[00:53] <Flannel> slow rolling netsplit!
[01:41] <genii-around> Was that a split or did some box go offline?
[01:41] <IdleOne> that was a split
[01:41] <genii-around> OK, thanks
[01:42] <IdleOne> to many users in different channels to be one box going offline
[02:02] <Flannel> Mmmm, delicious network problems
[02:23] <bazhang> BlackUbuntu ?
[02:24] <genii-around> Ubuntu BE ?
[02:24] <bazhang> REdBallz in #ubuntu
[02:25] <genii-around> Probably means some monochrome/black theming
[03:01] <bazhang> * [union131] (~union131@pool-71-251-162-239.bflony.east.verizon.net): william   ban forward to here?
[03:06] <bazhang> is moondog even vaguely ontopic, or just off topic and snarky
[03:07] <bazhang> seems to be snark day, and ask #ubuntu because there are many users in it day
[03:10] <rww> sounds like a good factoid to me.
[03:11] <IdleOne> hehe
[03:11] <IdleOne> mediatomb is better anyway
[03:14] <bazhang> heh
[03:14] <bazhang> not interested in bullgard's offtopic requests for support just about anywhere, then rude responses
[05:06] <rww> crazy night tonight.
[07:03] <bazhang> he did not appear to do anything when he rejoined
[10:49] <knome> !panels-#xubuntu is Did your panels disappear? Press alt+f2 and run: xfce4-panel | See also: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/XubuntuPanels
[10:49] <knome> err
[10:56] <tsimpson> knome: you forgot the !no, and you forgot the <reply>
[10:57] <knome> awh :)
[10:57] <Tm_T> and there's |
[10:57] <knome> you can still fix for me, darlings?
[10:57] <tsimpson> that shouldn't matter, as long as the bot knows you're editing
[10:57] <knome> +it
[10:58] <tsimpson> !no panels-#xubuntu is <reply> Did your panels disappear? Press alt+f2 and run: xfce4-panel | See also: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/XubuntuPanels
[10:58] <jussi> netsplits are evil
[10:58] <tsimpson> bot has some... "logic" to deal with | in factoids
[10:59] <tsimpson> knome: can you do @whoami? I'm not sure if the bot knows who you are
[10:59] <knome> @whoami
[10:59] <tsimpson> hmm, try "@login"
[10:59] <knome> @login
[10:59] <knome> yeah
[10:59] <knome> i think jussi has been lazy
[10:59] <knome> :)
[11:00] <jussi> who me?
[11:01] <knome> :)
[11:01] <knome> i thought you were going to set up me an account
[11:01] <knome> i don't think i have access to the bantracker either
[11:02] <tsimpson> if the bot doesn't know you, you don't have access to anything ;)
[11:04] <tsimpson> should be all set now
[11:04] <knome> thanks, so
[11:04] <knome> @whoami
[11:04] <knome> :o
[11:04] <knome> wise bot
[11:04] <knome> @losin
[11:04] <knome> bah
[11:04] <knome> dumb user
[11:04] <knome> @login
[11:04] <knome> can i now edit the factoid?
[11:05] <tsimpson> you can
[11:05] <tsimpson> though I already edited it ;)
[11:05] <knome> nice!
[11:05] <knome> hehe
[11:05] <knome> nicer!
[11:05] <knome> thanks
[11:05] <tsimpson> !encyclopedia
[11:05] <tsimpson> that page has lots of usage info, in case you want to edit others
[11:05] <knome> okay, great! i'll add that to bookmarks
[11:06] <tsimpson> though, hopefully, we'll be scrapping Encyclopedia soon-ish
[11:06] <tsimpson> but the usage of the new plugin shouldn't be too dissimilar
[11:08] <knome> aha, okay
[11:08] <knome> no problemo
[13:04] <Pici> !natty =~ s/unstable/beta/
[13:42] <bazhang> check -meeting
[13:44] <jrib> Pici: does passwd -l set the hash to "!"?
[13:44] <Pici> jrib: I'm pretty sure.
[13:44] <Pici> jrib: Oh hey, the manpage says it does just that.
[13:45] <jrib> Pici: the other day I tried to use recovery mode and had a password prompt.  So I thought that passwd -l was doing something else (setting a hash that couldn't be entered but on that still had recovery mode asking for a password)
[13:45]  * jrib tries
[13:48] <jrib> Pici: so I'm not sure.  http://paste.ubuntu.com/589242/  I'd have to check whether or not I get a password prompt in recovery mode with that hash that gets produced by passwd -l
[13:48] <jrib> it seems like -l just puts a ! at the beginning
[13:49] <Pici> jrib: And what were you expecting?
[13:51] <jrib> Pici: well I have a suspicion that if I have '!blahblah' as the hash and not just '!', that I will be prompted for a password when I try to enter recovery mode
[13:51] <jrib> I'll have to check next time I reboot
[13:51] <Pici> Hmm.
[14:16] <bazhang> :|
[14:17] <Pici> bazhang: #ubuntu?
[14:18] <bazhang> Pici, blueskaj and ohsix
[14:22] <LjL> !samba
[14:23] <LjL> !no samba is <reply> Samba is the way to cooperate with Windows environments. Links with more info: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Samba and https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/windows-networking.html - Samba can be administered via the web with SWAT.
[14:23] <bazhang> thats getting annoying
[14:24] <bazhang> well ohsix has been asked to stop twice.
[14:25] <LjL> he has a point though
[14:25] <Pici> agreed.
[14:38] <Tm_T> whwhat where
[14:40] <Tm_T> right
[14:40] <Pici> exactly.
[14:40] <Tm_T> just direct the guys to somewhere else where they can continue
[14:40] <Pici> /dev/null
[14:40] <bazhang> they stopped awhile ago
[14:41] <bazhang> ohsix PM 'd me thanks for t eh patience
[14:46] <knome> err
[14:46] <knome> hmm, wrong tab
[14:48] <Tm_T> and no need to blame ohsix alone, blueskaj can be like that sometimes (:
[14:53] <bazhang> yes, but ohsix is quite argumentative
[15:00]  * genii-around watches Floodbot2 get opped 5 times
[15:01] <Pici> That was rather weird.
[15:02] <IdleOne> seems like chanserv is lagged
[15:06] <Pici> Some weird latency issues going on right now.
[15:06] <IdleOne> look at it this way, chanserv could not be opping at all
[15:06] <Pici> that took long enough.
[15:07] <Pici> I was getting no response from /wii
[16:13] <bazhang> root____ 's been doing that for quite awhile now and refuses to shut it off
[16:23] <bazhang>  [darkwingduck_] (~darkwingd@host81-137-11-17.in-addr.btopenworld.com): mickey
[16:24] <Pici> I believe I saw some complaints about him reported elsewhere the other day.
[16:25] <bazhang> yeppers in -uk
[16:25] <bazhang> postulating it might or might be phin/ferb/nomdujour
[16:26] <bazhang> err might not
[16:27] <popey> that was the postulation, yes
[16:28] <mneptok> is "postulation" when you're really happy to get something in the mail?
[16:29] <popey> *slow hand clap*
[16:29] <popey> :)
[16:30] <mneptok> your heartfelt support is an limitless font of inspiration.
[16:30] <mneptok> :)
[16:46] <popey> s/font/fount/
[16:46] <popey> HTH HAND
[16:52] <mneptok> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/font  def 3
[16:58] <knome> charlie-tca, maybe discuss the host here rather
[16:58] <charlie-tca> Why? they were in our channel.
[16:59] <charlie-tca> Any one know the person with the mailto:contempt@stole.ur.cc-number.info
[16:59] <charlie-tca> Any one know the person with the IP contempt@stole.ur.cc-number.info
[16:59] <charlie-tca> Is th
[16:59] <IdleOne> it's a vanity host from a bnc/shell provider
[16:59] <IdleOne> probably nothing to be worried about
[17:00] <charlie-tca> Seems wrong to want help / support and even suggest such a ridiculous thing
[17:01] <IdleOne> I guess it isn't the best message to put out there but there are a lot worse than that
[17:02] <IdleOne> I wouldn't ban based on that host but it is your channel :)
[17:03] <knome> mmh
[17:05] <knome> hosts aren't really as bad as bad attitude
[17:05] <charlie-tca> Thank you, your advice is accepted gladly
[17:05] <charlie-tca> IdleOne: ^^
[17:06] <IdleOne> knome: agreed, unless the host is clearly offensive (sexual,racial...)
[17:06] <IdleOne> charlie-tca: welcome
[17:06] <IdleOne> :)
[17:08] <knome> IdleOne, absolutely
[17:11] <knome> but tbh
[17:11] <knome> if a user with that kind of host has connection problems
[17:11] <knome> people will notice it easier
[17:13] <IdleOne> true but who really pays attention to hosts besides us crazy op type people
[17:14] <IdleOne> hmm my logic fails me, if nobody paid attention there wouldn't be vanity hosts and server cloaks :)
[17:15]  * IdleOne shines his @ubuntu/member badge
[17:15] <knome> nobody
[17:15] <knome> but that's exactly what i meant
[17:16] <knome> if the host was something like a regular host, i might have not noticed that at all
[17:16] <knome> and he could still be jumping
[17:16] <Pici> If hes not making trouble, whats the issue?
[17:16] <knome> no, the hosts are just something that you want for yourself
[17:16] <knome> because you *think* people care
[17:17] <knome> it's like an another extension to your virtual wiener
[17:17] <Pici> ...
[17:17] <knome> my host (which you can't see because of the cloak) is irc.knome.fi and i'm damn proud of it even if you can't see it
[17:17] <knome> ^ see? :D
[17:17] <mneptok> kippis. ;)
[17:18] <knome> Pici, why is there ##fix_your_connection ?
[17:18] <IdleOne> Pici: no issue. he just keeps piniging out
[17:18] <IdleOne> pinging
[17:18] <IdleOne> and the host became more evident
[17:19] <Pici> knome: Then forward there.
[17:19] <IdleOne> he did
[17:20] <knome> yeah, and then we discussed if hosts like that should be banned
[17:20] <mneptok> great shell/bnc provider you have there. you have a WICKED AWESOME mask for the 12 seconds you're connected.
[17:20] <knome> yeah! think about it!
[17:21] <IdleOne> the splits may have had a little part in his connection issues
[17:22] <knome> mmh
[17:22] <knome> probably, but still he had a lot of ping timeouts
[17:23] <IdleOne> to avoid any of that you could +b *!*@*
[17:23] <IdleOne> makes for quiet channel where you can think
[17:24] <IdleOne> ;)
[17:24] <charlie-tca> like it is not quiet enough there?
[17:24] <IdleOne> hehe
[17:25] <knome> charlie-tca, well there you have somebody talking! :)
[17:25] <charlie-tca> Might be the only person today, though, as you know.
[17:26]  * charlie-tca thinks he didn't have much to say, either :-(
[17:26] <knome> there was at least 4 before
[18:03] <ikonia> is that packaged for ubuntu now
[19:51] <Daniel0108> hi
[19:52] <Daniel0108> I need locobot for my loco channel (#ubuntu-at) :)
[19:54] <rww> Daniel0108: are you looking for a logbot or a factoid bot?
[19:55] <Daniel0108> the locobot_2 like in #ubuntu-locoteams :)
[19:55] <Daniel0108> a logbot ;)
[19:55] <Daniel0108> rww: ^
[19:55] <rww> Daniel0108: LocoBot is deprecated, LoCos are supposed to use ubuntulog now. Email rt@ubuntu.com and ask for it.
[19:55] <Daniel0108> okay
[19:55] <Daniel0108> thank you :)
[19:55] <rww> No problem :)
[19:56] <rww> (in future, LoCo channel stuff generally goes in #ubuntu-irc)
[20:02] <Daniel0108> okay, rww, paultag told me to ask here :)
[20:04] <IdleOne> someone needs to tell paultag where to direct loco requests
[20:04] <IdleOne> :)
[20:05] <rww> IdleOne: thanks for volunteering :)
[20:06] <IdleOne> msg sent to paultag
[21:16] <Tm_T> floodbots are opping each other wildly in #k
[21:16] <knome> /nick Floodbot9
[21:16] <knome> "oops"
[23:09] <bazhang> so eamon is root______ of the annoying scripts
[23:09] <Pici> is he?
[23:09] <LjL> yes
[23:10] <rww> annoying scripts as in lolispamurchannelnow?
[23:10] <bazhang> well they've both been told
[23:10] <bazhang>  /nowplayingthoughIjusttypeditsoitsokay
[23:41] <Logan_> that was a mistake :P
[23:46] <Logan_> rww: what was that change spelling command?
[23:49] <nhandler> Logan_: What are you trying to change?
[23:49] <Logan_> a factoid
[23:50] <nhandler> Logan_: Yeah, which one and to what (I'll do it for you)
[23:50] <Logan_> nvm, unimportant :P
[23:50] <nhandler> Uh, ok...