[00:41] * penguin42 wonders about bug 745350 [00:41] Launchpad bug 745350 in firefox (Ubuntu) "while working on Firefox/Gmail, my cat sit down on keyboard (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/745350 [06:28] is there any active mentors around? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [13:22] hi [13:22] someone please triage this bug [13:22] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rednotebook/+bug/745657 [13:22] Launchpad bug 745657 in rednotebook (Ubuntu) "no password protection (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] === BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_jobIntervie [15:08] trinikrono: there are always at least one experienced triager here (and, probably, also a mentor) [16:27] hello i was asked to test with a mainline kernel [16:27] Does that mean i use this one http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/daily/current/ [16:28] i am on a fully updated 10.10 ubuntu [16:31] Tetsuo55: yes, that is the correct one [16:32] it says my boot is full [16:32] damn [16:32] need to clean up [16:39] will this now automatically be my new default kernel? [16:39] or do i need to choose it from the boot menu [16:40] i guess ill find out [16:47] hmm [16:47] with the daily kernel my screen problems are even worse [16:47] now the monitor is stuck on 1024x768, and it hasnt even detected the laptop monitor [16:48] does ubuntu add special patches for laptops and their ability to display on external monitors? [16:48] (to the kernel) [16:50] Tetsuo55: the Ubuntu kernel may have patches from upstream to address specific issues. The best way to find out is to look at the source package diff [16:50] i just installed the kernel that was compiled today from git [16:50] so that seems unlikely to me [16:50] unless by upstream you mean not-yet-committed-to-kernel.org [16:51] Tetsuo55: if you installed a kernel from the kernel ppa, then there are no Ubuntu patches [16:52] yes [16:52] ok finished burning natty nightly cd [16:52] so lets see what happens there [17:29] back, same problem on the latest natty build with regards to my hardware button not working [17:29] now on to the problem with 10.10 where my monitors are not correctly detected by the daily mainline kernel [17:29] i quickly saw an error flash by before the ubuntu desktop appeard [17:30] is that logged somewhere so i can find it? [17:35] could this be relevant? [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer [17:38] Tetsuo55: use the dmesg command and see if your error is there [17:41] mtrr: type mismatch for e0000000,10000000 old: write-back new: write-combining [17:41] [drm] MTRR allocation failed. Graphics performance may suffer. [17:41] lp: driver loaded but no devices found [17:41] [Firmware Bug]: Duplicate ACPI video bus devices for the same VGA controller, please try module parameter "video.allow_duplicates=1"if the current driver doesn't work. [17:42] [drm:i915_gem_mmap_gtt] *ERROR* Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer (6 times) [17:43] those are the errors i get, sorry for not using pastebin but my screen is tiny [17:43] i also get a lot more warnigns and even a segfault for other hardware [17:47] QA Weekly meeting in #ubuntu-quality in 14 minutes [18:09] Does this error suggest i need to install the kernel-matching headers?? bluetoothd[1281]: segfault at 7f4fdbbe4450 ip 00007f4ed9881664 sp 00007fff40f4d520 error 4 in libc-2.12.1.so[7f4ed980a000+17a000] [18:34] just looks like a bug in bluetoothd [18:37] Tetsuo55, you should probably open a bug against 'linux' about the i915 errors, and one different one for bluez if you can find a .crash file under /var/crash relating to the segfault line you copied [18:37] i may have found a fix [18:37] on google [18:37] just 2 more unfixed errors left [18:37] can i change this somewhere [18:38] ACPI: Deprecated procfs I/F for AC is loaded, please retry with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER cleared [18:38] ill report them all once i finish trying the workarounds [18:38] or does the ACPI thing require a recompile of the kernel [18:40] thats one and the other (MTRR) is supposedly solved by doing this http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1285176.html [18:40] brb [18:44] ok better, many errors are gone now [18:44] but one thing has failed to work [18:45] disabling all animation fixed the errors i was having (that appeared 6 times) [18:52] ohh i see my mistake [18:52] rebooting again [20:08] allright ive made some progress [20:08] the videocard problems are being caused by MTRR mismapping (for some reason it thinks i have 32gb of ram and the resulting mapping is blocking videocard memory from being writable or something) [20:09] now to fix it i need some way to specify the MTRR settings during bootup [20:09] i have used a tool to generate the exact settings for my systems. but i dont know where to specify them [20:12] hmm looks like there have been 9 bioses released since the current one i am using, and one contains a firmware update for the videocard [20:12] that might fix the problem [20:16] hmm how to run a windows bios update utility from ubuntu.... [22:23] can someone tell me what is the purpose of that depenencies.txt that are on all the bug reports, i realised it does not just list installed packages on a system , is the dependencies of the package itself? [22:24] trinikrono: yes, it should be the dependency tree of the package [22:25] oh cool :D [22:51] can bug 646699 be set to fix released since it is so in maverick [22:51] Launchpad bug 646699 in nautilus (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Nautilus; unclear whether cut or copy used (affects: 1) (heat: 21)" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/646699 [22:54] trinikrono: hm true, they seem to be highlighted now, so setting to fixed is ok [22:54] it would be nice to have a changelog that says that it was fixed, but that's probably not the case here [22:56] yes because it was implemented without considering the bug [22:56] yofel: what about if the reporter wanted this feature in lucid, would that be considered a backport? [22:58] hm, I don't think nautilus is really backportable (https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports) and we don't SRU new features [22:58] if anything it would be a backport [23:00] ok i will set as fix released and put a link to a article i found, http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/08/nautilus-update-in-maverick-bring-many-new-fixes-changes/ [23:04] If a bug is fixed in the current development release, it is Fix Released. If the bug also needs to be fixed in a stable release, use the "Target to release" link to nominate it for that release. [23:05] yofel: can i do that? [23:05] trinikrono: that's used for SRU tracking https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates [23:05] read the "When" and decide if that applies here [23:07] oho so only serious bugs, i will tell him to request a backport if he really wants then [23:22] trinikrono: backports are for new features generally, FYI [23:46] turns out the ubuntu kernel is heavily patched to work-around issues with my motherboard/videocard [23:46] so the vanilla mainline builds are unusable [23:47] the error still occurs, but in the official ubuntu kernel a few lines later a workaround is apploed [23:47] applied* [23:48] its the same for all the errors i had, they all have a workaround in place [23:48] so i updated my tickets :) [23:57] Tetsuo55: Hey well it's good those fixes are there and work [23:58] indeed [23:59] unfortunately they are still required with current kernel git-head/tip [23:59] its too bad because i wopuld like the wonders patch (new group scheduling)