=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[01:29] <ApOgEE> good morning
[08:55] <dholbach> good morning
[10:57] <iulian> Morning dholbach, mok0.
[10:58] <dholbach> hey iulian
[11:06] <iulian> Does anyone know how one can increase the number of workspaces in Unity?
[11:07] <Rhonda> Isn't this rather a question for #ubuntu?  :)
[11:07] <iulian> True.  I'll try in #ubuntu+1.
[11:09] <ajmitch> iulian: compizconfig-settings-manager, general options, desktop size
[11:10] <iulian> Uhm, I thought I looked in there.
[11:10] <iulian> Thanks ajmitch.
[11:10] <ajmitch> it's not under the unity options, which is where I was looking :)
[11:11] <iulian> Indeed.
[11:42] <hrw> iulian: basically if you want to change something related to window management in unity you have to check ccsm (compiz settings)
[12:37] <AnAnt> Hello, how can I add software categories in Unity's application browswer
=== AnAnt_ is now known as AnAnt
[12:38] <AnAnt> Hello, how can I add software categories in Unity's application browser ? I've got extra-xdg-menus installed , yet I don't see the Electronics category for example
[13:10] <c2tarun> AnAnt: I dont think this is the proper channel for this question.
[13:10] <AnAnt> c2tarun: #ubuntu-desktop ?
[13:17] <c2tarun> AnAnt: I guess try #unity
[13:17] <AnAnt> thanks
=== chuck_ is now known as zul
[14:10] <iulian> hrw: Understood.  Thank you.
[15:04] <lfaraone> ScottK: when you have a chance can you sync bug 759830? (fixes CVE-2011-1500 and other bugs)
[15:04] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 759830 in pithos (Ubuntu) "Sync pithos 0.3.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/759830
[15:04] <ubottu> ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem.  When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-1500)
[15:04] <ScottK> lfaraone: I can't.  I don't have sufficient access.
[15:05] <ScottK> lfaraone: Ask pitti in #ubuntu-devel.
[15:05] <lfaraone> ScottK: I thought you were in ~ubuntu-archive. The bug only affects natty.
[15:06] <ScottK> lfaraone: I am, but doing a sync requires shell access in the Canonical data center, which I don't have.
[15:06] <lfaraone> Ah, fun, mk.
[15:06] <ScottK> I'm, unfortunately, limited to what the LP U/I provides for archive admins to do, which is a lot, but not everything.
[15:07] <lfaraone> And we haven't implemented that "sync me" button yet :)
[15:09] <ScottK> Nope.
[15:09] <ScottK> Once that's implemented anyone that can upload the package in question will have it.  It won't be limited to archive admins.
[15:19] <lfaraone> Mhm. That'll make life much easier.
[15:32]  * davidgiluk_ has an MPI related FTBFS on ARM and isn't sure of the right way forward - any MPI MOTUs around?
[18:32] <Arash_> Hi there
[18:33] <Arash_> I have a problem in packaging an update
[18:36] <Arash_> anybody there?
[18:41] <Arash_> I am trying to do a package for an update so I got the source code of the latest version
[18:41] <Arash_> then I dowloaded the new version
[18:41] <Arash_> I'm trying to do "debuild -S -sa"
[18:42] <Arash_> but I get this error
[18:42] <Arash_> :
[18:42] <Arash_> dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b opencv-2.2.0 gave error exit status 1
[18:42] <Arash_> anyone can help me?
[18:43] <davidgiluk_> I guess the question is what do you see before that point
[18:44] <Arash_> dpkg-source: info: use the '3.0 (quilt)' format to have separate and documented changes to upstream files, see dpkg-source(1)
[18:44] <Arash_> dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
[18:44] <Arash_> dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b opencv-2.2.0 gave error exit status 1
[18:44] <Arash_> debuild: fatal error at line 1337:
[18:44] <Arash_> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d -us -uc -S -sa failed
[18:45] <micahg> !pastebin > Arash_
[18:45] <ubottu> Arash_, please see my private message
[19:30] <marktraceur> I don't suppose this is the place to ask for help about packaging?
[19:34] <Pici> marktraceur: Usuaully #ubuntu-packaging is a better place to start
[19:34] <marktraceur> Pici: I'm there now, looks pretty dead there too
[19:34] <marktraceur> Pici: But thanks
[19:41] <soren> There's an #ubuntu-packaging? Wow. Who knew.
[19:42] <micahg> soren: persia set it up about a year ago to take the generic packaging help out of here and #launchpad
[20:58] <Arash__> I am trying to build a package for un update
[20:58] <Arash__> after doing "debuild -S -sa" I get this error
[20:59] <Arash__> dpkg-source: info: use the '3.0 (quilt)' format to have separate and documented changes to upstream files, see dpkg-source(1)
[20:59] <Arash__> dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
[20:59] <Arash__> dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b opencv-2.2.0 gave error exit status 1
[20:59] <Arash__> debuild: fatal error at line 1337:
[20:59] <micahg> !pastebin > arand
[20:59] <ubottu> arand, please see my private message
[20:59] <micahg> arand: sorry
[20:59] <Arash__> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d -us -uc -S -sa failed
[20:59] <micahg> !pastebin | Arash__
[20:59] <ubottu> Arash__: For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use http://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use http://imagebin.org/?page=add | !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic.
=== chuck_ is now known as zul
[21:35] <Arash__> I am trying to build a package for un update. After doing "debuild -S -sa" I get this error: dpkg-source: info: use the '3.0 (quilt)' format to have separate and documented changes to upstream files, see dpkg-source(1) dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b opencv-2.2.0 gave error exit status 1 debuild: fatal error at line 1337: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d -us -uc -S -sa faile
[21:36] <Arash__> I am trying to build a package for un update. After doing "debuild -S -sa" I get this error: dpkg-source: info: use the '3.0 (quilt)' format to have separate and documented changes to upstream files, see dpkg-source(1) dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b opencv-2.2.0 gave error exit status 1 debuild: fatal error at line 1337: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d -us -uc -S -sa faile
[21:40] <broder> Arash__: what does debian/source/format say?
[21:43] <Arash__> broder: I did not get what you mean: "what does debian/source/format say?"
[21:43] <broder> does that file exist?
[21:43] <Arash__> debian folder exists
[21:44] <broder> and the rest?
[21:44] <Arash__> I just copied debian folder from an older version 2.1 into newer version 2.2
[21:44] <Arash__> what I read in toturials
[21:47] <Ampelbein> Arash__: the error message indicates that you changed for example a non-text file. (dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source)
[21:48] <Arash__> Ampelbein: Thanks, I will check it
[21:48] <Arash__> I've just done as in toturial : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/PackageUpdate
[21:49] <Ampelbein> Arash__: what package?
[21:49] <Arash__> Ampelbein: I try to make a package for opencv-2.2.0
[21:50] <Arash__> opencv-2.1.0 already exists
[21:51] <Ampelbein> Arash__: can you copy the complete debuild output to a pastebin?
[21:52] <Arash__> http://paste.ubuntu.com/593751/
[21:54] <Ampelbein> Arash__: see all the lines starting with "dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change" like line 24.
[21:56] <Ampelbein> Arash__: nevermind, your problem seems to be that you didn't add a correct entry in debian/changelog with 2.2.0 as the version number
[21:59] <Arash__> Yes, that's true. I did not put a correct version
[21:59] <Arash__> thank you
[21:59] <Arash__> I will try again
[22:08] <Arash__> Ampelbein: Now I have another error. Could you help me please? : http://paste.ubuntu.com/593757/
[22:09] <Ampelbein> Arash__: did you by chance just rename the bz2 to gz?
[22:10] <Arash__> yes, I did. But I did not rename. I extract bz2 and I did ziped to gz
[22:11] <Ampelbein> Arash__: "gzip: stdin: not in gzip format" is the error
[22:12] <Arash__> thanks
[22:12] <Arash__> ok I will try
[22:27] <Arash__> Thank you so much. I did it!
[22:27] <Arash__> Ampelbein: Thank you so much. I did it!
[22:28] <Ampelbein> Arash__: great! ;-)
=== Sarvatt_ is now known as Sarvatt
[22:59] <Arash__> when I do "pbuilder build package.dsc" it takes lots of time to unpack all the packages in the system! Is it normal?
[22:59] <paultag> Arash__: yes, do you know what pbuilder is actually doing?
[23:00] <paultag> Arash__: you can do quick builds locally, but pbuilds are critical to run before any meaningful upload. I usually do all testing in a pbuilder, but others might not (and that's OK :) )
[23:00] <Arash__> making package?
[23:00] <paultag> Arash__: yeah, but it extracts a chroot, installs the packages needed to build (in build-deps), and runs the build -- this is to make sure you have everything set up to build in a clean setting
[23:01] <Arash__> I think it would be better to do it locally because if I have some errors it takes lot of time to show error
[23:01] <paultag> Arash__: e.g. you might take awk for granted as being on the system or something (I think it might be, but not the issue), and if you leave it out, when it builds on the clean build machines, it throws an error that awk is not found
[23:01] <paultag> Arash__: this way it tests it in a very clean chroot
[23:02] <paultag> Arash__: kosher?
[23:03] <Arash__> OK, I see
[23:03] <paultag> :)
=== Philip6 is now known as Philip5
[23:04] <paultag> Arash__: dpkg-buildpackage will do it without a chroot
[23:04] <paultag> Arash__: just use a pbuilder build to test before any sort of debdiff, upload or patch
[23:05] <Arash__> Sorry I am kind of new. I did not get
[23:05] <paultag> Arash__: http://man.cx/dpkg-buildpackage(1)
[23:05] <Arash__> I just tried to update a package
[23:06] <Arash__> so after debuild I do pbuilder
[23:06] <Arash__> and you said i can do it locally before
[23:06] <paultag> Arash__: sure. if it's for something you'd like to see in use, that is the best way to do it.
[23:06] <Arash__> so I would like to know how I can do it locally
[23:06] <paultag> Arash__: yes, you can, with dpkg-buildpackage. pbuilder creates a chroot, installs packages in the chroot and builds it
[23:06] <Arash__> aha, ok
[23:06] <paultag> Arash__: I sent you the manpage for dpkg-buildpackage :)
[23:06] <Arash__> i will test it
[23:07] <paultag> it works, I assure you :)
[23:07] <Arash__> paultag: thank you so much
[23:07] <paultag> Arash__: sure! Good luck!
[23:42] <Arash__> while doing pbuilder I am facing another error : http://paste.ubuntu.com/593791/
[23:48] <Arash__> I think the error is rather here : http://paste.ubuntu.com/593792/