[00:46] <cousteau> Qucs 0.0.16 was released in mid-March. Any chance it gets to Natty? if not, it would be nice to see it at least in Oneiric
[00:48] <JanC> cousteau: Qucs 0.0.15 is in natty now, and as we are less than a week from the release...
[00:48] <cousteau> ok, so Oneiric then
[00:48] <JanC> is it in Debian already?
[00:48] <cousteau> let me see
[00:49] <cousteau> hmm... nope
[00:50] <cousteau> don't know which changes will this version introduce, but after 2 years of development I'd expect some nice features...
[00:51] <JanC> or a single bugfix, depending on activity  ;)
[00:52] <cousteau> (then again, if they haven't released a new version in 2 years, maybe the project is a bit stalled)
[00:52] <JanC> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622758
[00:53] <JanC> so you're not the first to request it  ☺
[00:55] <JanC> seems like the Qucs devs are somewhat "release notes, what's that?"  :P
[00:57] <cousteau> well, they have a "News" section with some info
[00:59] <cousteau> it's a nice and easy to use software for electronic simulations... but it gets updated each... well, 2 years
[01:00] <jbernard> hallyn: nice work! thanks for all your help on that
[01:05] <hallyn> jbernard: thanks for not pointing out that the last bug was my own fault :)
[01:05] <hallyn> jbernard: thanks, have a good weekend
[01:05] <hallyn> i'm skeedaddling
[11:29] <bdrung_> hi, i have a problem with my dput upload: http://paste.debian.net/114872/
[11:30] <bdrung_> it is correctly signed with my key
[11:31] <BlackZ> bdrung_: I had the same problem but the package got uploaded
[11:32] <bdrung_> now i get the mails.
[13:29] <bambee> Hello, python-apt developers: in data/Ubuntu.info.in line 27, there is a missing description => software-properties-gtk displays "none" in updates tab, and software-properties-kde crashes (it should not, I agree, but I does because it tries to translate a None string). Add a description field solves the problem.
[13:29] <bambee> (I can be wrong...)
[13:31] <bambee> and all other templates have a description...
[13:34] <abhinav-> bambee: see this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/769364
[13:37] <bambee> abhinav-: it is exactly the problem :)
[13:37] <abhinav-> ah :)
[13:37] <abhinav-> its strange
[13:55] <bambee> see http://paste.ubuntu.com/597838/, there are two "natty-security", two "natty-proposed", two "natty-updates" with the same name and the same description, the only differences are the RepositoryType (deb-src). software-properties uses aptsources  which parses this file, then for each "Suite" it displays the name and the description => so we've duplicates options in the "updates" tab.
[13:55] <bambee> :)
[15:07] <mdke> I see that the Canonical Partner repository doesn't appear in software sources in natty - is it intended that users add the apt line manually or am I missing something?
[17:56] <Meep> Hi, anyone here interested in chasing down the kernel power regression.
[18:10] <lars_t_h> Meep, maybe you will be more lucky at #ubuntu-kernel
[18:10] <lars_t_h> You should also post a link to an error report
[18:20] <Meep> lars_t_h: Thanks.  Posted it to that channel with a ref to launchpad 760131
[23:24] <tomreyn> hi
[23:24] <tomreyn> what needs to happen to have this taken on? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bitlbee/+bug/757008
[23:24] <tomreyn> with bitlbee-otr installed, bitlbee fails to start. and this package is unusable
[23:36] <tumbleweed> tomreyn: I can't reproduce that. From the Dependancies.txt it simply looks like a missing libotr2. Broken upgrade?
[23:37] <tomreyn> tumbleweed: thanks for looking into it. I haven't tried it for a while. Let me try it now
[23:39] <Ampelbein> looks to me like a missing Depends in bitlbee-plugin-otr
[23:40] <tumbleweed> Ampelbein: lol, I was in a sid chroot my bistake
[23:43] <tomreyn> tumbleweed: http://paste.ubuntu.com/598058/
[23:43] <tumbleweed> tomreyn: yeah I can see it now
[23:43] <tomreyn> but i agree about missing depends
[23:44] <tomreyn> do youthink there's a chance to get it fixed for natty?
[23:44] <tumbleweed> the plugin isn't linked again libotr2, and it should be. PRobably a result of the linker changes. Which may mean that it just needs a rebuild now (we've gone back to a conservative linker for release)
[23:44] <tumbleweed> yes
[23:44] <tomreyn> sweet
[23:44] <tumbleweed> yup, rebuilding works
[23:46] <tomreyn> what's the magic command for this again? 'apt-get -b source bitlbee-plugin-otr' or something?
[23:47] <tomreyn> oh --compile
[23:50] <Ampelbein> tumbleweed: are you preparing a no-change rebuild?
[23:52] <tumbleweed> Ampelbein: yeah
[23:53] <Ampelbein> btw, that error seems nasty as there is no way to auto-detect it at build time
[23:54] <tumbleweed> I guess that's a problem with any shared library plugin
[23:55] <Ampelbein> yeah, so in oneiric we must have an eye on packages with potential problems
[23:57] <tumbleweed> I'm still not sure exactly what caused this