| c2tarun | Riddell: ping | 03:02 |
|---|---|---|
| c2tarun | I was working on new version of ktorrent, I found this page http://packages.debian.org/experimental/ktorrent debian packed it and kept in experimental, I downloaded the debian tarball and packed it and it built fine on Ubuntu Natty. Can anyone please tell me now what should I do? call for a sync? | 03:06 |
| ScottK | c2tarun: You should look at the current Ubuntu package and see if we have an existing difference with Debian and if we do, if we still need to maintain it. | 03:09 |
| c2tarun | ScottK: yup, I think there are some changes, check this http://paste.ubuntu.com/585738/ | 03:17 |
| ScottK | c2tarun: I don't have time to help right now, sorry. | 03:17 |
| c2tarun | ScottK: np :) | 03:17 |
| c2tarun | Riddell: when you come around, please reply before switching off that ec2 machine, thanks | 06:37 |
| tsimpson | just a heads up, that paste from c2arun is 27MB, don't try opening it... | 07:12 |
| ScottK | :=0 | 07:14 |
| tsimpson | starts with 576859 blank lines, and it has seems to do a complete diff of ktorrent-4.0.5/ to ktorrent-4.1~rc1 | 07:19 |
| lucidfox | Hmmm | 07:49 |
| lucidfox | Launchpad shows there are translations for Muon in Natty, and Russian in particular is fully localized | 07:50 |
| lucidfox | Any idea why I'm seeing it in English, then? | 07:50 |
| lucidfox | Also, blarg, after I updated ttf-ubuntu-font-family, it is rendered differently in Qt and GTK applications | 08:36 |
| lucidfox | ah, bug #741862 | 08:49 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 741862 in ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu) "Default interface font is too bold in all Qt4 applications" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/741862 | 08:49 |
| lucidfox | what is it with Canonical and breaking UI changes shortly before release? | 08:49 |
| bambee | morning | 08:56 |
| * bambee needs a coffee v_v | 08:57 | |
| === mgraesslin_ is now known as mgraesslin | ||
| === tuos_ is now known as tuos | ||
| shadeslayer | apachelogger: http://people.ubuntu.com/~rohangarg/out.ogv | 10:48 |
| Quintasan | ffs | 11:55 |
| Quintasan | Why can't I mark a connection as system default in Network Manager? | 11:55 |
| JontheEchidna | not implemented in the KDE frontend | 11:56 |
| Quintasan | @_@ | 11:56 |
| Quintasan | Why bother adding a checkbox there? | 11:57 |
| JontheEchidna | trollface.jpg | 11:57 |
| Quintasan | Now I have no idea how to give static IP to eth0 | 11:57 |
| JontheEchidna | http://lamarque-lvs.blogspot.com/2011/03/plasma-nm-big-feature-bigger-than-i.html <- will have to be fixed for NM 0.9 | 11:57 |
| Quintasan | wow cool | 11:59 |
| Quintasan | he has been working for a year on it? | 11:59 |
| Quintasan | looks like I will have to manually edit files | 11:59 |
| === nigelb_ is now known as nigelb | ||
| Quintasan | JontheEchidna: really, that's some really shitty NetworkManager implementation | 12:10 |
| Quintasan | WHY THE HELL ANYTHING CANT WORK IN MY HOUSE | 12:13 |
| Quintasan | FFS | 12:13 |
| nigelb | Quintasan: ah, that's why the autoconnect doesn't work | 12:22 |
| nigelb | meh | 12:22 |
| Quintasan | bash | 12:49 |
| Quintasan | bah | 12:49 |
| Quintasan | no good tag editors either | 12:49 |
| c2tarun | Riddell: ping | 12:51 |
| shadeslayer | has anyone been able to make their firefox look like this : http://kde-look.org/content/preview.php?preview=1&id=117962&file1=117962-1.png&file2=117962-2.png&file3=117962-3.jpg&name=Oxygen+KDE+%28Firefox+Theme%29 ? | 14:02 |
| jussi | shadeslayer: no, but cripes thats nice! | 14:09 |
| jussi | also, anyone know how I fix this? The following packages have unmet dependencies: | 14:09 |
| jussi | libgpg-error-dev : Depends: libgpg-error0 (= 1.6-1ubuntu2) but 1.10-0ubuntu2~maverick1~ppa1 is to be installed | 14:09 |
| jussi | apart from removing the ppa | 14:09 |
| shadeslayer | jussi: just go to View and disable Menu Bar | 14:09 |
| jussi | shadeslayer: any ideas if thats just a screwup by someone (the = not being a > ) or if its by design - ie it only works with that version and not a higher one? | 14:11 |
| ScottK | jjesse: No. The = is necessary. You have to revert to the earlier libgpg-error0. ppa-purge may come in handy for this. | 14:23 |
| jussi | ScottK: what is ppa-purge? | 14:28 |
| ScottK | jussi: It's a script that will remove all packages from a selected PPA and revert them to the version in the archive. | 14:29 |
| ScottK | I believe it's in a package of the same name. | 14:29 |
| jussi | ScottK: ahh, excellent. thank you. | 14:29 |
| jussi | Hrm, how does one tell which ppa its in? apt-cache policy isnt helpful... | 14:31 |
| jussi | kubuntu-ppa-beta-maverick - Im confuzzled, what is the beta ppa for? | 14:51 |
| ScottK | Backports of beta/pre-release versions of KDE. | 14:53 |
| shadeslayer | apachelogger: agateau either of you around? | 14:54 |
| jussi | right, so how does that differ from the backports ppa then? | 14:54 |
| shadeslayer | jussi: one sec | 14:54 |
| shadeslayer | jussi: https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/KubuntuPPAs | 14:55 |
| jussi | shadeslayer: ahhh!!! thank you!!!! | 14:56 |
| shadeslayer | np :) | 14:56 |
| === GrueMaster_ is now known as GrueMaster | ||
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: how to enclose a bug number in debian/changelog for a kde bug? | 15:08 |
| shadeslayer | c2tarun: * CHanges here (LP : #bugno) | 15:09 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: if the bug is on bugs.kde.org and not on LP then? | 15:10 |
| shadeslayer | c2tarun: you can't close that bug | 15:10 |
| c2tarun | ok | 15:10 |
| shadeslayer | c2tarun: which bug are we talking about? | 15:10 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=240916 it was there in junior jobs :) | 15:10 |
| ubottu | KDE bug 240916 in FlickrExport "Question for web authentification: Better button names [patch]" [Minor,New] | 15:10 |
| shadeslayer | c2tarun: okay, that is now upto kde upstream to fix | 15:11 |
| shadeslayer | but ... poor choice of words | 15:12 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: kde upstream means/ | 15:12 |
| shadeslayer | something like : "Application authenticated" would have been better | 15:12 |
| shadeslayer | c2tarun: means, the developer of kipiplugins will fix it | 15:12 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: he dont even remember that application :( | 15:13 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: what should I do? fix the bug or leave it? | 15:14 |
| shadeslayer | uh.. you attached the patch | 15:14 |
| shadeslayer | that's the most you can do | 15:14 |
| shadeslayer | and keep poking the developer in the bug | 15:15 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: well there is a funny thing about it :) I didn't notice that the package is in our archives, so now I pulled it from archive and making a proper patch | 15:15 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: is it that in all kde bugs its upto upstream author to include the fix or not? | 15:20 |
| shadeslayer | yes | 15:21 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: but still if the patch works and its proper it can be included into the version in our archive? | 15:22 |
| shadeslayer | yep ... but you should probably ask the upstream developer if the patch is the correct one before applying it in our archives | 15:23 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: I asked him, he told that patch is ok, but he dont remember the application, I dont think he'll fix it :/ anyway I'll pack it and add a patch to that bug | 15:24 |
| c2tarun | Riddell: if you come around, please dont off your ec2 I am using it to build a package. | 15:25 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: ping | 16:29 |
| shadeslayer | c2tarun: pong | 16:29 |
| c2tarun | you remember the bug we just discussed? | 16:29 |
| shadeslayer | yes | 16:29 |
| c2tarun | I pulled the version from our archive and created a patch and fixed it. but the debdiff b/w the dsc's is for the ubuntu right? should I attach it to bugs.kde.org will it be correct? | 16:30 |
| c2tarun | shadeslayer: ^^ | 16:30 |
| shadeslayer | nope | 16:31 |
| shadeslayer | you just need to send in the patch | 16:31 |
| shadeslayer | no need to send the debdiff | 16:31 |
| c2tarun | and the patch I posted earlier was not working :( is there any way of removing it from there? | 16:31 |
| shadeslayer | i don't think so | 16:49 |
| shadeslayer | just attach a new diff | 16:49 |
| jussi | shadeslayer: have you got tomahawk compiled and working on your machine yet? | 17:08 |
| jussi | amazing!! | 17:08 |
| shadeslayer | no | 17:08 |
| shadeslayer | jussi: tomahawk is too new even for natty | 17:08 |
| shadeslayer | 2-3 libraries are missing :( | 17:08 |
| jussi | shadeslayer: so compile them - I did - it takes like 5 mins... | 17:09 |
| shadeslayer | hehe | 17:09 |
| shadeslayer | well .. i'm trying to get opensync to work first | 17:09 |
| jussi | the client is _awesome_!!! | 17:09 |
| shadeslayer | so that i can send in my GSoC Proposal | 17:09 |
| jussi | hehe | 17:09 |
| c2tarun | I applied a patch by -f option and then on refresh I am getting nothing in the patch, does this mean patch doesnt apply | 17:43 |
| c2tarun | can anyone please help me with this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/585931/ | 18:25 |
| bambee | c2tarun: does something beginning with "debian/tmp/usr/share/icons/oxygen/" is installed ? | 18:28 |
| c2tarun | bambee: nope | 18:33 |
| bambee | well, what's the error line 3649 ? (see your paste) | 18:34 |
| tsimpson | fix your .install file(s) | 18:40 |
| tsimpson | looks like you'll want to replace "oxygen" with "hicolor" in the .install (guessing) | 18:41 |
| c2tarun | tsimpson: ohh....yeah :) thanks | 18:44 |
| c2tarun | tsimpson: what should be my changelog entry ? and how do you know everything :( | 18:44 |
| tsimpson | I know because I see lots of things being installed into usr/share/icons/hicolor, rather than usr/share/icons/oxygen | 18:45 |
| tsimpson | and the changelog entry, well just say you adjusted the .install files | 18:45 |
| tsimpson | you don't need to go into excruciating detail about every single change in the changelog | 18:46 |
| tsimpson | just say what you generally did and note anything important | 18:46 |
| c2tarun | I never payed attention that where things get installed, :/ I dont even look at it unless I get an error. from now I'll look at it. :) | 18:47 |
| tsimpson | well if you get an error from dh_install, you should look | 18:47 |
| c2tarun | where is Riddell? | 18:56 |
| ScottK | !weekend | c2tarun | 18:56 |
| ubottu | c2tarun: It's a weekend. Often on weekends the paid developers and a lot of the community may not be around to answer your question. Please be patient, wait longer than you normally would or try again during the working week. | 18:56 |
| tsimpson | probably enjoying his weekend | 18:56 |
| c2tarun | sure :) and tsimpson you packaged half of KDE wow... :) | 18:57 |
| tsimpson | back in the early 4.0 days, yes | 18:58 |
| * c2tarun that explains how you know everything :) | 18:58 | |
| tsimpson | I'm not an especially active packager recently, but if I see "dh_install said it could not find usr/share/icons/oxygen/*", I'll go look at what was installed | 19:00 |
| tsimpson | obviously everything becomes easier with experience though | 19:00 |
| Quintasan | though new linking stuff is... | 19:07 |
| Quintasan | urgh | 19:07 |
| yofel | areed :S | 19:09 |
| yofel | *agreed | 19:10 |
| c2tarun | can anyone please look at this error. http://paste.ubuntu.com/585950/ | 19:13 |
| Quintasan | Cannot find file: /home/ubuntu/qtiplot/qtiplot-0.9.8.5/manual/manual.pro. | 19:15 |
| Quintasan | What's there you don't understand? | 19:15 |
| c2tarun | Quintasan: where is the file I guess :/ | 19:15 |
| yofel | with my qmake knowledge I would say there's a project file that includes a non-existent file | 19:15 |
| Quintasan | What yofel siad | 19:15 |
| Quintasan | said* | 19:15 |
| c2tarun | yofel: yup, pro are project files, but I think they are created. but it is not getting created here. | 19:16 |
| yofel | c2tarun: can you try to build qtiplot outside of the package once so we know if the packaging is foobared or the upstream source? | 19:18 |
| yofel | sure, .pro files are usually generated by qmake, but the developer is supposed to create those in most cases | 19:19 |
| c2tarun | yofel: what do you mean be building outside of package? never did it before | 19:19 |
| yofel | well, go to your upstream source tarball, extract that somewhere else, and build it | 19:20 |
| yofel | there's usually a README or INSTALL file that tells you how to build it | 19:20 |
| c2tarun | sure | 19:20 |
| c2tarun | yofel: manual says You also need to build and install the slightly modified versions of the Qwt (5.2) and QwtPlot3D libraries which are shipped with QtiPlot in the "3rdparty/qwt" and "3rdparty/qwtplot3d" folders respectively | 19:25 |
| yofel | hm, either the package ignores that or I'm too tired to understand the rules... | 19:29 |
| yofel | c2tarun: where did you get the new source from? | 19:32 |
| c2tarun | uscan | 19:32 |
| yofel | ah, thx | 19:32 |
| yofel | hm... | 19:39 |
| yofel | in your log there's | 19:39 |
| yofel | cd manual/ && /usr/bin/qmake-qt4 /home/ubuntu/qtiplot/qtiplot-0.9.8.5/manual/manual.pro -after QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE\ =\ -Wall\ -g\ -O2 QMAKE_POST_LINK\ ~=\ s/strip/: -o Makefile | 19:39 |
| yofel | Cannot find file: /home/ubuntu/qtiplot/qtiplot-0.9.8.5/manual/manual.pro. | 19:39 |
| yofel | here it simply runs | 19:39 |
| yofel | cd manual/ && make -f Makefile | 19:39 |
| c2tarun | yup | 19:39 |
| c2tarun | yofel: not getting, I think it runs cd manuals and then qmake-qt4 inside manual. | 19:40 |
| yofel | yes, for the packaging, but the plain build I'm doing here does something else | 19:41 |
| c2tarun | BTW what does make -f Makefile mean? | 19:42 |
| yofel | that's just telling make to use 'Makefile' as makefile | 19:42 |
| c2tarun | ohh... | 19:42 |
| yofel | c2tarun: man make | 19:43 |
| * c2tarun looking | 19:43 | |
| c2tarun | got it :) is your package building there (plain build?) | 19:43 |
| yofel | plain build means no pakcage | 19:44 |
| yofel | I just extracted the source, went in there and ran qmake && make | 19:44 |
| c2tarun | you mean inside manual folder qmake && make, but there is no make in packaging I guess | 19:45 |
| yofel | c2tarun: no, I meant that I ignored the packaging, went outside, extracted the orig.tar.gz somewhere else, and tried to build that | 19:47 |
| c2tarun | yup I got that, | 19:47 |
| c2tarun | yofel: I guess your make failed. | 19:55 |
| yofel | it did, something about qwt, and I'm out of ideas here, someone that actually knows qmake will need to take a look at this | 19:56 |
| c2tarun | its mentioned in manual that we have to make qwt first. | 19:57 |
| c2tarun | :/ | 19:57 |
| shadeslayer | anyone around to help with a DSO error? | 20:11 |
| shadeslayer | http://paste.kde.org/8168 | 20:12 |
| yofel | shadeslayer: where's the source? | 20:15 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: follow instructions from http://saidinesh5.wordpress.com/2010/08/24/are-we-there-yet/ | 20:15 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: looks like a DSO error tho right? | 20:16 |
| yofel | it is one | 20:16 |
| yofel | adding -lQtDBus somewhere would be my first attempt | 20:17 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: the problem is... it uses ... autotools | 20:19 |
| yofel | oh yeah, great | 20:19 |
| * yofel tries to remember the autotools tutorial he once did... | 20:20 | |
| shadeslayer | heh | 20:20 |
| JontheEchidna | *autohell | 20:21 |
| yofel | first it's a build-dep hell :S | 20:22 |
| ScottK | The LDADD macro is the one you want. | 20:22 |
| shadeslayer | w00t | 20:22 |
| shadeslayer | ScottK is here ... he's probably been here long enough to know autotools :P | 20:22 |
| ScottK | Dear lord no. | 20:23 |
| shadeslayer | haha | 20:23 |
| shadeslayer | well we have SYNCEVOLUTION_LDADD = | 20:23 |
| yofel | I would rather say to modify syncevolution_LDADD here | 20:27 |
| ScottK | Sounds right. | 20:27 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: via configure? | 20:28 |
| ScottK | shadeslayer: syncevolution is a bit offtopic for #kubuntu-devel. We ought to be discussing this in #ubuntu-motu. More likely people who know auto* stuff there too. | 20:28 |
| shadeslayer | okay | 20:28 |
| yofel | shadeslayer: no, in src/Makefile.am - around line 140 | 20:28 |
| shadeslayer | moving to #ubuntu-motu ? | 20:29 |
| === larva_ is now known as larva | ||
| c2tarun | what kind of patch is this? http://paste.ubuntu.com/585975/ | 21:12 |
| tazz | c2tarun, seems like multiple files are patched. | 21:23 |
| c2tarun | tazz: I thought its a diff followed by a patch :P anyway its already applied :) | 21:24 |
| tazz | heh cool | 21:24 |
| tazz | yea seemed odd... | 21:24 |
| bambee | apachelogger: I've a patch for the gpodder service in amarok ("no such slot" error). I should probably contact stefan nop ? | 21:41 |
| ScottK | JontheEchidna: It'd be really nice if you could look at the quickaccess thread on kubuntu-devel and make an assessment of what we should do. | 23:44 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
