[00:00] <Pici> We usually use !test to check if the bot is replying, along with !ping
[00:00] <IdleOne> hmm ok.
[00:19] <genii-around> Darn. I wish I knew what ubottu told him now!
[00:19] <Pici> genii-around: it was about using tab complete.
[00:20] <genii-around> Aaaa
[01:16] <bazhang> llua, hi
[01:17] <bazhang> essy is an op or staff, right?
[01:17] <LjL> staff
[01:17] <bazhang> thanks
[01:17] <bazhang> ie Guest96463
[01:36] <bazhang> ban forward-able?
[01:37] <IdleOne> yes
[01:37] <IdleOne> I said I was wrong and he still acts like a jerk
[01:38] <IdleOne> llua: anything we can help you with?
[01:39] <llua> dunno
[01:39] <IdleOne> llua: please don't idle here.
[01:39] <llua> you say that as uf i chose to come here
[01:40] <llua> chioce*
[01:40] <IdleOne> ahh, I see. you didn't
[01:40] <IdleOne> apologies. you were forwarded here from #ubuntu-offtopic
[01:40] <bazhang> ban forward from -ot
[01:47] <bazhang> llua, you were asked to change your quit message; that was the reason for the ban forward to here
[01:50] <bazhang> dork, hi
[01:50] <dork> i apologize for being a dick, my ownership was off
[01:50] <dork> oh, interesting
[01:50] <bazhang> the language was uncalled for
[01:50] <dork> you're absolutely right
[01:50] <bazhang> okay then
[01:50] <dork> and i apologize whole-heartedly
[01:51] <dork> pass it along for me, if you will
[01:51] <bazhang> please have a look at the guidelines if you would
[01:51] <bazhang> !guidelines
[01:51] <bazhang> whoops
[01:52] <bazhang> either need more or less coffee: I typed 3 lines before I noticed he'd quit
[02:31] <bazhang> llua, hi
[02:32] <llua> hi
[02:33] <bazhang> llua, you know why you were ban forwarded here
[02:34] <llua> was that a question? its lacking a "?"
[02:34] <bazhang> because of your quit message, which you were asked to change
[02:38] <bazhang> llua, ^
[02:38] <llua> its another statement. how am i to respond? no command or task was given.
[02:38] <bazhang> llua, pardon?
[02:39] <bazhang> llua, you were asked to change your quit message. that is the reason for your ban forward here
[02:39] <bazhang> llua, should you wish the ban to be lifted, then you would need to change the quit message
[02:40] <llua> look at your scroll back at 20:16
[02:40] <llua> you told me hi. i left. what was my quit message? there was none. do you wish for me to have a quit message or not?
[02:40] <bazhang> llua, did you wish to resolve your ban in #ubuntu-offtopic ?
[02:41] <IdleOne> the attitude is not going to help get the ban lifted
[02:44] <IdleOne> llua: Could you please part this channel, I will ask Tm_T to send you a PM so that you two can resolve the ban.
[02:45] <llua> llua,  i currently dont have a quit message. how do you want me to change something i dont have.
[02:45] <llua> IdleOne, *
[02:45] <llua> i even parted the channel once i came
[02:45] <llua> its in your scrollback or log.
[02:46] <llua> i have no quit message. i am not understanding what to change
[02:46] <IdleOne> llua: ok well if you don't have a default quit message set then I suggest you not use any offensive quit/part message in the future
[02:47] <IdleOne> Since there doesn't appear to be any #ubuntu-offtopic ops active to help you with this, please part the channel and I will make sure that the op who set the ban contacts you.
[02:52] <IdleOne> llua: Please leave this channel.
[06:13] <bazhang> see Error in -ot
[06:59] <bazhang> gnomefreak, he's a well known troll
[06:59] <bazhang> onkavezigir etc
[07:01] <gnomefreak> i am ;)
[08:30] <ray24> oh sup
[08:39] <ikonia> hello there
[08:40] <ikonia> ray24: how can we help this morning ?
[08:40] <ray24> I don't think you have the power to remove my ban.
[08:40] <ikonia> I'm pretty sure I can
[08:41] <ikonia> what's the current status (I'll just get the logs)
[08:41] <ray24> I'm at the conclusion stage and the verdicts on my side
[08:41] <ray24> we went over this earlier today with the other ops
[08:41] <ray24> So I'm pretty sure I'll have the ban taken off.
[08:42] <ikonia> ok, I'll just check the logs, I'll just be a moment
[08:43] <ikonia> ok ray24 the logs don't show that at all
[08:43] <ikonia> who did you talk to
[08:43] <ikonia> (if you're trying to miss-lead me, please don't, lets just resolve the ban and get it sorted)
[08:43] <ray24> I talked with nhandler, then i talked to idleone
[08:44] <ikonia> ray24: I've just checked the logs and nhandler makes it %101 clear he has not agreed to remove the ban
[08:45] <ikonia> he just attempted to calm you down so we could progress/resolve the ban
[08:45] <ikonia> so I guess, what's changed in your attitude for us to remove the ban from any of the channels you are banned from ?
[08:45] <ikonia> that's the question/problem we need to resolve
[08:46] <ray24> I'm not cursing
[08:46] <ikonia> agreed, that's a great start
[08:46] <ikonia> but the reason you got banned was a lot more than just bad language
[08:46] <ikonia> your whole attitude and comments where not really something we'd accept in the channels
[08:47] <ikonia> have you read the ubuntu channel guideline (the ones which explain how to act what's acceptable/not acceptable ?
[08:49] <ray24> I read the US constitution
[08:49] <ikonia> no, that's not what I asked
[08:49] <ikonia> I'm asking about the ubuntu channel guidelines that explain the rules of behaviour within the channels
[08:49] <ray24> No I don't read guidelines
[08:50] <ikonia> ok, that may be a good start
[08:50] <ikonia> !guidelines | ray24
[08:50] <ray24> i'll take a second to skim through it
[08:50] <ikonia> ray24: I suggest you take longer than a second, and read it properly
[08:53] <ray24> Ok, I'm done reading it
[08:54] <ikonia> can you see how your attitude and comments have had you removed ?
[08:54] <ray24> yup i see
[08:54] <ikonia> great, so if I remove the ban, you agree to abide by all the guideliens you've just read ?
[08:55] <ray24> yup!
[08:55] <ikonia> that includes, all the racist and homophobic comments, bad language, the ranting about being hacked and the threats to people, that will all stop, agreed ?
[08:56] <ray24> yeah, that's past
[08:56] <ikonia> ok, so I'll remove the ban in #ubuntu for you now
[08:56] <ray24> cool , thanks
[08:56] <ray24> you're not angling for a donation or anything right
[08:56] <ray24> just asking
[08:57] <ikonia> no
[08:57] <ikonia> could you tru to join #ubuntu for me please
[08:57] <ray24> ubuntu? I was never banned from #ubuntu
[08:57] <ray24> I was banned from ubuntu-offtopic
[08:57] <ikonia> oh, ok, I'll remove it from #ubuntu-offtopic
[08:57] <ray24> cool
[08:58] <ikonia> could you give it a try now please ?
[08:58] <ikonia> there we go
[08:58] <ray24> yup, :)
[08:58] <ray24> now the fun begins
[08:59] <ikonia> ray24: so I guess just keep in mind what we discussed in this channel, you're welcome to leave this channel and enjoy #ubuntu-offtopic
[08:59] <ray24> thanks for contributing to my enjoyment
[08:59] <ikonia> no problem,
[08:59] <ikonia> if you're done here, we ask that you leave the channel so we can help others out who need it
[08:59] <ray24> Yes, I shall evaporate
[09:00] <ikonia> thanks
[09:33] <ikonia> someone may want to watch ray24 in #ubuntu and #ubuntu-offtopic while I step away
[09:38] <elky> i look in -ot for the first time in over a week and they're talking about breast size. charming.
[10:21] <quup> in view of the fact that ubuntu is the concept of humanity towards all and the fact that people shouldn't be banned indefinetly I request Anastasius bans be conciderd null and void.
[10:25] <ikonia> quup: sorry what ?
[10:25] <quup> xD
[10:25] <quup> ikonia: unban Anastasius
[10:25] <ikonia> quup: what's up ?
[10:25] <ikonia> quup: I've offered to unban him multiple times he's said "nah it's fine"
[10:26] <quup> oh well, thanks anyway!
[10:26] <ikonia> maybe if he wants to be unbanned, he could ask himself
[11:21] <mrmist> any chansops about for #ubuntu? sisska appears to be onjoin spamming
[11:22] <ikonia> sure
[11:22] <mrmist> unresponsive to /msg
[11:23] <ikonia> gone
[11:23] <mrmist> super
[11:23] <ikonia> they are also complaining in #archlinux about it
[11:23] <mrmist> figures
[14:58] <oCean> hi
[14:58] <oCean> see <Da|Mummy> in #u?
[15:00]  * maco tries to remember if that's the bad one or the good one
[15:01] <tsimpson> well, it's not great...
[15:01] <oCean> thx
[17:25] <ikonia> Anastasius: all sorted ?
[17:25] <Anastasius> This has been a test, Thanks, ikonia.
[17:25] <ikonia> welcome
[17:26] <IdleOne> was that it?
[17:26] <ikonia> I asked him to join/part to test to confirm so everyone was happy and clear
[17:28] <IdleOne> glad it worked out painlessly
[17:28] <ikonia> seems so
[19:00] <Pici> Who is this telemundo person?
[19:01] <IdleOne> huh?
[19:01] <Pici> 13:52:17 <?telemundo> ikonia rhymes with stankonia
[19:01] <Pici> 13:56:29 <?telemundo> tell them unity blows while you're in there
[19:01] <Pici> Then when I had them in pm they started getting weird.
[19:02] <IdleOne> no idea
[19:04] <IdleOne> strange though, ikonia hadn't said anything from when telemundo joined
[19:05] <Pici> ikonia's other split personality perhaps?
[19:07] <IdleOne> how many does he have?
[19:08] <IdleOne> I was just remarking that there was no reason for him to target ikonia
[19:08] <Pici> ohh
[19:09] <IdleOne> ikonia really should stop wearing his work shirt to #ubuntu
[19:09] <IdleOne> :P
[19:51] <ikonia> Pici: just got back to my desk and he's sent me a delightful pm quoting the rap from the fresh prince of bel air
[19:51] <ikonia> I don't know the nick / ip but obviously I've done something to him in the past for the randomness of it
[20:09] <IdleOne> haha that is still a good song
[23:03] <jrib> ljl got k-lined?
[23:04] <rww> ubuntu ops are such trolls :(
[23:04] <Flannel> jrib: First rule of K-lines is you don't talk about K-lines (or else you'll get K-lined, it seems)
[23:04] <popey> thats two in a week
[23:05] <popey> who's going for the hattrick?
[23:05] <rww> in before popey [...] has quit [K-Lined]
[23:05] <rww> LjL: What are your crimes!
[23:05] <popey> :)
[23:05] <jrib> LjL: stop being a bad boy
[23:09] <LjL> my crime consists in trying to be a backticked robert well ;(
[23:09] <rww> Odd. I tried that nick on another connection shortly after my k-line and didn't get k-lined.
[23:10] <rww> And no, I'm not sure it's a good idea.
[23:12] <marienz> LjL: sorry for that
[23:13] <marienz> rww: please don't experiment with those, staff won't always be around to unset them as quickly as you'd probably like if you do set something off
[23:13] <LjL> marienz: i did it on purpose. someone say sorry to rww instead... :(
[23:13] <rww> marienz: I care about 0% whether my home address is k-lined, since I don't use it for IRC ;P
[23:14] <rww> I don't need an apology, I think it's kinda hilarious that one of my grouped nicks is apparently autok-lined
[23:14]  * LjL too
[23:15] <marienz> (it no longer is, but I still recommend not experimenting)
[23:15] <rww> well, there goes all my trollcred.
[23:15] <rww> (thanks :)
[23:15] <marienz> you can probably figure out how this might've happened, especially if you dig through logs for previous occurences of that nick
[23:15] <LjL> marienz: i don't call rww grouping to one of his nicks "experimenting", though. i certainly was experimenting, but for that matter i was also prepared to stay k-lined for longer.
[23:16] <marienz> rww: you might want to turn on enforce
[23:16] <rww> 22:16:36 -NickServ(NickServ@services.)- The ENFORCE flag is already set for account rww.
[23:17] <marienz> huh. I stand corrected.
[23:17] <marienz> do you happen to remember if that's a recent change?
[23:18] <rww> marienz: I have no idea. I looked into /msg nickserv help set a few months ago after spamming a channel on another network accidentally because my client wasn't set up with the right password and was join-quitting repeatedly, so it might be from then.
[23:18] <marienz> actually it doesn't really matter
[23:18] <marienz> I'm just confused
[23:18] <rww> welcome to my world
[23:20] <topyli> heh