=== phisko_ is now known as kyofel_
=== kyofel_ is now known as kyofel
[01:32] <penguin42> can someone set prio on 743324 - it's my bug so I won't recommend one; but its pretty important for netbooks
[01:32] <penguin42> bug 743324
[01:32] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 743324 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Allocate drive space window too large for netbook - can't get to buttons (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/743324
[01:44] <paultag> penguin42: I think there's a workaround. Regardless, set.
[01:44] <paultag> penguin42: thanks! :)
[02:00] <penguin42> thanks
=== ravitejavad is now known as rav
[09:08] <ikt> has any progress been made on this bug:
[09:08] <ikt> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/705988
[09:08] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 705988 in software-center (Ubuntu) "[master] Untrusted packages can not be installed (affects: 81) (dups: 28) (heat: 286)" [Medium,Confirmed]
[09:08] <ikt> I was just affected by it, it's not nice :/
[09:13] <abhinav-> ikt:  I am also affected by it :-/
[09:13] <abhinav-> although installing from command line using apt allows to confirm the source
[09:20] <ikt> I unticked the 'Canonical Partners' in the other sources tab of software sources and it seemed to fix it
[09:21] <ikt> I've seen 5 different work arounds
[09:21] <ikt> but this shouldn't be a bug at all in a program that has such a simple job to do
[09:25] <abhinav-> ikt : if apt asks the user about confirming the authenticity of the source, then this could also be done in software center ? although I never noticed this problem until recently
[09:30] <ikt> I'm not sure tbh
[09:30] <ikt> I've never had apt ask me about the source
=== ogra_ac is now known as ogra_
[11:13] <BUGabundo> o/
[14:44] <Abhijit> hi
[14:44] <Abhijit> need to submit bug for ubuntu notificatioons. plese tell me the package name.
[14:49] <hggdh> Abhijit: what do you mean by 'Ubuntu notifications'? Indicator?
[14:49] <Abhijit> yes
[14:49] <Abhijit> hggdh, like sound bar
[14:49] <Abhijit> gwibber notificatioon
[14:49] <Abhijit> etc
[14:49] <Abhijit> that
[14:50] <hggdh> Abhijit: then it is (probably) indicator-applet
[14:50] <Abhijit> okay thanks hggdh
[14:58] <Abhijit> hi guys
[14:59] <Abhijit> should i go to #kubuntu-bugs for kde bugs or here is okay? hggdh ?
[15:00] <Abhijit> ah okay i head to there
[15:09] <hggdh> Abhijit: #hubuntu-bugs will know more about KDE bugs; if no response, you can try here
[15:09] <Abhijit> O.o
[15:09] <Abhijit> hggdh, if you mean #kubuntu-bugs then yes i gone there already. :-p
[15:10] <Abhijit> hggdh, and they said to submit it upstream. so will do it later.
[15:10] <Abhijit> hggdh, just to confirm should i submit gourment recipe manager bug here only or go upstream?
[15:13] <Abhijit> hggdh, ??
[15:21] <hggdh> Abhijit: please be patient, we may be busy elsewhere (as I was)
[15:21] <Abhijit> yeah okay
[15:21] <Abhijit> i am patient
[15:21] <hggdh> gourment recipe manager?
[15:21]  * hggdh goes digging data about it
[15:22] <Abhijit> yes
[15:23] <Abhijit> hggdh, yes
[15:23] <hggdh> gourmet, you mean, correct?
[15:24] <Abhijit> yes
[15:24] <Abhijit> its in software center
[15:24] <Abhijit> in software center in search type the word 'recipe'
[15:24] <Abhijit> and gourment will be first result
[15:25] <hggdh> Abhijit: gourmet -- no 'n' before the 't'
[15:25] <Abhijit> :-)
[15:25] <Abhijit> yeah!
[15:26] <hggdh> Abhijit: you can open the bug here for record, but (a) it is an Universe package, so it is a target of opportunity for contributors; (b) it would help to _also_ open the upstream bug, and link both to each other
[15:26] <Abhijit> hggdh, ok so first i submit here. and now i also go upstream too. thank you for yout time! :-)
[15:27] <hggdh> Abhijit: correct
[15:27] <hggdh> and thank you
[15:27] <Abhijit> hggdh, this is the launchpad one https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gourmet/+bug/744302
[15:27] <Abhijit> :-)
[15:27] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 744302 in gourmet (Ubuntu) "gourment automatically selects the section (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[15:30] <hggdh> Abhijit: ok, I have some points I would like to raise re. 744302
[15:30] <Abhijit> hggdh, sure! :-)
[15:31] <hggdh> (1) you show a bug in gourmet in English -- not always auto-selecting the right section;
[15:31] <Abhijit> wait wait
[15:31] <hggdh> (2) you show another bug -- perhaps the same, perhaps not -- on *not* English: always selecting the wrong section
[15:31] <Abhijit> hggdh, i dont understand that above whole sentence 1st one
[15:32] <hggdh> no problem
[15:32] <Abhijit> hggdh, hey wait you doont get my point. why i mentioned that english and non english thing becuase
=== bcurtiswx_ is now known as bcurtiswx
[15:32] <Abhijit> in english 'very few times' some times it does select it correctly. but thats very few.
[15:32] <hggdh> OK
[15:32] <Abhijit> but in my native language it never does that. i just wanted to point out the difference
[15:33] <Abhijit> in short bug exist for both languages
[15:33] <hggdh> Abhijit: so far a *similar* bug exists for both languages; perhaps it can be extended to others
[15:34] <Abhijit> hggdh, do you mean i should to submit two different bugs?
[15:34] <hggdh> (other languages)
[15:34] <hggdh> no
[15:34] <Abhijit> then?
[15:35] <hggdh> I am just pointing out to you that there is a risk on assuming
[15:35] <hggdh> but moving on
[15:35] <Abhijit> oh i see okay
[15:36] <hggdh> you then propose to *change* the way gourmet works: add an option to either always preselect the sections, or to never preselect the sections
[15:36] <Abhijit> wait
[15:36] <Abhijit> it will be radio button selection
[15:37] <Abhijit> 1. autoselect sectioons for all webpages
[15:37] <Abhijit> 2. ask on each time
[15:37] <Abhijit> hggdh, ^^
[15:37] <hggdh> Abhijit: this is implementation detail
[15:37] <Abhijit> yes
[15:37] <hggdh> but still it will either preselect or *not* preselect
[15:38] <hggdh> the issue I have with it is there is nothing in the above proposal that fixes the bug you raised
[15:38] <hggdh> so I can still click the radio button and get the wrong section preselected
[15:39] <Abhijit> yes
[15:39] <hggdh> so?
[15:39] <hggdh> what fixes the bug?
[15:39] <Abhijit> but who those aware of this setting will change it to ask on each so they will be like me benefitint
[15:39] <Abhijit> but those who only using enlish website dont need this
[15:39] <hggdh> Abhijit: I am afraid this will not resolve the bug
[15:39] <Abhijit> hggdh, then what to do?
[15:40] <hggdh> Abhijit: *fix* the wrong section selection
[15:40] <hggdh> :-)
[15:40] <Abhijit> hggdh, currently this is really annoying to me becaue there are lots of recipe i download from web and each time i manually neeed to first unselect all sectioosn becuase they all are wrong? what should i do?
[15:40] <Abhijit> hggdh, how to fix it? its not in english?
[15:41] <hggdh> Abhijit: you pointed an error in the application -- it is selecting the wrong sections. Instead of adding code to BYPASS the bug, we should *correct* it
[15:42] <Abhijit> oh yes
[15:42] <Abhijit> hggdh, but now another questions come how? since its for non english webpages? who will do it?
[15:42] <Abhijit> hggdh, if you want i will change the description of the bug accourdingly. should i ?
[15:43] <hggdh> Abhijit: first of all, you have to find out how the application selects sections
[15:43] <Abhijit> ok
[15:44] <hggdh> Abhijit: I am _not* involved with gourmet. I can still state that if I were to be involved, I would refuse your bug
[15:44] <hggdh> Abhijit: your suggesting does not solve the issue
[15:45] <hggdh> Abhijit: it may well be a good thing to be implemented, but IT DOES NOT SOLVE THE BUG
[15:45] <hggdh> and this is an important thing
[15:45] <hggdh> you point out a bug, and then you propose a way that will allow you to select to bypass the bug, but does NOT correct it
[15:46] <Abhijit> hggdh, ok. but now what should i do?
[15:46] <hggdh> it is sort of a non sequitur
[15:46] <Abhijit> hggdh, as of now i am not in situation to fix the bug? because fixing will reauire coding?
[15:46] <hggdh> Abhijit: point out the issue -- you already did that. Now, either submit it upstream, and wait for someone to look at it or
[15:47] <Abhijit> hggdh, yes i am going to submit it upstream.
[15:47] <hggdh> Abhijit: find out what would need to be done (grab the source code, chat with the upstream developers, read)
[15:47] <Abhijit> hggdh, and thanks for clearing me.
[15:47] <Abhijit> yeah
[15:47] <hggdh> perhaps it needs coding, perhaps it does not
[15:47] <Abhijit> ok
[15:47] <hggdh> but if you do not try to find out you will not really know
[15:48] <Abhijit> yeah ......but dont have that much time. really! i have time to submit bug that i can do for now!
[15:48] <Abhijit> :-)
[15:48] <Abhijit> and that is i am doing. so far 3 bugs submited!
[15:48] <hggdh> Abhijit: good enough, and very good indeed
[15:48] <Abhijit> for goourmet that is.
[15:49] <hggdh> it is not that we have to do it all -- we do not, 99% of us are volunteers
[15:49] <hggdh> but we shoudl try to do the right thing ;-)
[15:50] <hggdh> at least the right step
[15:50] <Abhijit> yeah
[15:50] <Abhijit> sure
[15:50] <hggdh> Abhijit: by the way thank you for your interest and willingness to help
[15:50] <Abhijit> hggdh, :-) sure!
[15:50] <hggdh> opening a bug DOES help
[15:51] <Abhijit> yes! :-)
[15:51] <hggdh> :-)
[18:54]  * drkenobi_work drkenobi-w
=== drkenobi_work is now known as drkenobi-w
=== em is now known as emma
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_fewd
=== bdrung_ is now known as bdrung
=== BUGa_fewd is now known as BUGabundo