[01:09] <jpastore> Can someone point me to documentation on enabling a second video card?
[12:57] <nessita> hello everyone
[12:57] <josvuk> Hi
[12:58] <josvuk> where is some documentation how ubuntu-desktop boots up I have to find out something which I would automate?
[12:58] <nessita> pitti: hey there, question: joshuahoover mentioned to me that the fix for bug #709494 (maverick patch) is good to go. Can I have the upload at https://code.launchpad.net/~nataliabidart/ubuntu/maverick/ubuntu-sso-client/ubuntu-sso-client-1.0.9/+merge/57380 sponsored?
[12:58] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 709494 in ubuntu-sso-client "[SRU] Missing user's name field" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/709494
[13:08] <zyga> hi, could anyone point me to hints on how to use bzr builddeb with pristine-tar?
[15:20] <rickspencer3> hey all
[15:25] <mterry> rickspencer3, hi
[15:26] <rickspencer3> mterry, just me and you today?
[15:26] <rickspencer3> :)
[15:26] <mterry> maybe  :)
[15:40] <cyphermox> rickspencer3, I'm there too
[15:40] <rickspencer3> hi cyphermox!
[15:40] <cyphermox> hey
[15:40] <rickspencer3> cyphermox, getting nice feedback on the nm-applet as indicator?
[15:41] <cyphermox> rickspencer3, except some complaining on twitter the other day, yes
[15:41] <cyphermox> or more precisely, not in a timeframe where I could have done anything about it, more or less
[15:41] <rickspencer3> what was the complaint? and why did they use twitter?
[15:42] <cyphermox> it was that the menu was convoluted or something like that, let me look it up
[15:42] <cyphermox> as for twitter, I don't know. there were some positive responses to it too
[15:43] <rickspencer3> cyphermox, nm
[15:43] <rickspencer3> if they were using twitter they just wanted to say something, they weren't trying to help
[15:46] <cyphermox> right
[15:49] <cyphermox> mterry, any omgbroken things I can help with or is it mostly testing?
[15:50] <mterry> cyphermox, I've been doing a little testing, but also picking at some appmenu bugs that didn't make it for release
[15:50] <mterry> cyphermox, so nothing omg
[15:50] <cyphermox> ok
[15:50] <cyphermox> seems like things are rebuilding for now
[16:56] <kenvandine> nessita, i just noticed ubuntuone-control-panel doesn't have a depends or recommends for gir1.2-unity-3.0
[16:56] <kenvandine> nessita, is there a bug filed about that yet?
[17:12] <nessita> kenvandine: u1cp does not depend on that package, u1client recommends it to have unity integration
[17:12] <nessita> kenvandine: u1cp is supposed to work without that package, is not the case?
[17:33] <kenvandine> nessita, it work with it yes
[17:33] <kenvandine> but tested on a new install
[17:33] <kenvandine> it doesn't have that
[17:33] <kenvandine> so no unity progress bar
[17:34] <nessita> kenvandine: u1cp depends on u1client, which recommends the unity package
[17:34] <nessita> kenvandine: do you install recommends?
[17:34] <kenvandine> those should get installed in a new install
[17:34] <kenvandine> weird
[17:35] <kenvandine> just confirmed it is a recommends in u1-client
[17:36] <kenvandine> nessita, just checked the manifest file on cdimage.ubuntu.com
[17:36] <kenvandine> gir1.2-unity-3.0 isn't on it
[17:38] <nessita> is not in the CD? oh
[17:38] <nessita> is... complicated then
[17:39] <nessita> kenvandine: I'm not sure how to fix this :-/ (if there's a fix)
[17:39] <kenvandine> it is puzzling... i thought recommends made it on the CD :/
[17:44] <kenvandine> nessita, i am asking about it in #ubuntu-release
[17:48] <kenvandine> nessita, gir1.2-unity-3.0 (>= 3.8.4-0ubuntu3) is the recommends
[17:48] <kenvandine> 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 is what we have in the archive
[17:48] <kenvandine> dobey, ^^
[17:49] <dobey> hrmm
[17:50] <nessita> hm
[17:50] <dobey> doh
[17:50] <nessita> dobey: ?
[17:50] <kenvandine> updated version of recommends
[17:50] <kenvandine> without dropping the ubuntu rev :/
[17:51] <dobey> yeah, i thought i did. doh :(
[17:51] <kenvandine> dobey, can you do a SRU for that and make sure there is a release note for it?
[17:53] <dobey> sad
[17:58] <dobey> kenvandine: is there a bug for this?
[17:58] <kenvandine> dobey, i am filing it now :)
[18:00] <dobey> faster, i'm already at the (LP: # point in dch -i :)
[18:03] <kenvandine> dobey, just a sec, got distracted
[18:05] <kenvandine> dobey, bug 770379
[18:05] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 770379 in ubuntuone-client "Recommends wrong version of gir1.2-unity-3.0" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/770379
[18:07] <dobey> now where to put it
[18:07]  * dobey really wants to put it on CD
[18:08] <dobey> but alas
[18:08] <dobey> guess i have to upload to -proposed
[18:09] <kenvandine> yeah, -proposed
[18:09] <kenvandine> dobey, make sure it gets noted in the release notes :(
[18:10] <dobey> i have no idea how to ensure that
[18:10]  * dobey pings someone who does
[18:12] <dobey> i wish dpkg would complain about that in lint on the source
[19:42] <hallyn> looking at gnome-terminal, I see where things like PopupOpenLink are added to the right-click popup menu.  Is there a way for me to add an entry of my own?
[19:42] <hallyn> (I want to be able to call a script on any number when preceded by '#')
[20:04] <Budd> Somehow, my ssh-agent carries a bunch of keys that I didn't explicitly add. Once I add three of my own, ssh logins fail due to too many key failures.
[20:05] <Budd> (because it's trying all the built-in keys first)
[20:05] <Budd> Also ssh-add -D only erases the keys I added; the mystery keys remain.
[20:06] <hallyn> (nm i'll go ahead and do a custom appindicator with the pythong bindings, even better)
[20:09] <evaluate> Hello.
[20:10] <evaluate> There is a pretty heavy bug in an application in natty that may be solved by a tiny patch. Is there a possibility to include such a patch before the final release or would it have to wait for after the release?
[20:11] <mainerror> heavy bug, tiny patch? Which bug is it?
[20:11] <evaluate> I am the upstream maintainer (in Debian) and I would do an upload to solve it there, I'm just afraid it might not make it in time for the final release of natty...
[20:11] <evaluate> It's bug #702316
[20:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 702316 in libappindicator "Generic Libindicate fallback support breaks applications (such as clipit) on non-Unity WMs/DEs" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/702316
[20:14] <evaluate> The bug can be solved by commenting/taking out line 569 in main.c
[20:18] <evaluate> Here's the 'patch': http://pastebin.com/n7veEAVv
[20:18] <evaluate> It would be really nice if this could be included before the final release.
[20:20] <AlanBell> what is the thing that does this boot splash image? http://people.ubuntu.com/~alanbell/bootsplash.png
[20:20] <AlanBell> it is something before plymouth
[20:24] <bryceh> AlanBell, good question; grub maybe?
[20:25] <AlanBell> well it is on the CD and that doesn't use grub
[20:25] <AlanBell> isolinux perhaps
[20:27] <chrisccoulson> pitti, do you plan to copy the remaining langpacks in the ubuntu-langpack PPA this week?
[20:27] <chrisccoulson> (hi btw) :)
[20:28] <AlanBell> syslinux package I think
[20:29] <nessita> pitti: hey there, question: joshuahoover mentioned to me that the fix for bug #709494 (maverick patch) is good to go. Can I have the upload at https://code.launchpad.net/~nataliabidart/ubuntu/maverick/ubuntu-sso-client/ubuntu-sso-client-1.0.9/+merge/57380 sponsored?
[20:29] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 709494 in ubuntu-sso-client "[SRU] Missing user's name field" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/709494
[20:30] <tedg> mterry, Cimi__ is saying that appmenu-gtk needs to look for "eclipse" instead of "Eclipse"
[20:30] <tedg> mterry, Did the title-case check work for you?
[20:30] <mterry> tedg, yeah, it works for me.  Just retested it today, after someone commented in upstream bug report
[20:30] <mterry> tedg, how about you?
[20:31] <tedg> mterry, I don't have it installed, Cimi__ said it didn't work for him.
[20:31] <tedg> Let me install it.
[20:31] <chrisccoulson> hi mterry, tedg!
[20:31] <mterry> tedg, hrm
[20:31] <chrisccoulson> are you guys working today?
[20:31] <mterry> chrisccoulson, hi!  yeah
[20:31] <chrisccoulson> awww :(
[20:31] <chrisccoulson> i bet it's been quiet in here hasn't it?
[20:31] <tedg> chrisccoulson, Howdy, yes.  Not a holiday in the US.  It has been quiet (not complaining) ;-)
[20:32] <mterry> chrisccoulson, not so bad, doing my patch piloting and in a developer board meeting now.  (They *might* make it to my core-dev app, but unlikely)
[20:32] <chrisccoulson> heh :)
[20:32] <chrisccoulson> well, all the best for that :)
[20:32] <chrisccoulson> i need to do more core-dev app at some point
[20:33] <tedg> Wow, eclipse is huge.
[20:33] <tedg> (with all the deps)
[20:33] <tedg> I'm actually not sure I have the disk space for this.
[20:34] <tedg> We'll see what happens.
[20:34] <chrisccoulson> tedg, i haven't really had much of a holiday here (if that makes you feel any better) ;)
[20:34] <chrisccoulson> i spent most of the day washing, polishing and waxing my car
[20:34] <chrisccoulson> and now my back is hurting ;)
[20:34] <stgraber> mterry: the idea is to extend the meeting to 2 hours if DMB members are still around so we can process the backlog
[20:35] <tedg> chrisccoulson, No, in fact it doesn't ;-)
[20:35] <mterry> stgraber, cool.  I'm in no rush and appreciate the board's efforts among chronic underattendence!
[20:35] <chrisccoulson> heh :)
[20:36] <chrisccoulson> tedg, i didn't even drink any beer today
[20:36] <chrisccoulson> it feels like a wasted holiday
[20:38] <highvoltage> p/win 26
[20:58] <tedg> mterry, Eclipse hits the blacklist fine for me.  The menus are in the window...
[21:15] <pitti> hey chrisccoulson; you mean for lucid?
[21:15] <chrisccoulson> hi pitti
[21:16] <chrisccoulson> for natty
[21:16] <pitti> chrisccoulson: I killed the build as it was interrupted by my natty run
[21:16] <pitti> chrisccoulson: we don't have PPA langpacks for natty
[21:16] <DBO> ping RAOF
[21:16] <pitti> oh!
[21:16] <pitti> chrisccoulson: so that's where they ended up
[21:16] <pitti> chrisccoulson: I uploaded them to natty proper, yes
[21:17] <chrisccoulson> pitti - ah, i see now.
[21:17] <mterry> tedg, yeah, so I don't know what the issue is...  is there a different way of running eclipse that fools the blacklist?  (ala emacs vs emacs23)
[21:18] <chrisccoulson> pitti - oh, some were uploaded just a short while ago :)
[21:18] <tedg> mterry, Perhaps if you don't install from the package?
[21:19] <mterry> tedg, oh maybe...  I would have assumed it would be the same, but that is a good guess
[21:19] <tedg> mterry, I don't know really.
[21:19]  * mterry doesn't want to compile eclipse from source to find out
[21:19]  * mterry is core-dev now!   w000t!
[21:23] <tremolux> mterry: woo hoo!!  congrats!!
[21:25] <bryceh> mterry, awesome graz
[21:26] <pitti> night everyone