=== Thermi is now known as thermi
[08:30] <donnie> hi
[09:45] <RockTeam> Hello. Is there anybody?
[09:46] <RockTeam> ...alive?
[09:46] <well_laid_lawn> sure RockTeam
[09:47] <RockTeam> Good.
[09:48] <RockTeam> Could you help me please?
[09:48] <well_laid_lawn> depends on the issue... :p
[09:48] <RockTeam> Do you have Exaile installed?
[09:48] <well_laid_lawn> nope sorry
[09:48] <RockTeam> Ok. Thanks!
[09:48] <well_laid_lawn> what's wrong with it?
[09:49] <RockTeam> I use ver. 3.2.0 and Radio Steams does't work from Radio Menu
[09:50] <RockTeam> But I can listen radio via direct link to mp3 steam
[09:52] <RockTeam> Radio Steams can't be updated via Radio Menu into Exaile :(
[09:53] <well_laid_lawn> something in the config about the net connection would be my guess
=== thermi is now known as Thermi
=== Thermi is now known as thermi
=== thermi is now known as Thermi
[13:42] <profus2> hi everybody, looking for tutorial vmware installation on xubuntu
[13:42] <profus2> any ideas?
[13:42] <profus2> thx
=== thermi is now known as Thermi
[14:50] <nikolam> profus2, why not using Vitrualbox-OSE that comes with Ubuntu repositories? It is open source. And Virtualbox from virtualbox.org have pluging with USB support, etc.
[14:51] <nikolam> VmWare is payed-for only product. You need to buy it. Virtualbox is not unless you use it for business, then it is also buy-for product. Unless you are using OSE version that is free to use for everyone, ever.
[14:52] <nikolam> There is also Xen for Ubuntu and you also have KVM/Qemu with its GUI frontends that works quite fine, too.
[14:54] <nikolam> So you have, like 3-4 virtualization open source products in place of closed pay for only vmware
[14:58] <knome> nikolam, depends... vbox is not necessarily buy-for even with business
[15:10] <nikolam> knome, ?? I guess vmware have its uses for people with $$ and high capacities and willing to manage with closed solutions.
[15:10] <nikolam> knome, I think I misunderstood you, sorry.
[15:11] <nikolam> yes, businesses can use vbox OSE for free. Vbox closed with usb, for fee if used comercially, I think.
[15:11] <nikolam> anyway, this also seems off-topic a bit ;)
[15:12] <knome> nikolam, it is a bit off-topic.. let's move to #xubuntu-offtopic
[16:52] <VastOne> Anyone tried April 3 daily Natty release to see if install is fixed?
[17:02] <charlie-tca> what is wrong with it?
[17:02] <charlie-tca> Did something break since the beta1 release?
[17:03] <VastOne> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/748885
[17:03] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 748885 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Natty beta 1 install fails on nsbp package install" [Undecided,New]
[17:04] <VastOne> I have just downloaded today's release and am about to test it
[17:04] <VastOne> will let you know
[17:05] <charlie-tca> Xubuntu or Ubuntu?
[17:06] <VastOne> X
[17:07] <VastOne> Ubiquity issue across all variants
[17:10] <sillav> aptitude search nsbp returns nothing. What package are you talking about?
[17:11] <VastOne> Ubiquity on the install
[17:11] <charlie-tca> The nsbp package that the installer can NOT find?
[17:11] <VastOne> apparently
=== Thermi is now known as thermi
[17:12] <charlie-tca> Chances are a bug reported reported yesterday is not fixed, since the developers usually take sat/sun off
[17:13] <VastOne> perhaps, but I have just confirmed that ubiquity is/has been updated on the Apr 3 daily
[17:13] <VastOne> so .. Just beginning to test the install, will let you and launchpad know
=== thermi is now known as Thermi
[17:19] <sillav> Well... ubiquity isn't installed on xubuntu, nor any package with ubuity in the name. And the only reference to a nsbp package on the entire internet seems to be the bug report you mentioned.
[17:20] <VastOne> ubiquity IS the installer
[17:22] <charlie-tca> sillav: the bug report is about the actual installer, not the finished installation
[17:23] <charlie-tca> If a file is called by the installer, it does not have to be in the final installation. It has to be available to the installer itself.
[17:23] <VastOne> I am sorry to come here and create confusion, I was merely checking to see if those who test with me had done so yet
[17:24] <charlie-tca> no, we had not
[17:24] <charlie-tca> As I said, installer bugs will seldom be fixed on the weekend, though.
[17:25] <charlie-tca> I have an install running, let's see what it does
[17:25] <VastOne> true, I am just about finished so... we shall see..  What is very strange is that it not only affects Beta1 but also Alpha2 and 3 release... So it is definitley something that is being pulled during the install
[17:26] <VastOne> If mine fails again, I am going to unplug from the Internet and try that as some have succeeded in doing in the past
[17:26] <charlie-tca> Actually, if it affected all those installs, we would not have a beta1 yet. It has not actually showed up in those milestones for most of us
[17:26] <charlie-tca> Maybe it is hardware related, instead of software related
[17:27] <VastOne> I know, my point is that it is now affecting those when it did not in the past
[17:27] <VastOne> No hw is not the issue and confirmed
[17:28] <VastOne> This same thing went on the entire month of March on Ubuntu installs of Alpha 3 and natty
[17:28] <charlie-tca> Then why wasn't it reported earlier?
[17:28] <VastOne> It was not until ISO testing was done that the bugs were fixed,
[17:28] <VastOne> It was
[17:28] <charlie-tca> I have never seen that bug
[17:28] <VastOne> many times
[17:28] <VastOne> I will get it ... and show you hang on
[17:30] <VastOne> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/739632
[17:30] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 739632 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Natty) "ubiquity crashed during install with: plugininstall.py: DebconfError: (10, "oem-config/enable doesn't exist")" [High,Fix released]
[17:31] <VastOne> and there are several that were thought o be duplicates that were actually different pulls with the same effect
[17:32] <VastOne> It was fixed, but now is back
[17:32] <charlie-tca> Well, I guess you will have to wait to have it fixed, then. I have not hit this bug, even with yesterdays images
[17:32] <VastOne> That was typical too, there were some it did not effect and others it did for a month
[17:33] <VastOne> lol, a frustrating one to say the least
[17:34] <VastOne> If it crashes this time, I have ubiquity -d enabled to send my var/syslog and install log...
[17:34] <VastOne> and it did just crash so ... I will need to wait
[17:34] <VastOne> thanks hagd
[18:03] <VastOne> I can confirm that by installing with the Network disconnected did work for Daily Apr 3 Natty Xubuntu installation
[18:21] <xubuntu995> lol
[18:50] <just_some_dude> i have xubuntu 10.04, xfce 4.6. i'm not sure how it happened, but networking is no longer automatically started at bootup. how can a make the network work automatically?
[18:51] <just_some_dude> clarification: the network manager starts at boot, but my net connection is not enabled by default.
[18:52] <just_some_dude> i'd like it to be enabled by default.
[19:02] <cg2916> i used unetbootin and when i tried to boot into linux, it said "windows could not start because of a computer disk hardware configuration problem"
[20:22] <kb8wms> anybody home?
=== Thermi is now known as thermi
[20:46] <guapamontse> hi people, it just came to my mind that i should have logged all my acess times on this computer. do you know some file that logs this so i can print it?
=== guapamontse is now known as obiwan_
[20:47] <obiwan_> like, user obiwan_ access 10 am, leaves 02 am
=== thermi is now known as Thermi
[20:58] <obiwan_> ok nvm seeyou
=== Thermi is now known as thermi