GrueMaster | JFo: Re apport-collect and bug 758961. A) Bug was autofiled by apport (triggered by two oops occurances) B) I can find no correlating oops messages in /var/log/*. Image is fresh from today with only 4 reboots total. | 00:40 |
---|---|---|
GrueMaster | I am trying to reproduce it, but have not seen an oops since 10:41 (it is now 16:41). | 00:41 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero | ||
=== smb` is now known as smb | ||
=== timblechmann is now known as tim | ||
jjohansen | rebooting | 09:59 |
* apw waves to smb | 10:23 | |
* smb looks sw | 10:24 | |
smb | apw, Morning | 10:24 |
* apw puts up a flare | 10:24 | |
apw | smb, morning ... | 10:24 |
smb | apw, too late, latitude already did. :) | 10:25 |
apw | heheh | 10:25 |
apw | gondoi, quota modules may not be included in -virtual, i suspect it would be an oversight if so... what specific module names are you missing | 11:12 |
Mamarok | hi | 12:20 |
Mamarok | I have problems installing he 38-8 kernel on my system, see also bug 759531 | 12:21 |
Mamarok | the output of the update is in the report as well | 12:21 |
Mamarok | after that I started with the previous -7 kernel: the update doesn't hang anymore but I get the following error: http://paste.ubuntu.com/593527 | 12:24 |
ppisati | what does it happen if i manually modify one of the debian/configs/...? i don't like editconfigs | 12:33 |
smb | ppisati, There is a special place in heck for people like you | 13:05 |
smb | ppisati, Make sure to run updateconfigs after any manual change and see how the effects are. | 13:06 |
Mamarok | smb: may I ask you to have a look at my question above? | 13:12 |
smb | Mamarok, Hm might be the dkms compilation of the nvidia driver failed for some reason but its hard to say for sure | 13:17 |
Mamarok | the funny thing is that I don't even have a Nvidia card | 13:18 |
smb | I would probably try to run apt-get install -f | 13:18 |
Mamarok | that doesn't help | 13:19 |
smb | What is done at line 1010 of /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic.postinst (which seems to be the failing point) | 13:19 |
Mamarok | the output stays the same | 13:19 |
Mamarok | there are not even that many lines, I guess it means line 110 | 13:20 |
Mamarok | as it prints later | 13:20 |
smb | One seems to be for the headers and the other for the kernel package | 13:20 |
Mamarok | yes, the line is the same, run-parts | 13:22 |
Mamarok | sorry, system ("run-parts --verbose --exit-on-error --arg=$version " | 13:22 |
smb | right so that seems to call /etc/kernel/postinst.d/nvidia-common | 13:23 |
Mamarok | as I said, I don't have a Nvidia card, but it insists on installing it by default | 13:24 |
smb | Yes I believe the wrapper is always there | 13:24 |
smb | Though it should just do nothing when the binary driver is not there... | 13:24 |
smb | Does the file itself look executable/reasonable (not corrupted)? | 13:25 |
Mamarok | yes, I can edit and search in it without problems | 13:26 |
smb | I am looking at an older version right now but that would try to read in /usr/share/debconf/confmodule | 13:27 |
Mamarok | I will try removing nvidia related packages I can, just a moment | 13:28 |
Mamarok | hey, that solved it! I removed nvidia-common and now it works | 13:29 |
Mamarok | I will add a comment in the bug | 13:29 |
Mamarok | thanks for the hint | 13:29 |
smb | Mamarok, As I said, it should aslo work with it | 13:29 |
smb | I got it installed here too and no nvidia card either | 13:30 |
Mamarok | indeed, but since I don't have a card it doesn't hurt me | 13:30 |
Mamarok | the problem will be for those using a Nvidia card if they run into that problem | 13:30 |
smb | Do you have that /usr/share/debconf/confmodule? | 13:30 |
Mamarok | yes | 13:31 |
smb | Hm, ok. I would suspect a bit that something goes wrong with fiddling around with the debconf and that may strike again even without the nvidia stuff | 13:32 |
Mamarok | I ha to kill the process a few times then I needed to unlock /var/cache/debconf/config.dat, but I didn't really modify something else | 13:34 |
Mamarok | had* to | 13:34 |
smb | That would somewhat sound even more like your problem does not only exist for the kernel package but might run into other trouble sooner or later | 13:36 |
Mamarok | I checked again: apparently there were some old nvidia-xx-modaliases packages that I removed, that might be the origin of the problem | 13:37 |
=== chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
Mamarok | since those are not in the Natty repos anymore | 13:37 |
smb | Hmm odd. | 13:39 |
Mamarok | anyway, I updated the bug report with this information and changed its status to "opinion" | 13:41 |
Mamarok | thanks a lot for the hints :) | 13:41 |
smb | Those alias packages should only contains some hints for jockey. There is multiple of those on my system too | 13:41 |
smb | Mamarok, Welcome. Just don't expect too much feedback for "opinion" bugs. ;) | 13:42 |
Mamarok | I know, but at least something is lying around if other people run into the same problem | 13:43 |
Mamarok | for now the report is out of the way, it can still be reactivated if needed | 13:43 |
smb | Right, if I had more time I would probably try to run through the upgrade path from Maverick to see that works... | 13:44 |
Mamarok | me too, but the same applies here, I don't really have time for that | 13:45 |
apw | mjg59, you heard any complaints of thinkpads overheating on 2.6.38 kernels? | 14:23 |
apw | mjg59, thinkpad x201* seems to be implicated | 14:23 |
mjg59 | Heard, yes. | 14:24 |
mjg59 | Haven't been able to track down yet. | 14:24 |
mjg59 | There's basically nothing that's changed in the thinkpad driver | 14:24 |
mjg59 | So I'm a bit stumped | 14:24 |
mjg59 | I think someone's really going to have to do a bisection | 14:24 |
mjg59 | The main reason I'm confused is that they don't have ACPI fans, so it's entirely under firmware control... | 14:25 |
apw | mjg59, i'll ask for some mainline kernel testing then between 2.6.35 and 2.6.38 and see what that gets us | 14:25 |
apw | mjg59, the last time we had anything like this it was a change of width of a read in acpi was confusing the ec, so it could be anything | 14:26 |
mjg59 | Yeah, it's more likely to be an ec change than anything else | 14:26 |
apw | mjg59, ok in the reporters court now, thanks for the info | 14:30 |
root___ | Hi, sorry if this is the wrong place but I know that my USB Audio DAC works with ubuntu I was wondering if you could help me set it up in my distro? The receiver is a texas instruments PCM2706 here is the output of lsusb - http://paste.pocoo.org/show/370983/ thanks if you can help at all I don't know where to start | 14:41 |
=== sconklin-gone is now known as sconklin | ||
hallyn | apw: hi, on bug 747090, you say you incorporated a comment from jan - but I don't see such a comment! | 14:54 |
apw | he simply suggested merging the xxx += inc_eip into the line above | 14:55 |
apw | that was jan wasn't it, or have i miss attributed | 14:55 |
hallyn | that's what i assumed based on your patch - i just don't see that msg in my inbox | 14:56 |
hallyn | was that in the kvm mailing list? | 14:56 |
hallyn | oh, you know - maybe he didnt' cc: me. I'm not actually on the list | 14:56 |
hallyn | lemme go fix that | 14:56 |
apw | hallyn, ahh ok ... cool | 14:57 |
apw | hallyn, it was nothing more than a nit, the binary produced should be identicle | 14:57 |
hallyn | apw: yeah the patch in your dir looked fine. I haven't been able to test the kernel itself yet | 14:58 |
hallyn | apw: say, would you mind sending your version of the patch to the kvm m-l then? :) | 14:58 |
apw | hallyn, no worries, how severe is the symptoms of the issue, ie. are we hoping to get it into the release kernel or can it wait for the first sru kerenel | 14:59 |
hallyn | apw: oh, no. there it is. I simply missed his comment in the noise. I don't do well with un-snipped emails some days | 14:59 |
hallyn | i was hoping for release kernel. let's ask cjwatson what exactly made him track this down | 15:00 |
apw | hallyn i think you're better doing it, so you get the credit | 15:00 |
hallyn | apw: it seems like ppl are running kvm just fine, on the one hand... | 15:00 |
apw | ok, i hope we can slip one more kernel in, but we are going to have to hoop jump to get it in | 15:01 |
apw | and if we do i'll make sure this one is in if we do | 15:01 |
hallyn | sounds good, thanks | 15:02 |
apw | hallyn, let me know when you have tested, and i'll get that patch out for acks | 15:05 |
=== root___ is now known as ranunculoid | ||
=== ranunculoid is now known as eamon | ||
apw | JFo, about ? | 15:47 |
ppisati | apw: in 5bfc8061, any reason why you choose CONFIG_USB_MUSB_TUSB6010 over any other option? | 15:56 |
apw | ppisati, erm | 15:57 |
ppisati | apw: easy :) | 15:57 |
ppisati | apw: even a "the name was cool" is ok | 15:58 |
apw | ppisati, is that a select ? | 15:58 |
ppisati | yep | 15:58 |
ppisati | apw: and we lost musb on omap | 15:58 |
ppisati | that's why i was asking | 15:58 |
ppisati | anywa, i'll modify it locallu | 15:58 |
ppisati | locally | 15:58 |
ppisati | omap.config | 15:59 |
apw | ppisati, looks to be the default for that new choise on omap, ie the first vslid one | 16:00 |
ppisati | ok | 16:00 |
apw | so essentislly arbitrary | 16:01 |
ppisati | ok ok, no prob | 16:01 |
apw | hallyn, ok i've taken you testing as good, and pushed the kvm patch to kernel-team@ for review | 16:32 |
hallyn | apw: great, thanks | 16:33 |
gondoi | apw: according to /boot/config-2.6.35-28-virtual: CONFIG_QFMT_V1=m | 16:57 |
gondoi | CONFIG_QFMT_V2=m | 16:57 |
apw | gondoi, yes but only select modules are actually packaged for the virtual flavour to keep it nice and small | 16:58 |
gondoi | apw: but the files are not there: ls -l /lib64/modules/2.6.35-28-virtual/kernel/fs/quota/ | 16:58 |
gondoi | total 0 | 16:58 |
* apw waves to cking | 16:58 | |
apw | gondoi, right that is entirly possible given how -virtual is packaged | 16:59 |
gondoi | hmm | 16:59 |
gondoi | so how can I do quotas on my vm? | 16:59 |
apw | gondoi, what are the module names which are missing, so i can check if they are meant to be included | 16:59 |
gondoi | or... where can I get the modules | 16:59 |
* cking waves to apw | 16:59 | |
gondoi | apw: just a sec | 16:59 |
apw | cking, hiya, back yet? | 16:59 |
cking | apw, still in SFO, will be back on Saturday | 16:59 |
gondoi | quota_v2.ko and quota_v1.ko | 16:59 |
apw | gondoi, maverick ? | 17:00 |
gondoi | yes | 17:00 |
apw | gondoi, doesn't look like they are included, and likely they should be | 17:02 |
apw | gondoi, is there a bug filed? if not please file one and let me know the number | 17:02 |
gondoi | i'll have a look and see what I can find | 17:02 |
gondoi | thanks apw | 17:02 |
=== herton is now known as herton_lunch | ||
apw | gondoi, if you haven't filed one already you may as well just file one | 17:04 |
gondoi | will do | 17:04 |
ppisati | cooloney: your patch on natty's make the board hags at boot | 17:38 |
ppisati | s/hags/hangs/ | 17:41 |
=== herton_lunch is now known as herton | ||
vanhoof | sforshee: heya if you're interested: http://people.canonical.com/~vanhoof/lazy_itable_init_testing_plus_dirty/debug/ | 18:00 |
vanhoof | sforshee: first directory is at start, last is either right before, or during the hang | 18:00 |
vanhoof | its hard to tell since forcing a sync w/ sysrq didnt appear to trigger any activity | 18:01 |
* vanhoof posts to bug | 18:01 | |
sforshee | vanhoof, cool, I'll take a peek and see if I notice anything interesting | 18:02 |
vanhoof | sforshee: awesome lmk if you see anything interesting :) | 18:04 |
=== sforshee is now known as sforshee-lunch | ||
bjf | apw, tgardner, and i have noticed a dramatic drop off in LP bug email, have you seen the same ? i know there have been 37 new bugs in the last 24 hours but i've only received 5 emails | 18:26 |
bjf | JFo, ^ ? | 18:28 |
vanhoof | bjf: getting updates from my projects pretty quickly | 18:30 |
apw | bjf hmmm, not really noticed, but then i don't really read ones which arn't assigned to me | 18:32 |
=== hallyn is now known as hallyn_afk | ||
jjohansen | bjf: well I can say I haven't gotten an email for every bug I have filed lately, so something seems off | 18:40 |
bjf | jjohansen, tim thinks there was a change that you don't get email about LP actions you've performed, but I'm not getting email about any new bugs against the linux source package | 18:41 |
jjohansen | bjf: odd because I am getting emails from some of the bugs I am filing just not all of them | 18:42 |
bjf | jjohansen, ok, then, -ENOCLUE | 18:42 |
* apw wanders to find some food ... laters | 18:49 | |
=== sforshee-lunch is now known as sforshee | ||
* jjohansen -> lunch | 19:59 | |
=== hallyn_afk is now known as hallyn | ||
=== chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
=== sconklin is now known as sconklin-afk | ||
michaelh1 | Hi there. The latest Natty kernel keeps faulting on my Core 2 ThinkPad. What should I do next? | 22:42 |
hallyn | what sort of faulting? is it overheating? (that's a popular one this week) | 22:43 |
michaelh1 | hallyn: I've had a few times where it logs me out and powers off. The others are where it switches to a black screen and dumps the backtrace on the different cores. | 22:47 |
michaelh1 | hallyn: I'm suspicious that it's due to the rtl8192 driver. I've switched from wired to wireless to see if the problem reduces. | 22:47 |
michaelh1 | hallyn: (the last backtrace had rtl8192_rx_normal and skb_put in it) | 22:47 |
michaelh1 | Is there a way of recovering the backtrace after a halt? | 22:48 |
=== Sarvatt_ is now known as Sarvatt |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!