/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/04/12/#ubuntustudio-devel.txt

ailoScottL, The Gnome3 link you gave didn't work for me00:56
ailo:(00:57
ScottLwhich link did i give you?00:57
ailoAt least regular Ubuntu didn't mess up my Grub this time00:57
ScottLheh :)00:57
ailoScottL, http://ugr.teampr0xy.net/00:57
ScottLoh, i haven't tried that yet...i'm still using the maverick install with gnome3 installed on top00:58
ailoHave you suffered any crashes so far?00:58
ailoSeems like Maverick is the way to go00:58
ailoScottL, What are the main differences between that and Fedora's Gnome3.00:59
ScottLfedora's seemed a little more "completed" or "finished"...mainly it was the right side "panel"01:00
ScottLno crashes so far, but i should say that i haven't really done too much with it or for very long01:00
ScottLi did get jack started with qjackctl and started ardour...made a few new tracks with ardour, but that is it01:00
ScottLi think i surfed the internet a bit01:00
ScottLadded some favourties to me left side menu that comes up with the super key01:01
ailoThink I will try installing Fedora. Doesn't really matter so much. Get some audio programs installed, and the just give it testrun. Get to know Gnome most of all01:01
ailoProbably good to try using some graphical programs too. Blender as well01:02
ailographical = programs used to make graphics :P01:03
ScottLooooh, i didn't think of that, good call01:03
ScottLi'm talking with jcastro about gnome-panels and gnome301:04
ScottLhe might have a good suggestion for testing gnome3 with natty01:04
ScottLjcastro recommends:  https://launchpad.net/~gnome3-team/+archive/gnome301:05
ScottLand warns that it's still a work in progress and we should backup any data01:05
ailoScottL, That's the one I tried before, however, I tried installing ubuntu-minimal without a desktop first.01:27
ailoLet's see if I can get it to work..01:27
ailoScottL, Have you had problems with Grub menu having a bad resolution for your screen01:32
ailo?01:32
ailoThere are some issues with Natty, that are a little hard to melt01:32
ailodigest, I mean01:32
ScottLailo, not really, just a disgusting color as the background :P01:35
ScottLailo, but seriously, i haven't had *any* problems with grub at all recently01:35
ailoI get it all the time. Even with beta 1. I should report it.01:36
ScottLyeah, probably so01:37
ScottLhi T0rCh_raony 03:26
ScottLTheMuso, whenever it is convenient can we talk about the methodology for getting plymouth-theme-ubuntustudio updated?03:46
ScottLto avoid any mistakes like i made last time03:46
TheMusoScottL: Wel lthere is only one thing really, if you need to update images in the package, or any other binary file, it needs to be given to me in a tarball. :)03:47
ScottLTheMuso, do you need the diff along with the tar ball?03:48
TheMusoScottL: Depends on whether the debian directory is also int eh tarball. If you pretty much build the package and ship the tarball over minus the dsc, I can do the rest.03:49
ScottLi presume the tar ball would be more than sufficient03:49
TheMusoYep.04:05
ScottLTheMuso, how shall i get the tarball to you?  attach it to the previous bug?04:16
ScottLhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-look/+bug/70631204:16
ubottuUbuntu bug 706312 in ubuntustudio-look (Ubuntu) "update plymouth-theme-ubuntustudio to remove progress bar for natty" [Undecided,Fix released]04:16
TheMusoScottL: Actually, that package has a bzr branch. Maybe if you make your changes there, I can pull them and upload that way.04:16
TheMusoScottL: And yeah, re-open that bug if you like.04:16
ScottLTheMuso, okay, so pull the branch, make the changes, the commit and push?04:17
TheMusoyep04:17
ScottLif i don't get it done tonight, i will have it done by tomorrow night (24 hours from now)04:17
TheMusoSure no proble,.04:20
TheMusoproblem04:20
ScottLi feel reasonably confident it will work this time as i had built it and tested it, ailo had tested it, we discovered why the .png file didn't get updated, i built it again, and testing it again :)04:23
ScottLi just wish i had made the time to address this before, i kept putting it off for other things and the release date snuck up on me04:23
ailoWe should get Ralf to do some testing on -lowlatency. I bet he would give us some nice facts04:36
ailoAt least what midi is concerned04:37
ailoDidn't think about that yet. 04:37
ailoWhat audio latency is concerned, I'm starting to like 2.6.39 a lot04:37
ScottLi'm really considering adding the release schedule to a google calender so i can have reminders04:53
ScottLi always seem to be behind on team reporting, release notes, and the like04:53
aboganiailo: Are you around?08:38
* abogani waves all!08:44
ailoabogani, I'm here. Happy with the latest -lowlatency08:49
aboganiailo: About your last email.08:49
ailoabogani, Yes?08:50
aboganiThe last kernel in you email is 38-8-lowlatency: Is it right?08:50
ailoabogani, No, typo.08:50
aboganiOk08:50
aboganiSo you used open source video driver (nvidia should dead-lock at the moment) and you installed rtirq-init, right?08:51
ailoabogani, Right. No nvidia drivers + rtirq-init08:52
ailoI mean, I did use rtirq08:52
aboganivery odd your results about on-board sound card...08:53
ailoabogani, That the results are the same?08:53
ailoOn -generic and -lowlatency?08:53
aboganiOn both because they have same results!08:53
aboganiI ask you the only last tests:08:54
ailoabogani, I have had good results on -generic now for at least a week.08:54
ailoSo, it is as it was with 2.6.38-1, at the beginning08:54
ailoOnly two cases where -generic is not performing well, while -lowlatency is. 1. holstein using firewire (don't know which arch) 2. Me using AMD6408:55
aboganiCould you provide me the output of 'ps -eo cmd,pid,rtprio' and say me the irqs of on-board and 101lt devices?08:55
abogani*1010lt08:55
ailoJust a moment08:56
ailohttp://paste.ubuntu.com/593015/08:59
ailoOn this machine, I have two ice1712 cards, and they are on irq 18 and 1909:00
ailohttp://paste.ubuntu.com/593016/09:01
ailoAnd this machine seems like the onboard card is on irq 4509:02
aboganiThere is a problem on the last one.09:04
aboganiailo: rtirq failed on the last one.09:04
aboganiailo: Could you check if rtirq-init is installed on the last machine, please?09:05
ailoabogani, It is. However, this is the line about the device and the irq:  45:    6056257          0   PCI-MSI-edge      hda_intel09:06
ailoShouldn't it be IO-APIC-fasteoi? Or does it matter?09:07
aboganiailo: Not matter which type of interrupt your sound device uses.09:07
ailook09:07
aboganiIt isn;t prioritized.09:07
ailoabogani, But that is the machine that gives the best results with -generic09:07
aboganiAs you can see all irq have 50 prio.09:08
aboganiailo: And the worst with -lowlatency. :-)09:08
aboganiTry to compare "ps -eo rtprio,cmd" on both machines. You will see clearly the problem.09:10
aboganiIf you ever repeat tests could you add one, please?09:11
ailoabogani, Yes. Not only for one device, but for two. I should try to reboot and see if I have made a mistake09:12
aboganiOnly -39-0-lowlatency kernel with and without nothreadirqs kernel option09:12
aboganiThanks in advance.09:12
ailoYou mean, uninstall rtirq-init in between tests?09:13
ailoSeems I already have done tests without it on one machine :)09:13
ailoI did seem to have slightly better performance, even so, on that machine09:14
ailoI will reboot now09:14
ailoabogani, It seems booting in safe graphical mode may affect this feature. Can it be possible?09:17
ailoI have higher prio now09:17
ailoBut, at least on this machine, the rtirq is not improving performance so that I can detect it09:19
ailohttp://paste.ubuntu.com/593020/09:20
ailoThe lowest latency setting I can use is the same as before09:20
ailoabogani, How can I remove the rtirq-init script without removing the kernel?09:22
aboganiailo: Why?09:23
ailoabogani, The kernel is depending on rtirq-init09:23
ailoAnd when I try remove rtirq it wants to remove the kernel image09:24
aboganiYeah but you wouldn't want remove it.09:24
ailoHow can I disable it?09:24
aboganiSorry I have to go out right now.09:24
ailoabogani, Ok. See you.09:25
aboganiPerhaps an "exit 0" at the head of the script.09:25
ailoWell, booting into recovery mode, and then using safe graphic mode does disable the rtirq script09:29
ailoabogani, I will make more testing later, but from what I see, testing both machines very quickly, I cannot find any significant benefit from the rtirq on my machines. We need to have someone test it who has a device sharing irq and usually gets problems because of that09:33
ScottLgood morning everyone :)13:18
ScottLhi quadrispro, how are you?22:38
ScottLso when will unity enter into unstable?22:39
quadrisproehya ScottL, fine :) and you, how'r you doing?22:39
quadrisproeh I don't know, I'm working hard on LV222:39
quadrisprorev.422:39
ScottLlol, that was a bad joke on my part about unity :P22:39
quadrisprommm I know that an ITP was opened22:40
ScottLi haven't kept up with the particulars, has lv2 changed much for rev.4?22:40
quadrispronot so much22:41
quadrisprojust a number of things for who wants to package LV2 exts,plugins22:41
ScottLbu ti guess you still need to rebuild everything with some slight changes22:41
quadrisprono need to rebuild anything :)22:41
quadrisproI've left /usr/include/lv2.h for backward compatibility22:42
ScottLi may seem a a little loopy because i'm using some muscle relaxers for my neck and i'm feeling a little funny :)22:42
quadrisprolol22:42
quadrisprothe really relevant change is: ladish :)22:43
ScottLyes it is :)22:43
ScottLi'm quite happy to see this coming, i think it beats the pants off of jack session22:44
ScottLif what i understand is true22:44
ScottLfalk is quite taken with ladish22:44
ScottLi haven't had much luck with jack-session and it's dreadfully unintuitive to know what you are doing IMO22:44
ScottLbut that was six months ago or so, i'm sure it's improved since then22:45
quadrisproif everything goes fine, within 2-3 months we'll have a first good version of the whole ladish'd stack in Debian testing22:47
quadrisproUbuntu 11.10 will get benefits from that22:47
quadrisproand it'll provide ladish, finally22:48
ScottLlol, i read that as 2-3 "years" at first and almost fainted22:48
ScottLthat's really good though22:48
ScottLquadrispro, what's debian doing about gnome3?  everyone moving to it?22:48
quadrisproreally I don't know much things on that topic22:51
quadrisproI think we'll move from GNOME2 -> GNOME3 for Wheezy, I don't think GNOME2 will get support for the next 2 years22:53
ScottLyeah, that is a concern for ubuntu studio, the majority think that unity or GNOME3 don't provide a good DE for studio work flow22:54
quadrisproyep, I've read something via UbuntuStudio ML, I didn't join the discussion due to the few spare time I have these days22:56
quadrisprohave to go now, see you soon"22:57
quadrisprobye!22:57
ScottLciao :)22:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!