=== yofel_ is now known as yofel [08:01] good morning [08:47] tumbleweed, never let me have to reformat that license text again :-P === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [09:13] dholbach: aren't CC licences fun :) [09:14] I guess there's fates worse than that :) [09:14] as soon as the license is in I'll set up daily builds [09:14] and we can get it into oneiric [09:14] now that the wiki license is sorted out we should be ready to go and can reformat wiki content easily [09:16] tumbleweed, it's time the CC licenses get into base-files ;-) [09:24] I tend to crib from packages I've already used them in [09:24] yeah [09:25] I saw "License: CC BY SA 3.0" somewhere else :) [09:25] (without the verbatim license text) [09:25] tumbleweed, does it look OK to you now? [09:26] dholbach: Format-Specification -> Format, bump the revision [09:29] tumbleweed, done [09:33] dholbach: maybe add something about CC-BY-SA to epub_copyright in conf.py ? [09:33] oh, no that's for dublin core metadata [09:34] ah, "copyright" [09:34] there's nothing regarding licenses in there [09:34] just copyright [09:35] yeah :/ but IIRC the value of copyright is displayed in the footer [09:35] can we maybe make that a separate discussion? [09:35] :) [09:35] :) [09:37] gracias [09:38] * dholbach hugs tumbleweed [09:39] np [13:09] Hi, I have a debdiff patch for tomboy which I want to be included in debian/patches. Here is what I am trying to do: http://paste.ubuntu.com/595990/ . At the end of all steps the patch generated in debian/patches has code merged from all the patches present in there. What's going wrong ? [13:18] I am not a packaging geek, but please upload the debdiff patch too [13:20] Here is the diff: http://paste.ubuntu.com/595995/ [13:21] abhinav-: attach it to the LP bug, and let ubuntu-bugs know (or tag it yourself) [13:22] abhinav-: oh, I misread -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuPackagingGuide/BuildFromDebdiff?highlight=%28debdiff%29 [13:23] paultag: it is already attached to bug for last one week I guess, I also had a merge proposal but I was told that it should be included through debian/patches [13:23] paultag: I followed this one https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/PatchSystems [13:25] abhinav-: no, a debdiff is a delta on debian it's self, not a delta for debian/patch -- apply the debdiff to the vcs and checkin the changes, propose that for merge [13:26] abhinav-: please note license etc very strictly === yofel_ is now known as yofel === _stink__ is now known as _stink_ === em is now known as emma === emma is now known as em === Zic_ is now known as Zic === maco2 is now known as maco === ampelbein_ is now known as Ampelbein [21:13] is this the channel to ask for packages updated in maverick ? [21:17] is there a problem with language-selector package ? [21:18] Yes. There is and it's being worked on now. [21:19] oki thanks ScottK