=== phisko_ is now known as kyofel_ | ||
=== kyofel_ is now known as kyofel | ||
penguin42 | can someone set prio on 743324 - it's my bug so I won't recommend one; but its pretty important for netbooks | 01:32 |
---|---|---|
penguin42 | bug 743324 | 01:32 |
ubot4` | Launchpad bug 743324 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Allocate drive space window too large for netbook - can't get to buttons (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/743324 | 01:32 |
paultag | penguin42: I think there's a workaround. Regardless, set. | 01:44 |
paultag | penguin42: thanks! :) | 01:44 |
penguin42 | thanks | 02:00 |
=== ravitejavad is now known as rav | ||
ikt | has any progress been made on this bug: | 09:08 |
ikt | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/705988 | 09:08 |
ubot4` | Launchpad bug 705988 in software-center (Ubuntu) "[master] Untrusted packages can not be installed (affects: 81) (dups: 28) (heat: 286)" [Medium,Confirmed] | 09:08 |
ikt | I was just affected by it, it's not nice :/ | 09:08 |
abhinav- | ikt: I am also affected by it :-/ | 09:13 |
abhinav- | although installing from command line using apt allows to confirm the source | 09:13 |
ikt | I unticked the 'Canonical Partners' in the other sources tab of software sources and it seemed to fix it | 09:20 |
ikt | I've seen 5 different work arounds | 09:21 |
ikt | but this shouldn't be a bug at all in a program that has such a simple job to do | 09:21 |
abhinav- | ikt : if apt asks the user about confirming the authenticity of the source, then this could also be done in software center ? although I never noticed this problem until recently | 09:25 |
ikt | I'm not sure tbh | 09:30 |
ikt | I've never had apt ask me about the source | 09:30 |
=== ogra_ac is now known as ogra_ | ||
BUGabundo | o/ | 11:13 |
Abhijit | hi | 14:44 |
Abhijit | need to submit bug for ubuntu notificatioons. plese tell me the package name. | 14:44 |
hggdh | Abhijit: what do you mean by 'Ubuntu notifications'? Indicator? | 14:49 |
Abhijit | yes | 14:49 |
Abhijit | hggdh, like sound bar | 14:49 |
Abhijit | gwibber notificatioon | 14:49 |
Abhijit | etc | 14:49 |
Abhijit | that | 14:49 |
hggdh | Abhijit: then it is (probably) indicator-applet | 14:50 |
Abhijit | okay thanks hggdh | 14:50 |
Abhijit | hi guys | 14:58 |
Abhijit | should i go to #kubuntu-bugs for kde bugs or here is okay? hggdh ? | 14:59 |
Abhijit | ah okay i head to there | 15:00 |
hggdh | Abhijit: #hubuntu-bugs will know more about KDE bugs; if no response, you can try here | 15:09 |
Abhijit | O.o | 15:09 |
Abhijit | hggdh, if you mean #kubuntu-bugs then yes i gone there already. :-p | 15:09 |
Abhijit | hggdh, and they said to submit it upstream. so will do it later. | 15:10 |
Abhijit | hggdh, just to confirm should i submit gourment recipe manager bug here only or go upstream? | 15:10 |
Abhijit | hggdh, ?? | 15:13 |
hggdh | Abhijit: please be patient, we may be busy elsewhere (as I was) | 15:21 |
Abhijit | yeah okay | 15:21 |
Abhijit | i am patient | 15:21 |
hggdh | gourment recipe manager? | 15:21 |
* hggdh goes digging data about it | 15:21 | |
Abhijit | yes | 15:22 |
Abhijit | hggdh, yes | 15:23 |
hggdh | gourmet, you mean, correct? | 15:23 |
Abhijit | yes | 15:24 |
Abhijit | its in software center | 15:24 |
Abhijit | in software center in search type the word 'recipe' | 15:24 |
Abhijit | and gourment will be first result | 15:24 |
hggdh | Abhijit: gourmet -- no 'n' before the 't' | 15:25 |
Abhijit | :-) | 15:25 |
Abhijit | yeah! | 15:25 |
hggdh | Abhijit: you can open the bug here for record, but (a) it is an Universe package, so it is a target of opportunity for contributors; (b) it would help to _also_ open the upstream bug, and link both to each other | 15:26 |
Abhijit | hggdh, ok so first i submit here. and now i also go upstream too. thank you for yout time! :-) | 15:26 |
hggdh | Abhijit: correct | 15:27 |
hggdh | and thank you | 15:27 |
Abhijit | hggdh, this is the launchpad one https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gourmet/+bug/744302 | 15:27 |
Abhijit | :-) | 15:27 |
ubot4` | Launchpad bug 744302 in gourmet (Ubuntu) "gourment automatically selects the section (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 15:27 |
hggdh | Abhijit: ok, I have some points I would like to raise re. 744302 | 15:30 |
Abhijit | hggdh, sure! :-) | 15:30 |
hggdh | (1) you show a bug in gourmet in English -- not always auto-selecting the right section; | 15:31 |
Abhijit | wait wait | 15:31 |
hggdh | (2) you show another bug -- perhaps the same, perhaps not -- on *not* English: always selecting the wrong section | 15:31 |
Abhijit | hggdh, i dont understand that above whole sentence 1st one | 15:31 |
hggdh | no problem | 15:32 |
Abhijit | hggdh, hey wait you doont get my point. why i mentioned that english and non english thing becuase | 15:32 |
=== bcurtiswx_ is now known as bcurtiswx | ||
Abhijit | in english 'very few times' some times it does select it correctly. but thats very few. | 15:32 |
hggdh | OK | 15:32 |
Abhijit | but in my native language it never does that. i just wanted to point out the difference | 15:32 |
Abhijit | in short bug exist for both languages | 15:33 |
hggdh | Abhijit: so far a *similar* bug exists for both languages; perhaps it can be extended to others | 15:33 |
Abhijit | hggdh, do you mean i should to submit two different bugs? | 15:34 |
hggdh | (other languages) | 15:34 |
hggdh | no | 15:34 |
Abhijit | then? | 15:34 |
hggdh | I am just pointing out to you that there is a risk on assuming | 15:35 |
hggdh | but moving on | 15:35 |
Abhijit | oh i see okay | 15:35 |
hggdh | you then propose to *change* the way gourmet works: add an option to either always preselect the sections, or to never preselect the sections | 15:36 |
Abhijit | wait | 15:36 |
Abhijit | it will be radio button selection | 15:36 |
Abhijit | 1. autoselect sectioons for all webpages | 15:37 |
Abhijit | 2. ask on each time | 15:37 |
Abhijit | hggdh, ^^ | 15:37 |
hggdh | Abhijit: this is implementation detail | 15:37 |
Abhijit | yes | 15:37 |
hggdh | but still it will either preselect or *not* preselect | 15:37 |
hggdh | the issue I have with it is there is nothing in the above proposal that fixes the bug you raised | 15:38 |
hggdh | so I can still click the radio button and get the wrong section preselected | 15:38 |
Abhijit | yes | 15:39 |
hggdh | so? | 15:39 |
hggdh | what fixes the bug? | 15:39 |
Abhijit | but who those aware of this setting will change it to ask on each so they will be like me benefitint | 15:39 |
Abhijit | but those who only using enlish website dont need this | 15:39 |
hggdh | Abhijit: I am afraid this will not resolve the bug | 15:39 |
Abhijit | hggdh, then what to do? | 15:39 |
hggdh | Abhijit: *fix* the wrong section selection | 15:40 |
hggdh | :-) | 15:40 |
Abhijit | hggdh, currently this is really annoying to me becaue there are lots of recipe i download from web and each time i manually neeed to first unselect all sectioosn becuase they all are wrong? what should i do? | 15:40 |
Abhijit | hggdh, how to fix it? its not in english? | 15:40 |
hggdh | Abhijit: you pointed an error in the application -- it is selecting the wrong sections. Instead of adding code to BYPASS the bug, we should *correct* it | 15:41 |
Abhijit | oh yes | 15:42 |
Abhijit | hggdh, but now another questions come how? since its for non english webpages? who will do it? | 15:42 |
Abhijit | hggdh, if you want i will change the description of the bug accourdingly. should i ? | 15:42 |
hggdh | Abhijit: first of all, you have to find out how the application selects sections | 15:43 |
Abhijit | ok | 15:43 |
hggdh | Abhijit: I am _not* involved with gourmet. I can still state that if I were to be involved, I would refuse your bug | 15:44 |
hggdh | Abhijit: your suggesting does not solve the issue | 15:44 |
hggdh | Abhijit: it may well be a good thing to be implemented, but IT DOES NOT SOLVE THE BUG | 15:45 |
hggdh | and this is an important thing | 15:45 |
hggdh | you point out a bug, and then you propose a way that will allow you to select to bypass the bug, but does NOT correct it | 15:45 |
Abhijit | hggdh, ok. but now what should i do? | 15:46 |
hggdh | it is sort of a non sequitur | 15:46 |
Abhijit | hggdh, as of now i am not in situation to fix the bug? because fixing will reauire coding? | 15:46 |
hggdh | Abhijit: point out the issue -- you already did that. Now, either submit it upstream, and wait for someone to look at it or | 15:46 |
Abhijit | hggdh, yes i am going to submit it upstream. | 15:47 |
hggdh | Abhijit: find out what would need to be done (grab the source code, chat with the upstream developers, read) | 15:47 |
Abhijit | hggdh, and thanks for clearing me. | 15:47 |
Abhijit | yeah | 15:47 |
hggdh | perhaps it needs coding, perhaps it does not | 15:47 |
Abhijit | ok | 15:47 |
hggdh | but if you do not try to find out you will not really know | 15:47 |
Abhijit | yeah ......but dont have that much time. really! i have time to submit bug that i can do for now! | 15:48 |
Abhijit | :-) | 15:48 |
Abhijit | and that is i am doing. so far 3 bugs submited! | 15:48 |
hggdh | Abhijit: good enough, and very good indeed | 15:48 |
Abhijit | for goourmet that is. | 15:48 |
hggdh | it is not that we have to do it all -- we do not, 99% of us are volunteers | 15:49 |
hggdh | but we shoudl try to do the right thing ;-) | 15:49 |
hggdh | at least the right step | 15:50 |
Abhijit | yeah | 15:50 |
Abhijit | sure | 15:50 |
hggdh | Abhijit: by the way thank you for your interest and willingness to help | 15:50 |
Abhijit | hggdh, :-) sure! | 15:50 |
hggdh | opening a bug DOES help | 15:50 |
Abhijit | yes! :-) | 15:51 |
hggdh | :-) | 15:51 |
* drkenobi_work drkenobi-w | 18:54 | |
=== drkenobi_work is now known as drkenobi-w | ||
=== em is now known as emma | ||
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_fewd | ||
=== bdrung_ is now known as bdrung | ||
=== BUGa_fewd is now known as BUGabundo |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!