[10:28] <thevariousJ> gday
[10:28] <thevariousJ> y r firefox & firefox-4.0 seperate ?
[10:28] <thevariousJ> I thought firefox-4.0 already had rc-status
[10:33] <thevariousJ> hmm...o.k just clicked on your link which directed me to ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable
[10:33] <thevariousJ> y r there 2 ppas ?
[12:17] <thevariousJ> :\
[14:06] <BUGabundo> why does FF4 always opens new windows when I have it set to tabs???????
[14:38] <chrisccoulson> fta - http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~chrisccoulson/libindicate/lp736240/revision/410 fixes your liferea issue
[14:40] <fta> chrisccoulson: thanks
[14:41] <fta> chrisccoulson, somehow, i would have used a define for the "com.canonical.indicate" prefix
[14:41] <chrisccoulson> possibly ;)
[14:41] <chrisccoulson> it doesn't matter too much though
[14:41] <fta> sure
[14:42] <fta> in my own code, i hate duplications
[14:42] <chrisccoulson> fta - if you change the interface name at a later date, it still needs to be changed in 2 files anyway
[14:42] <chrisccoulson> (it also needs to be changed in the xml description for the interface too)
[14:44] <fta> 1 line in 2 files, vs 16 lines in 1 file ;)
[14:45] <fta> damn, compiz re-organized my workspaces.. again
[14:45] <fta> i thought it was fixed :(
[18:22] <fta> micahg, jdstrand: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1715928  :(
[18:23] <jdstrand> that is unfortunate, but the password regression would be even more unfortunate and people would complain about a lack of testing or care with the update
[18:24] <jdstrand> micahg is investigating the issue so we can provide the update
[18:25] <jdstrand> the idea being to revert the new behavior with the last update to be that of what is in the archive now. if that can be done, we'd push it out (talk to micahg for details)
[18:25] <micahg> jdstrand: should I respond on the forum?
[18:26] <jdstrand> micahg: probably a good idea. just say the update hasn't happened because of a regression and link to the upstream bug. then say the problem is being investigated by us and google
[18:27] <jdstrand> micahg: and by 'us', I mean 'Ubuntu', not the security team or you or anyone specifically
[18:27] <jdstrand> s/ally//
[18:27] <jdstrand> my two cents anyway :)
[18:42] <micahg> fta: sorry, I've been sick the past couple days and haven't been moving as fast as I would like, I'll try to get this sorted out today
[18:43] <fta> ok
[18:43] <fta> in the meantime, i will update natty for the arm ftbfs
[18:43] <micahg> fta: sounds good
[18:44] <fta> bug 745854
[18:44] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 745854 in chromium-browser "chromium-browser version 10.0.648.204~r79063-0ubuntu1 failed to build on armel" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/745854