[08:52] <dholbach> good morning
[09:22] <quaketo> hi
[09:23] <quaketo> what?
[12:12] <dholbach> can somebody have a look at http://pad.lv/mps/ubuntu-packaging-guide? if there's a more elegant/better way to do it, I'm all ears :)
[14:53] <dholbach> can somebody please check out http://pad.lv/mps/ubuntu-packaging-guide?
[14:57] <Laney> I don't like it
[14:57] <Laney> can't the makefile do cleverness to find out what it can build given the current sphinx version?
[14:57] <Laney> or can't sphinx 1.0 be backported to the ppa?
[14:59] <dholbach> Laney, that could work, but it's not automatic, as something's wrong with the mercurial imports
[15:00] <Laney> does the natty package not backport?
[15:00] <dholbach> Laney, the makefile is generated by sphinx-project or whatever the command is called
[15:01] <Laney> or you could generate that as part of the build instead?
[15:01] <Laney> I don't know if that would need more BDs though
[15:01] <dholbach> I guess we can just backport natty sphinx for now
[15:02] <Laney> hardcoding 'natty' is definitely a bad idea anyway, as that would break for future releases
[15:07] <dholbach> Laney, I'll backport then
[15:07] <Laney> cool, hope it works
[15:08] <dholbach> *cross fingers*
[15:33] <dholbach> Laney, "python-jinja2 (>= 2.2)" for karmic - do you want to do that one? :)
[15:38] <dholbach> nm, done
[15:45] <dholbach> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/70016187/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.jinja2_2.3.1-1~karmic1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz - ok, let'S forget karmic for now - if anyone is passionate about it, file a bug :)