[04:45]  * genii-around blinks
[04:46] <tonyyarusso> interesting
[04:46] <tonyyarusso> I remember Madpilot got accidentally K-Lined once.
[04:47] <genii-around> Heh
[04:47] <hypatia> i wonder if he just has that as his quit message
[04:47] <hypatia> he dropped off another network at the same time
[05:00] <Tm_T> quit message has this "Quit:"
[05:01] <IdleOne> Do we want to let staff know about him being k-lined?
[05:02] <IdleOne> which btw is FUNNY
[05:02] <nhandler> No need
[05:02] <IdleOne> k
[05:04] <tonyyarusso> If only there were staff hanging out in this channel that would be likely to notice.  That would certainly save a step.
[05:05] <IdleOne> I assume they don't spend all their time looking at this channel
[05:05] <Tm_T> tonyyarusso: we don't have staff here?
[05:06] <IdleOne> I count 8
[05:07]  * nhandler counts 13
[05:07] <tonyyarusso> Tm_T: No, none at all.  They hate us, and avoid dealing with us at all costs.
[05:07] <Tm_T> noooooooooooo
[05:07] <IdleOne> nhandler: with clones?
[05:07] <tonyyarusso> If one of them actually *talked* in such a sad corner of the network as this they'd probably be banished to Undernet.
[05:08] <nhandler> IdleOne: Not counting clones (assuming I counted right)
[05:09] <IdleOne> recount game me 11
[05:09] <IdleOne> gave
[05:10]  * nhandler did a /ls .*freenode.*
[05:10] <IdleOne> xchat does not know /ls
[05:12] <nhandler> IdleOne: PM
[05:34]  * genii-around kicks his computer, violently
[05:37] <IdleOne> don't blame the hardware
[05:41] <genii-around> IdleOne: There seems to be some mouse gesture I'm not aware of that closes my IRC client :(
[05:41] <IdleOne> so PEBKAC
[05:41] <IdleOne> :)
[05:43]  * genii-around grumbles
[05:51]  * IdleOne slides over coffee
[05:54] <genii-around> Mmmmmmmm caffeine
[05:55] <genii-around> IdleOne: I'm actually drinking Guinness now :)
[07:29] <jussi> hehe, Ive been klined accidentally in the past also.
[07:29]  * genii-around slides jussi a beverage of his choice
[07:30] <jussi> genii-around: at this time its definitely coffe.
[07:30] <jussi> coffee
[07:30] <genii-around> Coffee it is!
[07:31] <genii-around> I'm on beer now. It's like 2:30am here
[07:31] <jussi> genii-around: you should be asleep
[07:32] <genii-around> Probably
[07:32] <genii-around> I do have to be at work in something like 5 and a half hours
[09:07] <Danielcg25> That's cool.
[09:38] <genii-around> !ping
[09:39] <jussi> !-ping
[09:41] <genii-around> Hm. And I think poor rww is K-lined
[09:42] <genii-around> My Natty keeps locking up, sorry the !ping
[11:45] <LjL> lunitik: hi
[11:45] <lunitik> Why am I still banned in #ubuntu ? This ban has been active for something like 5 years now and I didn't even do anything wrong in the first place, just corrected an op
[11:46] <LjL> let me guess, that op was Seveas
[11:46] <lunitik> Yeah
[11:46] <lunitik> I think so anyway, I believe it was the person who wrote the bot  :/
[11:47] <LjL> yes. well you will have to wait for someone much higher up the ladder than me who can possibly remove that ban :)
[12:03] <jussi> Pici: Ive refered dpm to you because he wants some stats from -classroom, I thought your script was nice and you may want to share it.
[14:39] <bazhang> boxxy seems familiar
[14:48] <bazhang> Mahoru`Tsunemi, hi
[16:02] <Pici> !test
[16:05] <LjL> :)
[16:18] <mneptok> uhhh ... is rww still k:'ed?
[16:19]  * mneptok pokes staff without !
[16:19] <LjL> he got k-lined? :D why?
[16:19] <Tm_T> mneptok: I believe it's up to rww to send an email
[16:19] <IdleOne> nick spamming I think is what the bot caught him for
[16:20] <LjL> i would like to think that exceptions to the boring procedures can be made for well-known operators
[16:20] <IdleOne> I don't think it has anything to do about being an op
[16:20] <LjL> well known users then
[16:21] <IdleOne> ^^ that I can agree with
[16:21] <Pici> Surely if an op's account is comprimised we wouldn't want to let them right back on the network.
[16:21] <popey> or if an op has "gone bad"
[16:21] <Pici> "gone rogue"
[16:22] <maco> why does that make me think of Palin?
[16:22] <IdleOne> but yeah, he had like 6 nick changes in as many seconds and I think ( pure speculation) freenode bot caught him
[16:22] <Pici> Or "gone rouge" maybe :P
[16:22] <mneptok> 4 changes.
[16:22] <IdleOne> haha
[16:22] <IdleOne> right 4
[16:22] <LjL> the bot is way oversensitive
[16:22] <mneptok> but whatever. i hope e-mail is not too laggy.
[16:22] <LjL> in my humble opinion
[16:23] <Pici> It may have had to do with the number of channels he was in.
[17:27] <Pici> !away > randomuser
[18:06] <s3r3n1t7> Hi, am i allowed to use the #ubuntu channel logs for creating a bot?
[18:06] <ikonia> in what respect ?
[18:06] <s3r3n1t7> I'm trying to make it understand conversations and it requires lots of them
[18:06] <ikonia> will it output anything to the channel
[18:06] <s3r3n1t7> no
[18:07] <ikonia> I don't see a problem then with out current policy
[18:07] <s3r3n1t7> it will be the epitome of silence and cannot be abused
[18:07] <ikonia> sounds reasonable then
[18:07] <s3r3n1t7> great!
[18:08] <s3r3n1t7> thanks ikonia
[18:08] <ikonia> thanks for letting us know
[18:08] <tsimpson> s3r3n1t7: you don't plan on publishing the logs though, right?
[18:08] <s3r3n1t7> tsimpson, ofcourse not
[18:09] <tsimpson> that's fine then :)
[18:09] <Tm_T> s3r3n1t7: is it able to use already present logs?
[18:09] <s3r3n1t7> tm_T, not yet ... that's a yet to be implemented feature
[18:09] <Tm_T> oh right, that would make things a lot easier though, considering the amount of our public logs (:
[18:10] <s3r3n1t7> hmm yes ... that's actually a great suggestion ...
[18:10] <s3r3n1t7> thanks!
[18:10] <Tm_T> np
[18:10]  * s3r3n1t7 runs off to get new feature in
[18:11] <s3r3n1t7> assuming there are no more questions on this for me?
[19:00] <ray24> Oh whats up kids
[19:00] <ray24> Can I get unbanned
[19:02] <LjL> i doubt it, honestly
[19:02] <LjL> but i'm not an op so i don't know. meanwhile have you read the guidelines?
[19:12] <ray24> I rather talk to someone who has jurisdiction, not some junkie
[19:12] <LjL> for instance, what you just said doesn't help your case at all
[19:13] <Pici> ray24: From where were you banned?
[19:14] <ray24> I already spoke with the legal advisor from freenode nhander, and we made a deal to settle this with the op that banned me
[19:14] <ray24> therefore, LjL has no power in this discussion
[19:14] <IdleOne> nhandler is freenode's legal advisor?
[19:15]  * LjL rolls eyes
[19:15] <Pici> ray24: I'd be happy to take a look at the ban, do you remember from where you were banned and why?
[19:16] <ray24> I was banned from ubuntu-offtopic unjustly
[19:16] <ray24> by Idleone
[19:16] <IdleOne> I am not an op there so it couldn't have been me
[19:17] <ray24> Strange, I was sure it was you
[19:17] <IdleOne> you were mistaken
[19:17] <ray24> Dude, it was you
[19:18] <IdleOne> Dude, no it wasn't.
[19:18] <IdleOne> I am not an op there
[19:18] <Pici> ray24: I see that IdleOne removed you from #ubuntu-ops, but not offtopic.
[19:18] <ray24> This whole thing started because of you. and I remember the ban message "enough"
[19:18] <IdleOne> /msg chanserv access #ubuntu-offtopic list
[19:18] <Pici> ray24: That was this channel.
[19:18] <IdleOne> ray24: that was in this channel
[19:18] <ray24> oh
[19:19] <IdleOne> I am also the one who decided to remove the ban from here to give you a fair chance to return and discuss your ban in -offtopic
[19:19] <ray24> I have no immediate evidence of who banned me from ubuntu-offtopic as I do not recall exactly what happened
[19:19] <Pici> Well let me take a look. One moment.
[19:20] <Jordan_U> It was rww.
[19:22] <Pici> ray24: It looks like you were accusing people of hacking you in #ubuntu-offtopic, does this sound familiar?
[19:23] <ray24> That accusation still holds prominent in my memory
[19:26] <Pici> I'm sorry, something has come up at work here that needs my attention.  I'm sure another op here can help you with the rest of your case.
[19:27] <ray24> Thank you for assisting me as much as you could.
[19:35] <ray24> So I need to get in contact with someone who has jurisdiction over at Ubuntu-offtopic
[19:36] <ray24> Who will remedy the situation for me, so i can start chatting there again
[19:36] <ray24> It's very important that I get to chat there again, because I am very interested in the discussion over there.
[19:36] <IdleOne> None of those ops are active. I suggest you return here in about 2-3 hours when they are normally around.
[19:37] <ray24> In that case, I will implement your suggestion in my strategic thinking
[19:37] <IdleOne> sounds like a plan
[19:37] <ray24> I will be around in about  2 to 3 hours.
[19:37] <IdleOne> see you then. have a good afternoon
[22:14] <nhandler> Just to clear things up (for the logs), I am not a legal advisor for freenode, nor did I ever claim to be one. I also never "made a deal", I simply talked to ray24 and some operators in an attempt to bring both parties to the table to discuss the ban civiliy
[22:17] <bazhang> I read that as civility
[22:31] <Flannel> What brought that up?
[22:32] <nhandler> Flannel: A comment made a few hours ago by ray24
[22:32] <genii-around> Flannel: "<ray24> I already spoke with the legal advisor from freenode nhander, and we made a deal to settle this with the op that banned me"
[22:32] <Flannel> Mmmm, my grep-fu must just be bad right now
[22:32] <Flannel> Ah, misspellings!
[22:38] <mneptok> i was injured in a channel drive-by. i want to speak to Freenode's legal counsel.
[23:55] <IdleOne> heya Logan_
[23:55] <Logan_> hey IdleOne
[23:55] <Logan_> it's a stupid factoid:
[23:55] <Logan_> !test again
[23:55] <IdleOne> !test
[23:56] <IdleOne> I tend to agree
[23:57] <IdleOne> Will leave it for now and see what the other ops think about forgetting it
[23:58] <genii-around> Maybe it should suggest #test
[23:58] <IdleOne> genii-around: good idea, thank for volunteering to edit it.
[23:59] <IdleOne> thanks*
[23:59] <genii-around> Heh!