| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| vish | so.. when we switch to wayland, will this channel be renamed to #ubuntu-w ? | 07:49 |
|---|---|---|
| tjaalton | you're not around to see it anyway ;) | 07:50 |
| vish | :D | 07:50 |
| tjaalton | x won't go away, at least it'll live as a wayland client for a long time to come | 07:51 |
| vish | aah! | 07:52 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: I'll merge xserver 1.10.1 | 08:31 |
| Sarvatt | tjaalton: no point is there, 1 commit you already added as a patch? | 09:03 |
| Sarvatt | WTH.. vblank_mode=0 glxgears under an xtrace display is fine on sandybridge, stutters and doesn't update outside of an xtrace display | 09:08 |
| tjaalton | Sarvatt: nicer package version, and the current one isn't uploaded either | 09:08 |
| tjaalton | merge pushed | 09:22 |
| tjaalton | hmm, still no abi-compatible virtualbox release.. | 09:23 |
| Sarvatt | OSE? theres a precompiled one on the virtualbox website | 09:24 |
| Sarvatt | http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/4.0.4/VBoxGuestAdditions_4.0.5-Xorg110.iso | 09:25 |
| tjaalton | yeah, i was thinking of the situation in natty | 09:25 |
| Sarvatt | someone pointed out the commit needed in a bug report when we first did 1.10, guess that didnt get uploaded..? | 09:26 |
| tjaalton | hmm, i'll check the package | 09:26 |
| tjaalton | right, it's just been rebuilt to pick up new deps, so it's still broken | 09:27 |
| tjaalton | debfx: ^ | 09:27 |
| Sarvatt | looks like the guest additions dont even compile atm | 09:28 |
| Sarvatt | /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox-ose-guest/4.0.4/build/include/iprt/assert.h:231:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault | 09:29 |
| tjaalton | heh | 09:30 |
| tjaalton | I'll try the latest source if it builds.. | 09:31 |
| Sarvatt | http://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/36301 | 09:32 |
| Sarvatt | http://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/36389 | 09:33 |
| Sarvatt | http://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/36300 | 09:33 |
| tjaalton | yuck | 09:33 |
| tjaalton | the first one is familiar looking.. | 09:33 |
| Sarvatt | a bunch of header manipulation in later commits too so it compiles | 09:34 |
| tjaalton | guess I'll pass on building the beast :) | 09:38 |
| Sarvatt | portal 2 doesn't work in wine, bah! :) | 09:46 |
| tjaalton | hehe | 09:48 |
| lilstevie | Sarvatt: damn you | 10:04 |
| debfx | tjaalton: what is broken in virtualbox? | 10:06 |
| Sarvatt | lilstevie: it doesn't work with fglrx or nvidia either, looks like its a wine and/or portal 2 problem | 10:06 |
| lilstevie | Sarvatt: meh I have an ATi 5750 | 10:07 |
| lilstevie | I however don't own portal 2 | 10:07 |
| Sarvatt | yeah 5770 is what i tested it on first | 10:07 |
| Sarvatt | http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26835 | 10:08 |
| ubot4 | bugs.winehq.org bug 26835 in -unknown "Portal 2 exits at menu screen." [Normal,New] | 10:08 |
| * Sarvatt is hoping for a miracle when he wakes up | 10:08 | |
| tjaalton | debfx: guest additions don't work in natty | 10:09 |
| tjaalton | debfx: also, I'm filing a bug report that you probably should use OBSOLETE_BY in dkms.conf, to tell dkms not to build on kernels newer than what the vbox version supports | 10:09 |
| debfx | tjaalton: the ones from the additions iso image? | 10:09 |
| tjaalton | debfx: i don't know where they are from :) | 10:09 |
| tjaalton | but if they are not distributed by ubuntu, it's not something you can fix, right? | 10:10 |
| debfx | both is in ubuntu, the virtualbox-ose-guest-x11 package and virtualbox-guest-additions (the iso image) | 10:11 |
| debfx | I could update virtualbox-guest-additions to the 4.0.5 pre-release | 10:11 |
| lilstevie | Sarvatt: a miracle for me would be someone giving me portal2 :p | 10:12 |
| debfx | about OBSOLETE_BY: how do I know which kernel version will break the module? ;) | 10:12 |
| tjaalton | debfx: yeah that would be good I think. and as Sarvatt pointed out, current version in natty doesn't even build | 10:12 |
| tjaalton | debfx: just put the one that the distro version is shipped with, the user can override it | 10:13 |
| tjaalton | debfx: do you still need a bugreport for it? | 10:13 |
| tjaalton | so, for natty you'd put 'OBSOLETE_BY=2.6.39', unless you know it builds with it | 10:14 |
| debfx | a bug report would be good, yes | 10:14 |
| tjaalton | in which case 2.6.40 would be ok | 10:14 |
| tjaalton | alright, I'll finish it | 10:14 |
| debfx | Sarvatt: internal compiler error -> please report a bug against gcc :) | 10:15 |
| ricotz | Sarvatt, hey :) | 10:17 |
| tjaalton | debfx: filed bug 765680 | 10:17 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 765680 in virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) "prevent building the dkms modules on kernels newer than is known to be supported (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/765680 | 10:17 |
| ricotz | Sarvatt, could you renew my xedgers membership? | 10:17 |
| debfx | tjaalton: thanks | 10:18 |
| * ricotz is having wifi problems and gets disconnected often | 10:20 | |
| debfx | tjaalton: maybe you could sponsor my debdiff on bug #753370 ? | 10:34 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 753370 in mesa (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "No Desktop Effects in Kubuntu 11.04 Beta1 (affects: 9) (dups: 2) (heat: 58)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/753370 | 10:34 |
| tjaalton | debfx: I can | 10:35 |
| debfx | cool, thanks! | 10:40 |
| tjaalton | debfx: uploaded | 10:42 |
| debfx | tjaalton: I'm not sure if adding OBSOLETE_BY is a good idea | 12:33 |
| debfx | I'd rather have something that displays a warning when the build fails with an unsupported kernel version | 12:33 |
| debfx | also dkms shouldn't fail package installations when a build fails | 12:34 |
| debfx | I should probably file a bug against dkms :) | 12:35 |
| tjaalton | debfx: think I tried that already :) | 14:07 |
| tjaalton | oh you found that | 14:08 |
| tjaalton | and i agree OBSOLETE_BY is a hack, but the best there is atm | 14:09 |
| tjaalton | xserver 1.10.1 uploaded | 14:30 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| debfx | tjaalton: for oneiric dkms needs to stop generating apport bugs for unsupported kernels, otherwise I'll start redirecting them ;D | 15:39 |
| tjaalton | debfx: heh, sounds good | 15:40 |
| debfx | either by a kernel version variable or by detecting if the kernel is from the ubuntu archive | 15:40 |
| ScottK | RAOF: Did you all reach a conclusion on what to do about the GEM/Intel question? | 15:56 |
| tjaalton | ScottK: uploaded already | 16:01 |
| tjaalton | and accepted | 16:01 |
| ScottK | tjaalton: Excellent. Thanks. | 16:02 |
| Sarvatt | ricotz: I extended your membership the day they emailed us, we had the same join date (but the years differed) so I'm expiring too :) | 17:27 |
| Sarvatt | but I can't extend my own membership even though i'm an admin | 17:28 |
| ricotz | Sarvatt, oh, thank you, actually i didnt looked at the team page and just relied on the email | 17:29 |
| ricotz | and there wasnt a "your membership was renewed" mail yet ;) | 17:30 |
| soreau | Sarvatt: ping: I was wondering if installing xorg-edgers on lucid will update the kernel as well | 20:39 |
| bryceh | soreau, no | 20:41 |
| soreau | bryceh: Ok thank you | 20:41 |
| bryceh | soreau, you can look at the package details of the ppa to see what gets installed | 20:42 |
| ScottK | My blur is back on KDE/Intel. Thanks everyone. | 20:47 |
| === soreau_ is now known as soreau | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!