[00:02] <gilbert> so, would anyone be able to take a look at #669211?  as-is, natty is going to ship with a completely broken xpdf package.  the fix is to revert to the pre-poppler conversion (as was done to fix the issue for maverick).  thanks.
[00:29] <slangasek> kirkland: accepted
[04:14] <kirkland> slangasek: thanks steve
[09:48] <skaet> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/Meeting/2011-04-18 has an updated summary of the bugs, and is accurate as of sunday night.  It needs a scrub by the leads, since the status of the bugs in launchpad is crufty.
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[15:00] <stgraber> skaet: I guess it's probably a good idea to retarget bug 747325 to Oneiric ?
[15:00] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 747325 in sqlite (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "demote sqlite, or remove it from the archive (affects: 1) (heat: 237)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/747325
[15:03] <skaet> stgraber,  yes retargetting to Oneiric is appropriate, avoiding optional churn on the archive is desirable.
[15:06] <stgraber> skaet: ok, marked as Won't fix for Natty and nominated for oneiric, can you accept the nomination ?
[15:06] <skaet> stgraber,  will do.  :)
[15:07] <stgraber> I guess something changed in LP recently, I seem to remember being able to approve them not that long ago. I guess it's now restricted to ubuntu-release (which makes sense)
[15:31] <ogra_> skaet, not sure you noticed, i moved one of the natty-updates bugs back to release ... fixing the bootloader in an update doesnt make much sense
[15:33] <skaet> ogra_, thanks!   yup,  that makes sense.
[15:33] <skaet> will we be able to fix it before we start off those final images on Thursday?
[15:33] <ogra_> especially given that the bug already has a small patch attached
[15:33]  * skaet nods
[15:33] <ogra_> i will talk to jcrigby and rsalveti
[15:33]  * skaet and crosses fingers that that fixes it too...
[15:34] <skaet> thanks ogra_   :)
[15:34] <ogra_> i think its small enough to upload it right away
[15:34] <ogra_> skaet, unity-2d told me they have a final package for me tomorrow, hope thats ok
[15:34] <skaet> ogra_, if its bug fixes,  that's cool.    If its new features - ...    less so.
[15:35] <ogra_> heh, indeed its not new features
[15:35] <skaet> ogra_, :)  goodness then.
[15:36]  * skaet -> appt.    will check back later.
[16:54] <bdmurray> bug 751018 is technically correct right?
[16:54] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 751018 in ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "i386 installer CDs are named improperly (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/751018
[17:35] <robbiew> ScottK: interested in your thoughts on bug 762505
[17:35] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 762505 in rsyslog (Ubuntu) "Outdated in Natty, please merge from Sid (affects: 3) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/762505
[17:36] <robbiew> is it too late to consider this for Natty, in your opinion?
[17:42] <robbiew> pitti: thoughts? ^^
[18:03] <pitti> robbiew: a jump from 4.6.4 to 5.8.0 in a rather central and also security sensitive package doesn't sound like something we should squeeze into natty now IMHO
[18:03] <robbiew> pitti: cool...that's what I thought
[18:03] <robbiew> but wanted some comfort from others :)
[18:20] <genec> will there be any warnings (probably Release Notes since it was mentioned the Installer is frozen) that btrfs support is still highly experimental?
[18:26] <micahg> I assume sync runs are still happening for appropriate syncs?
=== tremolux_ is now known as tremolux
=== smspillaz|z is now known as smspillaz|zzz
[22:05] <ScottK> robbiew: Commented in the bug.  I think it'd be great for natty-backports after it's in oneiric.  SInce natty-backports is NotAutomatic, I'm not worried about it.  For lucid/maverick-backports I'd want some extra testing done.
[22:05] <robbiew> ScottK: cool...thnx!