cnd | bryceh, there's no upstream status for them | 00:01 |
---|---|---|
cnd | because the support is built on top of the multitouch work | 00:01 |
cnd | which doesn't exist in upstream synaptics yet :) | 00:01 |
cnd | I can note this if you'd like | 00:02 |
cnd | tbh, I'm not sure what to do with upstream x synaptics either, because they will need to resolve the issue without multitouch support | 00:02 |
cnd | which will be rather difficult | 00:02 |
cnd | bryceh, btw, in case you get any questions about input coordinate transformation (swap axes, rotate, etc.): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/InputCoordinateTransformation | 00:04 |
bryceh | ok, yeah just indicate they're dependent on ubuntu's MT framework or something, that should be enough | 00:05 |
bryceh | cnd, excellent thanks | 00:05 |
bryceh | cnd, I've read through the patches and roughly follow the changes, no comment on them since I'm not super familiar with this stuff but looks sane | 00:05 |
cnd | bryceh, ok, cool | 00:07 |
cnd | they're in our ppa so I hope they are getting some testing by a handful of people | 00:08 |
bryceh | cnd, and yeah it's too late for beta1 but go ahead and push into -synaptics git packaging tree | 00:08 |
cnd | ok | 00:08 |
bryceh | in the meanwhile I'll load it on my laptops and netbook to dog food it a bit | 00:08 |
cnd | I'd like to get them pushed as soon as beta 1 is released so we get as much exposure early on as possible :) | 00:08 |
bryceh | sounds good | 00:09 |
cnd | it actually makes my trackpad soooo much better | 00:09 |
cnd | that gave me a bit of a kick in my step today :) | 00:09 |
bryceh | :-) | 00:09 |
ScottK | bryceh: So I'm in Natty on may main laptop now and finding in much better for Intel 945 than Maverick. | 00:09 |
bryceh | ScottK, good to hear | 00:12 |
bryceh | ScottK, in terms of stability, performance, ...? | 00:12 |
ScottK | yes. | 00:12 |
bryceh | nice | 00:12 |
ScottK | Actually mostly performance and quality of the display. | 00:12 |
ScottK | I didn't have a lot of stability trouble since just after maverick release. | 00:13 |
ScottK | I just upgraded today, so it'll be a few days before I have a solid opinion on stability. | 00:13 |
tjaalton | the spurious mouse button release/clicks turned out to be due to the microswitch. cleaned it up and can't reproduce it anymore :) | 12:22 |
alkisg | Is there a proprietary nvidia driver that supports Vanta? (1999) | 13:13 |
alkisg | I believe I'd need nvidia-71, but I can't find it in the archives. Should I try this? http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_ia32_71.86.13.html | 13:16 |
alkisg | Or should I try the one from debian sid? http://packages.debian.org/sid/nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx | 13:20 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
jcristau | you won't be able to use that with a halfway recent xserver. | 13:21 |
tjaalton | there probably is no blob that supports both your card and current(ish) xserver | 13:21 |
tjaalton | echo | 13:21 |
Sarvatt | alkisg: I think ~2.6.18 is the latest kernel that supports too | 13:22 |
alkisg | Ah :( That's on a chroot, to be served on netbooted clients (LTSP). I can build a hardy chroot, if needed. | 13:22 |
alkisg | I saw a -glx-71 package for hardy, would that do? | 13:22 |
alkisg | http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/nvidia-glx-legacy | 13:24 |
tjaalton | the nvidia page shows that it should work, so.. maybe | 13:26 |
alkisg | Thank you guys, I'll give that a try | 13:27 |
cnd | bryceh, didrocks said you might know somethign/be able to help about the new fglrx not working with unity from the daily build ppa | 19:59 |
tjaalton | cnd: Sarvatt said it'd need a newer compiz? | 20:04 |
Sarvatt | that was tseliot | 20:04 |
tjaalton | ah, sorry | 20:05 |
Sarvatt | http://fossplanet.com/f10/%5Bubuntu-x%5D-fglrx-support-natty-118210/ | 20:05 |
cnd | tjaalton, yeah, I've got the new compiz | 20:06 |
cnd | compiz seems to be running fine | 20:06 |
cnd | it's the panel and the launcher that seem broken | 20:06 |
Sarvatt | + // Avoid detection of the compiz program by the fglrx driver. | 20:10 |
Sarvatt | + // Change program name to work around app detection in fglrx, | 20:10 |
Sarvatt | + // which is needed for older versions of compiz but breaks this | 20:10 |
Sarvatt | + // version of compiz. | 20:10 |
Sarvatt | sheesh | 20:10 |
Sarvatt | got my ati box doing another set of upgrades, lets see if I have the same problem.. | 20:11 |
jcristau | hahaha | 20:11 |
bryceh | Sarvatt, yeah | 20:11 |
bryceh | Sarvatt, I take it you weren't cc'd on that massive internal thread we had about that? | 20:11 |
Sarvatt | which one? was on one a few weeks ago when we set up the PPA | 20:12 |
bryceh | after that one X-) | 20:12 |
Sarvatt | woohoo, yeah I missed out :) | 20:12 |
bryceh | gotta love working on proprietary drivers :-/ | 20:12 |
Sarvatt | I'm going to get those fugly scrollbars forced on me if I use the unity PPA aren't I? :P | 20:14 |
bryceh | I think they're cute (but haven't tried using them yet) | 20:15 |
bryceh | man I'm getting sick of -intel gpu lockup bugs | 20:19 |
Sarvatt | want to just turn them off? they're firing when the system recovers fine now too | 20:20 |
bryceh | still? thought apw fixed that | 20:21 |
Sarvatt | vblank_mode=0 glxgears on a sandybridge system is a good example | 20:21 |
bryceh | no, we should leave them on, there's still some legit problems | 20:21 |
Sarvatt | dmesg flooded with hangcheck timer messages, crash report every 2-3 seconds in /var/crash/ | 20:21 |
Sarvatt | only visible problem is a stutter while it does the dump | 20:21 |
bryceh | any idea what causes it? | 20:22 |
bryceh | just inconsistent vblanking or something? | 20:22 |
Sarvatt | nope, apparently ickle can't reproduce it | 20:22 |
Sarvatt | compiz + sandybridge + vblank_mode=0 glxgears always triggers it here | 20:22 |
bryceh | well, you know we still gotta update the apport hook to stop using intel_gpu_dump | 20:23 |
Sarvatt | ok without adding the unity PPA choosing a Ubuntu session launches a classic session, adding the PPA now | 20:25 |
Sarvatt | err, classic desktop picking the ubuntu session with it too.. | 20:30 |
Sarvatt | unity works with fglrx if i start it manually, of course I can't get rid of gnome-panel thats over top of it | 20:34 |
Sarvatt | don't know whats up with that, unity was working fine without fglrx | 20:35 |
Sarvatt | of course i did the weekly 600mb upgrade before rebooting too | 20:36 |
Sarvatt | removed fglrx and unity session works again, very odd | 20:37 |
Sarvatt | lessee what .xsession-errors has to say, maybe it bails out of unity for some reason | 20:38 |
Sarvatt | out of all my systems, the one using r600g by far has the best experience in unity | 20:40 |
Sarvatt | thats strange, compiz doesn't even try to load with fglrx installed | 20:41 |
Sarvatt | http://paste.ubuntu.com/587508/ http://paste.ubuntu.com/587509/ | 20:42 |
Sarvatt | http://paste.ubuntu.com/587510/ | 20:43 |
Sarvatt | cnd: I don't know what bug you're actually having after discussing my fglrx/unity problem in #ubuntu-desktop.. | 21:13 |
Sarvatt | cnd: have you been dist-upgrading that machine? is it possible you dont have gnome-panel installed? | 21:13 |
Sarvatt | it tried to remove it a few times in the past month or two here | 21:14 |
Sarvatt | the unity session falls back to the classic gnome session because of a screwed up exit status after running /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p | 21:14 |
Sarvatt | just with fglrx | 21:14 |
cnd | Sarvatt, I still have the panel in unity 2d | 21:15 |
Sarvatt | cnd: but do you have the gnome-panel package installed? I dunno if unity-2d uses that | 21:15 |
cnd | I'll check | 21:15 |
cnd | unity_support_test -p says everything looks good | 21:15 |
cnd | but unity_support_test alone returns 234 | 21:16 |
cnd | instead of 0 | 21:16 |
Sarvatt | do a echo $? after running it | 21:16 |
Sarvatt | yeah thats what I get | 21:16 |
cnd | I still have gnome-panel installed | 21:16 |
cnd | so to test out unity, I have to hack up /usr/share/gnome-session/sessions/ubuntu.session | 21:17 |
Sarvatt | maybe if I install unity-2d the panels will be screwed too, lets see :) | 21:17 |
cnd | and replace the IsRunnableHelper with /bin/true | 21:17 |
Sarvatt | didrocks said the unity_support_test will be fixed in tomorrows build | 21:18 |
cnd | yeah | 21:18 |
Sarvatt | ah yea i see it tries to do a unity-2d session as the fallback first if its installed, thats probably where things are getting screwed up | 21:20 |
cnd | oh, so if you uninstall unity-2d things work? | 21:20 |
Sarvatt | i just installed it to see if the panels are screwed | 21:20 |
Sarvatt | hasnt come up yet | 21:20 |
Sarvatt | the classic session fallback for sure works here | 21:21 |
Sarvatt | nope unity-2d works fine | 21:21 |
cnd | yes, but does unity 3d still work after installing unity-2d? | 21:21 |
cnd | unity 2d works fine here too | 21:21 |
cnd | just not unity 3d | 21:21 |
Sarvatt | i mean choosing a ubuntu session which should start unity after unity-2d is installed to see if the fallback to unity-2d works does work so that theory is out the window | 21:22 |
Sarvatt | yeesh confusing myself | 21:22 |
cnd | oh | 21:22 |
Sarvatt | was hoping the ubuntu session fallback to unity-2d might be where the panels were getting lost for you but it works here :) | 21:23 |
cnd | yeah | 21:24 |
Amaranth | Ok, now I think my computer is just screwing with me | 22:04 |
Amaranth | Latest updates from edgers resulted in some king of GPU hang when starting compiz so I did a ppa-purge and now with stock natty stuff GLES is working again | 22:04 |
Sarvatt | yep latest update borked sandybridge here too | 22:05 |
Sarvatt | it was 5 days of updates in one though since libdrm was busted | 22:05 |
Amaranth | Sarvatt: That part isn't surprising, the surprising part is GLES stuff randomly working again | 22:06 |
Amaranth | Although I still can't run compiz due to "symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/egl/egl_dri2.so: undefined symbol: _glapi_get_proc_address" but oh well | 22:08 |
Sarvatt | Amaranth: check out https://launchpad.net/~sarvatt/+archive/vanhoof if you want mesa speeds not to suck | 22:09 |
Sarvatt | https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32677 ? | 22:09 |
ubot4` | Freedesktop bug 32677 in Other "egl_dri.so depends on _glapi_get_proc_address" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] | 22:09 |
Amaranth | Sarvatt: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34476 | 22:10 |
ubot4` | Freedesktop bug 34476 in Mesa core "/usr/lib/egl/egl_dri2.so needs libGL but not link to it" [Normal,New] | 22:10 |
Amaranth | But they look like the same bug | 22:10 |
Amaranth | Although I'm not sure why this only hits compiz | 22:10 |
Amaranth | Oh, because core doens't link to libGL or libGLES, we dlopen our libopengl.so plugin | 22:11 |
Sarvatt | so you're hitting a bug where gles isn't working over egl_dri2 in 7.11, and missing that other bug because of libglapi, and hitting that other bug in 7.10.. ugh | 22:12 |
Sarvatt | libglapi-mesa was the fix for the _glapi_get_proc_address problem | 22:14 |
Amaranth | Yeah, but that's only in 7.11 which breaks GLES, like you said :) | 22:16 |
Amaranth | I suppose I can just patch compiz to work around this for now, I guess | 22:19 |
Sarvatt | i'm not seeing any obvious reason why gles is broken over dri, wonder if the shared dricore has anything to do with it | 22:21 |
* Sarvatt squints at --enable-shared-glapi | 22:26 | |
Sarvatt | Amaranth: is es2_info showing you softpipe results on 7.10? | 22:31 |
Sarvatt | it is here | 22:31 |
Amaranth | Sarvatt: If I don't define EGL_DRIVER, yes | 22:31 |
Sarvatt | thats the same as EGL_DRIVER=egl_gallium es2_info on 7.11 | 22:31 |
Sarvatt | oh ok | 22:31 |
Sarvatt | yep egl_dri2 is actually working here too on stock natty | 22:32 |
Amaranth | I've just stuck export EGL_DRIVER=egl_dri2 in my ~/.bashrc | 22:32 |
Amaranth | Yeah, for me as well | 22:32 |
Sarvatt | i dont see -DHAVE_SHARED_GLAPI in the build and looking at the egl_dri2 source i'm thinking it needs it | 22:33 |
Sarvatt | going to try building edgers mesa with --enable-shared-glapi | 22:34 |
Amaranth | Don't you already do that for edgers mesa? | 22:34 |
Amaranth | RAOF pointed me to it because you build with that :) | 22:34 |
Sarvatt | I thought it was enabled by default, I'm not forcing it enabled or anything but it looks like egl_dri2 compiles differently if you do force it enabled.. | 22:35 |
RAOF | Um, yeah. Why aren't you building with --enable-shared-glapi? :) | 22:36 |
Sarvatt | it's building a shared glapi lib without it | 22:37 |
RAOF | The more you know™ | 22:38 |
Sarvatt | only ifeq ($(SHARED_GLAPI),1) isn't returning true so its not building egl_dri2 with it enabled? | 22:38 |
* Sarvatt is confused | 22:38 | |
Amaranth | Ok, so let's try a build with --enable-shared-glapi :) | 22:40 |
Sarvatt | started off a build, lets see how it goes | 22:40 |
Amaranth | Although since something else is killing SNB in general right now I'm not sure I'll be able to test it for you | 22:40 |
Sarvatt | ah hell yer right, i shoulda used the 0325 checkout | 22:41 |
Sarvatt | glad i still have the source handy | 22:41 |
Sarvatt | so much for taking off early because I had to be up at 7 for a call :P | 22:44 |
Amaranth | eep | 22:45 |
Sarvatt | will know in about 20 minutes, this i7-2620M isnt very fast | 22:45 |
Amaranth | Sarvatt: Is that by any chance a fruit product? :) | 22:46 |
Amaranth | Also how can you say that's not fast? Compared to what? | 22:46 |
Sarvatt | got a i7-2820qm in another laptop thats tons faster, nope its not it's a dell :) | 22:46 |
Sarvatt | and 2500k and 2600k in the desktops blow them all away but i got discrete gpu's in those at the moment testing fglrx and nvidia.. | 22:47 |
Amaranth | 2820M will only be faster for compiles | 22:48 |
Sarvatt | the 2620 is a dual core, mesa loves the quads | 22:48 |
Amaranth | Which is what you're doing so yeah | 22:48 |
bjsnider | Sarvatt, how fast is the sandybridge graphics in natty? | 22:48 |
bjsnider | compared to previous intl stuff | 22:48 |
Amaranth | phoronix had a benchmark, it's like 20% of the windows driver | 22:49 |
Sarvatt | pretty crappy until the new mesa gets uploaded, unity is slow as heck | 22:49 |
Amaranth | I haven't noticed unity being slow | 22:49 |
bjsnider | that sucks | 22:49 |
Sarvatt | Amaranth: do you not use the search to find apps? | 22:49 |
Sarvatt | typing in that is a lagfest | 22:50 |
Amaranth | oh god | 22:50 |
Sarvatt | Amaranth: compare it to https://launchpad.net/~sarvatt/+archive/vanhoof, it'll blow your mind | 22:50 |
Amaranth | Yeah, I made my dock 32px so I should shove 10 apps on there so I don't use the dash much | 22:50 |
Amaranth | Yeah, 7.11 already has that patch so I've seen the difference | 22:51 |
Sarvatt | in windows its basically the same as a hd5470m discrete GPU, about the same as a 9600 on the nvidia side | 22:52 |
Amaranth | It makes low end discrete GPUs a waste of money :) | 22:53 |
Sarvatt | funny story about that, an OEM was gonna ship a discrete model and had to change the discrete GPU at the last minute because the sandybridge side was faster :P | 22:54 |
bjsnider | doesn't sound much different than a gma4500 | 22:54 |
Sarvatt | oh it blows that away, at least 10x faster | 22:54 |
Sarvatt | yay debs building now, didnt have to screw with .symbols | 22:55 |
Amaranth | Ok so I changed compiz's call to dlopen from RTLD_LAZY to RTLD_LAZY|RTLD_GLOBAL as a temporary hack and now my desktop can run GLES builds of compiz too | 22:56 |
bryceh | hey do we still support hibernate? bug 745304 says he sees graphics corruption and wondering if I should wontfix it | 22:57 |
ubot4` | Launchpad bug 745304 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Graphics corruption after hibernate with Intel GMA 3150 chipset (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/745304 | 22:57 |
=== cnd` is now known as cnd | ||
Sarvatt | yeah its still offered (unless you have an encrypted /home apparently) | 22:59 |
bryceh | ok | 22:59 |
Amaranth | after a week of messing with different library versions and getting an ARM development board up and running so I can test this stuff I make a one-line change and it works just fine on my desktop | 22:59 |
Sarvatt | --enable-shared-glapi made no difference | 23:00 |
Amaranth | Sarvatt: Does it not set the define or does the define not help? | 23:01 |
Sarvatt | yeah it sets the define right | 23:01 |
Sarvatt | will make that change in edgers regardless | 23:01 |
jhammons | Hi all. Should I expect hardware accelerated video for my crappy graphics card using the PPA? I have "Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c)" It worked in 10.04, but after upgrading to 10.10 I've had no such luck. :( | 23:06 |
RAOF | jhammons: That should be well supported by basically every release of Ubuntu ever. | 23:08 |
jhammons | :( | 23:08 |
jhammons | That's what I thought. | 23:08 |
RAOF | Although if you've upgraded from 10.04 to 10.10 without disabling the xorg-edgers PPA (as it says to ☺) then it's quite possible you've broken stuff. | 23:08 |
jhammons | I wasn't using this PPA with 10.04 | 23:09 |
RAOF | Which PPA are you thinking of specifically, and why are you using it? | 23:12 |
jhammons | RAOF: I tried ubuntu-x-swat thinking newer xserver-xorg-video-intel would help. | 23:14 |
jhammons | RAOF: Have any troubleshooting advice? | 23:15 |
jhammons | Except this: kernel: [ 24.608957] [Firmware Bug]: Duplicate ACPI video bus devices for the same VGA controller, please try module parameter "video.allow_duplicates=1"if the current driver doesn't work. | 23:15 |
jhammons | Will try that. | 23:15 |
RAOF | jhammons: The contents of /var/log/Xorg.0.log in a pastebin is often useful. | 23:16 |
jhammons | RAOF: Okay. Thanks. | 23:16 |
RAOF | Also, dmesg. | 23:16 |
bryceh | the type of improvements you're probably after aren't to be had from xserver-xorg-video-intel | 23:17 |
jhammons | bryceh: Indeed. :) | 23:17 |
bryceh | that X driver is really pretty limited these days | 23:17 |
jhammons | I see.. | 23:17 |
RAOF | It can screw things up, but it's not really involved in much that you care about. | 23:18 |
bryceh | probably where you should be looking for bleeding edge intel stuff are the drm-intel-next kernel daily builds | 23:18 |
bryceh | http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/drm-intel-next/ | 23:18 |
bryceh | beware sometimes those have new bugs. Work backwards from current until you find a kernel you like | 23:19 |
bryceh | also, those are raw upstream kernels, without any of the normal ubuntu enhancements | 23:19 |
jhammons | I see. | 23:21 |
bryceh | at the moment there probably aren't huge differences between stock natty and upstream stuff in any case, but enough for it to be worth testing | 23:21 |
jhammons | I'm going to try the suggestion I found in dmesg output (see above). Here's my Xorg log. I'll be back in a minute. If it doesn't work, a quick gander at that would be appreciated: http://pastebin.com/UCwVaFQG | 23:22 |
jhammons | I think what it is referring to is my stupid dock for the laptop. | 23:23 |
RAOF | [ 29.354] (EE) Failed to initialize GLX extension (Compatible NVIDIA X driver not found) | 23:24 |
RAOF | Less binary nvidia driver, please :) | 23:24 |
jhammons | Hmm. | 23:25 |
jhammons | I'll be right back (hopefully). Thanks RAOF, bryceh. | 23:28 |
jhammons | Thanks for catching that RAOF! Works like a dream now. :) | 23:31 |
jhammons | If you kind folks ever have any issues with an Atlassian tool, hit me up: jhammons@atlassian.com -- thanks again! | 23:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!