[01:19] <psusi> cjwatson, oh man.. I don't know how the hell that happened, but dmraid failed to build because somehow DP() got changed to Dp() the last time I refreshed that patch.  I need to bump the package rev and propose another merge don't I?
[01:20] <cjwatson> psusi: nope, I beat you to it and fixed it already :)
[01:20] <psusi> heh, cool... I can't believe that happened...
[01:20] <cjwatson> ah well
[01:21] <cjwatson> I ought to have build-tested before upload
[01:24] <psusi> I literally typed in the opening while() { and then just highlighted that whole block and ran indent-region and appended the }... nothing should have changed except the indent there...
[01:27] <psusi> cjwatson, I've also tracked down that raid10 problem... we have a patch to parted that tries to identify the partition devices and omit them, but it does so by looking to see if the dm device has another dm device as a target, which is also true for the main raid10 device.  I think I can fix it by modifying the patch to actually look at the target, make sure it is only one target, and that it is a linear mapping, and THAT should only be true for a part
[01:27] <psusi> ition device.  Is that something that can still get in this cycle if I get it done this weekend?
[01:29] <cjwatson> psusi: I'd have to look at the patch, but yeah, I recognise the problem; I expect this weekend should be fine, as the archive will reopen for a period of a bit over a week after beta-1
[01:30] <psusi> oh wait, that would unhide the main raid10 device, but you also want to hide the lower level raid0 devices it is built on instead... so I guess that idea doesn't fully address it... maybe have to let this one go for next cycle and see where this discussion I got going about changing the uuid prefix to flag devices as internal or partition vs "disk" goes...
[01:30] <cjwatson> it's certainly in principle possible to follow the whole dm chain up with just libm
[01:30] <cjwatson> libdm
[01:31] <cjwatson> whether you want to bother is another question, and I expect it would mean grovelling around in /dev/mapper beyond just the device the user asked for
[01:31] <cjwatson> maybe
[01:31] <psusi> right, but I don't think parted should be guessing about whether a given device is internal or intended to be partitioned and used like a disk... I think dmraid/lvm/whatever should explicitly indicate that
[01:32] <cjwatson> perhaps
[01:33] <psusi> lvm snapshots also create a few internal devices that you don't want showing up in things like parted, and so does pvmove
[01:38] <psusi> cjwatson, say, I thought when a build failed, it got stuck in the upload queue and to re-upload it you had to bump the revision?
[01:39] <cjwatson> I did bump the revision
[01:41] <psusi> strange... bugs were closed saying 4.1-ubuntu2, lp page says last upload was 4.1-ubuntu3, but current natty rev is 4.1-ubuntu2
[01:42] <cjwatson> source uploads close bugs
[01:42] <cjwatson> 1.0.0.rc16-4.1ubuntu3 is working its way through but has not been published yet
[01:43] <psusi> ahh
[01:43] <cjwatson> everything is functioning normally; there is no cause for concern
[03:10] <zubin71> hello everyone, is there any kind of an apt-get hack which can get me a listing of deb packages(in the ubuntu repo, of course) written in C?
[10:40] <cjwatson> FYI, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2011-March/032789.html
[11:56] <sven777> does keybuk ever come around anymore?
[12:54] <directhex> NCommander, ping
[12:55] <directhex> NCommander, try installing libmono-addins0.2-cil from debian experimental to fix breakage of apps like banshee on mono 2.10
[13:14] <c2tarun> how can I check whether a pacakge is in universe or multiverse?
[13:15] <kklimonda> apt-cache show, apt-cache policy will tell you, apt-cache showpkg
[13:19] <c2tarun> kklimonda: some packages on this ftbfs tracker are not ftbfs http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi how come?
[13:19] <kklimonda> c2tarun: maybe they've already been fixed by someone?
[13:20] <c2tarun> kklimonda: fixed and uploaded by same version number??
[13:21] <c2tarun> kklimonda: for example check package elektra its versio in tracker and in archive is same, and the one in archive build successfully on natty
[13:21] <kklimonda> c2tarun: a package can fail to build because of problems in other packages, in this case you can just retry a build when the other package is fixed.
[13:57] <c2tarun> if a package is not following any packaging system or patching system, its just an ubuntu application how can we create a patch for it?
[14:10] <thekorn> c2tarun: bzr branch lp:ubuntu/package_name; cd package_name; "do your changes"; bzr diff > yourpatch.patch
[14:42] <c2tarun> thekorn: that package is not on lp I think, but ya diff will do :) thanks
[14:49] <c2tarun> what is meaning of 1.0 in debian/source/format file?
[14:49] <directhex> c2tarun, debian source fomat 1.0
[14:50] <directhex> man dpkg-source
[14:51] <c2tarun> directhex: how to  apply a patch in this case, quilt push -a is not working :(
[14:51] <directhex> c2tarun, did you export QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches?
[14:52] <c2tarun> oops ... sorry its and ec2 machine I forgot :(
[14:52] <directhex> c2tarun, you need to integrate quilt into debian/rules yourself if it's debsrc 1. depends on the debhelper compat version as to how
[14:53] <ScottK> directhex: However if Debian doesn't use a patch system we generally discourage adding one in Ubuntu.
[14:54] <directhex> yes
[14:54] <directhex> i assumed there was one already, given the talk of qult
[16:56] <c2tarun> can anyone please help me with this error http://paste.kde.org/8149/
[16:59] <Laney> does that file exist?
[17:01] <c2tarun> Laney: error se no  and I check in previous version's manual folder there is no such file
[17:08] <c2tarun> Laney: ping
[17:09] <Laney> I don't know
[17:09] <Laney> you should find out why it's not there
[20:43] <op_amp> This might be OT but I need an answer for this ques. Previously, I worked on a project,written in python mostly. In that I used to directly modify the code in the installation director and check after running
[20:44] <op_amp> But, what if whole project is written in c++ and wxwidgets? Then will I need to modify the source first, built it(takes time :() and then after installing see the code change effect
[20:44] <op_amp> *?
[23:23] <Gulfstream> is it possible for someone who learned to program with VB to help develop Ubuntu?
[23:33] <bregma> Gulfstream, absolutely, VB skills are transferable to, say, Python
[23:33] <ScottK> Gulfstream: Yes.  You'll need to be ready to learn new things but much of the development work does not require complex programming.
[23:34] <ohsix> smegma D:
[23:34] <ohsix> oops, wrong channel for such shenanigans