=== rww is now known as rww_ === rww_ is now known as rww__ === rww__ is now known as robertwall === robertwall is now known as rww` [04:45] * genii-around blinks [04:46] interesting [04:46] I remember Madpilot got accidentally K-Lined once. [04:47] Heh [04:47] i wonder if he just has that as his quit message [04:47] he dropped off another network at the same time [05:00] quit message has this "Quit:" [05:01] Do we want to let staff know about him being k-lined? [05:02] which btw is FUNNY [05:02] No need [05:02] k [05:04] If only there were staff hanging out in this channel that would be likely to notice. That would certainly save a step. [05:05] I assume they don't spend all their time looking at this channel [05:05] tonyyarusso: we don't have staff here? [05:06] I count 8 [05:07] * nhandler counts 13 [05:07] Tm_T: No, none at all. They hate us, and avoid dealing with us at all costs. [05:07] noooooooooooo [05:07] nhandler: with clones? [05:07] If one of them actually *talked* in such a sad corner of the network as this they'd probably be banished to Undernet. [05:08] IdleOne: Not counting clones (assuming I counted right) [05:09] recount game me 11 [05:09] gave [05:10] * nhandler did a /ls .*freenode.* [05:10] xchat does not know /ls [05:12] IdleOne: PM [05:34] * genii-around kicks his computer, violently [05:37] don't blame the hardware [05:41] IdleOne: There seems to be some mouse gesture I'm not aware of that closes my IRC client :( [05:41] so PEBKAC [05:41] :) [05:43] * genii-around grumbles [05:51] * IdleOne slides over coffee [05:54] Mmmmmmmm caffeine [05:55] IdleOne: I'm actually drinking Guinness now :) [07:29] hehe, Ive been klined accidentally in the past also. [07:29] * genii-around slides jussi a beverage of his choice [07:30] genii-around: at this time its definitely coffe. [07:30] coffee [07:30] Coffee it is! [07:31] I'm on beer now. It's like 2:30am here [07:31] genii-around: you should be asleep [07:32] Probably [07:32] I do have to be at work in something like 5 and a half hours [09:04] In ubottu, Danielcg25 said: !Ginbuntu is Ginbuntu is what you get when you stay up too late coding, and end up mixing gin in your cup of Ubuntu. [09:06] In ubottu, Danielcg25 said: !testing is 123 [09:07] That's cool. === genii-around_ is now known as genii-around === genii-around_ is now known as genii-around [09:38] !ping [09:38] Here I am, brain the size of a planet and they ask me to respond to factoid requests. Call that job satisfaction? Because I don't. [09:39] !-ping [09:39] ping has no aliases - added by Hobbsee on 2006-07-11 15:58:48 - last edited by rww on 2011-03-01 07:41:28 [09:41] Hm. And I think poor rww is K-lined [09:42] My Natty keeps locking up, sorry the !ping [11:45] lunitik: hi [11:45] Why am I still banned in #ubuntu ? This ban has been active for something like 5 years now and I didn't even do anything wrong in the first place, just corrected an op [11:46] let me guess, that op was Seveas [11:46] Yeah [11:46] I think so anyway, I believe it was the person who wrote the bot :/ [11:47] yes. well you will have to wait for someone much higher up the ladder than me who can possibly remove that ban :) [12:03] Pici: Ive refered dpm to you because he wants some stats from -classroom, I thought your script was nice and you may want to share it. [14:39] boxxy seems familiar [14:48] Mahoru`Tsunemi, hi === Pici is now known as Guest95063 === Pici` is now known as Pici === nik0 is now known as niko [16:02] !test [16:02] You're testing my patience! [16:05] :) [16:18] uhhh ... is rww still k:'ed? [16:19] * mneptok pokes staff without ! [16:19] he got k-lined? :D why? [16:19] mneptok: I believe it's up to rww to send an email [16:19] nick spamming I think is what the bot caught him for [16:20] i would like to think that exceptions to the boring procedures can be made for well-known operators [16:20] I don't think it has anything to do about being an op [16:20] well known users then [16:21] ^^ that I can agree with [16:21] Surely if an op's account is comprimised we wouldn't want to let them right back on the network. [16:21] or if an op has "gone bad" [16:21] "gone rogue" [16:22] why does that make me think of Palin? [16:22] but yeah, he had like 6 nick changes in as many seconds and I think ( pure speculation) freenode bot caught him [16:22] Or "gone rouge" maybe :P [16:22] 4 changes. [16:22] haha [16:22] right 4 [16:22] the bot is way oversensitive [16:22] but whatever. i hope e-mail is not too laggy. [16:22] in my humble opinion [16:23] It may have had to do with the number of channels he was in. [17:27] !away > randomuser [18:06] Hi, am i allowed to use the #ubuntu channel logs for creating a bot? [18:06] in what respect ? [18:06] I'm trying to make it understand conversations and it requires lots of them [18:06] will it output anything to the channel [18:06] no [18:07] I don't see a problem then with out current policy [18:07] it will be the epitome of silence and cannot be abused [18:07] sounds reasonable then [18:07] great! [18:08] thanks ikonia [18:08] thanks for letting us know [18:08] s3r3n1t7: you don't plan on publishing the logs though, right? [18:08] tsimpson, ofcourse not [18:09] that's fine then :) [18:09] s3r3n1t7: is it able to use already present logs? [18:09] tm_T, not yet ... that's a yet to be implemented feature [18:09] oh right, that would make things a lot easier though, considering the amount of our public logs (: [18:10] hmm yes ... that's actually a great suggestion ... [18:10] thanks! [18:10] np [18:10] * s3r3n1t7 runs off to get new feature in [18:11] assuming there are no more questions on this for me? [19:00] Oh whats up kids [19:00] Can I get unbanned [19:02] i doubt it, honestly [19:02] but i'm not an op so i don't know. meanwhile have you read the guidelines? [19:12] I rather talk to someone who has jurisdiction, not some junkie [19:12] for instance, what you just said doesn't help your case at all [19:13] ray24: From where were you banned? [19:14] I already spoke with the legal advisor from freenode nhander, and we made a deal to settle this with the op that banned me [19:14] therefore, LjL has no power in this discussion [19:14] nhandler is freenode's legal advisor? [19:15] * LjL rolls eyes [19:15] ray24: I'd be happy to take a look at the ban, do you remember from where you were banned and why? [19:16] I was banned from ubuntu-offtopic unjustly [19:16] by Idleone [19:16] I am not an op there so it couldn't have been me [19:17] Strange, I was sure it was you [19:17] you were mistaken [19:17] Dude, it was you [19:18] Dude, no it wasn't. [19:18] I am not an op there [19:18] ray24: I see that IdleOne removed you from #ubuntu-ops, but not offtopic. [19:18] This whole thing started because of you. and I remember the ban message "enough" [19:18] /msg chanserv access #ubuntu-offtopic list [19:18] ray24: That was this channel. [19:18] ray24: that was in this channel [19:18] oh [19:19] I am also the one who decided to remove the ban from here to give you a fair chance to return and discuss your ban in -offtopic [19:19] I have no immediate evidence of who banned me from ubuntu-offtopic as I do not recall exactly what happened [19:19] Well let me take a look. One moment. [19:20] It was rww. [19:22] ray24: It looks like you were accusing people of hacking you in #ubuntu-offtopic, does this sound familiar? [19:23] That accusation still holds prominent in my memory [19:26] I'm sorry, something has come up at work here that needs my attention. I'm sure another op here can help you with the rest of your case. [19:27] Thank you for assisting me as much as you could. [19:35] So I need to get in contact with someone who has jurisdiction over at Ubuntu-offtopic [19:36] Who will remedy the situation for me, so i can start chatting there again [19:36] It's very important that I get to chat there again, because I am very interested in the discussion over there. [19:36] None of those ops are active. I suggest you return here in about 2-3 hours when they are normally around. [19:37] In that case, I will implement your suggestion in my strategic thinking [19:37] sounds like a plan [19:37] I will be around in about 2 to 3 hours. [19:37] see you then. have a good afternoon === evilessy is now known as Guest96463 [22:14] Just to clear things up (for the logs), I am not a legal advisor for freenode, nor did I ever claim to be one. I also never "made a deal", I simply talked to ray24 and some operators in an attempt to bring both parties to the table to discuss the ban civiliy [22:17] I read that as civility [22:31] What brought that up? [22:32] Flannel: A comment made a few hours ago by ray24 [22:32] Flannel: " I already spoke with the legal advisor from freenode nhander, and we made a deal to settle this with the op that banned me" [22:32] Mmmm, my grep-fu must just be bad right now [22:32] Ah, misspellings! [22:38] i was injured in a channel drive-by. i want to speak to Freenode's legal counsel. [23:55] In ubottu, Logan_ said: !forget test again [23:55] heya Logan_ [23:55] hey IdleOne [23:55] it's a stupid factoid: [23:55] !test again [23:55] Failed again. [23:55] !test [23:55] You're testing my patience! [23:56] I tend to agree [23:57] Will leave it for now and see what the other ops think about forgetting it [23:58] Maybe it should suggest #test [23:58] genii-around: good idea, thank for volunteering to edit it. [23:59] thanks* [23:59] Heh!