[13:27] bac benji danilos looking at kanban, call in 3 [13:29] gary_poster, ack [13:56] bac, btw, this is what I get sometimes when I have an unsaved file: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/597440/; not sure why it manages to build it in certain cases? [13:57] danilos: run make within emacs and it'll prompt you to save unsaved files! [13:58] when you invoke make replace the command with "cd `bzr root`; make jsbuild" [13:58] which you only have to do the first time [13:58] bac, heh, I know how to work around it, but sometimes I don't want to save them (i.e. I changed one thing and started on a different change but decide to test the first change first :) [13:59] bac, still, I think it'd be better if emacs backup files were ignored [14:00] yep [14:04] bug 768965 is for integration tests... [14:04] <_mup_> Bug #768965: The new javascript subscription code needs integration tests < https://launchpad.net/bugs/768965 > [14:11] bug 768967 is for team muting and subscription level of direct subscriptions... [14:11] <_mup_> Bug #768967: No UI to mute or change subscription level for direct team subscriptions < https://launchpad.net/bugs/768967 > [14:19] LPClient mock/stub bug 768970 [14:19] <_mup_> Bug #768970: JS LPClient stub/mock needs to be polished and shared < https://launchpad.net/bugs/768970 > [14:19] I wonder if the person who files the 1 millionth LP bug will get a prize, like unlimited lifetime usage of LP? [14:40] gary_poster: it'll probably be mpt who files that bug. he seems to get the good ones [14:41] bug 1000 [14:41] <_mup_> Bug #1000: There are too many bug reports in Malone < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1000 > [14:41] bug 100000 [14:41] <_mup_> Bug #100000: There are still too many bug reports < https://launchpad.net/bugs/100000 > [14:44] heh [15:41] bac benji danilo, I think I am done with https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP/BetterBugSubscriptionsAndNotifications/FeatureReviewNotes-2011-04-25 . Could you all be my reviewers, please? :-) Please feel free to make improvements directly, without consulting me. You can ping me about it and I can remember how to look at the wiki diffs. [15:42] also bac, it is really important for you and I to get our QA done ASAP so we can be sure to get the changes in the no-downtime deploy that danilos requests Monday morning. (Maybe you've already done so and not moved the cards; I'm just looking at the kanban board.) [15:43] gary_poster, should we list bugs like bug 739141 for items considered "done" somewhere? [15:43] <_mup_> Bug #739141: I get lp bug mail even though 'on own actions' turned off < https://launchpad.net/bugs/739141 > [15:44] gary_poster: i did the QA and marked the bugs bug have not moved the card [15:44] will do so now [15:45] danilos, I don't understand the question. Sadly, we don't think that bug is necessarily done, though we may make the argument that the error is somewhere else in LP (in code that identifies the wrong person as the actor, so our email sending code simply does not have the proper information to do the right thing). [15:45] bac, great, thank you [15:45] gary_poster: all of mine are qa-ok on https://devpad.canonical.com/~lpqateam/qa_reports/deployment-stable.html [15:45] yay :-) [15:45] if only we had a fourth place to look! [15:45] :-P [15:46] gary_poster, right, I am wondering if bugs like that should be mentioned in the feature review, or we consider that such things won't help feature review (or do we assume that mrevell/Ursula when they look at stuff they'll know about existing bugs, or will find them when they try to file new ones :) [15:46] gary_poster, it's not a big deal, I am just wondering if we should have 'special notes' section :) [15:47] danilos, ah! well, we should have a link to https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-project/+bugs?field.tag=story-better-bug-notification . I think that should be sufficient, yeah? [15:47] gary_poster, yeah, probably [15:47] "Look here for the bugs (and please don't forget to use the tag for new bugs)" [15:47] ok coo [15:47] l [15:53] gary_poster, btw, should the links for "unmute" be updated to production? also, we should explain when the "mute bug mail" shows up, because it only shows up in limited circumstances (i.e. when you are assigned directly [and not through a team] to the bug in my testing) [15:55] danilos, update links: absolutely. explain when the mute bug mail link shows up: we should file bugs for the things you identified in that email, I think. For this case maybe it is worth highlighting on the wiki page additionally; not sure. Fine if you want to. Do you want me to file bugs for those seven items? I could do it and then send them to you for review if you like [15:56] gary_poster, if you feel no rush, I was thinking of filing them Monday morning [15:56] danilos, sure, that's fine, as long as they are in before the review starts [15:56] gary_poster, understood [15:56] cool [15:57] augh the bugheat timeouts on qastaging are killing me [16:02] the unsubscribe in anger page is kinda nice now :-) [16:02] * danilos tries it out with latest devel :) [16:03] or on qastaging! [16:03] :-) [16:03] it could be better, could do more, and all that, but I think it is pretty useful as is. [16:04] and it's relatively slick [16:05] yeah, it looks very nice :) [16:19] anyway, I am off, have a nice weekend everyone [16:27] bye danilos [17:17] and were back [17:17] er, "we're" [17:34] :-) [17:34] OK I'm running away now. FWIW, I updated the other critical bug with some more notes: bug 753000 [17:35] <_mup_> Bug #753000: NotOneError caused by duplicate stuctural subscriptions

< https://launchpad.net/bugs/753000 > [17:35] have a nice afternoon, and talk to you all later