[02:49] <SergioMeneses> buenas...
[16:53] <zul> hi
[16:53] <RoAkSoAx> o/
[16:58] <kirkland> o/
[16:59] <smb>  /o\
[16:59] <JFo>  /o/ \o\ /o/
[16:59] <JFo> :)
[17:00] <smb> JFo, Just in case this will be the server team meeting I believe. ;)
[17:00] <JFo> yeah
[17:00]  * JFo lurks
[17:01] <SpamapS> RoAkSoAx: do not suffer the lazy and tardy.. I suggest that you begin! :)
[17:01] <RoAkSoAx> #startmeeting
[17:01] <MootBot> Meeting started at 11:01. The chair is RoAkSoAx.
[17:01] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[17:01] <jamespage> o/
[17:02] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[17:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[17:02] <RoAkSoAx> First of:
[17:02] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey to submit UDS-O topic for translations and docs
[17:02] <RoAkSoAx> what's the status
[17:02] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: ?
[17:02] <Daviey> I've spoken to David P about it... he seems excited, and will certianlly attend
[17:03] <Daviey> So it's essentially done, it will happen - just not drafted
[17:03] <Daviey> Mark as done
[17:03] <Daviey> sorry for being brief - otp.
[17:03] <RoAkSoAx> alrighty!
[17:03] <RoAkSoAx> let's move on then
[17:03] <RoAkSoAx> jamespage to helpout with verification of euca-dhcp bug
[17:04] <zul> i think thats been done
[17:04] <robbiew> o.
[17:04] <robbiew> o/
[17:04] <jamespage> Verified - yes - by me - no - required - no - so mark as DONE
[17:04] <robbiew> sorry..late
[17:04] <RoAkSoAx> jamespage: awesome!
[17:04] <RoAkSoAx> jamespage to discover process/location for fixing ubuntu server documentation
[17:04] <jamespage> OK - so docs here are now up-to-date : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase#Documentor resources
[17:05] <jamespage> We where not far off TBH - loads of stuff on the documentation team wiki pages as well
[17:05] <smoser> o/'
[17:05] <RoAkSoAx> any further action to be taken?
[17:06] <jamespage> not from my perspective
[17:06] <RoAkSoAx> alrighty then. Let's move on then
[17:06] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Natty Development
[17:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  Natty Development
[17:06] <RoAkSoAx> robbiew: ^^
[17:07] <robbiew> so...I'd like to propose Daviey take this section over ;)
[17:07] <SpamapS> http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/natty/canonical-server.html
[17:07] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/natty/canonical-server.html
[17:07] <SpamapS> still a few items remaining
[17:07]  * Daviey is off the phone
[17:07] <robbiew> I can cut and paste links...as above ;)
[17:07] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: go for it :)
[17:07] <robbiew> in terms of development...I'm more interested in Bugs now anyway
[17:08] <Daviey> Sorry, somewhat unprepared.
[17:08] <robbiew> any remaining work items should be universe related or non-code
[17:08] <robbiew> Daviey: no worries...I'm always that way :P
[17:08] <Daviey> I think mainly, people need to make sure the blueprints are updated.
[17:08] <SpamapS> Daviey: do we still have an auto-generated report from the server-n* tags ?
[17:09] <Daviey> SpamapS, Yes
[17:09] <Daviey> That is what i've mainly been tracking this week tbh.. it's more uselful at this stage for specific bug tracking,than WI.
[17:09] <Daviey> IMO
[17:09] <SpamapS> awesome. ;)
[17:09] <Daviey> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=server-nrs
[17:09] <SpamapS> WI is almost done anyway, so yeah bugs are where its at. :)
[17:10] <RoAkSoAx> awesome then
[17:10] <RoAkSoAx> anyone has anything to add?
[17:10] <SpamapS> Should show milestoned bugs as purple on the WI tracker. ;)
[17:11] <Daviey> RoAkSoAx, ok to move on...
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> alright, I guess there's nothing else,
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Ubuntu Server Team Events
[17:11] <Daviey> but make sure WI's are up to date :)
[17:11] <MootBot> New Topic:  Ubuntu Server Team Events
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> any event coming up?
[17:11] <SpamapS> TOMORROW I'm speaking at the MySQL User's Conference about Drizzle in Natty
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> SpamapS: \o/
[17:11] <SpamapS> Santa Clara, CA .. be there, or be square.
[17:12] <zul> ill be there...just not this week
[17:12] <jamespage> Good luck SpamapS - is it due to be video cast?
[17:12] <SpamapS> jamespage: not likely, its a massive event.
[17:12] <Daviey> SpamapS, Looking forward to reading your blog post about it :)
[17:12] <SpamapS> jamespage: and it will be at 3:15pm UTC -0700 ..
[17:12] <RoAkSoAx> maybe would be a good thing to video tape all the events/talks on which ubuntu server member participate, to share them with the community
[17:13] <Daviey> RoAkSoAx, Thanks for volunteering to be the team camera man.
[17:13] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: no worries if I can travel lol :)
[17:13] <zul> you stole my soull..
[17:13] <RoAkSoAx> anyway, let's move on
[17:13] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[17:13] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[17:13] <RoAkSoAx> hggdh: you are up
[17:13] <Daviey> hey hggdh o/
[17:13] <hggdh> yo
[17:13]  * SpamapS just finished downloading the latest iso's
[17:14] <hggdh> going thru euca now
[17:14] <SpamapS> its ISO testing time yes?
[17:14] <Daviey> SpamapS, cautionary
[17:14] <hggdh> initial ISO tests via jenkins are all done, with success except for ec2 -- will discuss with jamespage
[17:15] <Daviey> The current posted ISO will be deprecated later today, so not too much investment... But sniffing is useful.
[17:15] <jamespage> hggdh - they have not been run yet.
[17:15] <hggdh> jamespage: they _were_ running this morning (mine morning)
[17:15] <Daviey> hggdh / jamespage: Is there any news on email failures of failed jenkins tests?
[17:15] <hggdh> Daviey: no, yet to look at it
[17:16] <Daviey> ok, thanks
[17:16] <jamespage> hggdh: that was some adhoc testing to determine whether we where still getting network failures on startup - looked OK
[17:16] <hggdh> I think it would be more productive to discuss jenkins usage on UDS -- where we would like it to go
[17:16] <hggdh> instead of just ad-hoc additions
[17:16] <hggdh> jamespage: roger, thanks
[17:17] <jamespage> hggdh: agree
[17:17] <RoAkSoAx> alright, I guess a session will be held at UDS
[17:17] <RoAkSoAx> anything else to add?
[17:17] <hggdh> ..
[17:17] <hggdh> :-)
[17:17] <RoAkSoAx> moving one then
[17:17] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[17:17] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[17:17] <Daviey> one mo
[17:18] <smb> evening
[17:18] <Daviey> hggdh, are you going to drive a blueprint on that?
[17:18] <Daviey> (sorry smb)
[17:18]  * smb waits
[17:18] <hggdh> Daviey: I can. Under QA, you mind?
[17:19] <Daviey> hggdh, that sounds like a good place!
[17:19] <Daviey> Thanks
[17:19] <Daviey> smb, Hi o/
[17:19] <smb> I am good to go? :)
[17:19] <RoAkSoAx> smb: the floor is yours now :)
[17:19] <smb> Ok, I try to leave as qquickly
[17:20] <smb> Basically main task is still going on lucid-ec2 patches
[17:20] <smb> now at 16 new and 35 changed of the 147 to go
[17:20] <Daviey> smb, Do you have the bug numbers handy?
[17:20] <smb> That has not yet a bug number
[17:20] <Daviey> Are they tagged?
[17:21] <smb> I will need to create one of "bring our patchset up to date with the one we were taking our  patches from"
[17:21] <zul> smb: may god have mercy on your soul
[17:21] <Daviey> smb, sounds good to me... We appreciate this :)
[17:22] <smb> I had been booting somewhere in the middle on ec2 and it surprisingly worked
[17:22] <SpamapS> Have we run automated ec2 tests since bug 731878 was fixed?
[17:22] <smb> But ok, atm it does not compile again
[17:23] <smb> SpamapS, Hm, I don't know
[17:23] <jamespage> SpamapS: yes - I was unable to run in all regions but I did not see any instances failing to startup - http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu-uk.org/view/natty-ec2/job/natty_server_ec2_adhoc/5/
[17:24] <smb> In the spare time I only looked over bug 751253
[17:25] <smb> But really that sounds a bit like maybe xen version or actually a lot of traffic as that machine had 500GB going out in 5 days
[17:25] <SpamapS> jamespage: will keep fingers crossed that it was indeed this kernel bug. :)
[17:25] <jamespage> SpamapS: me to!
[17:26] <RoAkSoAx> alright, anything else to add?
[17:26] <smb> I would not have more if there are no questions
[17:26] <RoAkSoAx> anyone with questions?
[17:26] <RoAkSoAx> I guess not. Moving on:
[17:26] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
[17:26] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
[17:27] <RoAkSoAx> I believe it is time for us to consider removing this topic from the agenda
[17:27] <SpamapS> Well
[17:27] <RoAkSoAx> SpamapS: have you been in recent contact with sommer?
[17:27] <SpamapS> I'd like to see the contact person changed.
[17:27] <RoAkSoAx> SpamapS: sounds like you are volunteering :)
[17:27] <SpamapS> RoAkSoAx: no, but I haven't tried much. Adam has moved on for now. :-/
[17:28] <SpamapS> I would love to do it, but I doubt I'd be very effective at actually getting things done.
[17:28] <RoAkSoAx> I guess that for now we can remove the item from the agenda till we have a replacement to cover this topic
[17:28] <RoAkSoAx> any objections?
[17:29] <RoAkSoAx> I'll take that as a yes to remove it from the agenda then
[17:29] <RoAkSoAx> ok, so moving on
[17:30] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[17:30] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[17:30] <kim0> Howdy everyone o/ .. Got a quick announcement to make
[17:30] <kim0> I will be running a weekly community IRC meeting for the Ensemble team. This will be run in #ubuntu-cloud starting tomorrow at 6pm-UTC, it will be merged with the older community meeting. Everyone attending this meeting is a good candidate to attend tomorrow's
[17:30] <kim0> That meeting will provide a high level overview of development in the Ensemble world since last meeting/week
[17:30] <kim0> I'm writing an announcement on http://cloud.ubuntu.com/ right now, which I'll mirror on planet, and everyone is encouraged to spread/tweet...etc
[17:30] <kim0> That's all for me
[17:31] <RoAkSoAx> awesome!
[17:31] <RoAkSoAx> anyone else with questions/suggestions/or anything?
[17:31] <RoAkSoAx> let's move on then
[17:31] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Open Discussion
[17:31] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion
[17:31] <SpamapS> Oh hah I missed that.
[17:32] <kirkland> RoAkSoAx: anyone else throwing a Natty Release Party?
[17:32]  * SpamapS would like to thank Time Warner's extreme lag for that wrong/window
[17:32] <kim0> hehe
[17:32] <RoAkSoAx> kirkland: throught FL yes... miami... uhmmm it is hard enough to get an Ubuntu hour
[17:32] <kirkland> RoAkSoAx: here's one we're having in Austin: http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2011/04/austins-natty-release-party.html
[17:33] <zul> ill be doing my customary release party thing...sleeping
[17:33] <RoAkSoAx> kirkland: unfortunately, not even my Univerty's LUG is that much involved in events
[17:33] <kirkland> zul: heh
[17:33] <kirkland> zul: don't get toooo excited now
[17:34] <RoAkSoAx> ok so anyone else attending/organizing a release party?
[17:34] <kirkland> RoAkSoAx: apparently not :-)
[17:34] <RoAkSoAx> or is everybody gonna party with zul in their dreams?
[17:35] <zul> that sounds bad
[17:35] <RoAkSoAx> heheh
[17:35]  * RoAkSoAx blames it to the language barrier
[17:35] <RoAkSoAx> :P
[17:35] <kirkland> well, I'm going to drink a beer in celebration of Natty, and one more in looking forward to Oneiric
[17:35] <RoAkSoAx> kirkland: +1. I might do it alone but at least I'll have a beer
[17:35] <RoAkSoAx> anyways.
[17:35] <RoAkSoAx> let's end the meeting
[17:36] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Announce next meeting date and time Tuesday, April 19th 2011 16:00 UTC
[17:36] <MootBot> New Topic:  Announce next meeting date and time Tuesday, April 19th 2011 16:00 UTC
[17:36] <RoAkSoAx> see you all next week same time/place
[17:36] <RoAkSoAx> #endmeeting
[17:36] <kirkland> \o
[17:36] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 11:36.
[17:59] <JFo> o/
[17:59] <apw> o/
[17:59] <herton> o/
[17:59] <sconklin> \o
[17:59] <jjohansen> \o
[17:59] <sforshee> o/
[18:00] <bjf> #startmeeting
[18:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 12:00. The chair is bjf.
[18:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[18:00] <bjf> ##
[18:00] <bjf> ## This is the Ubuntu Kernel Team weekly status meeting.
[18:00] <bjf> ##
[18:00] <bjf> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[18:00] <bjf> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Natty
[18:00] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[18:00] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Natty
[18:00] <bjf> # Meeting Etiquette
[18:00] <bjf> #
[18:00] <bjf> # NOTE: '..' indicates that you are finished with your input.
[18:00] <bjf> #       'o/' indicates you have something you'd like to add (wait until you are recognized)
[18:00] <bjf> #
[18:00] <bjf> [TOPIC] Release Metrics (JFo)
[18:00] <MootBot> New Topic:  Release Metrics (JFo)
[18:00] <JFo> Release Meeting Bugs (10 bugs, 8 Blueprints)
[18:00] <JFo> [18:00] <JFo>  * 4 linux kernel bugs (up 2)
[18:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux-ti-omap4 bugs (no change)
[18:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux-meta-ti-omap4 bug (no change)
[18:00] <JFo> [18:00] <JFo>  * 32 linux kernel bugs (up 5)
[18:00] <JFo>  * 1 linux-ti-omap4 bugs (changed to package omap4)
[18:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux-meta-ti-omap4 bug (changed to package omap4)
[18:00] <JFo> [18:00] <JFo>  * 6 blueprints (Including HWE Blueprints)
[18:00] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * 6 Linux Bugs (no change)
[18:01] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo> changed to only reflect linux package bugs
[18:01] <JFo>  * 15 Linux Bugs (no change)
[18:01] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * [[https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bugs?field.has_patch=on | Bugs with Patches]]
[18:01] <JFo>  * [[http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/csv-stats/bugs-with-patches/linux/ | Breakdown by status]]
[18:01] <JFo> ..
[18:01] <bjf> [TOPIC] Blueprints: Natty Bug Handling (JFo)
[18:01] <bjf> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/hardware-kernel-n-bug-handling
[18:01] <MootBot> New Topic:  Blueprints: Natty Bug Handling (JFo)
[18:01] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/hardware-kernel-n-bug-handling
[18:01] <JFo> * nothing to report today
[18:01] <JFo> ..
[18:01] <bjf> [TOPIC] Status: General Natty (apw / ogasawara)
[18:01] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: General Natty (apw / ogasawara)
[18:01] <apw> o/
[18:01] <apw> The natty kernel is now at v2.6.38-8.42 (v2.6.38.2 based) [thank you Leann], following the upstream stable branch.  Following some uploads for compiler changes we are now frozen for the natty-beta-2 release.  We are also going to be in Kernel Freeze by the itime we come out of beta freeze.  This implies that from now on we will only take high priority bugs before release.  It also implies we now need full SRU acks for all changes.
[18:01] <apw> ..
[18:02] <bjf> [TOPIC] Status: Stable Kernel Team (sconklin / bjf)
[18:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: Stable Kernel Team (sconklin / bjf)
[18:02] <sconklin> ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || All kernels in this cycle are awaiting signoff by certification and QA, and are then ready to be published.
[18:02] <sconklin> ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || The Lucid kernel was respun after verification to add a single patch that resolves a regression. This single
[18:02] <sconklin> || patch was cherry-picked from the set of upstream stable patches which are currently queued for the next
[18:02] <sconklin> || Lucid update, and therefore does not requrie verification.
[18:02] <sconklin> ||
[18:02] <sconklin> ..
[18:02] <bjf> [TOPIC] Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Karmic/Hardy/Dapper (sconklin / bjf)
[18:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Karmic/Hardy/Dapper (sconklin / bjf)
[18:02] <sconklin> || Package                                    || Upd/Sec              || Proposed             ||  TiP || Verified ||
[18:02] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || dapper   linux-source-2.6.15               || 2.6.15-57.94         || 2.6.15-57.95         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:02] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || karmic   linux-ec2                         || 2.6.31-308.28        || 2.6.31-308.29        ||    1 ||        1 ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.31-23.74         || 2.6.31-23.75         ||    1 ||        1 ||
[18:02] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || lucid    linux-ec2                         || 2.6.32-314.27        || 2.6.32-315.28        ||    5 ||        5 ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ports-meta                  || 2.6.32.30.23         || 2.6.32.31.23         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick  || 2.6.35.25.36         || 2.6.35.28.37         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || ---      linux-lts-backport-maverick       || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1  || 2.6.35-28.50~lucid1  ||   13 ||       13 ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.32    || 2.6.32-30.29         || 2.6.32-31.31         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.34.4               || 1.34.7               ||    1 ||        1 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.32-30.59         || 2.6.32-31.61         ||    5 ||        5 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.32.30.36         || 2.6.32.31.37         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-ec2                    || 2.6.32.314.15        || 2.6.32.315.16        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || maverick linux-backports-modules-2.6.35    || 2.6.35-28.19         || 2.6.35-28.20         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ti-omap4                    || 2.6.35-903.21        || 2.6.35-903.22        ||    1 ||        1 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.38.5               || 1.38.6               ||    2 ||        1 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.35-28.49         || 2.6.35-28.50         ||    7 ||        7 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:03] <sconklin> ..
[18:03] <bjf> [TOPIC] Incoming Bugs: Regressions (JFo)
[18:03] <MootBot> New Topic:  Incoming Bugs: Regressions (JFo)
[18:03] <JFo> Incoming Bugs
[18:03] <JFo>  655 Natty Bugs (up 81)
[18:03] <JFo>  1255 Maverick Bugs (up 3)
[18:03] <JFo>  1064 Lucid Bugs (up 3)
[18:03] <JFo> Current regression stats (broken down by release):
[18:03] <JFo> [18:03] <JFo>   * 47 maverick bugs (up 1)
[18:03] <JFo>   * 77 lucid bugs (no change)
[18:03] <JFo>   * 6 karmic bugs (no change)
[18:03] <JFo>   * 0 hardy bugs (no change)
[18:03] <JFo> [18:03] <JFo>   * 335 natty bugs (up 48)
[18:03] <JFo>   * 249 maverick bugs (up 3)
[18:03] <JFo>   * 223 lucid bugs (up 1)
[18:03] <JFo>   * 38 karmic bugs (no change)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 2 hardy bugs (no change)
[18:04] <JFo> [18:04] <JFo>   * 17 natty bugs (up 2)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 1 maverick bugs (up 1)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 0 lucid bugs (no change)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 0 karmic bug (no change)
[18:04] <JFo> ..
[18:04] <bjf> [TOPIC] Incoming Bugs: Bug day report (JFo)
[18:04] <MootBot> New Topic:  Incoming Bugs: Bug day report (JFo)
[18:04] <JFo> nothing to report
[18:04] <JFo> ..
[18:04] <bjf> [TOPIC] Triage Status (JFo)
[18:04] <MootBot> New Topic:  Triage Status (JFo)
[18:04] <JFo> nothing to report
[18:04] <JFo> ..
[18:04] <bjf> [TOPIC] Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[18:04] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[18:04] <bjf> thanks everyone
[18:04] <bjf> #endmeeting
[18:04] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 12:04.
[18:04] <JFo> thanks bjf that is a record
[18:04] <JFo> :)
[18:05] <sconklin> a new record!
[18:05] <sconklin> Thanks
[18:05] <apw> speedy indeed :)
[18:05] <ppisati> a new record :)
[18:07] <smb> There has been a meeting? :-P
[19:07]  * wendar waves
[19:07] <wendar> Who's here for the ARB meeting?
[19:07]  * stgraber waves
[19:08]  * wendar pinging others
[19:10] <wendar> we may not have enough people for voting, but we can at least do status updates
[19:12] <wendar> #startmeeting
[19:12] <wendar> [TOPIC] Review action items
[19:12] <wendar> [LINK] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Agenda
[19:12] <MootBot> Meeting started at 13:12. The chair is wendar.
[19:12] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[19:12] <MootBot> New Topic:  Review action items
[19:12] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Agenda
[19:14] <wendar> stgraber: I don't know of any progress on the actions from last meeting, do you?
[19:14] <stgraber> nope, there wasn't anything on the mailing-list, so I guess it's safe to carry them all over to the next meeting
[19:15] <wendar> carried over
[19:15] <wendar> [TOPIC] Proposal Review
[19:15] <MootBot> New Topic:  Proposal Review
[19:15] <wendar> [LINK] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-app-review-board
[19:15] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-app-review-board
[19:16] <wendar> no changes on existing proposals
[19:16] <stgraber> hmm, not sure why suspended-sentence is still listed on the wiki, it's been on extras.u.c for a while now
[19:17] <stgraber> pytask still hasn't moved a bit (waiting for new version)
[19:17] <wendar> good point, I'll remove suspended-sentence
[19:17] <wendar> there's an update proposal for the news app
[19:17] <stgraber> we have a new version of news that needs reviewing. I can take it as I did a quick review of the previous version
[19:17] <stgraber> do, you were faster :)
[19:18] <stgraber> *doh
[19:18] <wendar> :)
[19:19] <stgraber> I assigned the news update to me and will review the change soon. Shouldn't be too hard at least, the packaging should already be good
[19:20] <stgraber> so this one should be ready for approval + upload at our next meeting
[19:21] <wendar> excellent
[19:21] <wendar> I think that's it for proposal review
[19:22] <wendar> [TOPIC] Chair for next meeting
[19:22] <MootBot> New Topic:  Chair for next meeting
[19:22] <wendar> strgraber: do you want to chair next time?
[19:22] <wendar> or, should we skip it, since it's release week?
[19:22] <stgraber> I'd be tempted to skip it as it's release week and we'll all be busy with other stuff
[19:23] <stgraber> would be cool if we could have quorum for our next meeting
[19:24] <wendar> our next meeting after release week is at UDS
[19:24] <stgraber> I'm probably going to ask for other ARB members to go vote for the news update directly in the bug report once it's in good shape
[19:24] <wendar> so, hopefully we can do it face-to-face
[19:24] <wendar> that's a good idea
[19:25] <wendar> we should talk at UDS about making ticket sign-offs the primary voting strategy
[19:25] <stgraber> yep, meeting at UDS would be good. Not sure how much of ARB is going to be in Budapest, but probably more than we currently have in this meeting anyway :)
[19:25] <wendar> you, me, mvo, and hopefully ajmitch
[19:25] <wendar> IIRC, fagan couldn't make it
[19:26] <wendar> I'll update the agenda to note UDS as the next meeting
[19:28] <wendar> sounds like a wrap
[19:28] <stgraber> indeed
[19:28] <wendar> #endmeeting
[19:28] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 13:28.
[19:28] <wendar> thanks, stgraber!
[19:29] <stgraber> thanks
[20:11] <mvo> wendar: I'm happy to attend a meeting at UDS
[20:11] <mvo> (I know I'm later :/)