[17:21] <Omega> micahg: ping
[17:22] <micahg> Omega: pong
[17:22] <Omega> Hey!
[17:22] <Omega> micahg: You said that we'd upgrade when support for a branch ends last time we spoke
[17:22] <micahg> Omega: yep
[17:23] <Omega> But support for 3.6 still hasn't ended and we upgraded that
[17:23] <micahg> Omega: huh?
[17:23] <Omega> Well, we're on 4 now
[17:23] <micahg> Omega: in the devel release :)
[17:23] <Omega> Huh?
[17:23] <micahg> it's the stable releases that can't be tinkered with as much
[17:23] <Omega> Ah
[17:24] <Omega> If fx7 is out when Oneiric get's released will we go from 4 -> 7?
[17:24] <micahg> Omega: well, it'll depend on how support for 4 works, mozilla hasn't decided yet
[17:25] <micahg> but the goal is to make sure each release has a upstream supported browser version
[17:25] <Omega> I don't think we should stress too much on the major version numbers and just upgrade mid-cycle.
[17:25] <Omega> Mhm
[17:25] <Omega> Well, except for LTS releases
[17:25] <micahg> when security support ends for the series in the release, we'll upgrade
[17:26] <Omega> 3.6 has been getting support for 15 months now :P
[17:27] <micahg> right, but if mozilla keeps with the previous commitment, it should get support for another 5 months (6 months after new version)
[17:27] <Omega> Is there somewhere you can point me to, maybe on BMO, that I can keep track of how support of 4 works?
[17:28] <micahg> no, not really, I just read the meeting notes from upstream each week and see what they've decided
[17:28] <micahg> there's also, the mozilla.dev.planning newsgroup
[17:29] <Omega> They discuss this in #fx-team over on Mozilla?
[17:29] <micahg> idk, not in that channel
[17:29] <Omega> Ah
[17:31] <Omega> Thanks for your time :)
[17:31] <micahg> Omega: you're welcome
[18:24] <vish> http://glow.mozilla.org/ is INSANEEE!!
[18:35] <chrisccoulson> vish, bit late on the bandwagon there ;)
[18:35] <vish> chrisccoulson: i mean, even today its ticking at that rate.. :)
[18:36] <vish> so when do we get FF5 btw ;)
[18:37] <micahg> chrisccoulson: FYI, bug 769759
[18:37] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 769759 in language-pack-en-base "English Firefox langpacks won't work with 4.0.x" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/769759
[18:37] <chrisccoulson> micahg - already taken care of ;)
[18:38] <micahg> chrisccoulson: where are the english langpacks?  the other languages were fixed
[18:40] <chrisccoulson> hmmm, not sure how that's happened. they're all done in the same job :/
[18:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson: right :)
[18:41] <micahg> we can fix it by pushing the langpack to -security, but I'm off mon and tues, so I emailed pitti and dpm about it
[18:41] <chrisccoulson> they're all in the PPA, so i guess pitti just didn't copy them yet for some reason
[18:42] <vish> hmm, weird, China has less downloads than India.. anyone have any idea what they prefer there?
[18:42] <chrisccoulson> in fact, there's a whole load that haven't been copied just yet
[18:42] <chrisccoulson> i guess they just weren't built when the others were copied
[18:42] <chrisccoulson> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/ppa?field.series_filter=natty
[18:43] <micahg> chrisccoulson: oh, hmm, really?  that's cool, that should make it easy then :)
[18:43] <chrisccoulson> so, i guess they will just get copied next time pitti is online
[18:43] <micahg> well, it's a little late to be copying langpacks, final ISOs have been generated
[18:44] <micahg> oh, these were uploaded later than the others as well :-/
[20:13] <fta> micahg, jdstrand: hi, update of ch10 planned soon, with 27 security fixes
[20:14] <fta> hm, it's most likely also a major upgrade (ch11)
[20:45] <micahg> fta: ugh, ok, well, I'm off tomorrow and tuesday, but can get it uploaded tuesday night
[20:46] <fta> micahg, release expected ~ Tuesday
[20:46] <micahg> fta: perfect :)
[20:46] <fta> EST time i guess
[20:47] <micahg> fta: will the password fix be in there as well (backport)?
[20:47] <fta> micahg, if it's ch11, yes, upstream provided a patch
[20:47] <fta> (i asked for it)
[20:48] <micahg> cool, that means the total stable password regression is < 2weeks :)
[20:48] <fta> well, i asked for a fix in trunk, but the guy was kind enough to also provide a backport
[20:48] <fta> he also fixed a bunch of issues for natty
[20:50] <fta> btw, lp is broken (dput), so all dailies, boom
[20:50] <micahg> hmm, dput
[20:50] <micahg> 's been working for me
[20:51] <fta> no, it's a known regression: http://paste.ubuntu.com/598401/
[20:52] <micahg> oh, so that actually should be uploading, just the display is wrong
[20:52] <fta> yep
[20:52] <fta> it breaks before creating the .upload file