[00:21] <h00k> tonyyarusso: Not by much! but yes, I voted.
[01:48]  * Takyoji wonders if anyone happens to know of an alternative to getty/agetty (since it's not available in Ubuntu 10.10)
[03:49] <tonyyarusso> h00k: yay.  Should give us some good entertainment for the next few weeks.
[03:50] <tonyyarusso> Takyoji: Cisco's network simulation thingy has a Linux version.
[04:06] <tonyyarusso> Did ripps' mail get hacked?
[04:42] <nnonix> Anyone running the beta yet?
[04:44] <tonyyarusso> my parents are
[04:44] <nnonix> How is it .. really?
[04:44] <nnonix> I assume you set that up for them.
[04:45] <tonyyarusso> I installed it, but didn't do anything else interesting.
[04:45] <tonyyarusso> Dad would have, but he wanted to go to bed.
[04:46] <nnonix> Well, if you haven't gotten any phone calls yet, I suppose that's good feedback.
[04:47] <nnonix> as-good-as
[05:35] <ripps> tonyyarusso: my google account was hacked on april 1, google shut it down and gave me the oppurtunity to reset the password
[05:37] <tonyyarusso> ripps: ah.  Got a funny-looking e-mail from you today.
[05:41] <ripps> tonyyarusso: really? It should have been fixed
[05:41] <ripps> and I don't have any sent mail in my inbox. Is somebody posing as me now?
[05:43]  * tonyyarusso checks headers
[05:44] <ripps> I suppose once they got access to my account, they then had everything they needed to pretend to be me, even without access to my account
[05:45] <tonyyarusso> bah, can't really tell because mailman scrubs stuff.
[05:46] <tonyyarusso> See PM for pastebin of the message
[05:54] <ripps> tonyyarusso: yeah, somebody accessed my account from Brazil 3 hours ago. I don't know how they got access, I changed my password
[06:13] <tonyyarusso> Geez.  It's going to be a doozy of a year for road construction.
[06:14] <sparklehistory> tonyyarusso: How so?
[06:14] <tonyyarusso> lots of pretty high-impact projects
[06:17] <sparklehistory> What else are they doing besides the light rail stuff?
[06:18] <tonyyarusso> Metro area list:  http://www.dot.state.mn.us/construction/2011/lists/2011Metro.pdf
[06:18] <tonyyarusso> GM list:  http://www.dot.state.mn.us/construction/2011/lists/2011OUTSTATE.pdf
[06:22] <sparklehistory> tonyyarusso: Aww, they're ripping up 35E at Hwy 96?  That's annoying.
[06:22] <tonyyarusso> They're ripping up everything :P
[06:23] <tonyyarusso> 35E north of my house, 35E east of my house, 694 east of my house, 694 west of my house, 36 east of my house, and 36 south of my house - wooo!
[06:23] <sparklehistory> tonyyarusso: So, you'll be using Snelling a lot this summer then...
[06:24] <tonyyarusso> maybe, when I can
[06:24] <tonyyarusso> The bridge over 694 will probably be closed sometimes, if not totally knocked out
[06:29] <sparklehistory> tonyyarusso: Good lord, where the hell are we getting the money for all this?  Last time I checked MN was broke.
[06:30] <tonyyarusso> a) These projects were approved and funded like 3 years ago, and are not part of the current budget
[06:30] <tonyyarusso> b) Theres a bunch of federal money in there
[06:31] <tonyyarusso> c) MN is nowhere near broke - the GOP just wants you to think it is.
[06:31] <sparklehistory> a) I suppose that makes sense.
[06:31] <sparklehistory> b) oh, is this still part of the Reinvestment and Recovery Act stuff?
[06:32] <sparklehistory> c) $5 billion dollar deficit?
[06:33] <tonyyarusso> huh, you can sign up for e-mail updates on the projects you're interested in.
[06:33] <tonyyarusso> b) Some of it, yes.
[06:33] <tonyyarusso> c) Is different from "we're broke".  There's money, they just don't want it.
[06:35] <sparklehistory> c) Well sure there's money if they raise taxes, but that's different than what's in the current revenue stream.
[06:41] <tonyyarusso> c) Exactly.  You don't get to throw away all of your money and then cry about how you have no money.
[06:52] <tonyyarusso> Interesting legal wrinkle in road construction:  http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d1/projects/hwy53relocation/
[06:53] <sparklehistory> ha, yeah that's a problem with easements
[06:54] <sparklehistory> You only have the rights specifically granted in them and no more, someone probably should have thought of that when they signed
[06:54] <sparklehistory> tonyyarusso: (This is also why I'm glad your parcels have direct road access :P)
[06:55] <tonyyarusso> Huh?  They obviously did think of that when they signed.
[06:55] <sparklehistory> So moving a road is a desired outcome?
[06:57] <tonyyarusso> Sure, if it doesn't happen until 50 years later and you save money.
[06:57] <sparklehistory> I suppose it's has been a number of years and the road probably needs repairs anyways.  And if there are minerals on the land buying it would have been expensive.