[00:01] <rakshasa> Than just install your ubuntu and select the right partition make sure you dont overwrite you windos
[00:02] <rakshasa> Leave some MB's unallocated space between the partitions
=== UndiFineD is now known as UndiFineD_
=== UndiFineD_ is now known as UndiFineD
[00:04] <rakshasa> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/separatehome#intro
[00:04] <rakshasa> Here is some info
[00:07] <Duhza> hello
=== ApOgEE__ is now known as ApOgEE
[01:47] <ApOgEE> hi all
[02:17] <thewrath> hey all!
=== evilnhandler_ is now known as evilnhandler
=== txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger
[03:28] <thewrath> hello
[08:16] <xardas008> what can be the reason for a file conflict in ubuntu one?
[08:16] <xardas008> and how can i avoid it in Ubuntu 10.10
[08:49] <r4y> Hello
[08:49] <xardas008> hello r4y
[08:49] <r4y> When Ubuntu 10.04 had come out I downloaded it and put it on CD
[08:50] <r4y> Do they change what they upload for downloaders to put on CD
[08:50] <r4y> you know iso
[08:50] <xardas008> how do you mean that?
[08:50] <r4y> How do I not mean that?
[08:51] <r4y> I am thinking how else I can say it
[08:51] <r4y> I should say something about what I am asking
[08:52] <r4y> I am not sure I can find the link I had read
[08:52] <r4y> there was a bug in the iso cd I downloaded of lucid lynx
[08:53] <r4y> where when installing, when the menu pops up I can't just let it automatically go into the live session
[08:53] <r4y> instead
[08:53] <r4y> I had to pick to go into the live session by pressing start
[08:53] <r4y> don't ask me why but I remember it
[08:53] <r4y> anyways
[08:54] <xardas008> normaly ubuntu lets you decide if you want to install or go into live session
[08:54] <r4y> It was a bug of some sort
[08:54] <r4y> I never had that problem before
[08:55] <r4y> I have burned Gutsy Gibbons, Hardy Heron, and that other one which I think was 9.04
[08:55] <xardas008> i never had any problems with the live image
[08:55] <r4y> they didn't have any problem like the one I have with this CD I had burned
[08:55] <r4y> So
[08:56] <r4y> I am asking do they change the upload they feed people for each individual version?
[08:56] <xardas008> for lts maybe
[08:56] <r4y> That's my thought as well
[08:57] <r4y> I don't know for sure either
[08:57] <r4y> What version are you running?, or are you?
[08:57] <nit-wit> would you iike a md5sum check link
[08:58] <r4y> No, I know where to go
[08:58] <nit-wit> cool
[08:58] <r4y> It's easy to find
[08:58] <r4y> thank you though
[08:58] <r4y> :)
[08:58] <xardas008> atm 11.04
[08:58] <r4y> Is 10.04 more stable?
[08:59] <xardas008> no it's a beta
[08:59] <r4y> Does beta mean newest?, I never quite understood alpha and beta
[09:00] <xardas008> it means that it is a testing version
[09:00] <xardas008> not for productive work
[09:00] <MrChrisDruif> r4y: 10.04 "should" be more stable than 11.04B4 or even 10.10 as it's a LTS
[09:00] <r4y> O, OK
[09:00] <r4y> thank you both
[09:01] <r4y> Wait, I was just on their website, I didn't see 10.10, although I have read that number of Ubuntu many times
[09:02] <r4y> I must have missed it somehow
[09:02] <r4y> I though 10.04 was Long term and 10.10 was not
[09:02] <r4y> I thought, not I though
[09:03] <r4y> wacks myself on the head
[09:04] <r4y> So I am wrong, then?, If I am wrong then Ubuntu 10.04 and Ubuntu 10.10 is Long Term?
[09:04] <r4y> are long term, not is, wack
[09:04] <xardas008> only 10.04 is Long Term
[09:04] <r4y> ouch
[09:04] <r4y> LOL
[09:04] <r4y> OK
[09:04] <r4y> is 11.04 also LT?
[09:04] <bioterror> no
[09:04] <r4y> I what you just said
[09:04] <MrChrisDruif> r4y: Nope :)
[09:05] <r4y> OK
[09:05] <r4y> OK I am sorry, thank you
[09:05] <bioterror> 12.04 might be ;)
[09:05] <r4y> So I should try Lucid again I guess
[09:05] <bioterror> as 08.04 -> 10.04 ->
[09:05] <r4y> When will that be out?
[09:05] <r4y> O, right
[09:05] <xardas008> 12.04 in april 2012
[09:05] <MrChrisDruif> bioterror: it should be 12.04 :)
[09:05] <bioterror> :D
[09:06] <r4y> I was just using 8.04 about a month and half ago
[09:06] <MrChrisDruif> Lucid is out r4y
[09:06] <r4y> One more year, but it will be in beta
[09:06] <r4y> OK, thank you guys
[09:06] <r4y> you have helped me understand better
[09:06] <MrChrisDruif> In beta?
[09:06] <r4y> 12
[09:06] <r4y> not 10
[09:07] <r4y> when it is out it will in beta for a while
[09:07] <r4y> testing
[09:07] <r4y> version 12
[09:07] <bioterror> those goes by the year
[09:07] <bioterror> 12 means 2012
[09:08] <r4y> I know 10.04 is out, I already have it on CD in this room which I burned some many months ago
[09:08] <bioterror> 10.04 came year ago
[09:08] <r4y> those?
[09:09] <r4y> each number by year?
[09:09] <r4y> I don't know why I didn'e see it before
[09:09] <r4y> really wacks
[09:09] <r4y> double ouch
[09:10] <MrChrisDruif> r4y: It took me some time to get that as well :)
[09:10] <r4y> I see the light, ha ha ha ha
[09:11] <r4y> ty all so much, now I know what I am going to do and I understand some more better
[09:11] <r4y> I always learn something when I come here
[09:11] <r4y> always
[09:12] <r4y> Take care all, o/
[09:12] <r4y> bye
[09:14] <r4y> Bye MrChrisDruif, bioterror, xardas008, and nit-wit
[09:14] <MrChrisDruif> Bya r4y :)
[09:14] <r4y> o/
[09:14] <bioterror> ubuntu comes every 6 months
[09:14] <bioterror> 04 and 10
[09:14] <r4y> evey 6 months
[09:15] <r4y> by number for number of the year
[09:15] <xardas008> and month
[09:15] <bioterror> year.month
[09:15] <r4y>  since 4?, right
[09:15] <bioterror> like 11.04
[09:15] <bioterror> that's how it will get version
[09:15] <r4y> So they started with number 4?
[09:15] <bioterror> they started with 5.04
[09:15] <bioterror> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(operating_system)#Releases
[09:15] <r4y> Well, now it makes sense
[09:16] <bioterror> sowwy, 4.10 was first ;)
[09:16] <r4y> aha, I see
[09:16] <bioterror> 6.06 was exception
[09:16] <r4y> well, close(spelling) enough for me
[09:17] <r4y> 4 being in the middle of the year,
[09:17] <r4y> OK well take care and ty you all
=== Timo__ is now known as Timo_
[10:07] <xardas008> i have a problem with ubuntu one, when i have a file conflict, i can't do what is described here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuOne/FAQ/HowDoIResolveConflictFiles because the original file isn't visible anymore
[12:48] <coz_>  good day to all
[12:53] <s-fox> =)
[13:02] <coz_> s-fox,   hey
[13:04] <s-fox> Hello. BIAB
=== MrChrisDruif1 is now known as MrChrisDruif
[18:19] <kristian-aalborg> hi all
[18:19] <kristian-aalborg> here's a simple question for once
[18:19] <kristian-aalborg> I need to install an extra kernel
[18:20] <kristian-aalborg> just as a security measure... what would I need? linux-image something something and?
[18:21] <xardas008> http://www.ramoonus.nl/2011/03/linux-kernel-2-6-38-installation-guide-for-ubuntu-linux/
[18:21] <xardas008> everything you need stands on this page
[18:22] <holstein> kristian-aalborg: you can easily install the PAE kernel
[18:22] <kristian-aalborg> yo holstein
[18:22] <holstein> sudo apt-get install linux-generic-pae
[18:22] <holstein> the problem is
[18:23] <holstein> which ever is the newest
[18:23] <holstein> which should be the normal -generic one
[18:23] <holstein> will the at the top of the list in grub
[18:23] <holstein> and get booted
[18:23] <holstein> normally
[18:23] <holstein> i just leave the last *good* kernel in place
[18:23] <holstein> and use it if needed
[18:30] <kristian-aalborg> aptitude update reveals no new kernels
[18:44] <kevin9286049> i know there's a kernel ppa kristian-aalborg
[18:45] <kristian-aalborg> kevin9286049: been there and not going back ;)
[18:46] <kevin9286049> i was able to add 2.6.26, i did it through the kernel ppa
[18:46] <kevin9286049> good luck then
[19:51] <Duhza> hello
[19:59] <Toastedegg> I'm trying to install ubuntu onto my netbook. I'm at the final installation step (Who are you?) and after typing in all my information, with the download bar saying "Ready when you are..." the Forward button isn't becoming available.
[19:59] <Toastedegg> What am I doing wrong here?
[20:00] <holstein> Toastedegg: what installer?
[20:00] <holstein> the live installer for the 32bit 10.10?
[20:01] <Toastedegg> The one available for the netbook from ubuntu.com.
[20:01] <holstein> right
[20:01] <charlie-tca> Toastedegg: make sure the username is not admin
[20:01] <Toastedegg> It isn't.
[20:01] <holstein> what version?
[20:01] <holstein> 10.10?
[20:01] <Toastedegg> 10.10
[20:01] <holstein> right?
[20:01] <holstein> OK
[20:01] <Toastedegg> Everything on the Who are you page has a green check.
[20:02] <Duhza> how can i get mysql on my 64bit ubuntu desktop
[20:02] <holstein> Toastedegg: back button working?
[20:02] <Toastedegg> yeah
[20:02] <holstein> you tried it?
[20:02] <holstein> already?
[20:02] <Toastedegg> yep
[20:02] <holstein> Duhza: check out http://blog.sudobits.com/2010/10/27/how-to-install-mysql-on-ubuntu-10-10/
[20:03] <holstein> Toastedegg: if it were me
[20:03] <holstein> i would DL the normal ubuntu
[20:03] <holstein> and try that installer
[20:03] <holstein> you should be able to get past that though
[20:03] <Toastedegg> Yeah, that's why I'm stumped about it.
[20:03] <holstein> probably just something fiddly with what you've entered
[20:04] <Toastedegg> Possibly.
[20:05] <Toastedegg> I'll check the only step that might be giving it problems, and then try the normal ubuntu.
[20:06] <Toastedegg> And now the loader bar is stuck at "Getting the time from a network time server..." Joy.
[20:08] <holstein> Toastedegg: how did it run live?
[20:08] <holstein> the network?
[20:08] <Toastedegg> I thiink so. I'm not certain.
[20:08] <holstein> well, i wouldnt expect anything miraculous to happen
[20:08] <holstein> it'll run the same as it did live
[20:09] <holstein> if you didnt have network from the live CD
[20:09] <holstein> you wont have it now, or right after the install
[20:09] <holstein> i think its a great idea to use the live CD's as a tool
[20:09] <holstein> to see how well the hardware supports linus
[20:09] <holstein> linux*
[20:10] <Toastedegg> Alright. It's a Toshiba netbook, so it shouldn't have too many problems.
[20:10] <Toastedegg> Guess I'll try the normal ubuntu.
[20:14] <holstein> Toastedegg: ?
[20:15] <Toastedegg> ?
[20:15] <holstein> depends on the hardwar really
[20:15] <holstein> hardware
[20:15] <holstein> i wouldnt assume anything
[20:15] <Toastedegg> True.
[20:15] <kevin9286049> Toastedegg: you might consider searching launchpad.net and ubuntuforums.org for your netbook model
[20:15] <kevin9286049> Toshiba's are MS-centric.  I have a u305-s7448 notebook
[20:15] <holstein> but, we'll help you sort out wifi or whatever post-install too :)
[20:16] <Toastedegg> Thanks.
[23:48] <kristian-aalborg> hurm, I did everything here: http://idyllictux.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/lucidubuntu-10-04-high-resolution-plymouth-virtual-terminal-for-atinvidia-cards-with-proprietaryrestricted-driver/
[23:48] <kristian-aalborg> then I got the backup kernel I talked about...
[23:49] <kristian-aalborg> now my changes have been undone?!
[23:50] <kristian-aalborg> the config files look the same though