[17:05]  * smb wonders whether there is a server-team meeting today...
[17:05]  * RoAkSoAx too
[17:06] <smb> Just looked in the scrollback and it was announced for Tue Apr-25 which is sort of impossible to archive...
[17:07] <smb> well at least not this year... :-P
[17:07] <smoser> kirkland turn to run
[17:07] <smoser> i did not archive
[17:07] <smoser> :-(
[17:08] <jamespage> o/
[17:08] <RoAkSoAx> \o/
[17:08] <smb> \o
[17:08] <kirkland> hey
[17:08] <kirkland> having trouble with my IRC client
[17:08] <kirkland> i think i have it sorted now
[17:09] <kirkland> #startmeeting
[17:09] <MootBot> Meeting started at 11:09. The chair is kirkland.
[17:09] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[17:09] <kirkland> [topic] Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[17:09] <MootBot> New Topic:  Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[17:09] <kirkland> I don't see any here
[17:09] <kirkland> [topic] Natty Development
[17:09] <MootBot> New Topic:  Natty Development
[17:10] <kirkland> Daviey / robbiew: ^
[17:11] <robbiew> If there's any "Natty Development"
[17:11] <robbiew> we have a problem ;)
[17:11] <kirkland> :-)
[17:11] <kirkland> robbiew: cool;  so shift focus from Natty Development to Natty SRUs + Oneiric Blueprints?
[17:11] <robbiew> yeah
[17:11] <kirkland> robbiew: okay, I'll change that heading to Oneiric Development after the meeting
[17:11] <kirkland> [topic] Ubuntu Server Team Events
[17:11] <MootBot> New Topic:  Ubuntu Server Team Events
[17:12] <kirkland> zul is at OpenStack Summit this week, I think
[17:12] <kirkland> we'll all be in Budapest for UDS in less than 2 weeks
[17:12] <jamespage> \o/
[17:12] <kirkland> anything else worth mentioning?
[17:12] <jamespage> I'm at puppetcamp in amsterdam later this week
[17:12] <kirkland> jamespage: oh, great
[17:13] <kirkland> jamespage: will very much like to hear your trip report from that
[17:13] <jamespage> kirkland: ack
[17:13] <kirkland> jamespage: I believe lynxman will be talking to the Puppet folks about Orchestra there
[17:13] <kirkland> [topic] Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[17:13] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[17:13] <kirkland> hggdh: ^ ?
[17:14] <hggdh> only that Euca is working :-)
[17:14] <hggdh> so far
[17:14] <RoAkSoAx> \o/
[17:14] <kirkland> \o/
[17:14]  * kirkland high fives hggdh 
[17:14]  * hggdh high-fives kirkland back
[17:14] <kirkland> [topic] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[17:14] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[17:14] <kirkland> smb: ^
[17:14] <smb> After completing the walk through ec2-next for lucid I sort of crashed. Unfortunately so does hardy xen in bug 705562.
[17:15] <smb> Despite the initial pointing towards some interrupt patches, it rather looks like some corruption in the page struct
[17:15] <smb> I hope to have some debug magic, but need the reporters to recreate it as it needs some workload/data setup
[17:16] <smb> Not much more due to Easter
[17:16] <smb> ..
[17:16] <kirkland> smb: okay, thanks
[17:16] <kirkland> [topic] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
[17:16] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
[17:16] <RoAkSoAx> I have a kernel related bug that I believe should be taken care off:  bug #756894 which has apparently been unnoticed... :(
[17:16] <kirkland> sommer is not here
[17:16] <kirkland> [topic] Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[17:16] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[17:16] <kirkland> kim0 is not here
[17:17] <kirkland> [topic] Open Discussion
[17:17] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion
[17:17] <kirkland> anyone?  anything?
[17:17] <RoAkSoAx> I have a kernel related bug that I believe should be taken care off:  bug #756894 which has apparently been unnoticed... :(
[17:17] <RoAkSoAx> smb: ^^
[17:17] <smb> RoAkSoAx, will take a look
[17:18] <RoAkSoAx> smb: thanks :)
[17:18] <smb> bug 756894
[17:18] <kirkland> RoAkSoAx: fwiw, poke JFo when you need to get a kernel bug noticed ;-)
[17:18] <JFo> :)
[17:18] <RoAkSoAx> kirkland: will do ;)
[17:22] <kirkland> [topic] Announce next meeting date and time
[17:22] <MootBot> New Topic:  Announce next meeting date and time
[17:23] <kirkland> May 3rd, same time, same place
[17:23] <kirkland> #endmeeting
[17:23] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 11:23.
[17:54] <bjf> ##
[17:54] <bjf> ## Kernel team meeting in 5 minutes
[17:54] <bjf> ##
[17:58] <kamal> o/
[17:58] <ppisati> o/
[17:59] <sconklin> \o
[17:59] <JFo> \o/
[18:00] <bjf> #startmeeting
[18:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 12:00. The chair is bjf.
[18:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[18:00] <cking> o\
[18:00] <bjf> ##
[18:00] <bjf> ## This is the Ubuntu Kernel Team weekly status meeting.
[18:00] <bjf> ##
[18:00] <bjf> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[18:00] <bjf> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Natty
[18:00] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[18:00] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Natty
[18:00] <bjf> # Meeting Etiquette
[18:00] <bjf> #
[18:00] <bjf> # NOTE: '..' indicates that you are finished with your input.
[18:00] <bjf> #       'o/' indicates you have something you'd like to add (wait until you are recognized)
[18:00] <bjf> #
[18:00] <bjf> Also note, this is the last irc meeting of this development cycle.
[18:00] <bjf> [TOPIC] Release Metrics (JFo)
[18:00] <MootBot> New Topic:  Release Metrics (JFo)
[18:01] <JFo> Release Meeting Bugs (15 bugs, 6 Blueprints)
[18:01] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * 1 linux kernel bugs (down 1)
[18:01] <JFo>  * 0 linux-ti-omap4 bugs (no change)
[18:01] <JFo>  * 0 linux-meta-ti-omap4 bug (no change)
[18:01] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * 38 linux kernel bugs (up 4)
[18:01] <JFo>  * 16 linux-ti-omap4 bugs (up 14)
[18:01] <JFo>  * 0 linux-meta-ti-omap4 bug (no change)
[18:01] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * 6 blueprints (Including HWE Blueprints)
[18:01] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * 5 Linux Bugs (no change)
[18:01] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * 16 Linux Bugs (up 1)
[18:01] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * [[https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bugs?field.has_patch=on | Bugs with Patches]]
[18:01] <JFo>  * [[http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/csv-stats/bugs-with-patches/linux/ | Breakdown by status]]
[18:01] <JFo> ..
[18:01] <bjf> [TOPIC] Blueprints: Natty Bug Handling (JFo)
[18:01] <bjf> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/hardware-kernel-n-bug-handling
[18:01] <MootBot> New Topic:  Blueprints: Natty Bug Handling (JFo)
[18:01] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/hardware-kernel-n-bug-handling
[18:01] <JFo> All items completed or postponed
[18:01] <JFo> ..
[18:02] <bjf> [TOPIC] Status: General Natty (apw / ogasawara)
[18:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: General Natty (apw / ogasawara)
[18:02] <apw> The kernel remains frozen for the Natty release.  We now have 2.6.38.4 pending for SRU.  We do have some desirable fixes pending and we likely would like an early SRU if possible.
[18:02] <apw> ..
[18:02] <bjf> [TOPIC] Status: Stable Kernel Team (sconklin / bjf)
[18:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: Stable Kernel Team (sconklin / bjf)
[18:02] <sconklin> ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || We are not currently in a normal SRU kernel cycle due to allocation of testing resources to Natty.
[18:02] <sconklin> || There are new kernels for Hardy, Lucid, and Maverick which need verification.
[18:02] <sconklin> ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || The Dapper kernel which is in -proposed will not be released. Instead, the stable kernel team will
[18:02] <sconklin> || prepare one final Dapper kernel by the end of this week.
[18:02] <sconklin> ||
[18:02] <sconklin> ..
[18:02] <bjf> [TOPIC] Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Karmic/Hardy/Dapper (sconklin / bjf)
[18:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Karmic/Hardy/Dapper (sconklin / bjf)
[18:02] <sconklin> || Package                                    || Upd/Sec              || Proposed             ||  TiP || Verified ||
[18:02] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:02] <sconklin> || dapper   linux-source-2.6.15               || 2.6.15-57.94         || 2.6.15-57.95         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:02] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || hardy    linux                             || 2.6.24-29.88         || 2.6.24-29.89         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || karmic   linux-ec2                         || 2.6.31-308.28        || 2.6.31-308.29        ||    1 ||        1 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.31-23.74         || 2.6.31-23.75         ||    1 ||        1 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || lucid    linux-ec2                         || 2.6.32-314.27        || 2.6.32-316.30        ||    8 ||        6 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ports-meta                  || 2.6.32.31.23         || 2.6.32.32.24         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick  || 2.6.35.25.36         || 2.6.35.28.37         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-lts-backport-maverick       || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1  || 2.6.35-28.50~lucid1  ||   13 ||       13 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.32    || 2.6.32-31.31         || 2.6.32-32.32         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.32-31.61         || 2.6.32-32.62         ||    4 ||        2 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.32.31.37         || 2.6.32.32.38         ||    1 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-ec2                    || 2.6.32.314.15        || 2.6.32.316.17        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || maverick linux-ports-meta                  || 2.6.35.28.21         || 2.6.35.29.22         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.35    || 2.6.35-28.20         || 2.6.35-29.21         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.35.28.36         || 2.6.35.29.37         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.38.6               || 1.38.7               ||    1 ||        0 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.35-28.50         || 2.6.35-29.51         ||   11 ||        5 ||
[18:03] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:03] <sconklin> ..
[18:03] <bjf> [TOPIC] Incoming Bugs: Regressions (JFo)
[18:03] <MootBot> New Topic:  Incoming Bugs: Regressions (JFo)
[18:03] <JFo> Incoming Bugs
[18:03] <JFo>  934 Natty Bugs (up 17)
[18:03] <JFo>  1129 Maverick Bugs (down 136)
[18:03] <JFo>  1022 Lucid Bugs (down 53)
[18:03] <JFo> Current regression stats (broken down by release):
[18:03] <JFo> [18:03] <JFo>   * 41 maverick bugs (down 6)
[18:03] <JFo>   * 74 lucid bugs (down 3)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 4 karmic bugs (no change)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 0 hardy bugs (no change)
[18:04] <JFo> [18:04] <JFo>   * 484 natty bugs (up 2)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 242 maverick bugs (down 8)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 218 lucid bugs (down 6)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 38 karmic bugs (no change)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 2 hardy bugs (no change)
[18:04] <JFo> [18:04] <JFo>   * 0 natty bugs (down 34)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 2 maverick bugs (up 1)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 0 lucid bugs (no change)
[18:04] <JFo>   * 0 karmic bugs (no change)
[18:04] <JFo> ..
[18:04] <bjf> [TOPIC] Incoming Bugs: Bug day report (JFo)
[18:04] <MootBot> New Topic:  Incoming Bugs: Bug day report (JFo)
[18:04] <JFo> I don't have another planned bug day until after UDS unless someone feels like there should be one.
[18:04] <JFo> ..
[18:05] <bjf> [TOPIC] Triage Status (JFo)
[18:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  Triage Status (JFo)
[18:05] <JFo> nothing to report
[18:05] <JFo> ..
[18:05] <bjf> [TOPIC] Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[18:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[18:05] <bjf> thanks everyone
[18:05] <bjf> #endmeeting
[18:05] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 12:05.
[18:05] <JFo> thanks bjf :)
[18:05] <ppisati> thanks
[18:06] <kamal> thanks bjf ... looong meeting today!  ;-)
[18:06] <czajkowski> wow that beats the technical board meeting the other day in shortness
[18:07] <kamal> the kernel team: efficiency is our number one goal!
[18:08] <czajkowski> I'll hold you to that if I find a bug!