[00:36] <matttbe> Hi,
[00:36] <matttbe>  I'm part of the Cairo-Dock team and I want to update Cairo-Dock packages on Ubuntu. I've opened two bug reports (cairo-dock and its plug-ins) one month ago (before the FF) with two linked branches: https://code.launchpad.net/bugs/723994 & https://code.launchpad.net/bugs/723995.
[00:36] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 723994 in cairo-dock (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "FFe: Please update Cairo-Dock to 2.3.0~0rc1 version (affects: 2) (heat: 16)" [Wishlist,New]
[00:36] <matttbe> Is it possible to help me now or should I have to be back later?
[01:44] <PinkUnicorns> .75
[01:55] <ScottK> matttbe: We discussed it a bit after your last visit.  I think micahg is going to look into it.
[01:58] <matttbe> ScottK: ok thank you! So... do I have to wait and see? nothing more?
[01:58] <matttbe> because we don't have any ack and I think that micahg can't give this ACK
[01:59] <ScottK> I think one of the issues he was looking into was the differences between packaging in Ubuntu and Debian.  As a rule, we prefer to align to Debian.
[01:59] <ScottK> I'll probably ack whatever recommendation he makes.
[02:00] <matttbe> yes I know but the Debian maintainer doesn't want to apply some patch given by the upstream...
[02:00] <matttbe> it's a bit ridiculous but... I'm not a Debian maintainer :)
[02:01] <ScottK> So I would seek him out on #ubuntu-devel when you seem him and ask how you can help out.
[02:02] <matttbe> ok but I've already given to him all reasons of this problem with Debian
[02:02] <matttbe> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cairo-dock-plug-ins/+bug/657564
[02:02] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 657564 in cairo-dock-plugins (Debian) (and 4 other projects) "Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian) (affects: 1) (heat: 27)" [Undecided,In progress]
[02:03] <ScottK> Yes and that may be enough.   I didn't hear from him yet, so it wouldn't hurt to ask.
[02:05] <matttbe> Ok so I'll try to be back later to ask some news about this problem!
[02:05] <matttbe> Thank you
[06:19] <slangasek> cjwatson: the current python implementation of checkrdepends reports on revdeps from the same source, which ISTR fixing the previous incarnation not to do; is this a deliberate behavior change, or can I re-fix this for the sourceful case?
[07:05] <slangasek> hmm, bug #747988 is troubling; the package was removed from Debian in August but was still in natty today
[07:05] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 747988 in agsync (Debian) (and 1 other project) "Please remove agsync from natty (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/747988
[07:05] <slangasek> I guess no one has been running process-removals?
[09:58] <cjwatson> slangasek: sounds reasonable to fix iff you asked it about a source package rather than a binary package
[09:59] <slangasek> ok, will poke at it later, thanks