=== asac_ is now known as asac === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away === micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team (Chromium too!): | Firefox 4 10.04-10.10 http://is.gd/5Fyywu | Firefox 3.6.17 & 4.0.1/Thunderbird 3.1.10/Seamonkey 2.0.13 in http://is.gd/dsudW need testing | Firefox 3.6.16/Thunderbird 3.1.8 in Stable Releases | Report Mozilla PPA bugs here: http://is.gd/hdZc1 [17:21] micahg: ping [17:22] Omega: pong [17:22] Hey! [17:22] micahg: You said that we'd upgrade when support for a branch ends last time we spoke [17:22] Omega: yep [17:23] But support for 3.6 still hasn't ended and we upgraded that [17:23] Omega: huh? [17:23] Well, we're on 4 now [17:23] Omega: in the devel release :) [17:23] Huh? [17:23] it's the stable releases that can't be tinkered with as much [17:23] Ah [17:24] If fx7 is out when Oneiric get's released will we go from 4 -> 7? [17:24] Omega: well, it'll depend on how support for 4 works, mozilla hasn't decided yet [17:25] but the goal is to make sure each release has a upstream supported browser version [17:25] I don't think we should stress too much on the major version numbers and just upgrade mid-cycle. [17:25] Mhm [17:25] Well, except for LTS releases [17:25] when security support ends for the series in the release, we'll upgrade [17:26] 3.6 has been getting support for 15 months now :P [17:27] right, but if mozilla keeps with the previous commitment, it should get support for another 5 months (6 months after new version) [17:27] Is there somewhere you can point me to, maybe on BMO, that I can keep track of how support of 4 works? [17:28] no, not really, I just read the meeting notes from upstream each week and see what they've decided [17:28] there's also, the mozilla.dev.planning newsgroup [17:29] They discuss this in #fx-team over on Mozilla? [17:29] idk, not in that channel [17:29] Ah [17:31] Thanks for your time :) [17:31] Omega: you're welcome [18:24] http://glow.mozilla.org/ is INSANEEE!! [18:35] vish, bit late on the bandwagon there ;) [18:35] chrisccoulson: i mean, even today its ticking at that rate.. :) [18:36] so when do we get FF5 btw ;) [18:37] chrisccoulson: FYI, bug 769759 [18:37] Launchpad bug 769759 in language-pack-en-base "English Firefox langpacks won't work with 4.0.x" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/769759 [18:37] micahg - already taken care of ;) [18:38] chrisccoulson: where are the english langpacks? the other languages were fixed [18:40] hmmm, not sure how that's happened. they're all done in the same job :/ [18:40] chrisccoulson: right :) [18:41] we can fix it by pushing the langpack to -security, but I'm off mon and tues, so I emailed pitti and dpm about it [18:41] they're all in the PPA, so i guess pitti just didn't copy them yet for some reason [18:42] hmm, weird, China has less downloads than India.. anyone have any idea what they prefer there? [18:42] in fact, there's a whole load that haven't been copied just yet [18:42] i guess they just weren't built when the others were copied [18:42] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/ppa?field.series_filter=natty [18:43] chrisccoulson: oh, hmm, really? that's cool, that should make it easy then :) [18:43] so, i guess they will just get copied next time pitti is online [18:43] well, it's a little late to be copying langpacks, final ISOs have been generated [18:44] oh, these were uploaded later than the others as well :-/ === fenris is now known as Guest58105 [20:13] micahg, jdstrand: hi, update of ch10 planned soon, with 27 security fixes [20:14] hm, it's most likely also a major upgrade (ch11) [20:45] fta: ugh, ok, well, I'm off tomorrow and tuesday, but can get it uploaded tuesday night [20:46] micahg, release expected ~ Tuesday [20:46] fta: perfect :) [20:46] EST time i guess [20:47] fta: will the password fix be in there as well (backport)? [20:47] micahg, if it's ch11, yes, upstream provided a patch [20:47] (i asked for it) [20:48] cool, that means the total stable password regression is < 2weeks :) [20:48] well, i asked for a fix in trunk, but the guy was kind enough to also provide a backport [20:48] he also fixed a bunch of issues for natty [20:50] btw, lp is broken (dput), so all dailies, boom [20:50] hmm, dput [20:50] 's been working for me [20:51] no, it's a known regression: http://paste.ubuntu.com/598401/ [20:52] oh, so that actually should be uploading, just the display is wrong [20:52] yep [20:52] it breaks before creating the .upload file