[11:42] <msucan> hello guys
[11:42] <msucan> can someone please put yasm 1.1.0 on the mozilla team ppa for lucid?
[11:44] <msucan> we can no longer build firefox from mozilla-central (on lucid lynx) - the ubuntu-provided yasm version is too old
[13:16] <chrisccoulson_> m_conley_away, i got my test working btw
[16:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: the daily firefox-4.0 is from the firefox/4.0 branch?
[16:40] <chrisccoulson_> micahg - it shouldn't be
[16:40] <chrisccoulson_> i've not check though. i know they don't work atm ;)
[16:40] <chrisccoulson_> but i'm too busy with other stuff right now
[16:41] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: oh, hmm, ok, I wanted to reenable PIE in the dailies first, then upload on Monday if they're fine, was going to reenable sat night
[16:42]  * micahg is also tempted to switch fennec to an internal xul copy
[16:44] <chrisccoulson_> that will be easier to do once it is in mozilla-central
[16:46] <chrisccoulson_> brb, restart
[17:10] <micahg> fta: FYI, I spent all day wed digging into chromium, but am still puzzled, will come back to it on Monday
[17:11] <fta> micahg, digging for what?
[17:12] <micahg> fta: well, the source of the password issue, if there was a switch flipped between the two updates
[17:13] <fta> i'm quite surprised it impacts both stable and trunk at the same time. so it should be a backported patch, relatively easy to identify
[17:14] <micahg> fta: you have confirmation on trunk too?
[17:14] <fta> micahg, it sure doesn't work for me in ch12
[17:16] <micahg> fta: well, sync was turned on in the update we already pushed out, but there were reports of it not working in our stable releases, I was going to do some user testing to see if I can reproduce the problem
[17:31] <fta> micahg, btw: http://ftagada.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/chromium-release-management-explained/#comment-269
[17:32] <fta> (last comment)
[17:33] <micahg> fta: yep, if you can find out what toolchain components they are building with, that might be helpful, my guess is they won't tell :)
[17:49] <fta> micahg, until recently, it was hardy. i long suspected our toolchain is regressing from a version to the next
[17:50] <micahg> fta: well, we can try to get some of that fixed for Oneiric if we can narrow it down
[17:50] <micahg> hardy used gcc-4.2, lucid/maverick gcc-4.4
[17:54] <fta> i'm not sure how to narrow it down. i don't use chrome at all, i never even installed it
[17:57] <micahg> fta: well, just getting which toolchain components they use would be a start, maybe they're using some type of optimizer that we're not
[17:59] <fta> micahg, would be nice to run some kind of benchmark of the two for each release
[18:00] <fta> even bench our own builds on lucid vs maverick vs natty
[18:00] <micahg> fta: there was some discussion about something like that in brussels, but I don't remember where it went
[18:49] <fta> micahg, what was the last version of stable you tested that didn't show the regression?
[18:49] <micahg> fta: didn't get there yet
[18:57] <fta> micahg, http://paste.ubuntu.com/588340/
[18:58] <fta> if that's in the right range, it's a good candidate
[19:00] <micahg> fta: yep, that's the code block I was staring at as well, I want to try to reproduce with 133, if there's no bug with that, but a bug w/current stable PPA, then we have to wait, if current stable is affected as well, we push out the update next week
[19:01] <micahg> the problem is, in theory, that revision "fixed" things
[19:07] <fta> i see nowhere a proof that it works with the GNOME Keyring now, yet, the patch assumes it does
[19:08] <micahg> no, now GNOME keyring is disabled because they kept their pet feature (sync) instead of disabling it, they disabled what conflicted with it
[19:23] <gnomefreak> anyone able to play a flash video in normal speed and sound? i thought it was a problem with HD but it happens without HD. for example the gmail motion video or any youtube videos
[20:33] <fta> jcastro, can i add stuff in a launcher quicklist? i'd like to have my bookmarked folders in the nautilus launcher
[20:45] <jcastro> fta: yeah, you can add it to the .desktop file
[20:46] <jcastro> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity/LauncherAPI
[20:46] <jcastro> fta: I just added some to my gmail shortcut, give me a sec to document it
[21:25] <fta> jcastro, no plan for a right click / edit this launcher i presume?
[21:26] <fta> grr, i can't even find my own desktop files
[21:36] <jcastro> not for natty
[21:37] <jcastro> fta: I keep them in a seperate folder seperated and nice and neat so I can back them up and give them nice icons, etc.
[21:37] <jcastro> fta: http://askubuntu.com/questions/31427/how-do-i-put-a-web-application-on-the-launcher
[21:37] <jcastro> fta: but I made that before this window matching landed so I'll likely have to update it
[21:44] <fta> jcastro, window matching?
[21:44] <fta> the WM class thingy?
[21:44] <jcastro> that webapp stuff trevino fixed
[21:44] <jcastro> yeah
[21:44] <jcastro> I need to update today still to try it
[21:44] <fta> i wonder if the chromium devs will finish their part
[21:45] <fta> or if i should
[22:13] <BUGabundo> yupi kayey 
[22:27] <LLStarks> will the 5.0 nightlies be packaged soon?
[22:29] <BUGabundo> LOL
[22:30] <BUGabundo> wait...
[22:30] <BUGabundo> there already 5 packages?
[22:30] <BUGabundo> guess 4 is stagle
[22:30] <BUGabundo> *stable
[22:39] <LLStarks> bugabundo, 4.2a1pre builds are 5.0
[22:39] <BUGabundo> ahhh
[22:39]  * BUGabundo checks
[22:45] <chrisccoulson> they will be packaged when i have time to fix the nightlies
[22:46] <BUGabundo> eheh