/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/04/26/#ubuntu-motu.txt

=== luciano_ is now known as virusuy
AnAntLP #77062205:10
ubottuLaunchpad bug 770622 in tzdata (Ubuntu) "2011g available" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/77062205:10
AnAntdoes that need a FFe ?05:11
ajmitchAnAnt: I think that was being handled already by a sync, I don't know the bug # though05:15
AnAntajmitch: no, Debian itself doesn't have 2011gt05:15
AnAntajmitch: no, Debian itself doesn't have 2011g05:15
AnAntthe sync was for 2011f05:16
ajmitchand 2011f doesn't have the updated DST rules for egypt?05:16
AnAntit was updated in 2011g05:16
ajmitchhow annoying :)05:16
AnAnthttp://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.time.tz/375805:16
ScottKAnAnt: It will need to be an SRU now.05:17
AnAntScottK: erm, is there anything that needs to be added to the bug report05:18
AnAntScottK: the reporter has attached the upstream diff05:19
ScottKI didn't look at the bug report, sorry.  Usually for tz updates cjwatson it pretty on top of them.05:19
ScottK(or pitti, IIRC)05:19
ScottKSo I suspect it's fine.05:19
cjwatsonpitti rather than me05:19
AnAntok05:22
=== siretart` is now known as siretart
dholbachgood morning07:45
iulianMorning dholbach.09:28
dholbachhey iulian09:31
AnAntLP #75239611:39
ubottuLaunchpad bug 752396 in bzr-fastimport (Ubuntu) "bzr-fastimport is not listed in "bzr plugins" list" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/75239611:39
=== ScottK changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Archive: Frozen for release - Natty SRUs can be uploaded | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | Sponsor queue: http://bit.ly/fz6AyQ | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/bugs/rcbugs/ | Congrats to new core-dev: SpamapS
=== moonflux_ is now known as moonflux
=== Pici` is now known as Pici
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
gaurav_pawaskarHi Guys, I am getting following issue while running pbuilder18:00
gaurav_pawaskarhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/598980/18:00
gaurav_pawaskari think i have a problem in control file18:00
gaurav_pawaskarhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/599388/18:00
gaurav_pawaskarBuild-depends: part18:00
gaurav_pawaskarany help?18:00
=== medberry is now known as med_away
arandgaurav_pawaskar: libqt4-dev-tools? for qmake?18:02
=== med_away is now known as medberry
=== medberry is now known as med_out
=== med_out is now known as medberry
gaurav_pawaskararand: sorry I did not understand.. this is my 1st time packaging :)18:03
arandgaurav_pawaskar: Try adding libqt4-dev-tools to the build-dependencies.18:05
gaurav_pawaskararand: ok18:05
arandgaurav_pawaskar: Ah, I think the package name is just libqt4-dev18:08
highvoltage    /win 918:10
stgraberhighvoltage: you are already in /win 9 (at least here :))18:10
highvoltageheh18:11
gaurav_pawaskararand: also when i run dpkg-buildpackage command.. i am not able get binaries in bin dir18:15
arandgaurav_pawaskar: That sound like its down to the application not using a good install target, you could use .install files for that..18:16
gaurav_pawaskararand: any reference for .install file?18:17
arandgaurav_pawaskar: packagename.install: src/binary /usr/bin          I think is the general format...18:21
gaurav_pawaskararand: when I run buildpackage command.. i should see /share and /bin dirs in /debian/<package>/usr      right?18:25
gaurav_pawaskarbut i can not see /bin dir at that location18:25
arandgaurav_pawaskar: Yes... which is likely because the "(q)make install" of that application doesn't install to /usr/bin, but to somewhere else, either you could patch the makefile at build time (quilt), or use install files to move binaries which are compiled within the source directory to the desired location in the filesystem.18:28
gaurav_pawaskararand : which location it will be?18:30
arandWell a binary would go in /usr/bin I guess, a png for an icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48, etc..18:32
=== Pici is now known as Guest67539
gaurav_pawaskararand: i am not talking about installing.. I am running dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot18:35
gaurav_pawaskarand it is not creating binary18:35
arandgaurav_pawaskar: Ah, hmm, do you get binaries just running debuild -us -uc ?18:38
gaurav_pawaskararand: if i run make command it is creating binary locally..18:38
arandYes.18:38
arandExactly.18:39
gaurav_pawaskarbut it is not getting placed in /debian/randy/usr/bin/18:39
gaurav_pawaskararand: i guess when i run buildpackage i should see it in /debian/usr/randy/bin dir18:40
arandWhich is why you need to either patch the makefiles install target, or use .install files. ...Or do some custom magic in the rules file, I guess18:40
gaurav_pawaskararand; http://www.sendspace.com/file/hddth618:41
gaurav_pawaskarcan you suggest changes. I am kind of confused now18:41
gaurav_pawaskar:(18:41
=== Pici` is now known as Pici
arandgaurav_pawaskar: Hang on , I'll see if I can change over to a sane computer..18:43
gaurav_pawaskararand: okay thank you18:44
arand_echo "randy usr/bin > debian/randy.install"18:52
gaurav_pawaskararand_: i did not get it18:53
arand_gaurav_pawaskar: Doing this makes it install a binary in /usr/bin for me18:53
arand_gaurav_pawaskar: What it means is that in the "install" process, it takes the file "./randy" and install it in what will later become /usr/bin.. the name of the .install file determines which package (if multiple) it is used for.18:55
gaurav_pawaskararand_: you mean it will first create file locally then place it in usr/bin ?18:57
arand_gaurav_pawaskar: Yes, that is normally how things go anyways, you have "make" and then "make install"18:58
gaurav_pawaskararand_ : ok let me try that18:59
arand_Your particular program doesn't seem to have a useful "make install" target, hence you need to do it manually.18:59
gaurav_pawaskarrandy                 /usr/bin/19:01
gaurav_pawaskardata/randy.desktop    /usr/share/application/19:01
gaurav_pawaskararand_ : ^^ is this enough for .install file?19:01
arand_gaurav_pawaskar: Well, I would guess so. Doesn't seem to be much more in the program :)19:02
gaurav_pawaskararand_: yes it is 1st packaging for me and application too :)19:03
gaurav_pawaskararand_ : http://paste.ubuntu.com/599432/19:12
gaurav_pawaskardoes it mean successful build?19:13
arand_gaurav_pawaskar: I would guess so, the contents of the .deb package is the final answer, of course19:14
gaurav_pawaskararand_ : it was without .install file. I will do it again with that file19:15
arand_gaurav_pawaskar: Ah, well it will likely build fine without it, but the binary won't be placed in the package.19:16
gaurav_pawaskararand_ : ohh I think that is why after installation I am not able to see that application19:17
paultaganyone have a hand in the gcc 4.6 o-series testing? doko's not arround19:43
gaurav_pawaskararand_: hey I got it.. only thing is I am not finding that application in Application/Accessories19:55
gaurav_pawaskararand_ : thanks alot :D19:55
arand_gaurav_pawaskar: You'll need the name of the Icon:  entry to match an installed icon e.g. /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/randy.png or /usr/share/pixmaps/randy.xpm19:58
arand_I'm not sure if you would change the category to "Acessories" instead of "Utilities" as well.. Dunno what the FD spec for the naming scheme there is.20:00
gaurav_pawaskararand_: is that mandetory. I can see a menu file in debian dir20:01
gaurav_pawaskarbut it did not make much effect for me20:01
arand_gaurav_pawaskar: .menu and .desktop are two ways of doing the same thing, is my shallow understanding of it..20:02
arand_.desktop is prefered, I think.20:02
gaurav_pawaskararand_ okay.. let me try that way20:02
arand_gaurav_pawaskar: Not that you will need to install an icon named "randy" for it to show up, or simply use the name of an already existing icon20:04
arand_*Note20:04
gaurav_pawaskarokay thanks20:04

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!