[00:00] You fail at apostrophes. [00:01] yes, yes I do. [00:07] /topichttps://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: wgrant | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ === sinzui changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: wgrant | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ [00:11] is there a ui for changing branch privacy, if you have access to use private branches? [00:13] yes [00:13] you can unhide a private branch [00:14] you can't hide a public branch [00:15] how do you create a private branch then? [00:16] two ways [00:17] either a privacy policy for a team you are in that says private-by-default [or always-private] or [00:17] create an empty branch and ask a losa to privatise it [00:17] these are both a bit awkward [00:17] we may overhaul this during the upcoming disclosure and privacy work [00:18] wgrant, hi, did you have a chance to look at the stats problem yesterday? [00:18] one of the challenges is bzr not being deeply integrated here - if you have a context where you /might want/ privacy, it would be nice to say '--private' or add a fake path element or something to get it private and tell LP what privacy group to grant access to the branch [00:19] wgrant, btw, i fixed my script. should work with both ff4 and ch now [00:19] that would be nice [00:19] remember that we permit different groups to have private branches in the same namespace - and they can either have partitioned membership or overlapping - both are supported [00:19] if there was an api to control it, we could add a ui for it [00:19] fta: Sorry, lots of other stuff came up :/ [00:19] fta: I'll try to get to it today. [00:19] the experience of pushing to a branch that lp 'knows' about but doesn't exist is pretty poor at the moment [00:20] so I think it would be nice to have a create-branch verb that knows how to talk about this [00:20] are losas involved because they do direct db access; or because they're a human sanity check; or ...? [00:20] (as well as not requiring launchpadlib chatter during initial push) [00:20] poolie: ... [I don't know] [00:20] lifeless: you are on RC mode, with DEVEL closed now. [00:20] wgrant, ok, n-p. do you still see the long legend in my page? [00:20] Chex: right, we want to be unrc'd [00:22] fta: Ah, that's much better. Yesterday it showed *every* package in the one graph. [00:24] wgrant, weird, i should have been like that for only a few minutes 2 days ago, maybe you had the old js in cache or something === bburhans_ is now known as bburhans [04:32] Hi, is the launchpad site down? I'm getting timeouts. [04:35] marvin2: Which pages? [04:35] It's working OK for me. [04:37] works fine for me too [05:20] what's the deal atm for getting spam removed? [05:20] i saw some bug updates from jcs [05:20] ask a losa still? [05:21] poolie: Bugs we (or you) can do. [05:21] do you mean, removing the whole bug? [05:21] Questions still needs a LOSA, but the necessary DB changes are being rolled out tomorrow night. [05:21] Bug comments. [05:21] ah, quite clearly it's an existing valid account that was compromised [05:21] questions can't be done at all atm [05:21] Which account? [05:21] wgrant, oh, how? [05:22] poolie: There's no UI yet, but the API is there and accessible to ~registry. [05:22] And will be for comments in a week or so too. [05:22] is there a cli to drive it? [05:23] https://launchpad.net/~starplant is the troublesome account [05:23] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-windows-installers/+bug/341465 is an example [05:23] Ubuntu bug 341465 in Bazaar Windows Installers "bzr linked version of msvcrt.dll is missing" [High,Invalid] [05:23] There's no common script, no. [05:23] I think I saw a question about that account... [05:23] Oh. [05:23] > will be for comments in a week or so too. [05:24] No, I hid all his comments last week, I thought. [05:24] Are there more? [05:24] so what is there an api for now? [05:24] there are [05:24] poolie: Will be for *questions*, sorry. [05:24] he did make some valid comments a year ago [05:24] what're the requirements to run an instance of the launchpad source? [05:24] poolie: Hmm, no comments since the 1st AFAICT. [05:24] great peace of mind [05:24] EvilPhoenix, also, see dev.launchpad.net/Running [05:24] nup, but several that day [05:25] poolie: Are any of them still there? [05:25] yes, there's one on the page i just sent you [05:25] I disposed of 12 of them last week, and I see no more now. [05:25] unless you removed it just now [05:25] Hmmm. [05:25] also bug 235668 [05:25] Launchpad bug 235668 in Bazaar GTK+ Frontends "seahorse crashes on import" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/235668 [05:25] Oh. [05:25] It would help if I looked for *all* his commented bugs, not just the open ones. [05:26] heh [05:26] Fixing, thanks. [05:26] haha [05:26] i'd actually rather learn how to fish in this case [05:26] how are you fixing them? [05:26] poolie: thanks [05:27] Well, it could be far more automated, but I just have a script a couple of lines long that takes a bug and comment number, shows it, asks for confirmation, and calls bug.setCommentVisibility(comment_number=n, visible=False) [05:28] ok [05:28] i know i could rewrite that script but how about if you put it into say the lp tree? [05:28] or a new lp-admin-clients project or something [05:30] i'll suspend the account i guess [05:30] or deactivate it? [05:30] sinzui was going to get this in the web UI [05:31] that would be nice [05:31] poolie: No need. [05:31] It was a one-off email spam incident. [05:32] Ah, already done I see. [05:32] At least we can unsuspend them now. [05:32] I'll set it back to deactivated. [05:32] Since we can't reactivate it like this. [05:32] But this will let the user log in. [05:33] oh i see [05:34] how do you know it was email spam? [05:35] Well, I don't know for sure, but it was a single incident all at the one time, and hasn't happened again. [05:35] I don't think suspending for that is useful. === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away [05:40] i guess if it was ongoing it would continue until the account was suspended [05:40] Right. [05:40] If it's ongoing then we should suspend. [05:42] poolie: Anyway, that's all of them gone, for real this time. [07:57] how can the 'tags' portlet show a tag and then find no bugs? [07:58] poolie: maybe it's an official tag? === ampelbein_ is now known as Ampelbein [08:17] poolie: it shows tags from all bugs ever [08:17] poolie: which is why its so busy and useless [08:26] i see [08:26] if i scratched an itch by making it show in huw's simpler layout just the official tags do you think that would be accepted? [08:26] (this is a bit hypothetical as my queue is already in train) [08:27] i mean full [08:30] personally [08:31] I value the emergent nature of tag clouds [08:31] I would not like to see officil tags onlyt [08:43] how about showing, in a decent layout, all the in-use tags then? [08:43] i guess, those in use on open bugs [08:44] perhaps truncated to say 50 [08:53] poolie: if I had time to hack on it, the first thing I'd do is measure how long it takes to determine 'in use tags' on e.g. Ubuntu [08:53] poolie: and use that to guide further decisions about what to do [08:55] good idea [09:01] ls [09:01] . .. [09:09] Morning [09:29] mrevell: Good morning, and in case I don't see ya, good afternoon, good evening, and good night! [09:29] heh :) Thanks mok0 [09:29] (cf. Truman :-) [09:29] Superb film. [09:36] mrevell: indeed :-) === doko_ is now known as doko [10:34] moin [10:35] someone here who can have a look for my lp account? [10:35] there is something wrong [10:35] wgrant: according to topic maybe you? [10:35] EisNerd: What's your Launchpad username? [10:36] got the message? [10:36] Yeah. [10:36] That account has never been used. [10:37] because I can't login [10:37] and can't reset password [10:37] Oh? [10:37] it exists since when? [10:37] What happens when you try? [10:38] yesterday or longer [10:38] Where are you trying to log in? What does it say if you try to log in? [10:38] because I tried to create it yesterday but never got this verification mail [10:38] https://login.launchpad.net/ [10:39] says "Passwort stimmt nicht überein" [10:39] Could you ask at https://forms.canonical.com/lp-login-support/? [10:39] damn javascript sides [10:42] ok [10:45] hm ok where is this member of the gsst? [10:46] What do you mean? [10:46] ;) [10:46] the message after submitting the request [10:46] "A member of the Global Support Services team will be in touch shortly to discuss your needs." [10:46] Ah, right. [10:47] so where is this member I have to discuss this with [10:48] ok afk === zyga_ is now known as zyga === yofel_ is now known as yofel [11:48] Hi, I have a question about binary-indep packages in PPAs. The packages are built on i386 only (which is intended). But the generated packages then should be available on all architectures. [11:49] And they are not. [11:50] Do I have to configure somehow that the packages are copied to other architectures? [11:50] purpleKarrot: Are the packages you generate in binary-indep set as Architecture: all? [11:51] (checking) [11:52] no, they are set to 'any'. should I set them to 'all'? [11:52] yes [11:52] Yes, or they will be built for i386 only. [11:52] OK, thanks! I will try that. [11:55] any/all is so damn confusing [11:55] Not so much confusing as badly named. [11:56] hence confusing :) [11:56] I still keep getting them the wrong way around after 4 years [12:00] wgrant: still noone contacted me [12:00] EisNerd: It's only been 90 minutes... [12:03] oh yesterday when I tried to reset the password I got already a message that it was recorded and will be handled asap [12:03] Oh, really? That sounds worse than I thought. [12:04] wgrant: I could try to reset it again and gove you detailed informations if it occurs again [12:05] if not and all is fine I would also be satisfied [12:06] EisNerd: login.launchpad.net is actually maintained by the Ubuntu SSO (login.ubuntu.com) team, not the Launchpad team, so I can't really help you directly. I'd wait for a response to the form you filled in earlier. If you don't have one within a day or so, poke me and I'll poke them for you. [12:07] ok thx [12:07] uh is there another way to login into launchpad? [12:08] Not yet. === bencer_ is now known as bencer === dbm changed the topic of #launchpad to: dhttps://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: wgrant | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ [13:00] ops === dbm changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: wgrant | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ [13:00] my bad === verterok` is now known as verterok === cnd` is now known as cnd [13:56] hey, I thought Launchpad accepted DKIM signatures in lieu of OpenPGP; am I confused, or am I doing something wrong? (my mail to new@ bounced) [13:57] idnar: Only from some domains for now (gmail.com being one), and it's not precisely bug-free yet. [13:58] ah, I'm using a Google Apps domain :( [13:58] idnar: bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bugs?field.tag=dkim [13:59] idnar: We'll probably open it up a bit more once we've ironed out the bugs. [14:00] (and worked out what a sane policy is) [14:01] I read some tickets, but I guess I missed the part where only explicitly-whitelisted domains were accepted === jcsackett_ is now known as jcsackett === jcsackett changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: jcsackett | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ === jtv is now known as jtv-afk [16:07] uh? is this new? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/68312726/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-amd64.compiz_1%3A0.9.4git20110322-0ubuntu6~fta2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [16:08] it worked last week [16:11] one second, fta, i'm looking at the log. [16:12] it's a log checker [16:12] but i didn't touch those files [16:17] That has definitely existed for some time [16:21] jcsackett: bug 750528 was filed due to the plain text nature of the timeout, not the fact that it timed out [16:21] Launchpad bug 750528 in Launchpad itself "Got a plaintext 504 timeout (dup-of: 438116)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/750528 [16:21] Launchpad bug 438116 in Launchpad itself "Timeout when converting bug into question (BugTask:+create-question)" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/438116 [16:21] micahg: dig, correcting. [16:21] jcsackett: thanks [16:21] maxb, but it didn't impact my previous upload, nor does it impact the official builds, why? [16:22] jcsackett: sorry, I should've been more verbose in the description :) [16:23] micahg: no worries. it's fixed now, and updated to indicate the actual issue more strongly. :-) [16:50] fta: Well, the relevant compiler warnings did not appear in your build that succeeded. [16:50] Since your package has not changed, I would be inclined to investigate possible toolchain changes in natty in the time between the builds === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] === zyga is now known as zyga-afk === jcsackett_ is now known as jcsackett === zyga-afk is now known as zyga === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch === tubadaz_ is now known as tubadaz === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === Odd_Blok1 is now known as Odd_Bloke === cdbs_ is now known as cdbs [18:46] after a revoke ui which is in the terminal revuid the uid key is revoked, but after a serverupload/synch. the revoked uid is still present in launchpad [18:46] is there a solution for this? [18:47] seahorse gives the same results....imo there no way to remove revoked uids from launchpad [18:54] leoquant: i'm afraid i may be a little confused. you're trying to revoke a gpg key on launchpad? (i'm assuming, based on seahorse reference) [18:56] jcsackett, via terminal and seahorse a uid can be revoked from the man key/emailadres [18:57] but after syncht that to the server the revoked emailadres is still visible [18:57] leoquant: do you try to "delete" an uid from your key? [18:58] rev oke geser [18:58] yes [18:59] "revoke": mark the uid as no longer in use [18:59] you can't remove that uid from your key completely only mark it as invalid (revoke) [19:00] yes, but i expected the emailadres/uid to be removed as weel in launchpad [19:00] (nwe keyboard sorry) [19:01] ah, you marked your uid as revoked, uploaded that key and expected that LP removed that uid from your LP page automatically? I don't know if LP can do it [19:01] seahorse has a "remove" option, even enigmail [19:01] yes indeed [19:02] ok geser [19:02] leoquant: you can remove a uid from your (local) key, but that doesn't work for keys on keyservers as keyservers have no auth so only can merge new key information [19:04] ok, understood. === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha [19:04] leoquant: if you want to remove/edit email address data on lp, you can use launchpad.net//+editemails === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [19:06] jcsackett, yes but i dont want to remove the complete string of emailaderesses, that should remove my main pgp key [19:07] only one which i do not use [19:07] but that adress is revoked [19:09] the only thing is to remove the pgp key completely which is linked to my ubuntu.com/launchpad account [19:09] but its ok now === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [19:45] hi! [19:45] I'm trying to subscribe on launchpad with my debian.org email address but I'm not getting any mails from the system, any problems there? [19:48] manty: what's your username on launchpad? [19:49] you mean my email? [19:49] manty@debian.org [19:50] ah, manty, i think i misunderstood. you do not have an account on launchpad, you're just trying to subscribe to a list? [19:50] I wanted to register on launchpad to comment on a bug [19:51] I don't think they asked me for a login for that [19:51] just my name, the email and a password I seem to remember [19:51] it was a while ago, I've been trying to see if the mail had been locked in any of my servers since then [19:53] manty: how long ago? [19:54] jcsackett: well, about 15 minutes or a little more maybe [19:54] and are you waiting on mail related to the bug, or related to registering? [19:54] to registering [19:54] the system says that I've been sent an email to my debian.org address to verify that it is mine [19:55] the mail with the code to fill in the web [19:56] manty: it may have been lost in spam or something on your end then; there shouldn't be any problems. [19:56] manty: you can also use https://forms.canonical.com/lp-login-support/ for support with registering/logging in to launchpad. [19:57] jcsackett: could be but then grep launchpad.net /var/log/mail.log [19:57] should return something [19:57] and it doesn't [19:57] unless debian.org is rejecting launchpad.net mails [19:58] or launchpad.net is having problems in sending them [20:01] manty: i was just able to get a confirmation email sent to me, so i don't believe launchpad is having any problems sending the email out. [20:02] manty: i'm seeing if there's anything else on our end that might be an issue. [20:02] I think I'm going to mail feedback@launchpad [20:02] jcsackett: can you see if mail has been sent to manty@debian.org recently? [20:03] and if it was rejected or something? [20:04] I can try to subscribe with my personal address but I'd rather use debian's [20:05] manty: you can add different addresses once you're signed up, and change which email is your preferred. [20:05] I see [20:05] jcsackett: I'll try that then, but it looks to me that if there is a problem mailing debian.org now I'll have the same problem later on [20:06] manty: true; but at least in the interim you'll be able to be involved in the bug you were interested in. === sinzui changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: sinzui | Mail notifications for bugs can see a delay of 4 hours | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ [20:08] yes [20:08] this one arrived [20:08] without any problem [20:08] manty: excellent. [20:08] and the machine receiving it is the same one as the debian.org mail [20:08] except for it traversing the debian.org systems [20:09] I know debian.org is working as I got mail recently [20:09] manty, i see also that there is a ~manty that was created automatically a package was initially imported, with your email address. https://launchpad.net/~manty [20:09] is that likely to be you? [20:12] maybe [20:12] I was trying to add the debian.org mail address [20:13] and it told me that it was in use [20:13] the weird thing is that it didn't told me so when trying to create the debian.org account before [20:13] manty: the address could have been imported from a changelog [20:14] manty: You can search https://launchpad.net/people for the address. You want to merge that user into you current profile [20:14] Lp will send an email to that address to confirm you control it [20:15] sinzui: I have already changed the password and gathered control to the debian.org account [20:16] but I'd say it's a bug not to inform the guy after all the process that the email already has an account for it [20:16] and instead tell him that a mail has been sent [20:16] when it hasn't [20:17] manty: yes. We are working on changing the merge rules this week so that users can reliably do this. === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [20:43] My import of a git branch failed for a funny reason (http://launchpadlibrarian.net/68344638/vperetokin-mudlet-trunk.log). Did I provide it the wrong URL? The UI did accept it... [20:58] "The remote server unexpectedly closed the connection. [20:58] could just be a transient remote problem === maxb_ is now known as maxb === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 === aj00200_ is now known as aj00200 [22:01] Hi. I'm trying to copy a PPA from Maverick to Natty within same PPA. I get "The following source cannot be copied:" and "gpaw 0.7.6974-1~ppa1 in maverick (same version already has published binaries in the destination archive)". It's here: https://launchpad.net/~campos-dev/+archive/campos/ [22:02] (In this case I chose 'rebuild binaries', but I get a similar error, something about 'already has binaries', if I attempt 'copy binaries') === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson [22:18] wgrant: Thanks, for working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/750640 [22:18] Ubuntu bug 750640 in Launchpad itself "If the source version differs from the binary version, it is not specified in the Package index for that binary" [High,Fix committed] === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-bbl === s1aden is now known as sladen === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk