[15:42] <nahuel_> Hi people
[15:42] <nahuel_> is there someone ?
[15:42] <nahuel_> I have a big issue in my ubuntu narwhal
[15:43] <nahuel_> I juste installed it, and I can have diacritics in my console
[15:43] <nahuel_> I have some "?" characters
[15:43] <nahuel_> Any idea what I can fix ?
[15:44] <nahuel_> any idea ?
[15:47] <charlie-tca> nahuel_: maybe a different font?
[15:47] <nahuel_> Hmmm
[15:48] <nahuel_> charlie-tca, I use "courier" that support diacritics, at least french diacritics...
[15:48] <nahuel_> I use it in my other computer under maveric
[15:55] <jibel> Riddell, which kubuntu flavor/arch did you smoketest ?
[15:56] <jibel> I mean variant not flavor
[15:57] <Riddell> jibel: i386 desktop and mobile
[15:58] <jibel> Riddell, thanks.
[16:00] <jibel> charlie-tca, did you test today's xubuntu images, does it looks good ?
[16:01] <charlie-tca> jibel: I did not test them all.
[16:01] <charlie-tca> upgrade failed completely, when I did not get an upgrade available prompt
[16:01] <charlie-tca> bug 756763
[16:01] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 756763 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "update-manager -d fails to allow upgrade from 10.10 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/756763
[16:02] <charlie-tca> The good news is, what I was able to test worked really good
[16:02] <jibel> charlie-tca, oh yes. I've seen your bug report. I've tried to reproduce with a fresh maverick xubuntu but the upgrade button is there in update manager and it starts the upgrade when I click on it
[16:03] <charlie-tca> I actually went to my old maverick, which has the files and settings I used, and that is what fails.
[16:03] <charlie-tca> I fear if a fresh install passes, but a install someone is using fails, we have problems
[16:06] <jibel> charlie-tca, does 'DEBUG_UPDATE_MANAGER=1 update-manager -d' outputs something interesting ?
[16:06] <charlie-tca> Let me bring the system up and see
[16:10] <charlie-tca> jibel: I don't know how to read that output, I will have to pastebin it
[16:13] <charlie-tca> jibel: http://paste.ubuntu.com/592656
[17:08] <jibel> skaet, if you agree, I'll add a run once testcase for memtest (bug 683904) for Ubuntu alternate. the test is very easy to run, basically, it's 'select test memory and wait'
[17:08] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 683904 in grub2 (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "natty: memtest86+ fails to run, reboots immediately (affects: 9) (dups: 1) (heat: 48)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/683904
[17:09] <skaet> jibel,  sounds good.    go ahead.
[17:12] <samantha-jian> skaet: ping
[17:14] <skaet> samantha-jian, pong
[22:16] <jibel> mvo, around ?
[22:17] <mvo> jibel: yes, a bit sleepy though
[22:18] <jibel> mvo, oh, I didn't expect a reply :-)
[22:18] <jibel> hi btw.
[22:19] <jibel> mvo, what's your opinion about bug 757754. Not an emergency and this can wait tomorrow.
[22:19] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 757754 in xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "On XUbuntu upgrade maverick->natty update manager offers to install the whole gnome (xubuntu-desktop recommends indicator-messages) (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/757754
[22:21] <mvo> jibel: well, I need to have a close look, but if that is undesired, then the recommend should become a suggests
[22:23] <mvo> jibel: oh, from reading the report its a virtual package? in thise case I could add a workaround in u-m or the xubuntu-desktop would recommend a non-gnome package first in the or dependency, does that make sense?
[22:28] <mvo> jibel: i commented in the bug
[22:28] <jibel> mvo, many thanks.I'll check with mrpouit tomorrow when he's online. Have a good night!
[22:29] <mvo> jibel: it looks a bit tricky, I will try to come up with a good idea over night
[22:29] <stgraber> mvo: did you start doing something for bug 745532 ? otherwise I'll probably have some time tonight to poke at it
[22:30] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 745532 in pam (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 2 other projects) "fails to restart (not running) gdm on maverick->natty upgrade (affects: 1) (heat: 432)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/745532
[22:30] <stgraber> it's a not common use case that happens to be very common for LTSP servers :)
[22:31] <stgraber> (not that I usually upgrade these, but still worth fixing)
[22:31] <mvo> stgraber: please do then, I won't work on this tonight
[23:57] <skaet> all,  first set of images for beta2 are now getting uploaded to the iso tracker.   ubuntu desktop/alternate,  kubuntu desktop/alternate now available...