| Kokito | hello | 05:19 |
|---|---|---|
| ailo | After getting that mail on the -devel list I'm now testing the -generic kernel. 2.6.38-7. And.. It's performing as well as -lowlatency. Just as 2.6.38-1 did in the beginning. | 19:59 |
| ronj_ | hi ailo | 20:41 |
| ronj_ | weird | 20:41 |
| ronj_ | did the diagnosis tools mentioned by David in the ML help you understand what caused this strange behavior? | 20:42 |
| ailo | ronj_, I'm not sure how to catch the output. Do you know something about debugging | 20:44 |
| ailo | Actually I'm getting more xruns than on -lowlatency, but not all the time | 20:44 |
| ronj_ | no I think I know as much as you about these commands he mentioned, I can't help you here | 20:45 |
| gabgom | just to tell yo the privative for ati radeon 4500 is not working at all in unity ubuntu 11.04 and is not fine in genome desktop | 20:47 |
| scott-work | ailo: in some ways that's a bit frustrating :P | 21:08 |
| scott-work | what's the point of being able to make a -lowlatency kernel if the -generic is going to perform as well | 21:08 |
| ailo | scott-work, It's up and down, I think. At least with -lowlatency we get stability. We can rely on it. | 21:09 |
| scott-work | if the propsed changed that allow the irq conflict resolution come through, that will _awesome_! | 21:10 |
| scott-work | that would really help laptop users with their firewire interfaces :) | 21:10 |
| ailo | scott-work, Absolutely. Also, with -generic, it seems it's not only the kernel deciding if you can use low latencies. 2.6.38-1 performed as well as -lowlatency at first, but then didn't. Now, it seems 2.6.38-7 is doing a bit better, but not as good as 2.6.38-1 did at first. I wonder what is causing this, and why -lowlatency is not affected by these changes | 21:12 |
| ailo | 2.6.38-1 -generic became unusable for low latencies at some point, after an update | 21:13 |
| scott-work | ailo: excellent questions, but alas, i'm quite ignorant about kernel matters such as these :( | 21:13 |
| scott-work | ailo: wasn't the 2.6.38 trouble because of the cgroup issue? | 21:13 |
| ailo | scott-work, No, that was in 2.6.37 | 21:13 |
| scott-work | ah, right | 21:13 |
| scott-work | i think i'll do some more testing this wekend on natty | 21:14 |
| scott-work | with the kernel i mean | 21:14 |
| ailo | scott-work, abogani started isntructing me on doing debuggin about a month ago, I think, but it was just too much to take in for me at the time. Something similar to what Henningson instructs now. Hopefully that will tell us something | 21:16 |
| ailo | ScottL, This is a one day brain storming on Ubuntu Documentation. Maybe you can pick out some ideas from it? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1llXJhvRZKprnMUcAYuCGn18-9vcF0oz7SiiZTauJ0z4/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKGJiYME&pli=1# | 22:28 |
| ailo | I haven't touched on graphics and video at all. Just audio. | 22:39 |
| TheMuso | ScottL: Removing ubuntustudio-controls from seeds now. Anything else while I'm here? | 22:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!