=== chuck_ is now known as zul [00:26] zul [00:27] highvoltage [00:28] TIMMEAH [00:42] highvoltage: heh [03:57] cjwatson: skaet: FYI, nux and unity uploaded, release well tested :) [03:57] now more than time to go to bed, see you tomorrow [03:57] didrocks: awesome. thanks! sleep well. [03:57] thanks :) [08:55] lamont, Calling command: /home/buildd/bin/BuildLiveCD -f ext3 -s omap4 -d natty ubuntu-headless [08:55] ssh: connect to host acorn.buildd port 22: No route to host [08:55] acorn.buildd finished at Thu Mar 24 08:38:03 UTC 2011 (failed) === doko__ is now known as doko === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk === nigelbabu is now known as nigelb === njpatel is now known as njpatel_ [13:46] does anyone know what happened to the amd64 iso for server today? [13:47] did you check the logs? [13:48] where are the logs? [13:49] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/ [13:49] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/natty/ for server [13:51] ogra_: thanks === njpatel_ is now known as njpatel [14:15] zul: I've fixed the overrides for the next publisher run [14:16] cjwatson: cool thanks.. [14:16] (some packages were at Priority: required when they shouldn't have been, due to a snafu in NEW) [14:51] is this acceptable? https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/2011-March/040160.html linking to sources on sourceforge to comply with MPL/GPL obligations, I would say not since the files on sourceforge might disappear [14:53] I'd tend to agree, we should meet our source distribution obligations without the aid of third parties [14:53] if nothing else it's in our own interest to do so [14:53] (though I haven't read the exact terms of the MPL here) [15:12] Would a copy of the source at p.u.c be sufficient? [15:13] why can't it go in the package? [15:14] it doesn't have to be built from it if the governing licence doesn't require that; but we have a perfectly good standard way to distribute source, I'm not sure why we wouldn't want to use it [15:14] Makes sense. [15:16] cjwatson: I discussed adding mx51images for Headless and Kubuntu with skaet last night and she was in favor. I also confirmed that the hardware I have to test them is functional with that subarch (and doesn't need a separate one of it's own). Would you be able to help me out with getting the images started? [15:17] ScottK: possibly, what's involved? [15:17] cjwatson: For Headless it should be just another subarch build. [15:18] I'm not sure what exactly needs to be done for that. [15:18] well, what's the required image format like? [15:19] I don't know more than 'like the ompa3/4 images' [15:24] I think we used to have i.MX51 images. Would it be sufficient to resurrect them? [15:25] in fact, the code's still in debian-cd for natty, just not built [15:25] It should be. [15:25] what kernel should be used? [15:25] we'll need a d-i build against it [15:25] It's built out of the linaro kernel. [15:25] let me look [15:26] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro-mx51 [15:27] good, it has udebs at least [15:42] should bug #727726 be assigned to someone or milestoned? it's still an issue [15:42] Launchpad bug 727726 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "gnome panel is about 4px instead of 30 on install (affects: 2) (heat: 177)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/727726 [15:45] the current custom partioner screen and tz selection page don't fit on a 1024x600 screen also [15:45] there is bug #732068 and a serie of others in launchpad [15:45] but none seems targetted for natty [15:45] seb128: Bug 732068 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/732068 is private [15:46] bug #732068 [15:46] Launchpad bug 732068 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "partitioning part of LiveCD installer doesn't fit on 1024x600 screen (affects: 1) (heat: 254)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/732068 [15:46] it's not? stupid bot :p [15:49] ev: ^- FYI [15:49] indeed, on my hit list via a separate bug [15:49] marking as a duplicate now [15:49] ev: thanks [15:50] ev: btw we were discussing ubuntu-geonames with desktopers yesterday, do you know if the fact that the locations are not translated would be easy to fix for natty? [15:51] not sure where the datas are coming from and if the translated infos are available [15:52] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-geonames/+bug/729022 [15:52] Launchpad bug 729022 in indicator-datetime (Ubuntu Natty) (and 5 other projects) "Locations in the settings are not localized (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Low,Invalid] [15:53] mterry and I talked through it a bit yesterday in #ubuntu-installer [15:53] I don't know if I'll have time for that, but fortunately it's a largely a server-side problem [15:53] ev: right, the question is rather "is that something easy to fix, or is the current database you use not providing what is needed" [15:53] we can anticipate the eventual change by passing the locale as an argument to the url [15:53] the database has it [15:54] ev: or asked differently "should we look at using libgweather for the indicator to fix that issue" [15:54] which is what the GNOME applet uses [15:54] it has its locations translated [15:54] it has a table of translated names [15:54] ok [15:54] so let's try to fix it [15:54] ev: thanks ;-) [15:55] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/03/23/%23ubuntu-installer.html around 14:24 [15:55] sure === jj-afk is now known as jjohansne === jjohansne is now known as jjohansen === smspillaz is now known as smspillaz|zzz [23:00] lamont: do you know why https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgd2/2.0.36~rc1~dfsg-5ubuntu2/+buildjob/2342500 is starting in 1 minute for 30 minutes? Is that within tolerance for launchpad's ability to predict start times, or is something wedged? :) [23:19] I thought https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcj-4.5/4.5.2-7ubuntu1/+buildjob/2342162 looked wedged... but seems it does take a long time! took 18 hours, 35 min to build on Maverick.. that is awful. (compared with 2.5 hours on amd64) [23:30] right, libgd2 is building now, so 'sallgood [23:31] Daviey: don't worry about java core packages, take care of eucalyptus ;p [23:32] * slangasek chuckles