/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/04/19/#ubuntu-release.txt

stgraberskaet: you may want to look at the screenshots I attached to bug 74602800:27
ubot4Launchpad bug 746028 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "Edubuntu: Wallpapers are not updated on upgrade to Natty (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/74602800:27
stgraberskaet: I just did a clean install of Maverick, made sure it's up to date, took two screenshots before upgrade, then the two same on Natty after upgrade and another of a new clean user.00:28
stgraberonly the new clean user gets the orangier (is that even a word ?) wallpaper00:29
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== doko_ is now known as doko
pittiScottK, slangasek, any release member: ^ any chance to process this? it's blocking ev's ubiquity fix09:57
* ev hugs pitti 09:57
evnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnma/slideshow09:58
pittiev: did you do a full end-to-end test with this? I followed up to the PAE bug with a question09:58
evwhoops09:58
evI tested it as far as it installed the right kernel and dpkg didn't error out on installing the nvidia driver09:59
evbut I don't have the requisite hardware to test that it completely works09:59
evI'll have a look at the bug now09:59
pittiev: right, I just simulated it here as well, and just checked with dkms status10:09
ogra_did someone let linux-meta-ti-omap4 out of new already ?10:23
ogra_(armel images failed due to it)10:23
pittiogra_: I think I accepted it from unapproved this morning, was that wrong?10:32
ogra_pitti, no, perfect :)10:32
evcan anyone comment on the likelihood of getting a freeze exception for bug 6900926 (adding a "nowhere" option to the bootloader installation)11:06
ubot4ev: Bug 6900926 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/6900926 is private11:06
evwhoops11:06
evbug 69092611:06
ubot4Launchpad bug 690926 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "Installer forces you to install grub somewhere (affects: 5) (heat: 28)" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/69092611:06
evnote that maverick had this same behavior of only being able to disable bootloader installation via a flag to ubiquity (ubiquity -b)11:07
ogra_if someone could let libqtbamf through i would appreciate that, a unity-2d upload is waiting for it11:13
pitticurrently reviewing the queue, will do11:14
pittiRiddell: any chance you could have a look at apport and jockey?11:15
Riddellpitti: can do11:15
pitticheers11:15
pittiogra_: done11:16
ogra_super, thanks !11:16
Riddellpitti: "+1.20.2 (UNRELEASED)" in apport NEWS file, accepting though11:21
pittiRiddell: yes, it's just a merge from trunk, but there's no new upstream release yet11:21
pittithanks11:22
mvopitti: how is the free space on the cd looking currently? I got a new app-install-data upload with more icons (improvements to the crawler were made) but the result is that it take ~1mb or so more13:26
pittimvo: I added back some langpacks, so tomorrow's will be back up to 696 MB or so13:45
pittimvo: 1 MB? that's quite a lot of new icons indeed :)13:46
mvopitti: yeah, good new code!13:49
mvopitti: but to be fair, there are just a lot of icons13:49
pitti$ du -hs /usr/share/icons13:50
pitti95M/usr/share/icons13:50
pittiyou bet13:50
mvo:)13:50
pittimvo: but they are already getting squeezed in the pkgbinarymangler, so I guess there's not a lot we can win on them still13:51
pittiexcept remove redundant/unneeded ones13:51
mvoyeah, I wrote a script to compare that we really take the ones we need (and not duplicate from icon theme) for that, but only tiny win, maybe  ~15 icons or so13:52
mvoI removed them now13:52
pittithat's actually a significant potential there, /me shelves that for the next round of CD space fights13:52
pitti48M/usr/share/icons/gnome13:52
mvoyou think of something like pngcruncher? scour?13:52
pitti19M/usr/share/icons/Humanity13:52
pittiI'm fairly sure that there's some overlap there13:52
mvoyeah13:52
pittimvo: binarymangler uses optipng and advancecomp13:52
mvowe do pngcrunch already, right?13:52
mvook, cool13:53
mvoin this case its quite possible that the result will actually be different as I build it locally and hvaen't factored in this13:53
pittiah13:53
mvo(less additional space)13:53
mvo*puhhh*13:53
mvothanks :)13:53
pittimvo: you can try by installing pkgbinarymangler, but don't worry too much13:53
pittiit'll fit13:53
mvocool13:53
* mvo installs13:54
pittimvo: it'll probably take what feels like a year to build13:54
mvohaha13:54
mvothats fine, I make a pot of tea in the meantime13:54
pittihah, always a good excuse!13:54
* pitti hugs mvo13:54
mvowe got some nice additional high profile icons (like audacity) that used to be missing13:54
mdeslaurplease reject my isc-dhcp upload ^14:06
mdeslaurI messed up the changelog14:06
pitti*flush*14:07
mdeslaurthanks pitti14:07
pittinp :)14:07
* apw notes there was a compiler update yesterday, heads up that that may mean a kernel rebuild14:42
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
kirklandjust uploaded a trivial distcc fix, for a rather old bug15:31
kirklandthanks15:46
=== kenvandine_ is now known as kenvandine
stgraberskaet: I just talked to didrocks and bug 746028 isn't Edubuntu specific. It affects Ubuntu as well but only for Maverick systems installed after the last ubuntu-wallpaper upload in Natty, thayt'16:11
ubot4Launchpad bug 746028 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "Edubuntu: Wallpapers are not updated on upgrade to Natty (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/74602816:11
stgraber*that's why it was a bit hard to reproduce for some :)16:11
stgraberThe caching system checks the timestamp of both the current cache and the wallpaper, has in my case my current cache (maverick's wallpaper) is newer than the wallpaper (natty's), it won't get updated and so I'll still have maverick's wallpaper after uprade16:12
=== ampelbein_ is now known as Ampelbein
skaetstgraber,  thanks for chasing this down.16:17
skaetstgraber,  thanks for tracking this down.16:18
bdmurrayskaet: has bug 751018 ever been discussed?16:32
ubot4Launchpad bug 751018 in ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "i386 installer CDs are named improperly (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/75101816:32
* skaet looking16:32
skaetbdmurray,   since it doesn't have an importance,  it appears to not have made the radar.16:33
SpamapSskaet: talking with jhunt about getting bug #728531 fixed and we realized that there's a much bigger problem which has no report yet (he is filing now)...16:54
ubot4Launchpad bug 728531 in upstart (Ubuntu Natty) (and 2 other projects) "chroot support is not reliable (affects: 2) (heat: 88)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/72853116:54
SpamapSskaet: the fix is already completed and has been tested (for both issues) for over a week.. we will probably need to get this new version of upstart in the release16:56
SpamapSjhunt: ^^16:56
SpamapSskaet: bug #76620617:00
ubot4Launchpad bug 766206 in upstart (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "user session support allows non-priv users to gain root privileges (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/76620617:01
skaetSpamapS, jhunt,  ack.17:11
skaetjhunt,  is there anything other than the fix in the new version of upstart?17:11
jhuntaside from the oom bug and the user escalation issue, there is a fix for bug 707479.17:14
ubot4Launchpad bug 707479 in upstart (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "service <service> restart does not use an updated job configuration (affects: 1) (heat: 43)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/70747917:14
jhuntThe final tweak is a change to the init-checkconf script which now checks script sections as well as the upstart config itself. The fact that the original init-checkconf didn't do this check was an oversight.17:15
jhuntbtw - init-checkconf is a script that users can choose to run if they so wish. It doesn't run as root (in fact it purposely disallows it)17:16
slangasekdid someone here reject gcc-4.4-armel-cross from binary NEW on Friday?  hrw says he didn't get an explanation for the reject and I don't see anything posted to ubuntu-archive17:29
ScottKNot /me.17:31
slangasekfigured out the reason for the reject, we'll get it sorted17:32
skaetjhunt, can you point me to a diff?17:46
jhuntskaet: one sec...17:47
jhunthttps://code.launchpad.net/~jamesodhunt/ubuntu/natty/upstart/fix-chroot-sessions/+merge/5824917:49
jhuntNote - the diff is quite big, but a lot of the changes are actually in the tests (init/tests/* and util/tests/*) which are only run at build time of course.17:49
* skaet looking17:50
jhuntfwiw, cjwatson is aware of the need for these fixes (although I'm not sure he's looked at the code yet). I think he's back online tomorrow am.17:51
SpamapSskaet: given the bugs that jhunt's branch fixes.. would you say it would be better to upload that package and let the release team approve it or get more feedback before that?19:30
skaetSpamapS, after scanning through the changes,  I'd prefer that cjwatson be consulted before it get accepted in.   Feel free to upload, and cjwatson can approve or reject it when he's back tomorrow.19:37
skaetjhunt, ^^19:38
SpamapSskaet: thanks, will do19:41
jhuntskaet: ack - thx.19:57
ScottKI would appreciate it if some other releast team member would look at Bug 766386.19:58
ubot4Launchpad bug 766386 in request-tracker3.8 (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync request-tracker3.8 3.8.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/76638619:58
kirklandcould someone take a look at and ideally accept rabbitmq-erlang-client?  this fix enable us to rebuilt rabbitmq-stomp and fix its FTBFS20:00
DavieyScottK: Do you have a debdiff handy?20:00
kirkland(all universe)20:00
ScottKkirkland: Already accepted.20:00
kirklandScottK: just saw the mail, thanks!20:00
ScottKDaviey: I can attach one to the bug.20:01
kirklandScottK: any idea how long to wait before sending the build-dependent package for a rebuild?  ie, i'll need to wait for a publisher run, right?20:01
ScottKkirkland: If you build-dep on the new version you can upload right away.20:01
kirklandScottK: duh, good point20:01
kirklandScottK: wilco20:01
ScottKNo need to worry about archive skew then either.20:02
ScottKkirkland: Accepted that one too.20:06
kirklandScottK: sorry, that one was a simple copyright change;  the FTBFS one is 1 last more coming20:07
ScottKOK20:09
jbichahi, I'm looking for a sponsor for bug 42621520:21
ubot4Launchpad bug 426215 in software-center (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "[UIF exception] apt:package-name isn't handled by the Store when appropriate (affects: 5) (heat: 35)" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42621520:21
kirklandScottK: okay, last two rabbitmq related changes, all to solve the FTBFS, which should be done after accepting and building rabbitmq-server and rabbitmq-stomp20:45
ScottKCool.20:46
ScottKkirkland: Done.20:46
kirklandScottK: thanks20:46
stgraberI'm guessing it's known that language-selector-common in maverick-security is failing in postinst ? breaking upgrade and netboot installs of maverick21:02
stgraberpitti, jdstrand: ^21:02
jdstrandstgraber: kees did that update21:03
* jdstrand goes to fetch him21:03
stgraberlanguage-selector-common's postinst returns exit code 2 (from what I can see in d-i's logs on a fresh maverick netboot install)21:04
pittiI guess the kill should be || true'd?21:05
stgraberindeed, redirecting output to /dev/null won't prevent kill from returning !=0 if the process doesn't exist21:07
* stgraber just finished reading the diff21:08
pittistgraber: kees is on it21:09
ScottKstgraber: Did you follow the SRU regression procedure?21:19
ScottKpitti: ^^^?21:19
jdstrandScottK: I don't think so, but kees is preparing updates as we speak21:19
ScottKI think it's still useful for notification.  We just got questions about the update in #ubuntu-motu and I only knew the answer because I was on this channel.21:20
ScottKAlthough I guess this is a security regression, not an SRU regression.21:21
ScottKSo it's a different process.21:21
stgraberScottK: as it was security we don't have a SRU bug open on LP. I'll open a bug report for the regression, mark critical and assign to kess (so he can close it with his upload)21:22
ScottKjdstrand: Is ^^^ reasonable?21:22
jdstrandfine by me21:22
stgraberkees: please close bug 766534 in your upload (if you didn't upload already)21:24
ubot4Launchpad bug 766534 in language-selector (Ubuntu) "Regression on maverick when updating to 0.6.7 (security upload) (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/76653421:24
SpamapSFYI: upstart package uploaded to natty, awaiting cjwatson's final review.21:24
keesstgraber: the fix is already built in the security queue. I'll close it manually when it publishes. :)21:27
=== bjf is now known as bjf[afk]
=== robbiew is now known as robbiew_
keesincoming policykit-1 security update for natty...23:38
kees(I put today's krb5 update into natty-security since it's not urgent, but policykit-1's update is semi-urgent)23:38
kees(as in, nothing in the wild yet to exploit it, but is a local root escalation if someone can land it)23:38
genecquick question (asked before; no answer): is it worth mentioning in the release notes that btrfs is still deemed experimental by kernel.org?23:40
ScottKkees: Accepted.23:49
ScottKgenec: I'd vote yes.23:49
genecScottK: where would the best place be to raise this point?  here, a mailing list, an LP bug?23:50
ScottKgenec: File a bug against the ubuntu-release-notes project.23:51
genecScottK: I know support is coming along from all angles but the fsck is the one major point holding it back.  will do.23:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!