/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/04/14/#launchpad.txt

Darxus$ bzr push lp:~darxus/+junk/spamassassin-unpackaging00:01
Darxusssh: connect to host bazaar.launchpad.net port 22: No route to host00:01
DarxusWoo.00:01
mwhudsonDarxus: yeah, the sysadmins are investigating00:01
=== lifeless changed the topic of #launchpad to: networking issues under investigation | https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/
chadadavisAre there issues with Launchpad at the moment? I'm trying to file a bug, I keep getting an Oops error from Launchpad.00:17
pooliechadadavis: yes00:17
poolieapparently some network hardware has failed; we're working on it00:17
chadadavispoolie, Thanks, I'll write them down and file them in the morning ...00:17
lifelesschadadavis: if you're attaching a file to the bug that will happen00:21
chadadavislifeless, thanks for the tip. It worked fine without the attachments. Just wanted the bug number. I'll attach them later.00:22
=== cinerama_ is now known as cinerama
rippsIs something wrong with bazaar.launchpad.net? I can't seem to connect. Ping shows this: From eth0.peumo.canonical.com (91.189.88.10) icmp_seq=8 Destination Host Unreachable00:34
lifelessyes00:35
ScottKripps: Look at the start of /topic.00:35
lifelesswe have a switch which has gone awol and isn't recoverable remotely; engineers are going onsite as we speak00:35
=== lifeless changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/
lifeless(*) builds will be slightly delayed as the final services are restored01:07
lifelessand there may be a cluster of rejections01:08
=== lifeless changed the topic of #launchpad to: lists.launchpad.net down (fallout from hardware failure) - back soon | https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/
DarxusSo did the switch just need power cycling or something?  Or did it get replaced?01:25
lifelessAIUI we've moved the wires to a different switch module and the failed component is being investigated01:34
lifelessDarxus: we have remote power cycling facilities etc, so I don't think it was that simple :)01:34
ScottKlifeless: Looks like the network issue got soyuz and the keyserver on bad terms again.01:53
lifelessspm: ^01:54
spmugh01:54
wgrantScottK: cocoplum again?01:58
ScottKwgrant: Yes.01:58
ScottK  Uploading plasma-mobile_0.0~svn20110101-0ubuntu2_source.changes: 1k/2k550 Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ["(7, 9, u'No public key')", "(7, 9, u'No public key')", "(7, 9, u'No public key')"] : Permission denied.01:58
wgrantThanks.01:58
ScottKWould you also please check if that actually got accepted?01:59
ScottKFun.  (Error ID: OOPS-1930H76) on https://launchpad.net/builders.02:01
ubot5https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1930H7602:01
wgrantHmm.02:01
* wgrant pokes cocoplum.02:01
wgrantHello cocoplum... are you there?02:01
zachtibis the ppa service having trouble? it's rejecting my gpg key, which it liked yesterday02:01
wgrantzachtib: We had a networking hardware failure earlier... possibly still fallout from that. Investigating.02:03
zachtibwgrant, huh... well, I just got a package accepted email for the lucid and natty packages... nothing on the maverick one, though02:11
spivHmm, I'm having trouble sending crash reports.02:14
ScottKThe /builders page is working again.02:16
ScottKwgrant: Once you have a spare moment from the current 'fun', I'd appreciate it if you would check and see if the kdebase and kdetoys builds on powerpc are really stuck (as it appears in the web U/I)?02:17
zachtiboh, duh, the maverick package never uploaded02:18
zachtibok, it seems to be building, though dput still throws an error anyways02:18
wgrantzachtib: Right, the error is mostly a warning.02:28
wgrantScottK: buildd-manager is still a little bit upset from the earlier networking fun, I think.02:29
wgrantSomething else seems to be wrong now, since I can't talk to cocoplum from some internal hosts :/02:29
ScottKOK.02:29
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
MTecknologya $40 bottle of tequila just broke on my floor........02:58
MTecknologyI grabbed it, then I was holding  on my way to put it in the fridge, and the whole bottle separated from the top (that I was holding)02:58
MTecknologya tad bit pissed off02:58
MTecknologygrrrr02:58
poolieapport bug filing seems really slow at the moment; this might just be still fallout03:09
poolieiow it's stuck on "please wait wihle bug data is processed"03:09
wgrantpoolie: Just got an alert about that 5 minutes ago.03:11
wgrantLooking.03:11
=== wgrant changed the topic of #launchpad to: builds, merge proposals and mailing lists having trouble (fallout from hardware failure) - back soon | https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/
rippsdput has suddenly stopped working for me. It's giving gpg verification errors suddenly.   Uploading mplayer2-build_2.0+git20110413.0bec988-0ubuntu1~ripps1_source.changes: 2k/3k550 Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ['General error', 'General error', 'General error'] : Permission denied.03:57
ScottKripps: Known breakage from the recent outage.  It probably was uploaded anyway.03:57
wgrantripps: We're still resolving widespread network fallout from the hardware failure earlier... it *may* still process okay.03:57
wgrantBut the buildds are still out, so it won't build for a while.03:58
pooliewgrant: i filed bug 760393 for the problem i hit before with apport getting stuck, just so you know04:38
ubot5Launchpad bug 760393 in Launchpad itself "apport bug stuck in "please wait while bug data is processed"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/76039304:39
wgrantpoolie: It's not really a bug, but yeah.04:39
pooliejust an operational thing04:40
pooliei'm happy if it's just rejected or whatever, i just thought i'd give it a handle04:40
wgrantSure.04:41
=== michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away
=== lifeless changed the topic of #launchpad to: apport-bug-filing, builds, merge proposals and mailing lists having trouble (fallout from hardware failure) - back soon | https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/
kl_Hi is there something wrong with launchpad? I cannot report a bug. Stuck on gathering info07:18
geserkl_: see /topic07:20
kl_geser: Was not that fixed 6 hours ago?07:24
lifelesswe got mostly operational 6 hours ago07:24
lifelesshowever the failed bit of kit was fairly large so we didn't have a spare idling around, a comprehensive shuffle has had to take place, and is still ongoing07:25
lifelesswe hope to be fully operational soon07:25
kl_lifeless: ok07:26
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
mabacIt seems I can't access any merge requests. Is this a known issue?08:55
mabacOOPS-1930W39308:55
ubot5https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1930W39308:55
ttxyes it's known08:55
mabacoh ok, thanks08:56
ttxdon't have any clear ETA on fix though08:56
ttx(see channel topic)08:56
wgrantmabac: We had a major networking hardware failure a few hours ago. Most services were restored quickly, but it was bad enough that the last few are going to take a while longer.08:56
mabacttx, thanks didn't notice that08:57
mabacwgrant, that's tough. I fully understand that it takes a while to recover.08:57
ttxwgrant: any idea what "a while longer" should be ? I have a release cooking...08:58
wgrantttx: I'm not sure :/08:59
ttxwgrant: ok, thanks08:59
pooliecodehost is down again?09:01
wgrantpoolie: Looks alive to me.09:02
pooliewgrant: you can ssh in?09:02
pooliefor me it seems to be hanging after 'offering dsa key'09:02
wgrantNot hanging, but rejecting my key :/09:03
poolieactually i also get a long pause, then rejection09:03
faganwe are having problems too09:03
faganit happened last night about 11 last night UK time09:04
faganand its still down :/09:04
fagansame as wgrant09:04
pooliefagan: i guess this is also network hardware failure fallout09:05
faganpoolie: is it going to last long we are at the windows sprint and we are blocked09:05
lifelessfagan: folk are working as fast as they can, sorry but no ETA yet09:06
poolieIS are working as fast as they can09:06
faganlifeless: sure its cool we can try work around it09:07
pooliefagan: pulling from http://bazaar.launchpad.net/whatever may still wokr09:08
faganpoolie: does it work with pushing09:09
pooliesorry we're readonly until this is fixed09:09
pooliethis particular bit may be fixed quite soon09:10
faganah ok09:10
faganwe are just going to ssh to a server until we can use lp again09:12
pooliegood idea09:13
philip_stoevhi, branching from LP also seems to not work -- I am able to load pages such as http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/maria-5.3-pstoevbuildbottesting/ in my browser but I can not bzr branch or bzr checkout from them09:16
cdbsMoreover, I can't view bug attachments09:16
cdbsI get a 502 proxy error09:16
cdbshttps://launchpadlibrarian.net/69307138/Screenshot1.png for example09:16
cdbshttps://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/760210 is the bug for the above example09:17
ubot5Ubuntu bug 760210 in unity "Random graphical glitches on the dash" [Undecided,New]09:17
lifelesssee topic09:17
lifelesswe have a major outage in progress09:17
lifelessengineers on site, recovering things09:17
cdbslifeless: LP Librarian isn't mentioned in that09:17
cdbslifeless: would be good if you posted it on identi.ca lpstatus?09:18
lifelessI'm just updating that09:18
=== michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1
pooliecodehost is ok for me now09:26
pooliefagan, philip_stoev^09:26
philip_stoevpoolie: thanks09:26
lifelesscodehosting back09:26
faganpoolie, lifeless cool thanks09:27
* cdbs can finally get back to Unity work09:29
ttxmerge proposals still oopses though.09:30
dpmhi launchpadders, I'm getting consistent OOPSes trying to moderate an LP mailing list. E.g. OOPS-1930W42909:31
ubot5https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1930W42909:31
dpmcould someone look at it?09:31
dpmok, no worries, I've just read the channel's topic :)09:32
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
fagandpm: yeah I already thought I blew up lp when I saw that09:37
dpm:-)09:39
bullgard4How long will be  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/ blocked yet?09:46
wgrantbullgard4: It should be working OK now.09:49
bullgard4wgrant: Not with me. I obtain: "Please wait while bug data is being processed." since 06:24 MESZ = GMT+2.09:51
wgrantbullgard4: Oh, that's not the URL you gave.09:53
wgrantbullgard4: The backlog is processing.09:53
wgrantThey started processing about 15 minutes ago.09:54
wgrantNot sure how long it will take.09:54
bullgard4wgrant: The precise URL is very long (and thus error prone): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sourcebase/banshee/+filebug/1ed4e3ba-666c-11e0-83cc-002481e7f48a09:56
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress]09:56
bullgard4wgrant: The precise URL is very long (and thus error prone): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+filebug/1ed4e3ba-666c-11e0-83cc-002481e7f48a09:58
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress]09:58
wgrantbullgard4: Right. It'll take a while to process all the apport uploads from the last few hours.09:59
bullgard4wgrant: Thank you for your information.10:00
ttxlooks like mergeproposals are back.10:03
wgrantttx: Yeah, they should be OK now. Just sorting out the few remaining issues...10:05
=== zyga_ is now known as zyga
timhi, i have debianized a package and tried to upload it to my ppa. however it is rejected, because of a missing signature. how do i create it? http://pastebin.com/aT7yMB7s10:48
bigjoolslifeless: time to update the topic?10:48
lifelessI think so10:48
bigjoolslifeless: is poppy still affected or is this guy's error real?10:49
lifelessbigjools: thats the gpghandler tempdir thing10:50
lifelesswe just need to bounce it10:50
bigjoolsawesome10:50
bigjoolslifeless: why do we have a tempdir reaper again? :/10:51
lifelessbigjools: because otherwise we run out of space and diaf10:51
bigjoolstim: you should be ok, wait for an acceptance email.  If you don't get one in 5 minutes ask again10:51
lifelessbigjools: can you liase with mthaddon on this one; I am about to head10:51
bigjoolslifeless: I guess10:52
SteveAgood morning10:52
lifelessbigjools: bug 75724810:53
ubot5Launchpad bug 757248 in Launchpad itself "poppy-sftp's signature checking relies on long-term survival of a directory in /tmp" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/75724810:53
lifelessSteveA: hola!10:53
SteveAhi robert10:53
lifelessSteveA: how goes amsterdam ?10:53
SteveAit's great :-)10:54
SteveAhow's new zealand? I hope things are getting back to normal there10:56
lifelessyeah10:56
lifelessbetter off than japan10:56
bigjoolshey there SteveA10:57
SteveAhi julian!10:57
lifelessSteveA: I'm in rangiora, nearly no disruption10:57
lifelesscritical services and most normal services are fine10:57
bigjoolsthis is a coincidence!  I was just debugging some code that says: if steveIsFixingThis:10:58
lifelessactual death toll was -very small- 0.25% of population10:58
lifelessthe property damage and infrastructure was huge10:58
SteveAbigjools: thanks for fixing it! :-)10:59
bigjools:)10:59
verwilstUploading php-mongo_1.1.4-0ppa1_source.changes: 1k/2k550 Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ['General error', 'General error', 'General error'] : Permission denied. Note: This error might indicate a problem with your passive_ftp setting.      Please consult dput.cf(5) for details on this configuration option.11:27
verwilstany ideas about this?11:27
verwilst"Successfully signed dsc and changes files" while making my packages11:27
geserverwilst: the LP FTP server checks now the signature during upload and sometimes the FTP server and the Ubuntu keyserver don't like each other and don't communicate (but your upload might got accepted despite the error)11:30
verwilsti havent gotten a mail so i guess it didnt go through11:31
verwilstgeser, but it's a server error i guess?11:31
geseryes11:31
verwilstlast week i uploaded another package11:32
verwilstdput was all fine11:32
verwilstbut i never got an email and the package never got on my ppa11:32
verwilstit just vanished as if i never uploaded it11:32
verwilsttried 3 times, dput was successful every time11:32
geserverwilst: does LP know about the key (that it belongs to your account) you used for signing?11:33
verwilstgeser, i've uploaded a lot of packages11:33
verwilstso i guess so :)11:33
geserah, so this only started happening recently?11:33
verwilstyeah11:34
nigelbhi, what can I do request a pad.lv for blueprints?11:34
geserthen the new FTP server is to blaime11:34
verwilsthttps://launchpad.net/~verwilst/+archive/ppa < as you can see i packaged stuff 5 days ago11:34
verwilstfrom the exact same server11:34
verwilstgeser, do you have the power to fix this? :D11:37
bigjoolsverwilst: there was a problem with the ftp server, it was bounced around 50 minutes ago to rectify that, do you get the same problem now?11:39
verwilstSuccessfully uploaded packages.11:40
verwilst:)11:40
geserverwilst: no, I'm just a mere LP user11:40
verwilst  Uploading php-gearman_0.7.0-0ppa1_source.changes: done. Successfully uploaded packages. < this is what i got last week as well for this other package11:42
verwilstbut it never appeared in ppa and never gotten a mail from it11:42
verwilstmaybe i will get one now11:42
bigjoolsverwilst: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+faq/22711:42
=== henninge is now known as henninge-lunch
onoxis it possible to make the text below a bug report page in color red and large font?12:02
verwilstbigjools, so how am i supposed to know what is wrong with my changes or control file? :P12:54
verwilstan error mail for example would be handy :)12:54
verwilsthm, maintainer is empty12:56
verwilstmight be that12:56
wgrantThat's probably it.12:56
wgrantverwilst: The difficulty is that we can't parse the changes file to identify who to send the email to.12:57
verwilstdh-make-pecl's fault! :)12:57
verwilstwgrant, but i get a mail when it's rejected or accepted :)12:57
verwilstjust use that email address :d12:57
=== henninge-lunch is now known as henninge
wgrantverwilst: Yeah, but that's when the changes file is parsable :(12:57
verwilst[PPA verwilst] [ubuntu/lucid] php-gearman 0.7.0-0ppa1 (Accepted)13:01
verwilsthurray!13:01
verwilstthanks for the help dudes ;)13:02
FloSoftare the buildservers still offline?13:42
wgrantFloSoft: They should be just about back to normal now, once the queue's processed.13:44
wgrantFloSoft: Are you seeing any problems?13:44
FloSofthmm okay, then I'll have to wait: "Start in 12h" -.-13:44
wgrantWhich build?13:44
FloSoftaah now it changed, now its "8min" - for 2 minutes it was 12h ^^13:45
FloSoftwgrant: okay good, now all my builds will start in max 20min, thats okay *g*13:47
wgrantFloSoft: Great!13:47
FloSoft12h would be a bit long *g*13:51
=== wgrant changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/
verwilstrah14:06
verwilstphp5-gearman_0.7.0-0ppa1_i386.deb: has 10 file(s) with a time stamp too far in the past (e.g. usr/share/doc/php5-gearman/examples/reverse_client.php [Thu Jan  1 09:13:08 1970]).14:07
verwilstnot again :(14:07
verwilstso now i can no longer re-upload the source package because the contents have changed if i touch the source files :(14:07
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
Philip5could i get the attention from any of the launchpad PPA admins to look at my question i just posted in "Questions for Launchpad itself" on launchpad.15:02
bigjoolsPhilip5: that's a faq15:03
* bigjools links15:03
Philip5bigjools: oh? i don't thinks that's in any faq15:05
bigjoolssee my answer15:05
Philip5bigjools: hmm, but in my case i uploaded it wrong and made a delete of it before it finished all the builds and never got published15:10
bigjoolsPhilip5: doesn't matter, you cannot ever re-upload the same files/versions15:10
Philip5but first i upploded 2.1.0-maverick~ppa1 which was built and fine and then uploaded 2.2.0-maverick~ppa1 that i deleted before it got published as it should have been 2.1.0-maverick~ppa215:13
Philip5now i'm stuck on 2.2.0-maverick~ppa1 you say?15:13
Philip5as i broke out 2.2 to be it's own set of packages so 2.1 will never be called 2.215:14
Philip5i med the error by not changing "Source Package" in my controll file15:15
Philip5med=made15:15
bigjoolsyes you are stuck on 2.2.015:16
Philip5hmm, that's not good15:17
Philip5and no way to delete that in my ppa history?15:17
bigjoolsno15:17
bigjoolsother people have done a ~really2.1.0~ppa1 style version15:18
Philip5that might solve it15:19
Philip5a little ugly though15:19
bigjoolsunfortunately yes :(15:22
=== doko_ is now known as doko
jcsackettadeuring: r=me.15:28
adeuringjcsackett: thanks!15:28
jcsackettadeuring: glad you were in this channel too. :-P15:28
Philip5is ~ a higher bump than a number?15:38
wgrant'~' is less than everything. Even ''15:39
wgrantYou can use dpkg --compare-versions to check your versions.15:39
wgranteg. dpkg --compare-versions 1 lt 2 && echo "true"15:39
Philip5thanks15:39
Philip5well that was the ugliest thing i have ever done on my PPA15:47
Philip5when you hit the low you can only do better :)15:47
AmpelbeinPhilip5: you could add an epoch to the version to avoid the ~really... stuff.15:51
wgrantYou want to be *really* sure about that.15:52
tsimpsonyou can never undo an epoch15:52
wgrantFor a small mistake like this it's almost definitely overkill.15:52
wgrantPermanent overkill.15:52
Ampelbeinyes, that's true.15:53
maxbTechnically you *can* make PPAs go back to lower versions, but if you do, you screw things up for users who have your packages installed. So it's only an option if you know your installed userbase is zero15:53
Philip5i didn't do an epoch just an ugly version naming15:53
Philip5maxb: how?15:53
Philip5no users have that packges as they never got published15:53
maxbIf you delete the old package in the web UI, you can upload a version that is lower15:54
maxbBut you can't upload a version which is the same as one used before, even if it is deleted15:54
Philip5maxb: no then the upload get rejected15:54
Philip5aha15:54
Philip5but that was what i did15:54
Philip5abd got into this mess in the first place15:55
maxbreally~2.1.0-maverick~ppa2 ?!15:58
maxbYuck15:58
maxbthat's hideous, and just as permanent as an epoch15:58
Philip5exactly, yuck15:58
tsimpsonit's not as permanent as an epoch15:59
maxbYou should delete it and upload a 2.1.0-maverick~ppa515:59
maxbYou might need to wait for a publisher run to occur between deleting and uploading a replacement16:00
maxbtsimpson: For all practical purposes it is, as no realistic upstream version will ever exceed it16:00
Philip5maxb: thats what i did but i got error when it was going to be uploaded for publication but it all built fine16:00
maxbIf you delete all of the stuff with bizarre versions, wait at least 10 minutes, and upload a sane one, it should work16:01
Philip5i think i'll do that bebore i do this ugly thing16:02
wgrant(it may take up to an hour, but 10 minutes is likely)16:10
Philip5then i wait an hour to be sure16:10
Philip5maybe that was my misstake in the first place. that i uploaded the new one too fast after i delete the first one that was wrong16:11
wgrantPhilip5: It's a bit of an unintended feature that that works.16:13
wgrantSo timelines are not obvious nor guaranteed.16:13
Philip5well i'll see... i'll go out for a bit and try a new upload when i get back16:16
Philip5thanks so far...16:17
FloSofthmm those buildservers: i have here one build which will start in 6h - is that okay? (buildjob 2475857)17:30
TheEvilPhoenixFloSoft:  yes, not all packages are built immediately17:31
FloSoftTheEvilPhoenix: okay than only the lpia-architecture has a very laaarrge queue ?17:31
FloSoft*then17:31
TheEvilPhoenixFloSoft:  dont know, i'm not a builder manager, i just know that several times I had to wait for over 5 hours to get a package built (and that package was architecture-independent)17:33
micahgFloSoft: lpia is only for karmic and hardy17:39
TheEvilPhoenix^17:40
=== michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away
=== beuno is now known as beuno-lunch
ScottKlifeless: More fun with your favorite package accept page.  (Error ID: OOPS-1930J1284) - It may be related to the fact that there's a previous upload still unaccepted.18:01
ubot5https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1930J128418:01
ScottK(Error ID: OOPS-1930F1319) too18:01
ubot5https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1930F131918:01
ScottKThird try was the charm...18:03
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
Philip5maxb & wgrant: btw, it worked with my rebuild after i deleted the wrong packages and waited. uploaded new bumped nice looking version :)  so thanks for the support guys18:47
maxb:-)18:47
Philip5maxb:  i'm so relieved that i didn't have to make that ugly version number for my packages. *sigh*18:49
=== beuno-lunch is now known as beuno
ScottKlifeless and wgrant: The builders page timed out again: (Error ID: OOPS-1930H1457)19:29
ubot5https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1930H145719:29
=== Meths_ is now known as Meths
=== michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1
FloSofthi, i've deleted a ppa but it's not removed from the system? only grayed out - but i can't reactivate that name21:46
maxbthat is correct (unfortunately)21:47
FloSofthmm21:48
FloSoftwhat does happen if the 2gb limit of the ppa is reached?21:48
maxbWhat steps exist between a package being shown as published in the Launchpad UI, and it actually appearing on archive.ubuntu.com ?22:17
lifelessmaxb: there is an rsync job that takes the archive launchpad produces, and mirrors it to the static web servers; along the way it gets split into a.u.c, p.u.c, s.u.c22:34
maxbIs it abnormal for that to have not happened yet 30 minutes after publication?22:37
lifelessbeta release stuff is happening22:37
lifelessso it might be related22:37
lifelessas for timelineness, I think 1 hour is the window22:38
lifelesswould like to make that smaller e.g. with lmirror but its not on the immediate agenda22:38

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!