[04:23] <Eureka> wiki: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/CaliforniaTeam/Projects/NattyRelease edited
[04:26] <pleia2> And: http://loco.ubuntu.com/events/team/920/detail/
[04:26] <pleia2> I'll write up an announcement in a bit, need dinner now
[04:31] <Eureka> wiki: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/CaliforniaTeam/Projects/NattyRelease edited
[09:59] <philipballew> is there a way to test the upstream kernel to see if a device i have might work with it?
[21:37] <Eureka> wiki: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/CaliforniaTeam/Meetings/11April24 edited
[21:42] <crashsystems> anyone know how to edit screen  colour saturation in ubuntu?
[22:30] <nhaines> crashsystems: what do you mean by editing color saturation in Ubuntu?
[22:30] <nhaines> Ubuntu is a collection of 10,000 programs.
[22:31] <crashsystems> well, it seems that my screen is fairly accurate but under saturated.
[22:33] <crashsystems> I'll probably just need to get an external monitor for photo editing.
[22:36] <seidos> crashsystems: you're on a laptop?
[22:36] <crashsystems> yep. thinkpad x201
[22:36] <seidos> i don't know how an external monitor would make a difference
[22:37] <seidos> oh, so that you can change the colors using the nobs?
[22:37] <crashsystems> well, from what I've heard most laptop screens are not great for color balance
[22:38] <seidos> that's interesting, i wonder why
[22:38] <crashsystems> not sure. apple laptops would seem to be the exception to that, but I'm not about to buy one of those.
[22:40] <seidos> my lcd looks fine to me
[22:40]  * seidos shrugs
[22:40] <seidos> i don't do photo editing though
[22:41] <seidos> i do watch movies...they seem okay
[22:41] <seidos> have you tried using "hue saturation" in gimp?  i wonder if that might work
[22:42] <crashsystems> thats for adjusting the photo, not your monitor
[22:42] <seidos> yeah, i know
[22:42] <crashsystems> if you want to make accurate adjustments to your photo, your monitor has to display the photo accurately
[22:43] <crashsystems> I really noticed it after taking a picture of something right in front of my laptop last night, then displaying it on the laptop while looking at the real thing. This was after setting manual white balance on the camera, so I know the photo was accurate.
[22:45] <seidos> best bet is to find other photo editing folks with the same laptop
[22:45] <seidos> anyway, you probably know that already
[22:45] <seidos> i'm going to wander back to gimp
[23:13] <nhaines> crashsystems: http://www.ubuntufieldmanual.com/?q=node/38 might be a good starting point.
[23:13] <crashsystems> thanks
[23:27] <MarkDude> Is there any chance that the Ubuntu Cali wiki can reduce the amount of links to Cali meeting page from 3 to maybe 2?
[23:27]  * MarkDude is hoping that by now that is no longer a contentious issue.
[23:29] <MarkDude> at least it is down from 4 links- I dont know that it is worth putting on the meeting agenda- but having one link to webchat.freenode.net would be a great way to help people use irc as well as help for folks at conventions, etc
[23:35] <atikus> webchat is a good idea
[23:38] <MarkDude> I had one set up on my wiki - to point to this channel and #gidgetkitchen
[23:38] <MarkDude> last conference I went to did not allow irc directly- so everyone used webchat- or did not talk
[23:39] <atikus> like blocked it on the network?
[23:39] <MarkDude> it was a university
[23:40]  * MarkDude forgets the exact reason- but when the folks smarter than myself said it was a nogo- I believed them :)
[23:54] <pleia2> MarkDude: what page?
[23:54] <pleia2> not sure what links you're talking about
[23:55] <pleia2> on our meeting page we link to the ContactUs page which has a link to webchats
[23:55] <pleia2> but you're asking to *reduce* links somewhere?
[23:57] <seidos> hmmm, well, webchat could be more prominent on https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InternetRelayChat
[23:57] <seidos> it's presently in the middle of the page
[23:58] <MarkDude> Not reduce
[23:58] <MarkDude> replace
[23:58] <pleia2> seidos: it's in the list of clients, you think it's more important than other clients?
[23:59] <MarkDude> just a sec
[23:59] <pleia2> seidos: I'm sure you can discuss it with the docs team (it's a wiki, but I'm sure folks may disagree about whether it's more important than the other clients, particularly empathy)
[23:59] <seidos> pleia2: depends who the audience is.  which client do you think is the easiest to get connected with?
[23:59] <MarkDude> I'll take screenshot
[23:59] <MarkDude> webchat is easiest