=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
msucan | hello guys | 11:42 |
---|---|---|
msucan | can someone please put yasm 1.1.0 on the mozilla team ppa for lucid? | 11:42 |
msucan | we can no longer build firefox from mozilla-central (on lucid lynx) - the ubuntu-provided yasm version is too old | 11:44 |
chrisccoulson_ | m_conley_away, i got my test working btw | 13:16 |
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley | ||
micahg | chrisccoulson_: the daily firefox-4.0 is from the firefox/4.0 branch? | 16:40 |
chrisccoulson_ | micahg - it shouldn't be | 16:40 |
chrisccoulson_ | i've not check though. i know they don't work atm ;) | 16:40 |
chrisccoulson_ | but i'm too busy with other stuff right now | 16:40 |
micahg | chrisccoulson_: oh, hmm, ok, I wanted to reenable PIE in the dailies first, then upload on Monday if they're fine, was going to reenable sat night | 16:41 |
* micahg is also tempted to switch fennec to an internal xul copy | 16:42 | |
chrisccoulson_ | that will be easier to do once it is in mozilla-central | 16:44 |
chrisccoulson_ | brb, restart | 16:46 |
=== jcastro_ is now known as jcastro | ||
micahg | fta: FYI, I spent all day wed digging into chromium, but am still puzzled, will come back to it on Monday | 17:10 |
fta | micahg, digging for what? | 17:11 |
micahg | fta: well, the source of the password issue, if there was a switch flipped between the two updates | 17:12 |
fta | i'm quite surprised it impacts both stable and trunk at the same time. so it should be a backported patch, relatively easy to identify | 17:13 |
micahg | fta: you have confirmation on trunk too? | 17:14 |
fta | micahg, it sure doesn't work for me in ch12 | 17:14 |
micahg | fta: well, sync was turned on in the update we already pushed out, but there were reports of it not working in our stable releases, I was going to do some user testing to see if I can reproduce the problem | 17:16 |
fta | micahg, btw: http://ftagada.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/chromium-release-management-explained/#comment-269 | 17:31 |
fta | (last comment) | 17:32 |
micahg | fta: yep, if you can find out what toolchain components they are building with, that might be helpful, my guess is they won't tell :) | 17:33 |
fta | micahg, until recently, it was hardy. i long suspected our toolchain is regressing from a version to the next | 17:49 |
micahg | fta: well, we can try to get some of that fixed for Oneiric if we can narrow it down | 17:50 |
micahg | hardy used gcc-4.2, lucid/maverick gcc-4.4 | 17:50 |
fta | i'm not sure how to narrow it down. i don't use chrome at all, i never even installed it | 17:54 |
micahg | fta: well, just getting which toolchain components they use would be a start, maybe they're using some type of optimizer that we're not | 17:57 |
fta | micahg, would be nice to run some kind of benchmark of the two for each release | 17:59 |
fta | even bench our own builds on lucid vs maverick vs natty | 18:00 |
micahg | fta: there was some discussion about something like that in brussels, but I don't remember where it went | 18:00 |
fta | micahg, what was the last version of stable you tested that didn't show the regression? | 18:49 |
micahg | fta: didn't get there yet | 18:49 |
fta | micahg, http://paste.ubuntu.com/588340/ | 18:57 |
fta | if that's in the right range, it's a good candidate | 18:58 |
micahg | fta: yep, that's the code block I was staring at as well, I want to try to reproduce with 133, if there's no bug with that, but a bug w/current stable PPA, then we have to wait, if current stable is affected as well, we push out the update next week | 19:00 |
micahg | the problem is, in theory, that revision "fixed" things | 19:01 |
fta | i see nowhere a proof that it works with the GNOME Keyring now, yet, the patch assumes it does | 19:07 |
micahg | no, now GNOME keyring is disabled because they kept their pet feature (sync) instead of disabling it, they disabled what conflicted with it | 19:08 |
gnomefreak | anyone able to play a flash video in normal speed and sound? i thought it was a problem with HD but it happens without HD. for example the gmail motion video or any youtube videos | 19:23 |
fta | jcastro, can i add stuff in a launcher quicklist? i'd like to have my bookmarked folders in the nautilus launcher | 20:33 |
jcastro | fta: yeah, you can add it to the .desktop file | 20:45 |
jcastro | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity/LauncherAPI | 20:46 |
jcastro | fta: I just added some to my gmail shortcut, give me a sec to document it | 20:46 |
fta | jcastro, no plan for a right click / edit this launcher i presume? | 21:25 |
fta | grr, i can't even find my own desktop files | 21:26 |
jcastro | not for natty | 21:36 |
jcastro | fta: I keep them in a seperate folder seperated and nice and neat so I can back them up and give them nice icons, etc. | 21:37 |
jcastro | fta: http://askubuntu.com/questions/31427/how-do-i-put-a-web-application-on-the-launcher | 21:37 |
jcastro | fta: but I made that before this window matching landed so I'll likely have to update it | 21:37 |
fta | jcastro, window matching? | 21:44 |
fta | the WM class thingy? | 21:44 |
jcastro | that webapp stuff trevino fixed | 21:44 |
jcastro | yeah | 21:44 |
jcastro | I need to update today still to try it | 21:44 |
fta | i wonder if the chromium devs will finish their part | 21:44 |
fta | or if i should | 21:45 |
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away | ||
BUGabundo | yupi kayey | 22:13 |
LLStarks | will the 5.0 nightlies be packaged soon? | 22:27 |
BUGabundo | LOL | 22:29 |
BUGabundo | wait... | 22:30 |
BUGabundo | there already 5 packages? | 22:30 |
BUGabundo | guess 4 is stagle | 22:30 |
BUGabundo | *stable | 22:30 |
=== davida is now known as davidascher | ||
LLStarks | bugabundo, 4.2a1pre builds are 5.0 | 22:39 |
BUGabundo | ahhh | 22:39 |
* BUGabundo checks | 22:39 | |
chrisccoulson | they will be packaged when i have time to fix the nightlies | 22:45 |
BUGabundo | eheh | 22:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!