[01:14] <patrickmw> jibel_, did you tell me last week you fixed the gnomeaboutme tests?
[01:16] <patrickmw> jibel_, getting those branches merged is important.  I having trouble tracking what you fixed, and also verifying my fixes worked
[01:22] <skaet> charlie-tca, xubuntu alternate posted, xubuntu desktop having its build retried.
[01:23] <charlie-tca> Thanks
[01:46] <skaet> hggdh, ubuntu server posted
[01:47] <hggdh> skaet: jenkins already on them :-)
[01:47] <skaet> :)
[01:47] <skaet> handy man, that jenkins,  doesn't need sleep ;)
[01:47] <hggdh> I would really love to have a majordomo like jenkins...
[01:48] <skaet> :)
[02:14] <charlie-tca> running xubuntu upgrade tests
[02:16] <skaet> charlie-tca,  xubuntu desktop posted now too.
[02:16] <charlie-tca> syncing
[02:16] <charlie-tca> Thanks, skaet
[02:39] <patrickmw> jibel_, sent you an email of mago tasks in LP.  We can pick back up on this after ISO testing :)
[05:03] <skaet> edubuntu dvd's posted
[06:20] <skaet> kubuntu dvd's posted
[06:22] <skaet> GrueMaster ubuntu-netbook preinstalled posted now,  rest should be emerging over the next few hours...
[06:27] <skaet> jibel,  on iso tracker,  why do ubuntu netbook omap3 & omap4  images not have any tests associated with them?
[06:28]  * skaet thinks its probably time to call it a night now....
[06:59] <astro73|derrial> ok, so I'm about to upgrade one of my secondary computers, but it wants to remove one of my local packages in the upgrade (something I wrote called python-pyinput). How can I tell it to not do that?
[07:46] <GrueMaster> skaet: thanks.  I'm down for the night, will start in first thing in the morning.
[08:27] <jibel_> skaet, that's because the name of the product in the tracker is Ubuntu Arm preinstalled. I'm changing it now.
[08:33] <skaet> jibel_, thanks.
[12:16]  * pedro_ doing ubuntu dvd i386
[13:37] <charlie-tca> Good morning
[13:38] <jibel> Good morning charlie-tca
[13:42] <hggdh> good morning jibel, charlie-tca
[13:42] <charlie-tca> Good morning, hggdh
[13:44] <jibel> good morning hggdh
[13:44]  * jibel doing xubuntu wubi i386/amd64
[13:45] <jibel> charlie-tca, the slideshow during installation is not translated, know issue ?
[13:46] <charlie-tca> I didn't know it.
[13:47]  * charlie-tca keeps fingers crossed that wubi will work now
[13:50] <jibel> charlie-tca, wubi works fine now. I'll file a bug for the translations. Do I file it against xubuntu-meta or ubiquity or else ?
[13:51] <charlie-tca> ubiquity-slideshow-xubuntu
[13:51] <charlie-tca> as I recall
[13:51] <jibel> charlie-tca,  thanks
[13:51] <charlie-tca> thank you!
[13:53] <jibel> charlie-tca, I've seen positive feedback about xubuntu on the forums http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10667472&postcount=14
[13:53] <charlie-tca> that will go away if you can't upgrade without adding all of Ubuntu
[13:54] <charlie-tca> Thanks, jibel
[14:05] <jibel> anyone to test Ubuntu Alternate and Kubuntu Desktop ?
[14:05] <jibel> and/or
[14:13] <pedro_> jibel, i'll take both
[14:15] <jibel> pedro_, thanks, I started alternate i386 entire disk and amd64 resize. And now starting  netboot i386/amd64
[14:16] <pedro_> i'm doing ubuntu dvd i386 and started with kubuntu desktop i386
[15:16] <skaet> hi all,   just curious if anyone else doing the upgrade testing from 10.10 has not seen their wall paper update to Natty's, or if this is expected behaviour?
[15:21] <charlie-tca> If you changed from default wallpaper, it is expected to remain the same
[15:22] <charlie-tca> upgrades should not override custom settings
[15:24] <skaet> charalie-tca,  it was a default clean 10.10 install;   no defaults were changed.
[15:25]  * skaet put fresh 10.10 iso image,  updated it,   then applied update test. 
[15:25] <charlie-tca> unexpected then, I believe. Defaults should upgrade
[15:26] <skaet> thanks charlie-tca,  will go add a bug, to the report.
[15:26] <charlie-tca> You are welcome
[15:54] <GrueMaster> Grrr.  Ubuntu-headless image fails to launch oem-config on omap4.  Checking omap to see if it is cpu specific (doubtful).
[15:58] <jibel> GrueMaster, I fixed the paths to the iso for arm on the tracker and we can now change them dynamically.
[15:58] <GrueMaster> Thanks!
[17:40] <jibel> Riddell, I've attached more logs to 758614. There are errors in it but I don't know what it means and if it's related.
[17:41] <Riddell> I don't see any relevant errors alas
[19:05] <bdmurray> Riddell: rekonq keeps crashing on me on a fresh install of kubuntu alternate i386 - is this known?
[19:09] <Riddell> bdmurray: not known
[19:09] <Riddell> crashing on startup?
[19:09] <bdmurray> Riddell: right, the kde crash handler wanted me to install debug symbols
[19:10] <Riddell> hum, that's weird
[19:10] <Riddell> working fine here on a fresh install from live CD
[19:11] <Riddell> bdmurray: able to install rekonq-dbg and get a backtrace?
[19:11] <bdmurray> Riddell: I reckon.  in a terminal it says QSocketNotifier: Invalid socket 15 and type 'Read', disabling
[19:12] <Riddell> I don't think that's related
[19:12] <bdmurray> okay
[19:16] <charlie-tca> jibel: Xubuntu desktop images done
[19:18] <patdk-wk> hmm, iscsi tests still failing
[19:19] <patdk-wk> lvm iscsi was totally distroyed
[19:29] <patrickmw> stgraber, any known issues with ltsp with the ubuntu alternate isos that you're aware of?  For amd64 and i386 , the thin client starts to boot, but errors with "Could not find kernel image: vmlinuz"
[19:30] <GrueMaster> Is anyone else testing the kubuntu armel images?
[19:30] <stgraber> patrickmw: none that I'm aware of. I'll download i386 alternate now to test
[19:30] <patrickmw> stgraber, ok. thanks
[20:09] <stgraber> patrickmw: apparently we also have a ltsp issue in edubuntu (probably related to dhcp3). I'll have a look at both issues
[20:09] <stgraber> skaet: ^
[20:09] <patrickmw> stgraber, ok.  I always like to check with you first :)
[20:09] <stgraber> patrickmw: seems to be different issues though :)
[20:10] <patrickmw> stgraber, in this case, what is the correct ltsp package to create a bug for?
[20:11] <stgraber> patrickmw: for yours, I'm not sure. I'll know in 10-15 minutes when my install is over. For the one we have in Edubuntu, it's either edubuntu-live, dhcp3-server/isc-dhcp-server or ubiquity (though ubiquity would be surprising)
[20:12] <stgraber> patrickmw: just mark it as failed on the tracker, I'll post the same result + bug report once I reproduced it
[20:12] <patrickmw> stgraber, ack
[20:22] <hggdh> are we going to respin server?
[20:27] <bdmurray> Riddell: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270790
[20:27] <ubot4> KDE bug 270790 in general "rekonq crashes when trying to start it up" [Crash,New]
[20:47] <chadadavis> Is that specific to i386? I just tested kubuntu amd64+mac and it didn't crash.
[20:48] <bdmurray> I don't know I was also following the encrypted lvm test case fwiw and was on i386
[20:49] <chadadavis> I can try it again. That was on the desktop CD. I'm going to be doing the alternate (w LVM) in a minute.
[21:36] <jibel> cjwatson, I can reproduce bug 756297. sda1 is a FAT recovery partition, what info do you need ? a copy of the whole partition ?
[21:36] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 756297 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "grub-mount assert failure: *** glibc detected *** grub-mount: free(): corrupted unsorted chunks: 0x09530568 *** (affects: 9) (dups: 9) (heat: 82)" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/756297
[21:38] <cjwatson> jibel: that would be perfect if it's reasonable
[21:39] <cjwatson> jibel: oh, and a dump of the partition table ('sudo sfdisk -d /dev/sda')
[21:43] <patdk-wk> what sector does sda1 start on?
[21:44] <jibel> patdk-wk, /dev/sda1 : start=     2048, size= 16384000, Id=1c
[21:44] <cjwatson> patdk-wk: that shouldn't be important here ...
[21:45] <jibel> cjwatson, its 8G, I'll see if I can manage to transfer it somewhere.
[21:46] <cjwatson> jibel: it should compress well
[21:46] <cjwatson> hopefully
[21:46] <cjwatson> downloading 8G over my wet string will take ... a while
[21:46] <cjwatson> (about a day, solid)
[21:46] <cjwatson> though I suppose I could debug it on a porter box in the DC
[22:01] <chadadavis> Can someone confirm that there shouldn't be any 'netbook' tests for amd64+mac. Referring to this test, which is also missing its instructions
[22:01] <chadadavis> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/5370/1023
[22:02] <cjwatson> chadadavis: confirmed
[22:02] <cjwatson> wait, netbook, not netboot
[22:02] <cjwatson> chadadavis: ignore me
[22:02] <chadadavis> cjwatson: thanks.
[22:02] <cjwatson> there probably ought to be, I guess, if there are for amd64 ...
[22:03] <chadadavis> They are not present for amd64, at least not for kubuntu
[22:03] <chadadavis> Also not for vanilla ubuntu
[22:03] <skaet> chadadavis,  netbook is only valid for arm images with this release.
[22:04] <chadadavis> skaet, that's what I thought. Thanks.
[22:04] <skaet> basically netbook was merged with desktop,  except for those preinstalled images.  ;)
[22:04] <chadadavis> Right.
[23:13] <skaet> all,  pitti has started off another spin of images to pick up the fixes created today in response to the bugs found from the testing.     Thanks for your efforts!  we'll keep the images we were testing today as backups, and hope for better images to emerge from the overnight builds.
[23:14] <skaet> New images will get added to the iso tracker as they emerge from the builders over night.
[23:15] <chadadavis> skaet, can I lookup which bugs are addressed by the new images, to know what I should retest and what hasn't changed?
[23:17] <skaet> chadadavis,  we probably need a better way of conveying this information going forward.   Any of the bugs that have been fixed should have fix committed/released in their status,  which is one way to check them.
[23:18] <chadadavis> skaet, I just found the QA reports, that's what I was looking for. Thanks.
[23:19] <skaet> :)
[23:43] <charlie-tca> Okay, I am going for a walk while things rebuild