| wgrant | You fail at apostrophes. | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| lifeless | yes, yes I do. | 00:01 |
| sinzui | /topichttps://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: wgrant | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | 00:07 |
| === sinzui changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: wgrant | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | ||
| poolie | is there a ui for changing branch privacy, if you have access to use private branches? | 00:11 |
| lifeless | yes | 00:13 |
| lifeless | you can unhide a private branch | 00:13 |
| lifeless | you can't hide a public branch | 00:14 |
| poolie | how do you create a private branch then? | 00:15 |
| lifeless | two ways | 00:16 |
| lifeless | either a privacy policy for a team you are in that says private-by-default [or always-private] or | 00:17 |
| lifeless | create an empty branch and ask a losa to privatise it | 00:17 |
| lifeless | these are both a bit awkward | 00:17 |
| lifeless | we may overhaul this during the upcoming disclosure and privacy work | 00:17 |
| fta | wgrant, hi, did you have a chance to look at the stats problem yesterday? | 00:18 |
| lifeless | one of the challenges is bzr not being deeply integrated here - if you have a context where you /might want/ privacy, it would be nice to say '--private' or add a fake path element or something to get it private and tell LP what privacy group to grant access to the branch | 00:18 |
| fta | wgrant, btw, i fixed my script. should work with both ff4 and ch now | 00:19 |
| poolie | that would be nice | 00:19 |
| lifeless | remember that we permit different groups to have private branches in the same namespace - and they can either have partitioned membership or overlapping - both are supported | 00:19 |
| poolie | if there was an api to control it, we could add a ui for it | 00:19 |
| wgrant | fta: Sorry, lots of other stuff came up :/ | 00:19 |
| wgrant | fta: I'll try to get to it today. | 00:19 |
| lifeless | the experience of pushing to a branch that lp 'knows' about but doesn't exist is pretty poor at the moment | 00:19 |
| lifeless | so I think it would be nice to have a create-branch verb that knows how to talk about this | 00:20 |
| poolie | are losas involved because they do direct db access; or because they're a human sanity check; or ...? | 00:20 |
| lifeless | (as well as not requiring launchpadlib chatter during initial push) | 00:20 |
| lifeless | poolie: ... [I don't know] | 00:20 |
| Chex | lifeless: you are on RC mode, with DEVEL closed now. | 00:20 |
| fta | wgrant, ok, n-p. do you still see the long legend in my page? | 00:20 |
| lifeless | Chex: right, we want to be unrc'd | 00:20 |
| wgrant | fta: Ah, that's much better. Yesterday it showed *every* package in the one graph. | 00:22 |
| fta | wgrant, weird, i should have been like that for only a few minutes 2 days ago, maybe you had the old js in cache or something | 00:24 |
| === bburhans_ is now known as bburhans | ||
| marvin2 | Hi, is the launchpad site down? I'm getting timeouts. | 04:32 |
| wgrant | marvin2: Which pages? | 04:35 |
| wgrant | It's working OK for me. | 04:35 |
| EvilPhoenix | works fine for me too | 04:37 |
| poolie | what's the deal atm for getting spam removed? | 05:20 |
| poolie | i saw some bug updates from jcs | 05:20 |
| poolie | ask a losa still? | 05:20 |
| wgrant | poolie: Bugs we (or you) can do. | 05:21 |
| poolie | do you mean, removing the whole bug? | 05:21 |
| wgrant | Questions still needs a LOSA, but the necessary DB changes are being rolled out tomorrow night. | 05:21 |
| wgrant | Bug comments. | 05:21 |
| poolie | ah, quite clearly it's an existing valid account that was compromised | 05:21 |
| spm | questions can't be done at all atm | 05:21 |
| wgrant | Which account? | 05:21 |
| poolie | wgrant, oh, how? | 05:21 |
| wgrant | poolie: There's no UI yet, but the API is there and accessible to ~registry. | 05:22 |
| wgrant | And will be for comments in a week or so too. | 05:22 |
| poolie | is there a cli to drive it? | 05:22 |
| poolie | https://launchpad.net/~starplant is the troublesome account | 05:23 |
| poolie | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-windows-installers/+bug/341465 is an example | 05:23 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 341465 in Bazaar Windows Installers "bzr linked version of msvcrt.dll is missing" [High,Invalid] | 05:23 |
| wgrant | There's no common script, no. | 05:23 |
| wgrant | I think I saw a question about that account... | 05:23 |
| wgrant | Oh. | 05:23 |
| poolie | > will be for comments in a week or so too. | 05:23 |
| wgrant | No, I hid all his comments last week, I thought. | 05:24 |
| wgrant | Are there more? | 05:24 |
| poolie | so what is there an api for now? | 05:24 |
| poolie | there are | 05:24 |
| wgrant | poolie: Will be for *questions*, sorry. | 05:24 |
| poolie | he did make some valid comments a year ago | 05:24 |
| EvilPhoenix | what're the requirements to run an instance of the launchpad source? | 05:24 |
| wgrant | poolie: Hmm, no comments since the 1st AFAICT. | 05:24 |
| poolie | great peace of mind | 05:24 |
| poolie | EvilPhoenix, also, see dev.launchpad.net/Running | 05:24 |
| poolie | nup, but several that day | 05:24 |
| wgrant | poolie: Are any of them still there? | 05:25 |
| poolie | yes, there's one on the page i just sent you | 05:25 |
| wgrant | I disposed of 12 of them last week, and I see no more now. | 05:25 |
| poolie | unless you removed it just now | 05:25 |
| wgrant | Hmmm. | 05:25 |
| poolie | also bug 235668 | 05:25 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 235668 in Bazaar GTK+ Frontends "seahorse crashes on import" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/235668 | 05:25 |
| wgrant | Oh. | 05:25 |
| wgrant | It would help if I looked for *all* his commented bugs, not just the open ones. | 05:25 |
| poolie | heh | 05:26 |
| wgrant | Fixing, thanks. | 05:26 |
| poolie | haha | 05:26 |
| poolie | i'd actually rather learn how to fish in this case | 05:26 |
| poolie | how are you fixing them? | 05:26 |
| EvilPhoenix | poolie: thanks | 05:26 |
| wgrant | Well, it could be far more automated, but I just have a script a couple of lines long that takes a bug and comment number, shows it, asks for confirmation, and calls bug.setCommentVisibility(comment_number=n, visible=False) | 05:27 |
| poolie | ok | 05:28 |
| poolie | i know i could rewrite that script but how about if you put it into say the lp tree? | 05:28 |
| poolie | or a new lp-admin-clients project or something | 05:28 |
| poolie | i'll suspend the account i guess | 05:30 |
| poolie | or deactivate it? | 05:30 |
| lifeless | sinzui was going to get this in the web UI | 05:30 |
| poolie | that would be nice | 05:31 |
| wgrant | poolie: No need. | 05:31 |
| wgrant | It was a one-off email spam incident. | 05:31 |
| wgrant | Ah, already done I see. | 05:32 |
| wgrant | At least we can unsuspend them now. | 05:32 |
| wgrant | I'll set it back to deactivated. | 05:32 |
| wgrant | Since we can't reactivate it like this. | 05:32 |
| wgrant | But this will let the user log in. | 05:32 |
| poolie | oh i see | 05:33 |
| poolie | how do you know it was email spam? | 05:34 |
| wgrant | Well, I don't know for sure, but it was a single incident all at the one time, and hasn't happened again. | 05:35 |
| wgrant | I don't think suspending for that is useful. | 05:35 |
| === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away | ||
| poolie | i guess if it was ongoing it would continue until the account was suspended | 05:40 |
| wgrant | Right. | 05:40 |
| wgrant | If it's ongoing then we should suspend. | 05:40 |
| wgrant | poolie: Anyway, that's all of them gone, for real this time. | 05:42 |
| poolie | how can the 'tags' portlet show a tag and then find no bugs? | 07:57 |
| spiv | poolie: maybe it's an official tag? | 07:58 |
| === ampelbein_ is now known as Ampelbein | ||
| lifeless | poolie: it shows tags from all bugs ever | 08:17 |
| lifeless | poolie: which is why its so busy and useless | 08:17 |
| poolie | i see | 08:26 |
| poolie | if i scratched an itch by making it show in huw's simpler layout just the official tags do you think that would be accepted? | 08:26 |
| poolie | (this is a bit hypothetical as my queue is already in train) | 08:26 |
| poolie | i mean full | 08:27 |
| lifeless | personally | 08:30 |
| lifeless | I value the emergent nature of tag clouds | 08:31 |
| lifeless | I would not like to see officil tags onlyt | 08:31 |
| poolie | how about showing, in a decent layout, all the in-use tags then? | 08:43 |
| poolie | i guess, those in use on open bugs | 08:43 |
| poolie | perhaps truncated to say 50 | 08:44 |
| lifeless | poolie: if I had time to hack on it, the first thing I'd do is measure how long it takes to determine 'in use tags' on e.g. Ubuntu | 08:53 |
| lifeless | poolie: and use that to guide further decisions about what to do | 08:53 |
| poolie | good idea | 08:55 |
| mok0 | ls | 09:01 |
| lifeless | . .. | 09:01 |
| mrevell | Morning | 09:09 |
| mok0 | mrevell: Good morning, and in case I don't see ya, good afternoon, good evening, and good night! | 09:29 |
| mrevell | heh :) Thanks mok0 | 09:29 |
| mok0 | (cf. Truman :-) | 09:29 |
| mrevell | Superb film. | 09:29 |
| mok0 | mrevell: indeed :-) | 09:36 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| EisNerd | moin | 10:34 |
| EisNerd | someone here who can have a look for my lp account? | 10:35 |
| EisNerd | there is something wrong | 10:35 |
| EisNerd | wgrant: according to topic maybe you? | 10:35 |
| wgrant | EisNerd: What's your Launchpad username? | 10:35 |
| EisNerd | got the message? | 10:36 |
| wgrant | Yeah. | 10:36 |
| wgrant | That account has never been used. | 10:36 |
| EisNerd | because I can't login | 10:37 |
| EisNerd | and can't reset password | 10:37 |
| wgrant | Oh? | 10:37 |
| EisNerd | it exists since when? | 10:37 |
| wgrant | What happens when you try? | 10:37 |
| EisNerd | yesterday or longer | 10:38 |
| wgrant | Where are you trying to log in? What does it say if you try to log in? | 10:38 |
| EisNerd | because I tried to create it yesterday but never got this verification mail | 10:38 |
| EisNerd | https://login.launchpad.net/ | 10:38 |
| EisNerd | says "Passwort stimmt nicht überein" | 10:39 |
| wgrant | Could you ask at https://forms.canonical.com/lp-login-support/? | 10:39 |
| EisNerd | damn javascript sides | 10:39 |
| EisNerd | ok | 10:42 |
| EisNerd | hm ok where is this member of the gsst? | 10:45 |
| wgrant | What do you mean? | 10:46 |
| EisNerd | ;) | 10:46 |
| EisNerd | the message after submitting the request | 10:46 |
| EisNerd | "A member of the Global Support Services team will be in touch shortly to discuss your needs." | 10:46 |
| wgrant | Ah, right. | 10:46 |
| EisNerd | so where is this member I have to discuss this with | 10:47 |
| EisNerd | ok afk | 10:48 |
| === zyga_ is now known as zyga | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| purpleKarrot | Hi, I have a question about binary-indep packages in PPAs. The packages are built on i386 only (which is intended). But the generated packages then should be available on all architectures. | 11:48 |
| purpleKarrot | And they are not. | 11:49 |
| purpleKarrot | Do I have to configure somehow that the packages are copied to other architectures? | 11:50 |
| wgrant | purpleKarrot: Are the packages you generate in binary-indep set as Architecture: all? | 11:50 |
| purpleKarrot | (checking) | 11:51 |
| purpleKarrot | no, they are set to 'any'. should I set them to 'all'? | 11:52 |
| soren | yes | 11:52 |
| wgrant | Yes, or they will be built for i386 only. | 11:52 |
| purpleKarrot | OK, thanks! I will try that. | 11:52 |
| bigjools | any/all is so damn confusing | 11:55 |
| wgrant | Not so much confusing as badly named. | 11:55 |
| bigjools | hence confusing :) | 11:56 |
| bigjools | I still keep getting them the wrong way around after 4 years | 11:56 |
| EisNerd | wgrant: still noone contacted me | 12:00 |
| wgrant | EisNerd: It's only been 90 minutes... | 12:00 |
| EisNerd | oh yesterday when I tried to reset the password I got already a message that it was recorded and will be handled asap | 12:03 |
| wgrant | Oh, really? That sounds worse than I thought. | 12:03 |
| EisNerd | wgrant: I could try to reset it again and gove you detailed informations if it occurs again | 12:04 |
| EisNerd | if not and all is fine I would also be satisfied | 12:05 |
| wgrant | EisNerd: login.launchpad.net is actually maintained by the Ubuntu SSO (login.ubuntu.com) team, not the Launchpad team, so I can't really help you directly. I'd wait for a response to the form you filled in earlier. If you don't have one within a day or so, poke me and I'll poke them for you. | 12:06 |
| EisNerd | ok thx | 12:07 |
| EisNerd | uh is there another way to login into launchpad? | 12:07 |
| wgrant | Not yet. | 12:08 |
| === bencer_ is now known as bencer | ||
| === dbm changed the topic of #launchpad to: dhttps://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: wgrant | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | ||
| dbm | ops | 13:00 |
| === dbm changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: wgrant | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | ||
| dbm | my bad | 13:00 |
| === verterok` is now known as verterok | ||
| === cnd` is now known as cnd | ||
| idnar | hey, I thought Launchpad accepted DKIM signatures in lieu of OpenPGP; am I confused, or am I doing something wrong? (my mail to new@ bounced) | 13:56 |
| wgrant | idnar: Only from some domains for now (gmail.com being one), and it's not precisely bug-free yet. | 13:57 |
| idnar | ah, I'm using a Google Apps domain :( | 13:58 |
| jml | idnar: bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bugs?field.tag=dkim | 13:58 |
| wgrant | idnar: We'll probably open it up a bit more once we've ironed out the bugs. | 13:59 |
| wgrant | (and worked out what a sane policy is) | 14:00 |
| idnar | I read some tickets, but I guess I missed the part where only explicitly-whitelisted domains were accepted | 14:01 |
| === jcsackett_ is now known as jcsackett | ||
| === jcsackett changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: jcsackett | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | ||
| === jtv is now known as jtv-afk | ||
| fta | uh? is this new? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/68312726/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-amd64.compiz_1%3A0.9.4git20110322-0ubuntu6~fta2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 16:07 |
| fta | it worked last week | 16:08 |
| jcsackett | one second, fta, i'm looking at the log. | 16:11 |
| fta | it's a log checker | 16:12 |
| fta | but i didn't touch those files | 16:12 |
| maxb | That has definitely existed for some time | 16:17 |
| micahg | jcsackett: bug 750528 was filed due to the plain text nature of the timeout, not the fact that it timed out | 16:21 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 750528 in Launchpad itself "Got a plaintext 504 timeout (dup-of: 438116)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/750528 | 16:21 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 438116 in Launchpad itself "Timeout when converting bug into question (BugTask:+create-question)" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/438116 | 16:21 |
| jcsackett | micahg: dig, correcting. | 16:21 |
| micahg | jcsackett: thanks | 16:21 |
| fta | maxb, but it didn't impact my previous upload, nor does it impact the official builds, why? | 16:21 |
| micahg | jcsackett: sorry, I should've been more verbose in the description :) | 16:22 |
| jcsackett | micahg: no worries. it's fixed now, and updated to indicate the actual issue more strongly. :-) | 16:23 |
| maxb | fta: Well, the relevant compiler warnings did not appear in your build that succeeded. | 16:50 |
| maxb | Since your package has not changed, I would be inclined to investigate possible toolchain changes in natty in the time between the builds | 16:50 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| === zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
| === jcsackett_ is now known as jcsackett | ||
| === zyga-afk is now known as zyga | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch | ||
| === tubadaz_ is now known as tubadaz | ||
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === Odd_Blok1 is now known as Odd_Bloke | ||
| === cdbs_ is now known as cdbs | ||
| leoquant | after a revoke ui which is in the terminal revuid the uid key is revoked, but after a serverupload/synch. the revoked uid is still present in launchpad | 18:46 |
| leoquant | is there a solution for this? | 18:46 |
| leoquant | seahorse gives the same results....imo there no way to remove revoked uids from launchpad | 18:47 |
| jcsackett | leoquant: i'm afraid i may be a little confused. you're trying to revoke a gpg key on launchpad? (i'm assuming, based on seahorse reference) | 18:54 |
| leoquant | jcsackett, via terminal and seahorse a uid can be revoked from the man key/emailadres | 18:56 |
| leoquant | but after syncht that to the server the revoked emailadres is still visible | 18:57 |
| geser | leoquant: do you try to "delete" an uid from your key? | 18:57 |
| leoquant | rev oke geser | 18:58 |
| leoquant | yes | 18:58 |
| geser | "revoke": mark the uid as no longer in use | 18:59 |
| geser | you can't remove that uid from your key completely only mark it as invalid (revoke) | 18:59 |
| leoquant | yes, but i expected the emailadres/uid to be removed as weel in launchpad | 19:00 |
| leoquant | (nwe keyboard sorry) | 19:00 |
| geser | ah, you marked your uid as revoked, uploaded that key and expected that LP removed that uid from your LP page automatically? I don't know if LP can do it | 19:01 |
| leoquant | seahorse has a "remove" option, even enigmail | 19:01 |
| leoquant | yes indeed | 19:01 |
| leoquant | ok geser | 19:02 |
| geser | leoquant: you can remove a uid from your (local) key, but that doesn't work for keys on keyservers as keyservers have no auth so only can merge new key information | 19:02 |
| leoquant | ok, understood. | 19:04 |
| === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha | ||
| jcsackett | leoquant: if you want to remove/edit email address data on lp, you can use launchpad.net/<yourusername>/+editemails | 19:04 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| leoquant | jcsackett, yes but i dont want to remove the complete string of emailaderesses, that should remove my main pgp key | 19:06 |
| leoquant | only one which i do not use | 19:07 |
| leoquant | but that adress is revoked | 19:07 |
| leoquant | the only thing is to remove the pgp key completely which is linked to my ubuntu.com/launchpad account | 19:09 |
| leoquant | but its ok now | 19:09 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| manty | hi! | 19:45 |
| manty | I'm trying to subscribe on launchpad with my debian.org email address but I'm not getting any mails from the system, any problems there? | 19:45 |
| jcsackett | manty: what's your username on launchpad? | 19:48 |
| manty | you mean my email? | 19:49 |
| manty | manty@debian.org | 19:49 |
| jcsackett | ah, manty, i think i misunderstood. you do not have an account on launchpad, you're just trying to subscribe to a list? | 19:50 |
| manty | I wanted to register on launchpad to comment on a bug | 19:50 |
| manty | I don't think they asked me for a login for that | 19:51 |
| manty | just my name, the email and a password I seem to remember | 19:51 |
| manty | it was a while ago, I've been trying to see if the mail had been locked in any of my servers since then | 19:51 |
| jcsackett | manty: how long ago? | 19:53 |
| manty | jcsackett: well, about 15 minutes or a little more maybe | 19:54 |
| jcsackett | and are you waiting on mail related to the bug, or related to registering? | 19:54 |
| manty | to registering | 19:54 |
| manty | the system says that I've been sent an email to my debian.org address to verify that it is mine | 19:54 |
| manty | the mail with the code to fill in the web | 19:55 |
| jcsackett | manty: it may have been lost in spam or something on your end then; there shouldn't be any problems. | 19:56 |
| jcsackett | manty: you can also use https://forms.canonical.com/lp-login-support/ for support with registering/logging in to launchpad. | 19:56 |
| manty | jcsackett: could be but then grep launchpad.net /var/log/mail.log | 19:57 |
| manty | should return something | 19:57 |
| manty | and it doesn't | 19:57 |
| manty | unless debian.org is rejecting launchpad.net mails | 19:57 |
| manty | or launchpad.net is having problems in sending them | 19:58 |
| jcsackett | manty: i was just able to get a confirmation email sent to me, so i don't believe launchpad is having any problems sending the email out. | 20:01 |
| jcsackett | manty: i'm seeing if there's anything else on our end that might be an issue. | 20:02 |
| manty | I think I'm going to mail feedback@launchpad | 20:02 |
| manty | jcsackett: can you see if mail has been sent to manty@debian.org recently? | 20:02 |
| manty | and if it was rejected or something? | 20:03 |
| manty | I can try to subscribe with my personal address but I'd rather use debian's | 20:04 |
| jcsackett | manty: you can add different addresses once you're signed up, and change which email is your preferred. | 20:05 |
| manty | I see | 20:05 |
| manty | jcsackett: I'll try that then, but it looks to me that if there is a problem mailing debian.org now I'll have the same problem later on | 20:05 |
| jcsackett | manty: true; but at least in the interim you'll be able to be involved in the bug you were interested in. | 20:06 |
| === sinzui changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: sinzui | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | ||
| manty | yes | 20:08 |
| manty | this one arrived | 20:08 |
| manty | without any problem | 20:08 |
| jcsackett | manty: excellent. | 20:08 |
| manty | and the machine receiving it is the same one as the debian.org mail | 20:08 |
| manty | except for it traversing the debian.org systems | 20:08 |
| manty | I know debian.org is working as I got mail recently | 20:09 |
| jcsackett | manty, i see also that there is a ~manty that was created automatically a package was initially imported, with your email address. https://launchpad.net/~manty | 20:09 |
| jcsackett | is that likely to be you? | 20:09 |
| manty | maybe | 20:12 |
| manty | I was trying to add the debian.org mail address | 20:12 |
| manty | and it told me that it was in use | 20:13 |
| manty | the weird thing is that it didn't told me so when trying to create the debian.org account before | 20:13 |
| sinzui | manty: the address could have been imported from a changelog | 20:13 |
| sinzui | manty: You can search https://launchpad.net/people for the address. You want to merge that user into you current profile | 20:14 |
| sinzui | Lp will send an email to that address to confirm you control it | 20:14 |
| manty | sinzui: I have already changed the password and gathered control to the debian.org account | 20:15 |
| manty | but I'd say it's a bug not to inform the guy after all the process that the email already has an account for it | 20:16 |
| manty | and instead tell him that a mail has been sent | 20:16 |
| manty | when it hasn't | 20:16 |
| sinzui | manty: yes. We are working on changing the merge rules this week so that users can reliably do this. | 20:17 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| vadi2 | My import of a git branch failed for a funny reason (http://launchpadlibrarian.net/68344638/vperetokin-mudlet-trunk.log). Did I provide it the wrong URL? The UI did accept it... | 20:43 |
| maxb_ | "The remote server unexpectedly closed the connection. | 20:58 |
| maxb_ | could just be a transient remote problem | 20:58 |
| === maxb_ is now known as maxb | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 | ||
| === aj00200_ is now known as aj00200 | ||
| askhl | Hi. I'm trying to copy a PPA from Maverick to Natty within same PPA. I get "The following source cannot be copied:" and "gpaw 0.7.6974-1~ppa1 in maverick (same version already has published binaries in the destination archive)". It's here: https://launchpad.net/~campos-dev/+archive/campos/ | 22:01 |
| askhl | (In this case I chose 'rebuild binaries', but I get a similar error, something about 'already has binaries', if I attempt 'copy binaries') | 22:02 |
| === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer | ||
| === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
| timrc | wgrant: Thanks, for working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/750640 | 22:18 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 750640 in Launchpad itself "If the source version differs from the binary version, it is not specified in the Package index for that binary" [High,Fix committed] | 22:18 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-bbl | ||
| === s1aden is now known as sladen | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!