[07:21] <sridharpandu> I just upgraded to FF4 on Ubuntu Maverick using ppa. On launching FF, it freezes at the add-on compatbility check. Any idea what could be wrong? Would appreciate any help I can get.
[07:24] <sridharpandu> please can someone help me. Won't be able to work without FF
[07:25] <sridharpandu>  :'(
[07:33] <sridharpandu> help! anyone around
[10:26] <gnomefreak> chromium is broken. everytime i try to click on address bar it clicks the bookmarks i have under the address bar
[10:27] <gnomefreak> version 12.0.713.0~svn20110324r79245-0ubuntu1~ucd1
[19:35] <mbana> hi
[19:35] <mbana> as always the font rendering on the firefox tar i downloaded mozilla is terrible
[19:39] <micahg> mbana: stable PPA in /topic
[19:40] <mbana> but why is it this always the case?
[19:40] <mbana> what are they doing wrong?
[19:41] <micahg> mbana: we have patches to cairo they won't take because they haven't been accepted upstream
[20:00] <fta> obviously, no one cared about my popcon issue
[20:01] <kbrosnan> mbana: read https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458612
[20:01] <ubot2> Mozilla bug 458612 in Graphics "(Ubuntu) system fontconfig settings override GNOME font rendering screen settings" [Normal,Resolved: invalid]
[20:13] <chrisccoulson> kbrosnan, at some point, we will drop the /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-* symlinks from our fontconfig package ;)
[20:21] <micahg> fta: what popcon issue?
[20:28] <fta> just filed bug 742017
[20:28] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 742017 in popularity-contest ""readline() on closed filehandle FILES" warnings caused by multiarch" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/742017
[20:28] <mbana> wait, when i download firefox it comes with its own .so
[20:29] <mbana> if cairo or freetype or whatever it is that does the rendering
[20:29] <mbana> surely it won't i'm seeing in my other apps
[20:30] <mbana> i'm confused nevertheless
[20:45] <chrisccoulson> mbana, what's your issue?
[20:56] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: ping
[20:56] <chrisccoulson> hi m_conley, how are you?
[20:56] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: things are good, and you?
[20:57] <chrisccoulson> yeah, not too bad thanks, but pretty busy this week
[20:57] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: i hear that.  :p  Quick question for ya, if you have a second:  do you know offhand if libnotify supports clickable notifications?
[20:57] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: because nsIAlertsService seems to default to a XUL notification if I tell it that the notification is clickable.
[20:58] <chrisccoulson> m_conley, the actual API supports that,but it's up to the actual implementation at the other end to decide whether it's going to display them
[20:58] <chrisccoulson> in the case of notify-osd in ubuntu, it doesn't support clickable notifications
[20:59] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: Gotcha, ok. :)
[20:59] <chrisccoulson> there's a hint you can check to find out whether it's supported or not
[20:59] <chrisccoulson> but it's not supported in ubuntu
[21:00] <chrisccoulson> yeah, the issue with nsIAlertService is why we get XUL notifications for downloads finishing ;)
[21:00] <chrisccoulson> but.....
[21:00] <chrisccoulson> ...i want to integrate that with the launcher anyway ;)
[21:00] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: cool, gotcha.  Thanks!
[21:05] <mbana> the fonts of the firefox download from mozilla has dodgy fonts
[21:05] <mbana> nothing compared to my other apps
[21:11] <chrisccoulson> mbana, just the mozilla.org build, or do you get the same with the ubuntu build too?
[21:11] <mbana> mozilla.org build
[21:16] <mbana> my question is:  why does the font rendering differ.  i'm looked at the linked bug report - it doesn't make sense to me
[21:17] <mbana> it seems mozilla.org include .sos in the build
[21:17] <mbana> or perhaps that's the issue
[21:17] <mbana> i'm not sure .
[21:19] <jcastro> m_conley_away: you're going to want morphing windows if you need interaction.
[21:20] <jcastro> m_conley_away: ken says looking in ido, idimessagedialog but I don't know what that means. Ping me tomorrow and I'll get you the info
[21:21] <jcastro> it's for things like "oh a voip call, I need to click to answer" style things
[21:33] <fta> boouh, a blue envelope now
[22:00] <fta> micahg, here it is: linux/stable (10.0.648.151 -> 10.0.648.204)
[22:11] <micahg> fta: ACK
[22:17] <fta> mahh, i landed 560 strings yesterday, there are already 66 more
[22:18] <fta> micahg, chrisccoulson: you guys don't put the CVE in the firefox changelogs?
[22:19] <chrisccoulson> fta - no, we don't know them before we do the build usually
[22:19] <chrisccoulson> they go in the USN instead
[22:19] <fta> i convinced upstream to provide them for chromium
[22:20] <fta> and it finally happened in this release
[22:20] <micahg> fta: that's the best way for chromium since there's no USN
[22:24] <fta> micahg, 5 fixes, all webkit related, good luck with the system webkit
[22:30] <fta> hm, 1 is not about webkit
[23:00] <fta> micahg, bug 742118
[23:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 742118 in chromium-browser "10.0.648.133 -> 10.0.648.204" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/742118
[23:04] <fta> damn, i can't upload to ubuntu anymore
[23:10] <[reed]> nobody likes you, obviously ;)
[23:11] <jcastro> he can't upload because his xterms are broken
[23:13] <fta> lp hates me
[23:14] <fta> something about the ftp server again i'm sure
[23:24] <fta> micahg, can't upload atm, so forget about the security update
[23:26] <micahg> fta: well, we won't publish until monday, so if you can get it up sometime before sunday, I can try to upload and test
[23:27] <BUGabundo> o/