| genec | ScottK: bug 766654 | 00:06 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 766654 in ubuntu-release-notes "btrfs: still considered experimental by kernel.org (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/766654 | 00:06 |
| genec | oops. somehow missed bug 619575 | 00:12 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 619575 in btrfs-tools (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "btrfs-tools fsck bug can cause data loss (affects: 4) (dups: 1) (heat: 28)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/619575 | 00:12 |
| === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
| kees | ScottK: thanks! | 00:48 |
| ScottK | You're welcome. | 00:53 |
| skaet | hmm, looks like there might be some archive synch up issues on the arm builds. | 03:37 |
| skaet | The following packages have unmet dependencies: | 03:37 |
| skaet | libnux-0.9-0 : Depends: libnux-0.9-common (= 0.9.44-0ubuntu2) but it is not going to be installed | 03:37 |
| skaet | unity : Depends: unity-common (= 3.8.8-0ubuntu2) but it is not going to be installed | 03:37 |
| ScottK | skaet: They failed to build on armel. I just retried them. | 03:56 |
| skaet | ScottK, thanks! | 03:56 |
| ScottK | nux is building. Unity also needed the newer nux, so it failed again. It'll need another retry after nux is build and in the archive on armel. | 04:18 |
| pitti | skaet: scrutinizing the upstart diff in the queue now; was that the one you worried about? | 07:44 |
| === smspilla1|zzz is now known as smspillaz | ||
| pitti | skaet: the changes look quite reasonable to me; I found one place which might cause a potential bug (commented on bug 766206), but it's defensive now and fails the right way around | 07:46 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 766206 in upstart (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "user session support allows non-priv users to gain root privileges (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/766206 | 07:46 |
| * pitti accepts and will take the bullets | 07:46 | |
| cjwatson | I haven't done a full diff review, but the general purpose of the upstart change has my approval, FWIW | 09:48 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| stgraber | skaet: for bug 746028 do we want the same "hack" I did for Edubuntu or should we wait to have an improved caching system (definitely post-natty) ? (touch the wallpaper in .postinst so that its timestamp gets bumped and triggers a cache update) | 14:01 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 746028 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "Wallpapers are not updated on upgrade to Natty (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/746028 | 14:01 |
| skaet | stgraber, I think the touch approach will be fine for Natty, its low risk, so would be good if we could get it in. | 14:07 |
| stgraber | skaet: ok, I'll do a quick check to make sure it works fine with Edubuntu and if it does, will apply the same to Ubuntu and upload. | 14:07 |
| skaet | stgraber, thanks!! agree that this should be revisted post-Natty though. :) | 14:08 |
| ara | good morning skaet | 14:09 |
| skaet | good morning ara. :) | 14:09 |
| skaet | ara, any worries on the hardware certification side? | 14:09 |
| ara | skaet, are we having a release meeting this Friday, or are we skipping due to the holidays? | 14:10 |
| skaet | ara, will make a final call on it whether we have it or not tomorrow, when we have a better feel for how the initial images are building, and if there's any known kitten killers lurking. Fingers crossed we won't need one. | 14:11 |
| ara | skaet, OK, please, let us know | 14:12 |
| ara | thanks! | 14:12 |
| skaet | ara, will do. | 14:12 |
| skaet | ara, how are the results looking on the hardware cert tests? | 14:12 |
| ara | skaet, they are looking good | 14:13 |
| ara | skaet, we are preparing everything for the 11.04 certification testing after the release | 14:13 |
| skaet | ara, thanks - could you send me a summary of what we're currently seeing? Would like to review, and make sure to ask any questions tomorrow if possible. | 14:15 |
| ara | skaet, nothing new apart from the bugs with blocks-hwcert tag | 14:16 |
| didrocks | skaet: stgraber reading comments on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746028? did you read my last comment on how few people are impacted by the change? (and the wallpaper isn't really changed for ubuntu, not edubuntu) | 14:20 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 746028 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "Wallpapers are not updated on upgrade to Natty (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Triaged] | 14:20 |
| stgraber | didrocks: yep, though if the touch does the trick, I don't see how it could hurt to do it | 14:21 |
| didrocks | stgraber: hum, not sure about the future, seems a little win there (and we already got that for lucid/maverick then, without complain apparently) | 14:22 |
| didrocks | it's just that the wallpaper was changed later, which has hidden the bug :) | 14:22 |
| didrocks | anyway, I'll fix that upstream for GNOME 3.2 (didn't see bug report about it on bugzilla as well) | 14:23 |
| didrocks | stgraber: I mean, little win for ubuntu-wallpapers, for edubuntu where the wallpaper is different, that's another story | 14:23 |
| skaet | didrocks, touch seems low risk and makes things a little more resiliant in future, so don't see much downside to putting it in, and for those who notice subtle differences, it will stop bugs. | 14:26 |
| * skaet --> heading out to QA meeting, back on line later | 14:27 | |
| didrocks | skaet: well, we didn't get bugs for the 2 previous cycles even having the same issue (I expect people installing maverick *now* for upgrading are not the majority). However, I think we will have a lot of bug reports about the wallpaper not changing (even when they are not affected by this bug) because it didn't change visually ;) | 14:29 |
| joshuahoover | the u1 team needs to release a new ubuntuone-client package to fix bug #764646 - can we get someone to review and give us the ok? | 14:48 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 764646 in ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu Natty) (and 4 other projects) "music store widget dies with «TypeError: find_credentials() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)» (affects: 3) (dups: 2) (heat: 26)" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/764646 | 14:48 |
| pitti | joshuahoover: pure bug fixes are fine and welcome at this point | 14:48 |
| joshuahoover | pitti: ah ok, thanks! | 14:49 |
| jibel | ev, ubiquity 2.6.6 is broken and today's desktop iso fails to install. | 15:01 |
| ev | jibel: the fix is in trunk | 15:02 |
| jibel | ev, ok | 15:02 |
| pitti | oh? I just finished a test install two hours ago on today's desktop daily | 15:02 |
| ev | I meant to upload it yesterday | 15:02 |
| ev | but I got caught up in this apt-clone issue | 15:02 |
| ev | pitti: are you sure it was today's desktop CD? The partitioner was very broken. | 15:02 |
| pitti | .disk/info says Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Beta amd64 (20110419) | 15:03 |
| pitti | so apparently not then | 15:03 |
| pitti | I rsynced it at 10:35 local, apparently I just missed today's one then, sorry | 15:04 |
| pitti | (8:35 UTC) | 15:04 |
| ev | no worries | 15:05 |
| ev | I'm nearly ready to upload a fixed version | 15:05 |
| jibel | ev, thanks. | 15:06 |
| pitti | what a version jump! | 15:33 |
| jibel | ev, once you uploaded the fix, can we rebuild the desktop images so we can try them today ? | 15:39 |
| ev | yes | 15:40 |
| ev | just waiting on the new console-setup to hit the archive | 15:40 |
| cjwatson | yeah, dupload is less forgiving of the GPG error than dput is, I think | 15:41 |
| cjwatson | reuploaded with dput | 15:41 |
| cjwatson | (the first one landed in cocoplum:~lp_queue/ubuntu-queue/failed/) | 15:42 |
| mvo | pitti: its all marketing! | 15:47 |
| stgraber | mvo: so you're expecting it to be the real real final upload ? :) | 15:47 |
| mvo | yes … | 15:48 |
| mvo | YES! | 15:48 |
| * pitti has that recorded! | 15:49 | |
| mvo | lol | 15:50 |
| doko | pitti: please could you have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-web/+bug/767144 | 16:14 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 767144 in icedtea-web (Ubuntu) "FFe - update to current trunk/1.1 release (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] | 16:14 |
| cjwatson | can somebody review console-setup? | 16:37 |
| cjwatson | tiny change | 16:37 |
| doko | am I allowed to? not member of the release team ... | 16:38 |
| cjwatson | I think archive admin is sufficient for things that aren't feature changes | 16:41 |
| === seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
| jhunt | hi all - I've just raised an MP for bug 767053. | 18:10 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 767053 in upstart (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) ""initctl status" no longer works as a non-privileged user (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/767053 | 18:10 |
| cjwatson | it's fine if it's uploaded today | 18:11 |
| jhunt | orig.tar.gz in the usual place if required. | 18:13 |
| cjwatson | can you get SpamapS to upload it? | 18:16 |
| cjwatson | (dinnertime here) | 18:16 |
| jhunt | cjwatson: ack | 18:20 |
| jhunt | cjwatson: I've pinged SpamapS but he's away atm. I've gotta pop out but will try and check back later tonight... | 18:22 |
| cjwatson | jhunt: I can't find the upstart .orig.tar.gz | 19:34 |
| cjwatson | jhunt: can I have a link? (I'm back now for a while) | 19:35 |
| stgraber | sorry for uploading ubuntu-wallpapers twice. Got the GPG error someone mentioned earlier ... | 19:37 |
| stgraber | they are both identical, so just reject one of them | 19:37 |
| kirkland | can someone please accept rabbitmq-stomp from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/+queue ? | 19:46 |
| kirkland | that has FTBFS until yesterday | 19:46 |
| kirkland | but now it builds! | 19:46 |
| cjwatson | stgraber: done (and accepted the other) | 19:49 |
| cjwatson | kirkland: accepted | 19:59 |
| kirkland | cjwatson: thanks | 19:59 |
| jhunt | cjwatson, SpamapS: link is chinstrap:/home/jhunt/upstart/upstart-0.9.7.tar.gz | 20:46 |
| Ampelbein | the apport upload from earlier broke installation and is generating lots of dupe-reports like 767496 | 20:48 |
| cjwatson | jhunt: thanks | 20:51 |
| jhunt | np - sorry for the delay in replying. | 20:52 |
| cjwatson | man's gotta eat | 20:53 |
| cjwatson | I'm syncing up generated files with the tarball | 20:54 |
| === SudoKing is now known as CuddleKing | ||
| cjwatson | jhunt: uploaded; somebody who isn't me will need to review/approve it | 21:01 |
| cjwatson | could somebody please review partman-auto (while I'm here to answer questions about it)? | 21:02 |
| slangasek | cjwatson: taking a look | 21:08 |
| cjwatson | http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2011/04/msg00333.html may be helpful for context | 21:09 |
| cjwatson | there was a followup questioning the safety of doing this for swap partitions, which isn't relevant to this upload since I didn't enable that | 21:10 |
| jhunt | cjwatson: thanks! I *will* fix that autogen problem when I get a chance :) | 21:21 |
| cjwatson | jhunt: maybe we can run through it with a scratch branch at the release sprint | 21:22 |
| jhunt | that'd be great, ta! | 21:22 |
| cjwatson | hm, the preserve-existing-partition stuff in the installer doesn't work for btrfs | 21:24 |
| slangasek | cjwatson: partman-auto accepted | 21:29 |
| ScottK | cjwatson: Sounds like fodder for the release note that says "BTRFS is supported in the installer, but it's all still experimental." | 21:30 |
| cjwatson | ScottK: could be, yeah | 21:31 |
| cjwatson | not sure I want to attempt a fix now | 21:31 |
| cjwatson | slangasek: thanks! | 21:31 |
| ScottK | Anyone who relies on any data being preserved on BTRFS is asking for it. | 21:32 |
| ScottK | We're already publishing updates through natty-security? | 21:33 |
| ScottK | I mean we are, but is it on purpose? | 21:33 |
| kees | ScottK: yes, I put non-essential updates into -security to avoid release archive churn. | 21:34 |
| kees | ScottK: is that causing problems? | 21:34 |
| ScottK | I don't think it's an actual problem, but I found it surprising that we were accepting them pre-release. | 21:35 |
| cjwatson | I think we've done it before | 21:36 |
| ScottK | OK. | 21:37 |
| ScottK | I often get surprised by things I shouldn't. | 21:37 |
| cjwatson | though I agree it seems odd at first, second, and third glance :-) | 21:38 |
| jhunt | can we discuss a plan for bug 436936? As mentioned, the latest gdm.conf (comment 26) on that bug "works for me", but I don't have the hardware to fully test the change. | 21:54 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 436936 in kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu Karmic) (and 9 other projects) "gdm upstart job checks /proc/cmdline for single user mode, won't start on post-boot runlevel change (affects: 15) (dups: 2) (heat: 86)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/436936 | 21:54 |
| jhunt | I spoke to apw re the 2 udev events we're checking for (graphics-device-added and drm-device-added) and it seems the order they arrive in isn't necessarily well understood? | 21:54 |
| stgraber | cjwatson: uploaded, just using "true" as an error handler did the trick | 21:57 |
| barry | hi all. is there still time, and are any sponsors available for a no-change rebuild to eliminate a mod_python error log message? | 22:00 |
| ScottK | barry: Should be fine. | 22:01 |
| ScottK | (although I don't volunteer to sponsor it) | 22:01 |
| barry | ScottK: okay ;) | 22:01 |
| cjwatson | stgraber: thanks, accepted | 22:05 |
| ScottK | barry: Is this the same package we need the fix for to make the python3 version work with 3.2? | 22:08 |
| ScottK | If so, it might make sense just to upload with that fix. | 22:08 |
| barry | ScottK: no, it's a rebuild of libapache2-mod-python to get rid of an error log entry | 22:09 |
| ScottK | Right, the other one was mod-wsgi. | 22:09 |
| ScottK | Which means I probably made a wrong comment in a bug earlier today. | 22:09 |
| cjwatson | grub-installer could use a review too - RC (IMO) installer fix | 22:09 |
| barry | ScottK: oh well, it happens :) | 22:10 |
| barry | ScottK: what bug were you thinking about? | 22:10 |
| ScottK | The mod-python one about pulling in pyhon3. | 22:11 |
| ScottK | Although it doesn't appear to have any python3 in it now, so maybe I got lucky. | 22:12 |
| barry | could be bug 759943 | 22:14 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 759943 in mod-wsgi (Ubuntu) "mod_wsgi.so-3.2 gives errors (affects: 1) (heat: 12)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/759943 | 22:14 |
| Daviey | barry, I need to upload that. | 22:20 |
| barry | Daviey: thanks | 22:42 |
| ScottK | Yeah. That was the one. | 22:45 |
| Daviey | ScottK, jamespage reworked the upstream patch to encapsulate all references to only do different behaviour on 3.2. So the same patch is valid on 3.1 and 3.2. | 22:47 |
| Daviey | He is going to fwd the patch to Debian. | 22:47 |
| ScottK | Yeah. I saw. Just accepted it. | 22:47 |
| Daviey | groovy | 22:48 |
| === CuddleKing is now known as SudoKing | ||
| cjwatson | could somebody review grub-installer, please? | 23:38 |
| cjwatson | it should be easy | 23:38 |
| ScottK | cjwatson: Done. | 23:43 |
| === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
| cjwatson | ScottK: thanks | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!