] when are desktop files going to start landing for Open in New Window and that kind of stuff? [02:21] let me ask jasoncwarner [02:21] jasoncwarner, ^ ? [02:21] greatcthulhu: I landed gnome-screenshot and inkscape. Updated the wiki page [02:22] there is a bug for our libreoffice maintainer [02:22] it's actually kind of weirding me out to be referred to as greatcthulhu === greatcthulhu is now known as rickspencer3 [02:22] rickspencer3: heh, troubled by the hilight? :) [02:23] well, it was just creepier than I thought it would be :) [02:23] rickspencer3: so yeah, jcastro wanted to make a small announcement to avoid the big rush [02:23] big rush of desktopfiles? [02:24] rickspencer3: yeah, everyone waiting to push desktop file update for every app of the universe without a clear view of what entries are really needed [02:24] for instance, do we want a "New window" or "New tab" for firefox? [02:24] well, time is running out! [02:24] we have like 3 weeks to make Ubuntu work [02:25] it's time to stop making changes and just fix fix fix [02:25] * rickspencer3 whip cracking noises [02:25] well, it's working, but the desktop files aren't fixes, it's changes? [02:26] didrocks, that's what I'm saying [02:27] too many changes still planned [02:28] rickspencer3: I patched all desktop files that I could and referenced by design (inskcape, gnome-screenshot) apart from libroffice as our maintainer will do an upload for that. Then, there is the gimp but I can't add the QL for the designer use case without touching gimp's code. So out of the scope now [02:28] what about Firefox? [02:28] didrocks, that's awesome btw [02:28] and a lot of the quick lists are really cool [02:29] rickspencer3: I asked for Firefox, they are thinking about it (for quite some months) [02:29] gnome-screenshot with a quick list sounds cool [02:29] not sure about "open a new window" or "add a new time" [02:29] what? [02:29] *pffft [02:29] ok, I'll follow up [02:29] that seems easy to me [02:30] add a new tab* [02:30] didrocks, did you mean "add a new tab" by any chance? [02:30] yeah [02:30] thats totally useless [02:30] anyway, open in new window is required [02:30] I agree, but I'm a keyboard user, so not that most common case :) [02:30] didrocks, I'll get that squared away asap [02:31] well, if you go to a new workspace, you need to open a new window [02:31] it's obvious [02:31] I mean, don't these people use computers? [02:31] :) [02:31] rickspencer3: compu*what*? ;) [02:31] lol [02:32] rickspencer3: what we need is a short list of app and entries to add [02:32] that can be a quick and nice community contribution [02:32] didrocks, yeah [02:33] let me look at the first bug about it, one sec [02:34] rickspencer3: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/676886 [02:34] Launchpad bug 676886 in unity-design "Launcher - Add 'new document' option to Open Office, Gimp and Inkscape quicklists" [Critical,Fix released] [02:35] that's coolio, but don't they use a web browser at all? [02:35] the web is already old fashioned for design :-) [02:35] lol [02:35] didrocks, well, nice job on that bug [02:41] didrocks, ping? [02:41] cyphermox: hey [02:41] hey ;) [02:41] I assume you use evo for email and stuff? [02:41] right :) [02:41] are you having issues with contacts over LDAP too? [02:42] just want to make sure it's not broken only for me ;) [02:42] cyphermox: the contact view you mean? I always had that issue [02:42] cyphermox: but if you look for a contact [02:42] in the search [02:42] it works [02:42] ah [02:42] then it must be my system [03:56] nux and unity uploaded \o/ [03:57] bed time now :) [03:57] see you tomorrow (probably a little later than usual) === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic [07:59] Morning, all! [08:02] pitti: This libgcj_bc stuff drives me crazy. I have reinstalled the package and have the symlink. The LO build still fails. After the (failed) build the symlink is still there. However, when I reboot, the symlink is gone. what the heck? [08:07] * Sweetshark builds 3.3.1-1ubuntu5 to see if it ftbfs [08:25] Good morning [08:26] Sweetshark: what, a package file disappears after a _reboot_??? [08:26] Sweetshark: grep for the name in /etc/init and /etc/init.d ? [08:28] pitti: do we maybe have something in /etc/init that removes broken symlinks in /usr/lib? [08:28] Sweetshark: not that I know of, and that would be utterly wrong [08:32] good morning [08:33] bonjour didrocks [08:33] Guten Morgen pitti [08:34] pitti: do you have libgcj-bc installed on your box, does dpkg -L libgcj-bc show a /usr/lib/libgcj_bc.so.1, and does that one actually exist in the fs? (just to make sure the problem is not local) [08:34] didrocks: Bonjour! [08:34] Sweetshark: installing, hang on [08:36] Sweetshark: I confirm the problem [08:37] pitti: yikes [08:37] I dont know if I am happy about that. [08:37] hm, it doesn't even have a postinst [08:38] pitti: what do you think about this: https://code.launchpad.net/~sladen/unity-place-files/unity-place-files-lp704997/+merge/54644 ? [08:38] pitti: as it's just paste UI freeze… (changing the icons for the places in the launcher) [08:38] past* [08:39] Sweetshark: I don't have a libgcj.so.11 either, though [08:40] pitti: well, I have a libgcj.so.10 [08:40] oh, multiarch [08:41] Sweetshark: even if the symlink would exist, it would be wrong and point to /usr/lib/ [08:41] /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcj.so.11 [08:41] that's where it lives now [08:42] Sweetshark: asking in #u-devel [08:42] oh, hm, you aren't there [08:44] * Sweetshark looks innocent [08:44] I am. [08:49] chrisccoulson: huh, why does swt-gtk want to go to universe all of a sudden? doesn't gwt still need it? [08:53] didrocks: urgh, when did you go to bed? doing package uploads at 5 am? [08:54] morning [08:54] pitti: well, that was the only way to make the release team happy it seems :) [08:54] pitti: as they were scared about having a traditional unity release on Thursday [08:54] didrocks: well, we do accept packages in the freeze, we just review them and want to know what's going on.. [08:55] didrocks: the MP doesn't say much, looking at the bug now [08:56] didrocks: ah, it's making the ws switcher gray instead of purple? [08:56] pitti: basically, it changes the icon of the places in the icon [08:56] go ahead, please [08:56] that indeed looks confusing [08:56] and same for places [08:56] (new icons) [08:56] the one you have in the dash homescreen [08:56] like the "find files" "find apps" [08:57] didrocks: oh, what changes there? they look sufficiently gray to me? [08:57] pitti: that's a design late request… [08:57] didrocks: sounds fine; please upload [08:57] pitti: open the dash [08:58] pitti: find apps/find files [08:58] pitti: I'll just change the proposed merge to use a symlink rather [08:58] didrocks: they have been gray for me all the time -- shoudln't they be? [08:58] * didrocks hugs pitti fighting memory space :) [08:58] bonjour seb128 [08:58] heh [08:58] pitti: they will still be gray [08:58] hey pitti [08:58] pitti: it's just the asset icon changing [08:58] didrocks, the man who never sleeps [08:58] didrocks: we already got an extra 1.5 MB due to the new font [08:59] salut seb128 [08:59] seb128: sleep is for weak :) [08:59] didrocks, did you sleep? when I went to bed at almost 3am you were still working [08:59] didrocks: really, you should take a looong nap in the afternoon.. [08:59] pitti: urgh, symlink so :) [08:59] seb128: I slept 4 hours, yeah ;) [08:59] seb128: unity uploads at 5 am.. [08:59] pitti, nice, I'm getting old, I crashed at 3 [08:59] pitti: I'll probably take a break this afternoon yeah [08:59] ;-) [09:00] ok, let's go to the symlink path [09:00] * pitti feels really bad now, going to bed at 1:45.. [09:00] lol [09:00] pitti, do we have CD space issues? [09:00] seb128: 5 MB oversized on i386 desktop, rest should be ok [09:01] ok [09:01] if we drop gl from cairo we should get back a bit [09:01] seb128: I'll do a langpack -base refresh tomorrow, that should help a bit [09:01] since that's bringing some libegl in that we wouldn't have otherwise [09:01] seb128: ah, nice [09:01] that's one of the things we spotted at a3 if you remember [09:01] seb128: I think we shoudl get that working today [09:01] well of the differences between a2 and a3 [09:01] right [09:05] pitti: argh, sorry, I have to take a copy of the 2 images as unity-2d use their own copy and path of the asset. If I do a symlink, it will break them :/ [09:06] hey kamstrup, good morning, do you have a minute for a couple of questions on giraffe? [09:06] dpm: sure thing [09:06] didrocks: well, they are tiny I guess? [09:09] pitti: yeah, both are 5kb [09:09] kamstrup, cool, thanks. So I noticed yesterday that the unity doc is not being generated, and I saw that it was because of this: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/584708/ happening on the last Unity-3.0.gir file from libunity3 3.6.8. I'm not too sure if that is a bug in giraffe or the .gir file? [09:09] didrocks: 5 kB! OMG!! [09:09] * pitti bbl [09:09] pitti: that's the 5 kB making the 5 Mb oversize of course :) [09:14] good morning everyone [09:14] pitti - gwt should still have a build-depend on the new swt-gtk [09:14] (note that the binary names have changed) [09:14] hey chrisccoulson [09:14] hi, how are you? [09:15] didrocks: hm, I still get my usual two unity crashes at login, but now it doesn't autorestart any more -- that was unfixed? :-( [09:15] chrisccoulson: bit tired, but ok; I guess everyone is :) [09:15] pitti - yeah, i'm pretty tired too. i was up late trying to make it possible to build easily against the new libmozjs [09:15] pitti: urgh, the autorespawn should still work… there were some cases where it wasn't working, but I tried to send a sigsegv and it worked when I tested [09:16] i had a few autofoo and soname issues this morning [09:16] didrocks! [09:16] pitti: what's your usual unity crashes at login, do you have a bug report? [09:16] you must be tired ;) [09:16] hey chrisccoulson ;) [09:16] i saw you on here at 4am :P [09:16] didrocks: bug 739434 [09:17] didrocks: sorry, bug 740757 (same, but good stack trace) [09:17] Launchpad bug 740757 in nux "compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_free()" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/740757 [09:17] pitti: argh, invalidated because of the new uploads [09:17] oh [09:17] pitti - can you NEW mozjs when i upload it in a few moments? [09:17] chrisccoulson: sure [09:17] pitti - cool, thanks [09:18] pitti: this one was *supposed* to be fixed (I closed a dup at least) with the amount of nux segfault fixes… [09:18] readding to the list then [09:18] didrocks: hm, perhaps it's a new one now; unfortunately I apport-blacklisted this compiz version, I unblacklisted it again now [09:18] pitti: and so, autorespawn doesn't work for you? [09:18] didrocks: well, it did work perfectly until yesterday, and just now after dist-upgrade/reboot it didn't [09:18] ctrl+alt+f1 DISPLAY=:0 unity FTW [09:19] hum hum hum [09:19] let me send a sigsegv here [09:20] and I still have a weird "ghost" launcher problem, but let's discuss this later [09:20] chrisccoulson: ah, swt-gtk is in NEW, perhaps that got it confused somehow [09:20] weird, why is it all in NEW, the binaries shouldn't have changed [09:20] * pitti investigates [09:21] pitti - yeah, possibly. nothing in main depends on the old binaries [09:21] chrisccoulson: oh, of course -- 3.5 -> 3.6 [09:21] yeah :) [09:21] ok "nice", sigsegv doesn't work there [09:21] chrisccoulson: so that would require a library transition [09:21] pitti, oh, i forgot about them sitting in NEW. i already uploaded the rest of the packages that depend on it ;) [09:21] didrocks, morning :) [09:22] i'll just need to retry all those builds once the new packages are published [09:22] chrisccoulson: you didn't bump their build dependencies to -3.6? [09:22] hey njpatel [09:22] njpatel: long time, isn't it? [09:22] chrisccoulson: gwt, azureus, tuxguitar, and zekr? [09:22] pitti - yeah, so they will all have either failed or be in DEPWAIT [09:22] didrocks, yeah ;) [09:22] they're all bumped to 3.6 already [09:22] chrisccoulson: yep, depwait, should be fine [09:23] pitti, njpatel is looking into your crash issue btw [09:23] \o/ [09:23] pitti - yeah, they are. so i guess all those builds will happen automatically won't they? [09:23] chrisccoulson: right [09:23] cool :) [09:23] * pitti reviews [09:23] pitti: I'm totally puzzled, I tried in a guest session yesterday and it respawn with the new compiz :/ [09:23] it was before [09:23] wasn't* [09:24] pitti: so, will you fix libgcj-bc? and what should i do with the LO build? [09:24] Sweetshark, oh, do you have issues with that too? [09:24] what's the actual issue, as i'm seeing linking problems and haven't had time to investigate? [09:25] Sweetshark: I pinged slangasek/doko, no response yet; I might have a stab at it, yes; is it blocking for beta-1? [09:25] Sweetshark: i. e. for the LO build? [09:25] we also need to sort out the cairo issue for beta1, not sure if seb128 has some time for this? [09:26] pitti: yes, it breaks the LO build [09:26] pitti: so you confirm that compiz -0ubuntu3 autorespawn worked for you on sigsegv? [09:26] didrocks: yes, that and some earlier versions, too [09:27] Pici, could you try with latest Unity? [09:27] pitti, sorry [09:27] chrisccoulson: newed except for armel (which is currently building); I'll watch this [09:27] pitti: I'll give some tests then again, trying to make it respawn [09:27] njpatel: I dist-upgraded 30 minutes ago, there's nothing newwer [09:27] pitti - thanks. i'm just about to upload mozjs too [09:27] chrisccoulson: there is a symlink in /usr/lib that is all wrong and vanishes. we have yet triaged what does that (dpkg maybe?) [09:27] njpatel: oh, you mean for the respawn issue or the __libc_free crash? [09:28] pitti, __libc_free [09:28] Sweetshark, is that causing link erros when linking against libgcj_bc.so.1? [09:28] njpatel: I still get a crash at exactly the same time and occasion, need to verify whether it's still the same [09:28] that sounds like a failure i'm seeing here ;) [09:28] pitti, I can do the libcairo work [09:28] seb128: are you on the new or old stack? (I mean, if you didn't update compiz yet, can you send a sigsegv when you get a change to compiz) [09:28] chrisccoulson: [09:29] $ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/libgcj-bc_4.5.1-1ubuntu3_amd64.deb | grep .so [09:29] pitti, Interesting....it seems it could be intel drivers but I'll keep poking [09:29] lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2010-10-22 08:02 ./usr/lib/libgcj_bc.so.1 -> libgcj.so.11 [09:29] chrisccoulson: that's the problem -- needs to be a multiarch lib dir now [09:29] seb128: cool, thanks [09:29] didrocks, sorry I upgraded first thing today, I wanted to give a round of testing to the current stack, I didn't restart my session nor compiz yet though so I still have the pre update version running [09:29] chrisccoulson: It is causing dpkg-shlibsdeps failures here. [09:30] seb128: so sending the sigsev should work once ;) [09:31] didrocks, yeah, trying [09:33] didrocks, respawns on sig11 [09:33] but the new version does as well [09:33] !!! [09:34] seb128: thanks for confirming I'm not crazy :) [09:34] didrocks, that I can't confirm ;-) [09:34] it doesn't respawn anymore then though… [09:34] it does here [09:34] seb128: don't even dare infering… :-) [09:34] I sent another sig11 after the respawn and it worked [09:35] hum, I'm really unsure about what happens then [09:35] seb128: if you use a guest session? [09:35] I can try if you want [09:36] seb128: if you have time, that would be nice ;) [09:40] didrocks, no, doesn't respawn [09:40] seb128: ok, let's revert to yesterday's version so… don't know what really happens with this sm_ protocole… === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|errand [09:44] kamstrup, did you see the giraffe question earlier on? ^ (just making sure it didn't get lost) [09:44] dpm: oh, sorry :-) got caught up in admin work [09:45] here now [09:45] no worries [09:45] so it was kamstrup, cool, thanks. So I noticed yesterday that the unity doc is not being generated, and I saw that it was because of this: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/584708/ happening on the last Unity-3.0.gir file from libunity3 3.6.8. I'm not too sure if that is a bug in giraffe or the .gir file? [09:45] hmm, unity doesn't start for me with the new compiz packages [09:46] dpm: right... There were no changes in libunity wrt to this, so the change must be in the GIR generated by an upgrade valac [09:46] dpm: it has prolly changed how it handles void methods or something [09:46] dpm: i'm on it [09:47] kamstrup, awesome. I've now got access to the d.u.c server, so once this is fixed, I should probably be able to publish the documents on d.u.c straight away [09:47] dpm: \o/ [09:48] dpm: byw, did you pull the latest trunk? There where some fixes to the generated C api [09:49] dpm: spooky... what's the chance of this: i open gedit to check the code and the cursor starts right on the line that the exception is thrown from... o_O [09:49] magic :) [09:50] kamstrup, it was just waiting for you to fix it :) [09:50] pitti - ok, mozjs is in NEW now [09:51] kamstrup, yeah, I think I used trunk. I also sent a merge proposal, not a big change (make it easier to call giraffe from other modules), but I thought it would be best if you could have a look at it if you want [09:51] pitti - when you approve it, are you able to add it to the mozilla packageset? [09:51] or does someone else need to do that? [09:51] chrisccoulson: I can [09:51] pitti - cool, thanks [09:54] chrisccoulson: is that an upstream tarball, or did you create it yourself? [09:54] pitti: could you import libtextcat 2.2-9 from debian (we are currently at 2.2-7)? LO will build without it, but it will be bigger. [09:54] Sweetshark: syncing [09:55] dpm: I think http://paste.ubuntu.com/584727/ is the problem... there are two within one element. I am not sure that makes sense... Pinging some vala guys about this [09:55] pitti - it's an unofficial tarball from the mozilla guy who is doing the release (he hasn't officially released it yet). i've just included the chanegset number in case he changes it before hosting it on ftp.mozilla.org [09:55] pitti - see the second from last comment on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628723 [09:55] Mozilla bug 628723 in JavaScript Engine "Create JS 1.8.5 source release" [Normal,Assigned] [09:55] chrisccoulson: hm, no license file in the tarball :/ [09:56] Sweetshark: done [09:56] pitti - oh, is there even one in firefox? [09:56] pitti: thanks [09:56] pitti: could you give me a ping when the libgcj-bc issue is fixed? [09:56] ah, yes. there is [09:56] Sweetshark: of course [09:57] kamstrup, yeah, I saw that as well when I was looking at it yesterday, but I wasn't sure where the problem was, or if it was a problem that the field had two callbacks. The previous gir file had the same callbacks, but they weren't inside a field. [09:57] pitti - oh, the firefox LICENSE file just points to http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/licensing.html [09:57] chrisccoulson: checking the copyright file; I know that GPL mandates shipping the license, not sure about MPL [09:58] chrisccoulson: could you at least add the standard pointer to common-licenses to the GPL/LGPL bits? [09:58] pitti - oh, did i not add those bits already? [09:58] chrisccoulson: if you do that in bzr, I'll accept the package, but I don't want this to get lost [09:59] License: MPL-1.1 or GPL-2 or LGPL-2.1 [09:59] and no details at all [09:59] ah [09:59] pitti - i missed that section. i copied it in to a section further down [10:00] chrisccoulson: ah, there are pointers to them further down [10:00] pitti - yeah, for Files: js/src/assembler/moco/* [10:00] i can add to the other sections in bzr as well though [10:00] chrisccoulson: I think the first section should have all the blobs, and subsequent sections shoudl be fine with the single-line License: [10:01] chrisccoulson: same for BSD -- add it to Files: js/src/jsgcchunk.cpp, and drop the copies further down [10:01] that will make the file both easier to read and less redundant [10:01] chrisccoulson: oh hang on, it's not the same BSD, so nevermind the "drop the copies" [10:03] pitti, is there any way to trigger a ddebs.ubuntu.com publishing manually? or when is the next one? [10:03] seb128: sure, I can run it [10:03] pitti, I would like the new unity ddebs to get published so retracing work for crashes we get today [10:04] (they are not at the moment) [10:04] seb128: next regular one is in 1 h [10:04] ok, I can wait an hour [10:04] pitti, thanks [10:04] seb128: running [10:04] seb128: too late :) [10:04] pitti, you rock ;-) [10:04] np, launching a cron job is not rocket science [10:05] it will stomp over the hardy/karmic/lucid/maverick ones, but who cares [10:05] seb128: actually, on macquarie this stuff is pretty fast, I think I can increase the frequency of this [10:05] pitti - http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/mozjs/mozjs-trunk.head/revision/7 [10:06] ok, thanks [10:06] chrisccoulson: accepted; it's still hard to read, but *shrug* [10:06] pitti, I would not say no to that, we get quite some broken retracing on weekly dx updates since users jump on next versions and report bugs but the ddebs take time to get there [10:06] pitti - thanks [10:06] chrisccoulson: armel buildds are congested, for the rest it should build fast [10:09] chrisccoulson: as for the package set, I guess it needs some time to trickle down the pipes, I currenlty get a KeyError [10:09] pitti - ok, no worries [10:09] thanks [10:10] Added: [10:10] mozjs [10:10] ah, there [10:10] chrisccoulson: you got it [10:10] excellent, thank you :) [10:12] dbarth, ping [10:15] rodrigo_, thanks for the g-s-d fix commit [10:15] seb128, you're welcome [10:20] hmmm, do people use symbols files with C++ libraries? [10:20] thats a bit of a pain, as the symbol name mangling seems to be arch-dependant [10:20] chrisccoulson, some do [10:20] check webkit for an example [10:20] but yeah, there is lot of tweaking [10:20] chrisccoulson: KDE guys are IIRC. I didn't for nux because of arch-dependant symbols [10:21] the kde guys have special utilities [10:21] xdatap: pong [10:21] didrocks, yeah, i just had mozjs fail on i386 because the symbols in the symbols file are only valid on amd64 :( [10:21] chrisccoulson: I got that everyweek, and add armel to the dance… [10:22] chrisccoulson: so right now, I'm with a shlibs… [10:22] not like if nux was used elsewhere for now anyway [10:23] dbarth, morning. I just reproduced the bug #735393 , on the same machine but this time with classic desktop. Still no evidence of crash on /var/crash . The pc is still up with the problem, some suggestion? [10:23] Launchpad bug 735393 in gnome-settings-daemon "Unity: top bar theme lost" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/735393 [10:25] seb128: ddebs should be there now [10:25] pitti, danke [10:26] and ddeb retrieval happens every 4 hours now [10:26]