[00:40] <hassan1990> hi there, I need some help about creating a branch based on another person branch on launchpad using bazaar.
[00:42] <hassan1990> anybody there??
[00:42] <spiv> hassan1990: Basically you just use the "bzr branch" command to make new branches from existing branches
[00:43] <spiv> Is that failing for you?
[00:43] <hassan1990> no I am not quite sure how to do it
[00:44] <spiv> Well, what's the branch you'd like to base your branch on?
[00:46] <hassan1990> ~antoniopatriarca/gephi/jogamp-vizengine
[00:48] <spiv> hassan1990: so you'd do "bzr branch lp:~antoniopatriarca/gephi/jogamp-vizengine my-branch-of-gephi" to make branch locally on your disk of that branch
[00:50] <hassan1990> and concerning what will be visible on launchpad??
[00:50] <spiv> hassan1990: and then you can "cd my-branch-of-gephi" and make changes in that branch and commit them, and when you want to publish them use "bzr push lp:~YOUR_LP_USERNAME/gephi/whatever"
[00:51] <hassan1990> thank you very much for your help
[02:26] <jderose> I thought launchpad hiccuped when I was registering my "dx-o-unity-bigscreen-productivity" blueprint... I can't find it now, but I also can't register again as it says name is already taken... any advice?
[02:26] <wgrant> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/dx-o-unity-bigscreen-productivity
[02:27] <jderose> wgrant: ah thanks, lanchpad never gave me a url, took me to main UDS-O sprint page
[02:27] <wgrant> Hmm. Odd.
[02:28] <jderose> yeah
[02:29] <jderose> maybe i didn't something weird without realizing it
[02:29] <jderose> wgrant: anyway, thanks so much for the help! :)
[04:20] <cody-somerville> :(
[04:20] <cody-somerville> On the +bugsupervisor on a project, the person selection modal dialogue doesn't work. Selecting someone (or some team) just dismisses it and doesn't set the text field with the selection.
[04:21] <cody-somerville> same with +securitycontact
[04:22] <lifeless> bug 761494
[11:43] <vadi2> Does http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mudlet-makers/mudlet/mudlet-main-git/files/head:/src/TLuaInterpreter.h?file_id=src loop for anyone else, or is it just me?
[11:46] <spiv> vadi2: looks like a redirect loop to me too
[11:46] <spiv> vadi2: please file a bug
[11:47] <vadi2> alright.
[11:49] <vadi2> should it be any specific component or launchpad in general? or loggerhead?
[11:52] <spiv> vadi2: just launchpad
[11:52] <spiv> vadi2: (it may also be a loggerhead bug, but the launchpad devs will add that assignment if needed)
[11:53] <vadi2> alright. also, my bzr pull is messing up:
[11:53] <vadi2> bzr pull
[11:53] <vadi2> bzr: ERROR: Cannot lock LockDir(lp-82359952:///~ian-mcintosh/luz/trunk/.bzr/branchlock): Transport operation not possible: readonly transport
[11:53] <vadi2> Did I do something wrong?
[11:54] <spiv> vadi2: sounds like you have a checkout of an lp branch
[11:54] <spiv> vadi2: so 'bzr pull' will try to pull to the lp branch you've checked out
[11:54] <vadi2> ah, so bzr update
[11:54] <spiv> Right
[11:55] <spiv> (And maybe also 'bzr launchpad-login' will help you)
[11:55] <vadi2> am logged in
[12:06] <vadi2> thanks for your help!
[12:22] <diwic> I fail to understand why the code import of https://code.launchpad.net/~diwic/sound-2.6/filtered fails - I can successfully clone the same git repository here
[12:40] <deryck> diwic, logs show timeouts causing the failure.
[12:41] <deryck> diwic, and it ran successfully 12 hours ago.  So I've reset it to run again now and see if we can get it going again.
[12:41] <diwic> deryck, yeah, but I don't get any timeouts when trying from here.
[12:42] <diwic> deryck, so it shouldn't be a problem with kernel.ubuntu.com
[12:42] <deryck> diwic, yeah, I'm not sure why we're seeing that.  Let's see if this import works.
[12:42] <diwic> deryck, seems not
[12:42] <deryck> hmmmm, ok.
[12:42] <deryck> diwic, let me look into it for you.
[12:44] <diwic> deryck, hmm, could it be some kind of name lookup failure of "kernel.ubuntu.com", i e network routing stuff?
[12:44]  * diwic has no idea of Canonical's network topology :-)
[12:47] <lifeless> deryck: could be fallout from the switch outage last thursday
[12:48] <deryck> lifeless, ah, ok.  How do I debug that?
[12:48] <deryck> lifeless, or do anything about it? :-)
[12:48] <lifeless> -ops :)
[12:49] <deryck> lifeless, ack :-)
[13:27] <web_knows> hi
[13:29] <maxb> hello
[13:49] <happyaron> how can I access bug #764575?
[13:49] <happyaron> or it's something wrong with apport retracing?
[13:50] <happyaron> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcitx/+bug/765830
[13:50] <happyaron> This one has been marked as a duplicate of 764575, but cannot find the one.
[14:07] <lifeless> happyaron: apport has hidden it
[14:08] <lifeless> happyaron: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/764414
[14:08] <happyaron> lifeless: thanks
[15:43] <tgardner> I know you'll think I'm nuts, but I'm wondering whats happened to all of my bug email? I'm either directly or indirectly a member of a bunch of projects, but it seems the email flow has died to nothing in some cases.
[15:44] <bjf> I'm having the same experience as tgardner
[15:46] <bjf> in the last 24 hours, there have been 49 new bugs filed against the "linux" package, yet I've not seen any email from those bugs
[15:47] <bjf> actually, i take that back, I have received email for one of those 49, bug 765007
[15:50] <bjf> adeuring, ^
[15:51] <adeuring> let me check
[16:36] <bjf> adeuring, any ideas ?
[16:37] <adeuring> bjf: I've asked the losas (LP sytsem administators); problem is that they are working at presnet on a rollout
[16:37] <adeuring> but your question is not lost ;)
[16:38] <bjf> adeuring, thanks :-)
[17:00] <ScottK> lifeless: What is "potato programming"?
[17:03] <james_w> ScottK, doing things in a loop over each object in a collection, rather than doing operations on the whole collection at once
[17:03] <james_w> "one potato, two potato..." rather than acting on the sack
[17:03] <ScottK> james_w: Thanks.
[17:22] <nxvl> hi, is there any issue with lpapi? i have a script that reports bugs into LP that used to work until something was updated on my system (natty)
[17:22] <nxvl> do i need to change anything or it's a bug?
[17:23] <maxb> does not work is not sufficient information for people to assist
[17:25] <nxvl> it doesn't file the bug
[17:25] <nxvl> doesn't show errors
[17:26] <nxvl> there is not sufficient information even for me to know it's an issue or not
[17:52] <abentley> adeuring: I'm next on help rotation.
[17:59] <adeuring> abentley: OK, I'll swap your and my name in the topic
[18:09] <TheEvilPhoenix> how can i get the system to stop yelling at me about a non-public GPG key in a PPA package?
[18:24] <TheEvilPhoenix> nevermind, i got my answer
[19:31] <sconklin> Can anyone tell me - Does the new pad.lv URL shortening support the qastaging server URLs in any way?
[19:35] <jcsackett> sconklin: i don't believe so, no.
[19:37] <jMCg> How can I compare what changes happend between two releases (of libmemcached in this case)
[19:37] <jMCg> Also: Hello folks o/~
[19:38] <sconklin> jcsackett: thanks
[19:38] <cgregan> mm
[19:53] <abentley> jMCg: do you want to see code changes, commit messages or ...?
[20:03] <ezra> abentley: can you give me a hand w/ username merge?
[20:04] <abentley> ezra: I'm certainly happy to try.
[20:07] <jMCg> abentley: commit messages, code, diff blah, whate ver I want to see what changed between two "tags"
[20:07] <abentley> jMCg: be with you in a minute.  Helping ezra.
[20:08] <jMCg> I got all the time in the world. In fact, I'll now drive home :), so no hurry. Read you later abentley
[20:23] <abentley> jMCg, the web interface's support for diffing between arbitrary revisions looks broken, but you can do this with bzr.
[20:26] <abentley> jMCg: "bzr diff -r tag:0.35 -r tag:0.37 lp:libmemcached" for the code changes, "bzr log -r tag:0.35 -r tag:0.37 lp:libmemcached" for the commit messages.
[20:49] <jMCg> abentley: ACK, thank you.
[20:49] <abentley> jMCg: No problem.
[20:53] <jMCg> Next question: What is my launchpad-login ID?
[20:53] <jMCg> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/102792
[21:01] <lifeless> jMCg: have you got an account on launchpad ?
[21:03] <jMCg> lifeless: yup.
[21:04] <lifeless> the ud to give launchpad-login is the id on launchpad - the text beside the logout button in the top right when you are logged in in a web browser.
[21:04] <lifeless> s/ud/id/
[21:04] <jMCg> https://launchpad.net/~i.galic
[21:05] <lifeless> si - i.galic
[21:05] <lifeless> bah, my typing is terrible this morning. Your id is 'i.galic'.
[21:06] <jMCg> lifeless: yah.. firgured that.. just took a while. Braining is terrible this evening -> hence: dinner.
[21:07] <lifeless> :)
[21:08] <bjf> lifeless, got a sec ?
[21:08] <bjf> maybe more than a sec
[21:08] <lifeless> in internets, noone can hear you scream :)
[21:08] <lifeless> bjf: sure
[21:09] <bjf> tgardner and I have noticed a significant drop off in bug emails due to nothing we've done
[21:09] <bjf> lifeless, we are trying to get to the bottom of it
[21:10] <bjf> lifeless, if your in the middle of something, just let me know
[21:10] <lifeless> bjf: 8am so various morning things are happening
[21:10] <lifeless> if you don't mind a little latency, I'm all yours.
[21:10] <bjf> lifeless, works for me
[21:11] <lifeless> anyhow
[21:11] <lifeless> have you noticed *slow* mail or *less mail*
[21:11] <lifeless> are there any specific mails you haven't gotten ?
[21:11] <bjf> lifeless, i'm a member of "Canonical Kernel Team" which is a member of "Ubuntu Bug Control" which is a member of "Ubuntu Bugs"
[21:11] <lifeless> [I know the last one is hard to proove :P]
[21:11] <bjf> lifeless, we are noticing *less mail*
[21:12] <bjf> lifeless, quite a bit less email
[21:12] <bjf> lifeless, does that mean that any bug that "Ubuntu Bugs" or "Ubuntu Bug Control" or "Canonical Kernel Team" is subscribed to, I should be getting email about ?
[21:13] <bjf> lifeless, "Canonical Kernel Team" is a subteam of a number of other teams and we are not getting any email from a number of them when other kernel folks are getting email
[21:13] <lifeless> IIRC At least one of them has a mailing list contact address precisely so that noone gets mail about everything in ubuntu
[21:14] <bjf> lifeless, that appears to be "Ubuntu Bugs"
[21:14] <lifeless> now, if bugcontrol is subscribed, everyone in bugcontrol should get mail (again, unless it has a contact mail address)
[21:16] <bjf> lifeless, ok, i see that bugcontrol has an email address
[21:16] <lifeless> bjf: so again, nothing bugcontrol is subscribed to will generate mail to its members.
[21:17] <lifeless> This is a bit of a fugly way to do things but perhaps will be better once the bug subscription thing finishes in a few weeks
[21:17] <bjf> lifeless, to be very specific we know that "The Dell Team" is getting email, which neither of us are seeing, but it does *not* have a contact email address
[21:17] <lifeless> right
[21:17] <lifeless> by which I mean
[21:17] <lifeless> not having a contact address means that the members of the team get mail
[21:17] <lifeless> for things the team is subscribed to
[21:23] <lifeless> bjf: so, are there bugs (or packaged) you have canonical kernel team subscribed to that you are not getting mail for ?
[21:25] <bjf> lifeless, i believe so, but your going to ask me next if I can find one and i'm looking
[21:25] <lifeless> I am, yes.
[21:27] <fta> any idea what that could be? bug 765087
[21:29] <bjf> lifeless, i think bug 759176 is an example (it's private)
[21:33] <lifeless> bjf: can you subscribe me to that ?
[21:33] <bjf> lifeless, done
[21:33] <lifeless> oh also, are you in the beta team for the new subscription stuff? [if you don't know, you aren't]
[21:34] <bjf> lifeless, don't know
[21:34] <lifeless> ok
[21:34] <bjf> lifeless, but that sounds suspicious
[21:35] <lifeless> ok, so dell team is subscribed to that bug
[21:35] <lifeless> and you are in canonical kernel team
[21:35] <lifeless> which is in dell team
[21:36] <lifeless> bjf: when did you guys notice this ?
[21:36] <bjf> lifeless, in the last 2 weeks
[21:36] <lifeless> so I think we need a bug for this
[21:37] <lifeless> the scenario is: person in team in team that is subscribed to private bug not getting (any?) bugmail about the bug.
[21:39] <bjf> lifeless, i have no problem filing such a bug, which project should it be against ?
[21:39] <lifeless> launchpad
[21:39] <bjf> lifeless, ok, you want me to subscribe you to it ? or just give you the bug number and you'll take it from there ?
[21:40] <lifeless> just file it
[21:40] <lifeless> I'll mention it to a maintenance squad as a possible regression
[21:40] <lifeless> and we'll see about reproducing / looking through mail logs
[21:40] <lifeless> please mention that bug # you referenced in the bug you file.
[21:40] <lifeless> I've unsubscribed myself now.
[21:41] <bjf> will do
[21:43] <lifeless> thanks!
[21:48] <bjf> lifeless, bug 766561
[21:49] <lifeless> thanks
[21:59] <bjf> lifeless, i found an email that i received on 3/31 as being on "The Dell Team" which I don't think I'd receive now, would that email be useful ?
[22:00] <lifeless> the launchpad metadata headers + the date would be useful, attached to the bug about this issue
[22:18] <lifeless> bjf: what email address should we be looking for in our logs
[22:19] <bjf> lifeless, all bug email to me goes to "brad.figg@canonical.com"
[22:20] <lifeless> bjf: what was the date that bug 759176 last changed ?
[22:21] <bjf> lifeless, yesterday the 18th
[22:21] <bjf> lifeless, there was a comment added
[22:22] <bjf> lifeless, last updated today at 20:44 UTC
[22:23] <lifeless> yeah, I just mis-grepped and am currently having my net wasted by the entire log for the 18th.
[22:24] <lifeless> ><
[22:33] <lifeless> bjf: well, I've confirmed we did not send you mail
[22:33] <bjf> lifeless, so it's not lost somewhere in our infrastructure, that's good
[22:56] <lifeless> bjf: could you find the _most recent_ mail that you would not receive now ?
[22:56] <bjf> lifeless, i'll try
[22:59] <lifeless> bjf: I'm trying to reduce the bisect window
[23:04] <bjf> lifeless, 4/1 seems to be the last day I got something from "The Dell Team"
[23:09] <lifeless> bjf: in that mail whats the launchpad revision (one of the metaheaders)
[23:09] <bjf> Launchpad (canonical.com); Revision="12710";	Instance="initZopeless config overlay"
[23:10] <lifeless> do you expect mail via tis path daily?
[23:10] <lifeless> e.g. something by 2011-04-07 for sure ?
[23:11] <bjf> lifeless, yes, i'd think so
[23:12] <bjf> lifeless, i'm heading out for a bit, will be back on in about an hour
[23:44] <lifeless> bjf[afk]: is anyone else also suffering less mail
[23:44] <lifeless> bjf[afk]: [in canonical kernel team]
[23:45] <lifeless> bjf[afk]: also do you know if folk directly in the dell team are getting these mails