[00:00] The wishlist bugs session sounds like a good one to me. [00:06] RAOF, ok I'll craft a blueprint [00:06] RAOF, meanwhile it seems one of monday's updates introduced a regression - see bug 757968 [00:06] Launchpad bug 757968 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "[i965gm] GPU lockup (IPEHR: 0x14000000) - Black screen (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 14)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/757968 [00:08] RAOF, any ideas offhand? If the user can repro it, I'm going to have them individually downgrade mesa, xserver, -intel, and compiz to see which causes it. [00:08] bryceh_: looking. [00:08] if I were to bet, I'd guess mesa. [00:09] Me too. [00:10] If it's reproducible, and downgrading mesa fixes it, it shouldn't be too hard to identify the bad commit. [00:13] * bryceh_ nods [00:13] alright, sounds like a plan [00:16] RAOF, btw I have a suspicion the libdrm patch ickle gave us is bad [00:16] The even-more-relaxed-tiling fixes one? [00:16] I've got 2-3 similar-ish bugs that I've got traced to regressing around the time that patch went in [00:17] Hm. [00:17] so far one test of downgrading it indicates that without that patch it freezes less often (maybe there's another freeze bug) [00:18] the bugs are freezes and/or black screen issues [00:18] so, if I can gather some more solid evidence I might revert that patch...100_intel_remember_named_bo.patch [00:20] RAOF, I do note that debian took a couple other patches along with that one for 2.4.23-3, so perhaps one of them corrects issues that this patch brought? [00:20] Fun fact: ‘break WriteToClient if who=0x14f92d0’ is *very importantly* not the same as ‘break WriteToClient if who==0x14f92d0’ :) [00:21] that or there were more parts of 2.4.24 needed too [00:21] bryceh_: Possibly? [00:21] The other parts of 2.4.24 *claimed* to be about older kernels, and certainly looked that way. [00:21] right [00:22] if I can confirm that downgrading solves these issues, I can also see about having them test against the newer version if it's in a ppa somewhere [00:23] these time zone differences between us all suck :) [00:23] anyway, thinking we should hold off on 2.4.24 until these regressions are better understood [00:23] Sarvatt, howso? [00:24] I can upload 2.4.24 into X staging pretty easily. [00:25] ok, that sounds like a good step [00:25] I'll have folks test against that [00:32] * RAOF turns on the coffee machine and sets to uploading. [00:51] Uploaded to ubuntu-x-swat. [01:14] AAaand built. [01:14] thanks === yofel_ is now known as yofel [07:22] bryceh_: whoopsie daisy.. done [09:07] RAOF, I loved seeing that email in the morning....thank you for your work helping to track this down :) [09:08] njpatel: It's a nice thing to end the week on :) [09:08] Indeed : [09:08] :) [09:34] good morning tseliot [09:34] good morning to you ara :) [10:45] bryceh_, some of the duplicates of the "intel_tex_image.c:726: intelSetTexBuffer2: Assertion `!texImage->Data' failed" have apport infos if that's useful [11:46] hi, is there anything I can do to help with bug 727620? I have to reboot my laptop 5 or 6 times, and then log into and kill X about the same before I get a usable session [11:46] Launchpad bug 727620 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "[Radeon HD 5650 and 5470] Driver crash during recovery boot and in normal boot (Regression from 2.6.38-3 to -4) (affects: 9) (dups: 1) (heat: 58)" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/727620 [12:21] bradm: why don't you use the workaround mentioned in comment #26 [12:24] tjaalton: I did try that and had some issues, should give it another go I guess. it'd be good to have the bug fixed though [12:26] bradm: strongly in the upstream territory though, it needs kernel changes that won't get in 2.6.38 [12:26] from what I can tell anyway [12:26] tjaalton: right, I suspected that might be the case but its not really 100% clear in the bug thats whats happening [12:27] bradm: have you looked at the upstream bug? [12:28] tjaalton: I did [12:28] "The switcheroo code [12:28] needs more work to switch properly on some systems it seems." [12:29] yes, there's a lot of it seems, and supposition, was just wondering if I could do anything to help clear it up [12:29] its not clear to me whats happening now with the bug [12:31] i can confirm it if you like [12:31] the bug report, not the bug happening [12:32] well, it does say status incomplete, made me think something was missing [12:32] there [12:33] cool, thanks [12:34] its definately still happening for me at least [12:34] i don't doubt that [12:35] oddly I couldn't see anything in my bios to tell it to just use the radeon, but it is downrev a bit [12:35] but it needs windows to do a bios update :-/ [12:37] it's updated from windows? [12:37] all HP provide is a windows .exe [12:37] its possible there's a way of flashing from linux but its not obvious from the time I've spent looking [12:38] which, admittedly, hasn't been an enormous amount [12:42] it's usually just a self-extracting zipfile [12:42] use unzip to extract it [12:43] there are docs for creating a bootable cd that you can use for flashing your bios [12:44] nope, its not a zip file [12:45] ah, its a cab file [12:45] have a link to it? [12:46] ftp://ftp.hp.com/pub/softpaq/sp50501-51000/sp50942.exe [12:50] I've found some references that say the bios is encrypted by one of the dlls provided [12:55] right, that tool really needs windows.. [12:55] fail [12:59] very much so [12:59] my next laptop won't be a HP :) [13:57] Sarvatt: I filed a bug for the issue I described you the other day: bug #761718 [13:57] Launchpad bug 761718 in nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) "Can't start Ubuntu default session properly (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/761718 [14:07] BlackZ: what happens if you downgrade to the previous version of nvidia-current and reboot? [14:08] tseliot: this is what I was just trying ;) [14:08] everything seems to be ok, BTW [14:08] yeah, looks quite weird [14:44] tseliot: downgrading to the previous version doesn't help at all [14:44] (and I was having the problem what that version as well) [14:44] BlackZ: I suspected that. It means that something else busted your system. Maybe unity? [14:45] tseliot: I don't think so. Even the classic Ubuntu session doesn't start properly [14:45] tseliot: I can only start the one without any effect [14:45] BlackZ: it's probably compiz then [14:46] tseliot: yeah, I think so [14:46] BlackZ: see if you can find something interesting in your ~/.xsession-errors after you reproduce the problem [14:47] tseliot: unfortunately no, I can't [14:48] BlackZ: can you reproduce the problem if you start the classic session without effects and then type: compiz --replace [14:48] ? [14:57] tseliot: bingo! the problem is compiz.. [14:57] tseliot: it seems to crash at "Starting unity-window-decorator" [14:58] BlackZ_: ok, please update the bug report and assign the bug to compiz [14:58] tseliot: will do! thanks :) [15:00] tseliot: btw I still can't figure out why it works with the nouveau drivers.. [15:18] why don't the other nvidia users have th is bug? [15:18] me, for example [15:51] bjsnider: no clue, this is really really weird [19:45] bryceh_, got a bug fix for evdev pushed to git for bug 573006 [19:45] Launchpad bug 573006 in xserver-xorg-input-evdev (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Touch screen driver clicks at wrong location (affects: 8) (heat: 52)" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/573006 [19:45] please upload when it's convenient [19:49] cnd, ok will do [20:44] bryceh_, got a fix for synaptics bug 754470 pushed to git too :) [20:44] Launchpad bug 754470 in xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (Ubuntu Natty) (and 2 other projects) "syndaemon consumes 100% CPU (affects: 65) (dups: 4) (heat: 342)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/754470 [21:44] cnd, bryceh_: pushed the reverted patch for bug 757972 to git [21:44] Launchpad bug 757972 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Easystroke doesn't recognize button release (affects: 5) (heat: 30)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/757972 [21:45] tjaalton, thanks! [21:45] cnd: sorry for just throwing the ball on your court yesterday ;) [21:46] tjaalton, np :) [21:46] it's a bit of a lull right now [21:46] and it very well could have been caused by some of my patches [21:47] heh, well your patches were, for the most part, already on our tree [21:47] in [21:48] aanyway, seems that there are less bugs flowing in that I feared [21:48] beta2 and all [21:50] some freezes yeah, but could just as well be compiz ones [21:53] and i really hope/believe that bug 507602 is finally fixed by libx11 1.4.2 [21:53] tjaalton: Bug 507602 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/507602 is private [21:53] duh [21:53] bug 507062 [21:53] Launchpad bug 507062 in libx11 (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "synaptic assert failure: synaptic: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed. (affects: 407) (dups: 267) (heat: 2474)" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/507062 [21:54] 267 dupes.. [21:54] there's more, I'm sure [21:54] wow [21:55] i ran the test code on the upstream bug for an hour or so, and couldn't reproduce it [21:55] though I should probably try it on beta1 too, to see if the code actually works [21:58] tjaalton: I think I saw a similar one for software-center recently, same pattern [21:59] mvo: yeah, many of those are from s-c [21:59] bug #761972 [21:59] mvo: Bug 761972 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/761972 is private [21:59] why my stuff? synaptic, software-center? *grumpf* ;) [22:00] heh [22:00] ah well [22:00] so it's a fresh one, probably didn't fix it then [22:00] duh [22:01] mvo, you're not alone. Many times I've gone to report an emacs, xterm, firefox, etc. bug only to end up finding out it's actually a friggin X bug. [22:01] at least I'm not alone! [22:02] there are also some interesting commits on the libxcb tree, but it's a risky business pulling those. there really should be a reliable way to trigger this, but I'm afraid that's asking for too much.. [22:13] yeah, we've been burned with xcb cherrypicks in the past. quite a fragile library [22:13] reboot time. bbiab [22:13] best to try it via an sru [22:13] or oneiric.. [22:13] most likely [22:19] cnd, [ubuntu/natty] xserver-xorg-input-synaptics 1.3.99+git20110116.0e27ce3a-0ubuntu12 (Waiting for appro [22:19] cnd, [ubuntu/natty] xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.6.0-1ubuntu12 (Waiting for approval) [22:19] bryceh, ta! [22:28] darn, i started packaging up a new libxcb but gave up halfway through the 100+ new symbols. guess i should finish it :P === schmidtm_ is now known as schmidtm