=== marrusl is now known as marrusl_afk [01:01] Hello all [01:02] I was tracing down a problem wiht my server (hard-lock) and noticed something really weird in the logs [01:02] Not sure if this is "normal" Apr 13 18:39:01 beluga CRON[6946]: (root) CMD ( [ -x /usr/lib/php5/maxlifetime ] && [ -d /var/lib/php5 ] && find /var/lib/php5/ -type f -cmin +$(/usr/lib/php5/maxlifetime) -print0 | xargs -n 200 -r -0 rm) [01:03] Daviey: hey, do we still need some ISO test coverage? [01:03] kirkland, That would rock. [01:03] kirkland, do you have hardware with 2 x hd's? [01:04] Daviey: tonight, or can it be done on the morrow? [01:04] Daviey: i have tons and tons of KVMs :-) [01:04] Anyone have any idew aht that command might be donig? I dont have any crontjobs setup as root o.o [01:04] Daviey: and my primary server has 2 hd's, but zat's it [01:04] SpamapS: can you please take care of the recently uploaded SRU by Daviey for vsftpd please [01:04] kirkland, we are slow close to complete coverage before b2, making nowish a better time. [01:05] crikey RoAkSoAx, i literally just dputted it :P [01:05] kirkland, i had a rough time with raid/amd64 using virtualbox [01:06] would really like it reproduced, even with kvm. [01:06] kirkland, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/5442/286 [01:07] Daviey: i can get this up and running with raid [01:07] Daviey: sorry, with kvm [01:07] kirkland, thanks - see my comments [01:08] Daviey: doing it now, then the missus wants me to join her for dinner [01:08] removing first hd worked for me, reversing the test failed... i think it was vboxes fault tho [01:08] kirkland, That is fine, dinner + laptop on table *always* goes down well.. I know from experience. :/ [01:12] Daviey: installing [01:17] Daviey: heeheh I just wanna get that done :P [01:18] :) [01:42] Daviey: okay, installed [01:44] Daviey: hmm, hanging for a *long* time at installing grub, 66% [01:44] Daviey: nevermind, made it past [01:44] kirkland: I'll get a DRBD/MySQL and will let you know to try eCryptfs [01:45] RoAkSoAx: rocking ;-) [01:46] kirkland, I was about to head to bed, but curious how this works out. [01:46] Daviey: hang here, 2 more minutes [01:46] Daviey: trying to boot from disk a only [01:47] Daviey: okay, disk a boot worked [01:47] Daviey: but i see my byobu/raid plugin is broken [01:47] Daviey: separate bug [01:48] :( [01:48] kirkland, yeah dropping disk A worked for me [01:48] (make sure you wait for raid to rebuild after boot) [01:48] Daviey: booting from disk b [01:48] Daviey: yup, it rebuilt [01:49] hm... jamespage is not awake. [01:49] slacker. [01:49] Daviey: disk b booted fine [01:49] hggdh, do you know how to kick off jamespage's jenkens ec2 tests ? [01:49] kirkland, ahh cool [01:49] Daviey: behavior looks good here, except for my byobu/raid breakage [01:49] wonder what caused my headache [01:49] http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/server/natty/20110413.1/ is ready [01:50] smoser: it only runs on his server... [01:50] Daviey: virtualbox [01:50] Daviey: i'll mark this passed for me [01:50] kirkland, sweet, thanks. [01:50] Daviey: no problem [01:51] Daviey: time for dinner [01:51] kirkland, o/ [01:51] time for bed here methinks. === marrusl_afk is now known as marrusl [01:51] smoser, The best i can suggest is jotting jamespage an email asking him to kick it off first thing. [01:52] smoser, I thought you and jamespage were working on a plan for you to be able to kick them off aswell? [01:52] yes. i will do that. [01:53] smoser, How long did the jenkins testing take last time? [01:53] (smoser, do i understand it that you won't be doing your normal testing for b2) [01:53] i did not do my testing for b1. [01:53] so i had not lanned to for beta2 [01:53] ok, cool. [01:54] under a couple hours to run the tests. [01:54] Daviey: done, i'm out [01:55] kirkland, o/ [01:57] Anything else before I head to bed? [01:57] Daviey: got your email [01:57] zul, got your reply :) [01:58] thanks zul [01:58] nn all o/ [02:23] danielck, sent you an email about testing [02:24] is anyone here tried vmbuilder before? if so, can you please tell how can I pass vhost=on and virtio as parameters while installing a kvm guest [02:33] as parameters to what, rnigam ? [02:46] smoser: Could you tell me how you would tell your guest to use virtio drivers and VhostNet drivers at creating time. [02:46] creation* [02:46] as in when building the image ? [02:47] or as in launching a guest [02:47] building an image really shouldn't need anything. the virtio drivers are included in any recent (karmic or later at least) kernel, and should "just work". [02:48] when starting kvm, via kvm command line, "-drive mydisk,if=virtio" there are other ways to do that in libvirt and such [02:51] smoser: what about VhostNet? I finally managed to install the vhost_net module in maverick but have not been able to understand whereI must pass vhost=on as mentioned in : http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/UsingVhost [02:53] i've never used that myself... but, [02:53] > egrep "CONFIG_(VHOST_NET|PCI_MSI)" /boot/config-$(uname -r) ~ [02:53] CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y [02:53] CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m [02:53] 2.6.38-8-generic [02:53] thats natty kernel i'm not sure aobut others [02:56] hey [02:56] I am at 2.6.35 and those options are already set by default. So in order for guest to use vhost_net i dont have to do vhost=on at all? [02:57] [02:57] [02:57] [02:57] [02:57] [02:57]

[02:57] [02:58] sorry that came by mistake ! [03:03] ah, in libvirt, you'll have to somehow tell it to create a kvm guest with vhost, yes [03:03] but i would think that the kernel will figure it out if you do manage to do that. [03:04] you might want to try just launching a kvm guest by hand as dscribed there. (ie, without libvirt as a test) [03:21] Cheers everyone. I'm setting up DHCP failover and I am a little confused. [03:22] I have an existing server, but on this server I have manually configured groups of hosts. Do each of these group { statements need a "failover peer "XXXXX" statement? [03:23] For example, I set up failover peer "NAME" { } with a bunch of parameters, and I also have to define what addresses fall into this failover rule… If I have a ton of different groups, do they all need to reference this? [03:24] BTW, this is all found in the dhcpd.conf file... [03:41] Any dhcpd gurus here tonight? === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates [04:28] anyone know how to mount a md device on boot ? [04:28] onecrazycat: yeah i'm pretty good with dhcpd [04:28] what are you trying to do? [04:30] ap0c: I'm setting up a failover [04:30] heh, yeah i scrolled back and saw that [04:30] whats the error ? [04:30] ap0c: No error, just that I have a lot of different groups configured in my dhcpd.conf file. [04:30] ah, so whats the problem? it's not failing over? [04:30] ap0c: none of the tutorials or man pages seem to address this commonality. [04:31] ap0c: it isn't even set up yet. I just want to configure it properly. [04:32] something like http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=447377 [04:32] ap0c: I just followed the man page, but I'm no so sure this will give me the results I want. If I put the "failover peer "NAME";" and a range section in a pool {} under my subnet settings, that's all well and good… but what about hosts outside of that range? [04:32] ? [04:33] ap0c: yes, similar to the forum post [04:34] ap0c: I'm thinking I'm going to give this a go and cross my fingers, but I'm the type that likes to spend a lot of time preparing and less time debugging, dig? :) [04:34] haha yeah pretty much [04:34] ap0c: which is why I asked about it here. I appreciate you replying. [04:34] just go for it man [04:35] ap0c: Will do. Thanks :) [04:53] Anyone here? [04:55] Nvm [05:31] hi [05:31] is it okay to have 5-6 apache processse running in localhost only apache server machine? or is it security issue? [05:31] hi [05:31] hepl [05:55] is it okay to have 5-6 apache processse running in localhost only apache server machine? or is it security issue? === KB1JWQ is now known as Corey [08:28] anyone wanna try to tackle a midnight postfix problem? :D [08:29] just ask your question [08:29] alright [08:29] i get these errors: warning: unable to create lock file /var/mail/xxxxx.lock: permission denied [08:30] postfix/local says : (cannot append message to file /var/mail/jeffro: cannot open file: Permission denied) [08:30] so fix your permissions [08:30] so i ran postfix set-permissions [08:30] i tried adding myself to the postdrop group [08:31] etc, doesn't work [08:31] im not experienced w/ linux, obviously [08:31] what are the permissions on /var/mail and /var/mail/jeffro [08:31] k [08:31] ls -ld /var/mail [08:31] drwxrwsr-x 2 root mail [08:32] thats mail [08:32] ls -l /var/mail/jeffro [08:32] /vra/mail/jeffro: -rw-rw---- 1 jeffro mail [08:32] and the places the error messages come from is /var/syslog [08:32] if that matters [08:33] in /var/syslog? are you running ubuntu? [08:33] yeah, 10.10 [08:33] sorry [08:33] /var/log/syslog [08:34] i've tried removing/installing [08:34] postfix is just pwning me [08:35] also tried taking off chroot for sendmail [08:50] also possibly relevant, i changed /etc/aliases to forward root to my user acct. i also appended jeffro: /var/mail/jeffro [09:00] sorry, back [09:48] hello soren \o/ [09:48] vmbuilder continues to suck an epic dick and not working at all [09:49] new bug: [09:49] Setting up linux-firmware (1.34.4) ... [09:49] , stderr: Done. [09:49] Running depmod. [09:49] update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-30-server [09:49] mktemp: failed to create directory via template `./TMP/mkinitramfs_XXXXXX': No such file or directory [09:49] update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-30-server === jamespage1 is now known as jamespage [09:54] soren: perhaps the workaround for lack of -tmp= flag screws up later installation? [09:54] the setting of TMPDIR [09:54] * xelister beats up smoser with a metall gauntlet [09:54] why can't you get vmbuilder to work correctly :< (on i7 and with small /tmp) [10:13] which is the quicly browser on ubuntu [10:13] thes26: Huh? [10:14] thes26: lynx [10:16] joschi, thx [10:16] New bug: #760478 in postfix (main) "postfix upgrade-configuration reports extraneous files" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/760478 [10:58] join #linuxoutlaws [10:58] :-) === Guest95063 is now known as screen-x === screen-x is now known as Guest98966 [11:43] what is the conf file for apt in 10.04 server in which I'm supposed to put the http proxy config ? [11:45] Anyone on here know anything about squid config? [11:47] pnunn, ask your question [11:51] nimrod10`: /etc/apt/conf.d/ [11:56] OK.. I have two servers talking to one authentication box... at one site it works fine... at the other not. [11:56] as far as I can see the configs are identical. [11:57] At one site in the log I get in the log [11:57] access.log.1:1302567283.836 618 192.168.100.132 TCP_MISS/200 7321 POST http://fred.spydus.com/cgi-bin/spydus.exe/PGM/CAT/AWZREQ - DIRECT/203.33.245.12 text/xml [11:57] at the other [11:58] access.log.1:1302590223.719 77 192.168.0.67 TCP_MISS/417 1938 POST http://fred.spydus.com/cgi-bin/spydus.exe/PGM/CAT/AWZREQ - NONE/- text/html [11:58] which I think means its not passing on the request after the cache miss for some reason. [11:58] I can't for the life of me find out why its not passing on the request. [12:03] soren, just put a name like http-proxy for that file ? [12:11] for further reference , to enable apt to work through a http proxy I've put a http-proxy file containing http://[[user][:pass]@]host[:port]/ in /etc/apt/preferences.d/ [12:11] soren, ^ [12:14] nimrod10`: see apt.conf(5) (-> `man apt.conf`) for the correct syntax [12:15] nimrod10`: and /etc/apt/preferences.d is wrong [12:16] nimrod10`: See "man apt.conf" for more info. [12:28] soren, joschi thanks for the heads up [13:18] morning [13:22] afternoon zul o/ === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates [14:05] morning all [14:16] New bug: #760653 in bind9 (main) "package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/760653 === jbernard_ is now known as jbernard [15:03] Daviey, et al ... [15:03] Beta 2 getting ready to go today! what's the word on the street for Ubuntu Server? [15:09] Daviey, so, really, we need to open https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/712026 [15:09] its not fixed. [15:09] Launchpad bug 712026 in udev "cloud-init.conf never runs, instance not reachable via ssh" [High,Fix released] [15:09] SpamapS, ^ [15:10] s/open/re-open/ [15:10] it seems like the race window was reduced. [15:16] rickspencer3, It's looking pretty good... We've already got near complete test case coverage. [15:17] Daviey, sweet! [15:17] Ubuntu Server is rocking in Natty [15:17] I hope you guys are as psyched as I am [15:17] rickspencer3, Something i'm not sure about, the minimal virtual instal (formally JeoS) is specified as being <500MB... I believe last cycle we had the same issue we are seeing now where it is ~535MB. [15:18] interesting [15:18] I'm not sure we /need/ to bring it back under 500MB... (there was original sensible rational). [15:18] Daviey, well, I think 500 Megs is a good limit [15:18] and this demonstrates why having an ISO is good for discipline [15:18] however, it's Beta 2 [15:18] and 35MB sounds like a lot [15:20] rickspencer3, ack... i'm reasonably sure we dicovered this in maverick but let it slide. [15:21] New bug: #760725 in cloud-init (main) "Cloud-init failed to complete actions" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/760725 [15:23] smoser, do you have thoughts on that bug ^^? [15:25] 535MB for JEOS? Wow. [15:25] Just... wow. === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk [15:26] Daviey, i have no thoughts on that. i only suspect that some upstart job hung, and thus blocked rc from running (or 'rc' job blocked on something) [15:26] and thus cloud-final didn't run. [15:27] one way or another cloud-final didn't run, and we don't have enough info from the instance to see why that was. [15:27] soren, Do you remember us having this same discussion last cycle? [15:27] jamespage will modify test suite to collect some info tha tmight be helpful in the future. [15:27] Daviey: Honestly? No :) [15:27] soren, I need to grep logs then... :) [15:27] Daviey: I'm not denying it happened. I just have no recollection of it :) [15:28] soren, oh aye... i can't remember who was in the discussion. [15:28] why is it so big? ;) === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates [15:29] If I had a nickle for every time I heard that question... [15:29] I'd have a nickel. [15:29] O_o [15:29] :( [15:29] :( [15:29] howdy. [15:29] I remember 3 years ago JeOS was smaller than a Debian minimal install ;) [15:29] Daviey: we had some issues earlier this cycle with the JeOS install size; I'll see if I can dig out what the issue was [15:29] jamespage, please... i expect it's printer related :) [15:30] smoser: i might be seeing the same thing in the lxc container using cloud-init [15:31] hggdh: please can you restart both Jenkins slaves; had to restart the master instance earlier today - ta [15:32] Wow: http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu-uk.org/view/natty-ec2/job/natty_server_ec2/9/testReport/ - nearly 1000 tests and we did not even do us regions! [15:35] The boot seed alone weighs in at 244MB. [15:38] I'm wondering if we are seeing bug 712145 again, the numbers seem to match. [15:38] Launchpad bug 712145 in pkgsel "ubuntu-server JEOS ISO install uses 519M of storage" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/712145 [15:39] Daviey: ISO testing looks for 550MB not 500MB as a good threshold - there was a reason for this [15:40] cjwatson, Is it likely pkgsel has reintroduced that bug above ^^? We are seeing large JEOS installs again. [15:42] cjwatson: language-selector-common is in standard. Won't it get installed regardless? [15:45] ok. mainly i'm just curios. [15:45] i dont understand this http://paste.ubuntu.com/594057/ [15:45] it seems to me that the 'targzfile.close()' should be enough to ensure that the file exists when 'size = os.path.getsize(targz)' checks. [15:50] smoser: How does it fail? [15:50] read the test case... but basically the file that it creates has size 0 when it checks [15:50] so, i guess it does exist, but i would have thought that the close would have ensured that it would have non-zero size. [15:51] Oh, it's size 0? [15:51] How big is this file usually? [15:51] 1549 [15:51] bytes? [15:51] yeah [15:51] so they're all in IO buffer [15:51] Right. [15:51] The problem is this: [15:51] but i would have thought the close would have flushed them [15:52] You're closing your own file descriptor, but zipproc has it open, too. [15:52] Twice, actually. [15:52] (once inherited from your process and once attached to its stdout) [15:52] Or maybe subprocess handles the former case. Anyways, it's open at least once. [15:53] ...and it's zipproc that has stuff in its buffer. [15:53] right. === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk [15:53] kirkland: we'd been wanting to package gpxe, looks like ipxe is all set (in its place), ITP for gpxe was http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=474034. Q is, is there anything to be done for it on our end before May? [15:53] so the fix path is fine, though. [15:53] Debian bug 474034 in wnpp "ITP: ipxe -- PXE network bootloader for x86 PCs" [Wishlist,Fixed] [15:53] right ? [15:53] smoser: Yes, perfectly. [15:55] zul: is there anything to be done to kick the samba community re https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6724 ? [15:55] bugzilla.samba.org bug 6724 in File services "smbd panic action with yield_connection name=0x0" [Normal,New] [15:55] hallyn: looking [15:55] smoser: You seem somehow unconvinced? [15:56] well it made sense to me when i made the patch [15:56] but then i thought about it [15:56] hallyn: not really; you could, perhaps, push it into the ~ubuntu-virt PPA, for curious Ubuntu virt users [15:56] i think your'e right though [15:56] hallyn: it won't make it into Natty, though [15:56] hallyn: and it should be sync'd from Debian once Oneiric archives open [15:56] hallyn: ill see what i can do [15:56] kirkland: it'll get automatically synced? [15:56] zul: thanks [15:57] smoser: It *does* happen. Cccasionally. [15:57] kirkland: that's waht i was wondering, if there were any steps we could take to get it into O as soon as possible [15:57] Occasinally, even. [15:57] hallyn: if it's in debian unstable before Oneiric's Debian Import Freeze, yes, it's automatic [15:57] Errr. [15:57] Darn it. [15:57] kirkland: awesome, thanks [15:57] * smoser deletes irc logs of this so he is not bothered by soren being correct [15:58] hallyn: which version is that with? [15:58] zul: you claimed 3.3 :) [15:58] lemme find our bugs for it again [15:59] hallyn: i did? :) [15:59] zul: well the original bug (which we link dups to) is bug 388483 [15:59] Launchpad bug 388483 in samba "smbd panic action with yield_connection name=0x0" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/388483 [15:59] hallyn: ah ok [16:00] there it's 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3 [16:01] 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 was the most recent [16:01] Daviey, RoAkSoAx: I just installed a minimal virtual amd64 natty and its only 429MB? [16:01] hallyn: yeah i think we might try to reproduce it again [16:02] jamespage, wtf. [16:02] jamespage, that is not helpful. [16:02] Daviey: TBH that's inline with what I saw on i386.... [16:03] Daviey: 410MB - still had it kicking around [16:04] jamespage, That makes no sense... RoAkSoAx and highvoltage both saw it 53XMB [16:04] i think there was one more report aswell of that. === zz_carcinogen75 is now known as carcinogen75 [16:08] RoAkSoAx, around? [16:08] Daviey: yes sir [16:11] Daviey: what's bothering you my friend? [16:13] Daviey, RoAkSoAx: http://paste.ubuntu.com/594071/ [16:13] ah lol (irssi doesn't notify me :s) [16:13] jamespage: weird [16:13] in my case was 533 [16:14] thats odd [16:14] * RoAkSoAx downloading a new ISO [16:15] Daviey: might be linked to that other issue I had re language support on the ISO boot screen? [16:15] maybe I'm not getting so many options? [16:15] RoAkSoAx: what did you test on? [16:17] jamespage: KVM, using testdrive [16:17] RoAkSoAx: I'm using KVM but from virt-manager [16:18] jamespage: will test both and compare [16:26] RoAkSoAx, sorry, i was afk [16:27] I wanted you to compare experiences with jamespage, to try and determine why you have different jeos sized images [16:27] Daviey: no worries [16:27] Daviey: yeah I'm on it [16:27] downloadin ISO now [16:49] jamespage: just installed again with TestDrive and is 533M [16:49] will now try with virt-manager === chuck_ is now known as zul [16:57] RoAkSoAx: most puzzling [17:08] jamespage: /win 13 [17:08] arghh [17:08] hehe [17:08] hehe [17:08] sry [17:08] happens all the time xD [17:09] heres my issue. i installed zyntal. but now i cant get it to speak on the network [17:09] jamespage: confirmed, installing with virt-manager gives a different disk size [17:10] jamespage: 428M [17:10] i clear all the iptables, recongiured dhcp. its gets an address but wont "connect" [17:10] RoAkSoAx: same as my install - now that is odd [17:10] jamespage: maybe the type of disk used [17:10] Might be - what does testdrive use? [17:11] kirkland: qcow2 [17:11] jamespage: qcow2 [17:11] kirkland: any ideas why the install size would differ between TestDrive and virt-manager? [17:11] RoAkSoAx: thats what I used in virt-manager as well so no diff [17:11] uhm weird then :S [17:13] RoAkSoAx: when you installed using virt-manager did you get presented with multiple language options in the ISO boot screen? [17:13] jamespage: yes [17:13] Hmmm - so not that then - I have an issue there but it seems to be a me only one [17:14] jamespage: in my case was everything exactly like with TestDrive [17:16] jamespage: kvm command from testdrive: kvm -m 512 -smp 2 -cdrom /home/roaksoax/.cache/testdrive/iso/ubuntu_natty-server-amd64.iso -drive file=/home/roaksoax/.cache/testdrive/img/testdrive-disk-KiJDSk.img,if=virtio,cache=writeback,index=0,boot=on -usb -usbdevice tablet -net nic,model=virtio -net user -soundhw es1370 -vga cirrus [17:16] jamespage: the one with virt-manager /usr/bin/kvm -S -M pc-0.14 -enable-kvm -m 512 -smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 -name natty7-jeos -uuid 59c4d5ff-82e7-4833-c7b9-8c95f5cc769a -nodefconfig -nodefaults -chardev socket,id=charmonitor,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/natty7-jeos.monitor,server,nowait -mon chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=readline -rtc base=utc -boot order=c,menu=off -drive file=/media/vm1/natty7.img,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,bo [17:16] jamespage: it must be something with that [17:18] jamespage: maybe because testdrive disk format used is with virtio while virt-manager's is raw? -drive file=/media/vm1/natty7.img,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,boot=on,format=raw [17:20] Daviey: dunno. are logs available? [17:20] hmm - don't think so - I use qcow2 in virt-manager [17:25] cjwatson, jamespage and RoAkSoAx and comparing, they have differing results. [17:25] s/and/are [17:25] Daviey: installing through testdrive appears to create a larger install than installing through virt-manager === NG_ is now known as ng_ [17:27] jamespage, this makes no sense... [17:27] Daviey: tell me about it :-) [17:28] RoAkSoAx / jamespage: Might be an idea to reproduce, saving the d-i logs? [17:30] Daviey: assuming that's what gets installed to /var/log/installer/syslog I already have one :-) [17:30] smoser, Daviey - what's the story with the UEC images? Am not seeing them on the iso tester [17:30] are we good to ship them? [17:31] They should be published now smoser ? [17:31] you're not ? http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/ubuntuserver/all [17:31] shows them there. we've not run test in the us regions [17:31] * skaet refreshing her link... === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates [17:31] because the apt mirrors are broken there. there is an is ticket open, but running test depends on 'apt-get update' not failing. [17:32] smoser, I don't see UEC images, just EC2 ones... [17:32] ah... uec images. ok. i dont think they'd been populated there for a while. [17:32] * skaet may be cross eyed though by now... [17:32] ah... they are the same. [17:32] well.... we used to have uec images [17:32] explicitly to test running the images under eucalyptus [17:32] smoser, They got dropped tho, didn't they?! [17:33] well, they really should not have. it is quite valid to test. we expect the images to work on UEC and we've seen failures on Eucalyptus before. [17:33] now, i happen to know that hggdh tested natty images in natty uec yesterday. [17:33] smoser, Daviey - we have mentioned them in the announce note. We'll need to synch up what's expected. [17:34] also, if you want to add them, i can get a test run on them. they will run fine. [17:34] smoser, that would be good. [17:36] skaet, hmm.. "http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/releases/natty/beta-2/ (Ubuntu Server for UEC and EC2)" [17:37] wait. was that supposed to have been done ? [17:37]